Early stage primary ovarian mucinous carcinoma: Outcome-based clinicopathological study in comparison with serous carcinoma

R. Abdominal Wall Reconstruction After Extirpation of a 140-Pound Primary Ovarian Mucinous Adenocarcinoma

Ovarian cancer is a feared diagnosis for women and clinicians alike. Ovarian mucinous adenocarcinoma is a unique subset of ovarian cancer. As a primary tumor, massive ovarian masses, and more specifically mucinous adenocarcinomas, have been infrequently reported in the medical literature. Team approaches to massive tumor extirpations are essential, as patients often require the expertise of various subspecialists including, but not limited to, gynecologic-oncologists, general surgeons, and plastic and reconstructive surgeons. Here we present a case of a 71-year-old woman with a massive, incapacitating pelvic mass, later found to be a primary ovarian mucinous adenocarcinoma. Once medically optimized, a multi-service team approach was utilized for tumor extirpation and abdominal wall reconstruction. Involved surgical services included Gynecologic-Oncology, General Surgery, and Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Exploratory laparotomy for tumor extirpation, hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy, peritoneal stripping, bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy, and appendectomy was performed. Extensively thin, devascularized, and attenuated abdominal wall fascia that was adherent to the tumor was removed. The abdominal wall defect was reconstructed and reinforced with inlay and overlays of biologic monofilament mesh. Inverted-T of the vertical and horizontal skin components was performed in a tailor-tacking fashion, assuring the maintenance and protection of the abdominal skin flap vascularity through utilizing the Huger Zones of perfusion. Pathology revealed a stage IA grade 2 mucinous adenocarcinoma of the ovary without evidence of metastasis. No adjuvant therapies were required. The tumor's weight was 140 pounds, and its dimensions were 63 x 41 x 40 cm. It is our hope that presenting this experience will raise awareness of this spectrum of diseases and allow for earlier diagnoses and treatments, as well as exemplify the virtues of a team-based approach in the successful extirpation and subsequent reconstruction of the abdominal wall and skin.

The Frequency and Prognostic Significance of the Histologic Type in Early-stage Ovarian Carcinoma: A Reclassification Study by the Spanish Group for Ovarian Cancer Research (GEICO)

The frequency and prognostic significance of the histologic type in early-stage ovarian cancer (OC) is not as well established as in advanced stages. In addition, histologic typing based only on morphologic features may be difficult, especially in high-grade tumors. In this study, we have analyzed a prospective cohort of 502 early-stage OCs to investigate their frequency, immunohistochemical characteristics, and survival of the 5 main histologic types. Histotype was assigned according to not only the morphologic features but also according to the expression pattern of WT1, p53, Napsin A, and progesterone receptors. In addition, an extended panel including p16, β-catenin, HER2, Arid1A, HINF1B, CK7, CDX2, and CK20 was used to refine the diagnosis in difficult cases. In this series, the frequency of the 5 major histologic types was as follows: endometrioid carcinoma, 32.7%; clear cell carcinoma, 25.1%; high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), 24.7%; mucinous carcinoma, 10.2%; low-grade serous carcinoma, 4.6%; and others, 2.8%. The combination of morphology and immunohistochemistry allowed the reclassification of 23% of OCs. The lowest concordance was found between samples initially diagnosed as endometrioid, but finally classified as high-grade serous tumors (22% error rate). Endometrioid carcinoma was the most favorable histologic type, whereas HGSC and low-grade serous carcinoma had the worst prognosis. Clear cell carcinoma with abnormal p53 immunostaining pattern also had poor prognosis. Although histologic grade was not a prognostic factor among early-stage endometrioid OCs, distinction between grade 3 endometrioid OC and HGSC is recommended, taking into account differences in prognosis and molecular alterations that can guide different treatments.