Predicting ureteral status below the ureteral calculi in patients undergoing ureteroscopic lithotomy

Relationship between stone volume, average CT value and operation time and efficiency before ureteral soft lens laser lithotripsy

BACKGROUND

Soft ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy is becoming increasingly popular as the preferred method for treating mid-to-lower ureteral stones. Studies have indicated that the size, composition, hardness, and fragility of the stones can impact the treatment's effectiveness.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the relationship between stone volume, average CT value and operation time and efficiency before ureteral soft lens laser lithotripsy.

METHODS

Our study on 126 patients undergoing ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy for ureteral calculi from May 2020 to January 2022 categorized them into groups based on stone volume and CT value. We compared surgical outcomes and analyzed correlations between stone characteristics, operation parameters, and stone clearance rate to identify independent risk factors influencing treatment efficacy.

RESULTS

Group A demonstrated significantly shorter operation durations and lower blood loss compared to Group B, along with higher single stone clearance rates and fewer postoperative complications. Similarly, Group C exhibited shorter operation times, reduced blood loss, higher stone clearance rates, and lower complication rates than Group D. Preoperative stone volume and CT value correlated positively with operation time and stone clearance rate, with both factors identified as independent risk factors affecting ureteral stone clearance following holmium laser lithotripsy.

CONCLUSION

The stone volume and average CT value before ureteral soft lens laser lithotripsy show a positive correlation with operation time and efficiency, indicating that larger stone volumes and higher CT values lead to slower lithotripsy speeds and reduced operation efficiency. Furthermore, preoperative stone volume and average CT value are identified as independent risk factors for residual stones.

The influence of perioperative nursing intervention in patients with ureteral calculi treated with URSL and its correlation to adverse event incidence: A retrospective study

To evaluate the effectiveness of perioperative nursing intervention in patients undergoing ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL) for ureteral stones and its implications for the incidence of adverse events, a total of 144 patients with ureteral stones admitted to our hospital from January 2021 to December 2022 were selected for retrospective analysis. They were divided into 2 groups based on their different nursing methods, with 72 patients in each group. The control group (CG) received routine nursing intervention, while the study group (SD) received refined perioperative nursing intervention. The surgical situation, effective stone removal rate, postoperative pain, inflammatory factors, stress response, and incidence of adverse events were compared between the 2 groups. In comparison with the CG, the SD demonstrated a significant reduction in gastrointestinal recovery time, urinary catheter removal time, and hospitalization duration, all presenting statistically significant disparities (P < .05). Notably, the SD exhibited a one-time stone removal rate significantly superior to that of the CG (P < .05). Similarly, the postoperative pain index was significantly lower in the SD (P < .05). Pre- and post-surgical serotonin (5-HT) levels in the SD were markedly lower than in the CG (P < .05). Postoperative levels of Interleukin-10 (IL-10), C-reactive protein (CRP), and white blood cells (WBC) were elevated in both groups, and gradually declined as the patients recovered. However, postoperative levels of IL-10, CRP, and WBC were significantly lower in the SD (P < .05). The SD also showed significantly lower levels of malondialdehyde and higher levels of superoxide dismutase (P < .05). Postoperative levels of cortisol, adrenocorticotropic hormone, and norepinephrine were elevated and progressively returned to normal over time, and were significantly lower in the study group (P < .05). Furthermore, the SD experienced a significant reduction in adverse event incidence compared with the CG (P < .05). Implementing refined perioperative nursing interventions for patients undergoing URSL can effectively decrease the incidence of adverse events, diminish the surgical stimulation of inflammation markers and oxidative stress indicators, and foster patient recovery.

Preoperative hydronephrosis is a predictive factor of ureteral stenosis after flexible ureteroscopy: a propensity scores matching analysis

Objectives

Ureteral stenosis is a serious complication of flexible ureteroscopy. How to predict the possibility of stricture before surgery is an important topic. This research retrospectively studied the influence of preoperative hydronephrosis on ureteral stenosis after flexible ureteroscopy, to explore whether the preoperative hydronephrosis could predict postoperative ureteral stenosis.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study on patients who received flexible ureteroscopy in our hospital for upper ureteral calculi from January 2015 to June 2018. Patients were followed-up for 36 months after surgery, and intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded. We divided patients into the mild hydronephrosis group and moderate to severe hydronephrosis group. Preoperative clinical baseline data of the patients were adjusted by propensity matching score analysis. Differences of intraoperative ureteral injury, operative time, postoperative ureteral stricture, and SFR one month after surgery was statistically analyzed. Kaplan–Meier’s method and Log-rank test were used to compare the differences in the cumulative incidence of ureteral stenosis between the two groups. Cox regression was used to compare the hazard ratio of ureteral stenosis between the two groups.

Results

A total of 447 patients with 469 sides surgery were included, including 349 sides in the mild hydronephrosis group and 120 sides in the moderate to severe hydronephrosis group. Twenty-nine patients with 30 sides developed ureteral stenosis. Before and after propensity, the incidence of ureteral stricture matching analysis was 6.4% and 8%, respectively. There were statistical differences in ureteral stricture and injury, but the statistical differences in SFR and operation time were inconsistent. Kaplan–Meier showed a significant difference in the cumulative incidence of ureteral stenosis between the two groups.

Conclusions

Patients with moderate to severe hydronephrosis before surgery were more likely to have an intraoperative ureteral injury and postoperative ureteral stricture after FRUS. Preoperative hydronephrosis is an important predictor of ureteral stricture.