The utility of diffusion-weighted imaging and ADC values in the characterization of mumps orchitis and seminoma

Comparative analysis of the image quality and diagnostic performance of the zooming technique with diffusion-weighted imaging using different b-values for thyroid papillary carcinomas and benign nodules

Objective

To compare image quality and diagnostic performance using different b-values for the zooming technique with diffusion-weighted imaging (ZOOMit-DWI) in thyroid nodules.

Materials and methods

A total of 51 benign thyroid nodules and 50 thyroid papillary carcinomas were included. ZOOMit-DWI was performed with b-values of 0, 500, 1000, 1500 and 2000 s/mm2. The sharpness was evaluated as subjective index. The signal intensity ratio (SIR), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were measured as objective indices. Pairwise comparisons were performed among the different b-value groups using the Friedman test. A receiver operating characteristic curve of the ADC value was used to evaluate diagnostic performance. The DeLong test was used to compare diagnostic effectiveness among the different b-value groups.

Results

In both the papillary carcinoma group (P = 0.670) and the benign nodule group (P = 0.185), the sharpness of nodules was similar between b-values of 1000 s/mm2and 1500 s/mm2. In the papillary carcinoma group, the SIRnodule was statistically higher in DWI images with a b-value of 1500 s/mm2than in DWI images with b-values of 500 s/mm2(P = 0.004), 1000 s/mm2(P = 0.002), and 2000 s/mm2(P = 0.003). When the b-values were 1500 s/mm2(P = 0.008) and 2000 s/mm2(P = 0.009), the SIRnodule significantly differed between the papillary carcinoma group and the benign nodule group. When b = 500 s/mm2, the ADC had an AUC of 0.888. When b = 1000 s/mm2, the ADC had an AUC of 0.881. When b = 1500 s/mm2, the ADC had an AUC of 0.896. When b = 2000 s/mm2, the ADC had an AUC of 0.871. The DeLong test showed comparable diagnostic effectiveness among the different b-value groups except for between b-values of 2000 s/mm2and 1500 s/mm2, with a b-value of 2000 s/mm2showing lower effectiveness.

Conclusion

This study suggests that 1500 s/mm2may be a suitable b-value to differentiate benign and malignant thyroid nodules in ZOOMit-DWI images, which yielded better image quality.

Magnetic resonance imaging features of complete androgen insensitivity syndrome in comparison to Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome

PURPOSE

Complete androgen insensitivity syndrome (CAIS) and Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome (MRKHS) share common clinical features such as female phenotype, vaginal hypoplasia, and primary amenorrhea. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is performed to investigate the cause of primary amenorrhea. However, the MRI features are also similar in both disorders. They are ultimately diagnosed by chromosome testing, but there is a possibility of misdiagnosis if chromosome testing is not performed. This study aimed to identify MRI features that are useful for differentiating CAIS from MRKHS.

METHOD

This multicenter retrospective study included 12 patients with CAIS and 19 patients with MRKHS. Three radiologists blindly evaluated the following features: (1) detection of vagina, (2) detection of nodular and cystic structures in the lateral pelvis; undescended testicles and paratesticular cysts in CAIS and rudimentary uteri and ovaries in MRKHS, (3) their location, (4) number of cysts in the cystic structures, and (5) signal intensity on diffusion-weighted images (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of the nodular structures. Statistical comparisons were performed using Mann-Whitney U and Fisher's exact tests.

RESULTS

Compared with MRKHS, the CAIS group showed significantly detectable vagina, more ventrally located nodular and cystic structures, fewer cysts within the cystic structures, and nodular structures with higher signal intensity on DWI and lower ADC values.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI features of detectable vagina, location of nodular and cystic structures, number of cysts within the cystic structures, signal intensity on DWI and ADC values of the nodular structures were useful in differentiating CAIS from MRKHS.

New insights on testicular cancer prevalence with novel diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic approaches

BACKGROUND

Testicular cancer (TC), comprising merely 1% of male neoplasms, holds the distinction of being the most commonly encountered neoplasm among young males.

RECENT FINDINGS

Most cases of testicular neoplasms can be classified into two main groups, namely germ cell tumors representing approximately 95% of the cases, and sex cord-stromal tumors accounting for about 5% of the cases. Moreover, its prevalence is on the rise across the globe. TC is a neoplastic condition characterized by a favorable prognosis. The advent of cisplatin-based chemotherapeutic agents in the latter part of the 1970s has led to a significant enhancement in the 5-year survival rate, which presently surpasses 95%. Given that TC is commonly detected before reaching the age of 40, it can be anticipated that these individuals will enjoy an additional 40-50 years of life following successful treatment. The potential causes of TC are multifactorial and related to different pathologies. Accurate identification is imperative to guarantee the utmost efficacious and suitable therapy. To a certain degree, this can be accomplished through the utilization of blood examinations for neoplastic indicators; nonetheless, an unequivocal diagnosis necessitates an evaluation of the histological composition of a specimen via a pathologist.

CONCLUSION

TC is multifactorial and has various pathologies, therefore this review aimed to revise the prenatal and postnatal causes as well as novel diagnostic biomarkers and the therapeutic strategies of TC.

An Overview of the Role of Multiparametric MRI in the Investigation of Testicular Tumors

Simple Summary

Although conventional ultrasonography remains the primary imaging modality for the assessment of testicular tumors, multiparametric MRI of the scrotum, which combines morphologic and functional data, serves as a powerful adjunct. Based on the recommendations issued by the Scrotal and Penile Imaging Working Group of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology, scrotal MRI is strongly recommended after equivocal US findings. In cases of testicular masses, the main clinical indications are as follows: lesion characterization when sonographic findings are non-diagnostic, discrimination between germ-cell and non-germ-cell testicular tumors, local staging of testicular tumors in patients who are candidates for testis-sparing surgery, and preoperative histological characterization of testicular germ-cell tumors in selected cases. This article aims to provide an overview of the role of multiparametric MRI in the investigation of testicular tumors.

Abstract

Conventional ultrasonography represents the mainstay of testis imaging. In cases in which ultrasonography is inconclusive, scrotal MRI using a multiparametric protocol may be used as a useful problem-solving tool. MRI of the scrotum is primarily recommended for differentiating between benign and malignant testicular masses when sonographic findings are ambiguous. This technique is also accurate in the preoperative local staging of testicular tumors and, therefore, is recommended in patients scheduled for testis-sparing surgery. In addition, MRI may provide valuable information regarding the histological characterization of testicular germ-cell tumors, in selected cases. Scrotal MRI may also help in the differentiation between testicular germ-cell neoplasms and non-germ-cell neoplasms. Axial T1-weighted imaging, axial and coronal T2-weighted imaging, axial diffusion-weighted imaging, and coronal subtracted dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging are the minimum requirements for scrotal MRI. A variety of MRI techniques—including diffusion tensor imaging, magnetization transfer imaging, proton MR spectroscopy, volumetric apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis, and MRI-based radiomics—are being investigated for testicular mass characterization, providing valuable supplementary diagnostic information. In the present review, we aim to discuss clinical indications for scrotal MRI in cases of testicular tumors, along with MRI findings of common testicular malignancies.