Esophageal foreign bodies in adults with different durations of time from ingestion to effective treatment

Imaging approach to ingested foreign bodies in the neck

Foreign body ingestion is a common clinical occurrence worldwide, with high morbidity in the pediatric population and in adult patients with intentional attempts. Coins and button battery ingestions are more common among children. Bone impaction and swallowed dentures are usually seen in older adults. While most ingested foreign bodies pass through the gastrointestinal tract spontaneously with no complications, some require endoscopic and/or surgical intervention. Complications such as pharyngoesophageal ulceration, perforation, stricture, and deep neck infection can develop without timely diagnosis and management. The purpose of this article is to familiarize radiologists with the imaging approach to assess for characteristics and impacted locations of ingested foreign bodies in the neck.

Pulmonary artery penetration due to fish bone ingestion: A rare case report

Accidental fish bone ingestion is a common manifestation at emergency departments. In most cases, ingested foreign bodies usually pass uneventfully through the gastrointestinal tract and complications only present in less than 5% of all patients. In this report, we present the first documented case of pulmonary artery injury due to a fish bone in a 63-year-old male patient hospitalized with hemoptysis after accidentally swallowing a fish bone 30 days ago. This patient subsequently had surgery and endoscopy to safely remove the foreign body and then recovered well on a follow-up examination. For cases of fish bone ingestion, contrast-enhanced chest computed tomography is one of the most essential tools to assess vascular problems and associated mediastinal infections-risk factors for life-threatening and long-term recurrent inflammation. Reconstructing planes along the foreign body axis and changing windows when analyzing CT scans is necessary to avoid missing lesions and dilemmas.

Combination of gastroscopy and fibro‑bronchoscopy facilitates removal of incarcerated fish bone in the esophagus: A case report

Esophageal foreign body impaction is a notable clinical emergency. If the high-risk esophageal foreign bodies are not removed in time, life-threatening complications, such as perforation, infection and injury to the vessels, may occur. In the present study, the case of a patient experiencing a foreign body sensation in the throat after ingesting a fish bone by mistake is presented. A high risk of impending arterial puncture was confirmed using thoracic CT and thoracic aorta CT angiography scanning. The ends of the fish bone were first confirmed using a fibro-bronchoscopy light source passing through the bronchial and esophageal walls, before biopsy forceps were used to successively free the thoracic aorta and bronchial ends under gastroscopy. Finally, the fish bone was safely removed using a combination of gastroscopy and the rarely used fibro-bronchoscopy, and the patient recovered well after standard care. In certain cases of foreign bodies, it is necessary to use multiple strategies in a timely manner according to the type and location of the ingested foreign body.

A Rare Etiology of Esophageal Obstruction: Esophageal Clot Formation After Teeth Extraction

Esophageal obstruction represents an endoscopic emergency owing to the high mortality rate associated with complications, including perforation and airway compromise. While typically caused by food or foreign body ingestion, esophageal clot represents a rare etiology of obstruction. We present a case of esophageal obstruction in the context of an anastomotic stricture and chronic anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation caused by clot formation due to oral hemorrhage after dental extractions. Clot retrieval was accomplished via endoscopic suction, and balloon dilation of the anastomotic stricture was performed to prevent recurrence. Our case illustrates the importance of considering oral hemorrhage, therapeutic anticoagulation, and esophageal strictures as risk factors for esophageal obstruction due to clot formation in order to make a timely diagnosis and treatment of this potential endoscopic emergency.

Feasibility and safety of a self-developed sleeve for the endoscopic removal of refractory foreign body incarceration

Objective

This study aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of a novel self-designed sleeve for the endoscopic removal of a refractory incarcerated foreign body in the upper gastrointestinal tract (UGIT).

Methods

An interventional study was conducted between June and December 2022. A total of 60 patients who underwent an endoscopic removal of a refractory incarcerated foreign body from the UGIT were randomly allocated to the self-developed sleeve and the conventional transparent cap. The study evaluated and compared the operation time, successful removal rate, new injury length at the entrance of the esophagus, new injury length at the impaction site, visual field clarity, and postoperative complications between the two groups.

Results

The success rates of the two cohorts in the foreign body removal display no significant discrepancy (100% vs. 93%, P = 0.529). Nevertheless, the methodology of the novel overtube-assisted endoscopic foreign body removal has culminated in a significant reduction in the removal duration [40 (10, 50) min vs. 80 (10, 90) min, P = 0.01], reduction in esophageal entrance traumas [0 (0, 0) mm vs. 4.0 (0, 6) mm, P < 0.001], mitigation of injuries at the location of the foreign body incarceration [0 (0, 2) mm vs. 6.0 (3, 8) mm, P < 0.001], an enhanced visual field (P < 0.001), and a decrement in postoperative mucosal bleeding (23% vs. 67%, P < 0.001). The self-developed sleeve effectively negated the advantages of incarceration exclusion during removal.

Conclusion

The study findings support the feasibility and safety of the self-developed sleeve for the endoscopic removal of a refractory incarcerated foreign body in the UGIT, with advantages over the conventional transparent cap.

Risk factors for the poor prognosis of Benign esophageal perforation: 8-year experience

BACKGROUND

Esophageal perforation (EP) has a high mortality rate and poor prognosis. This single-center retrospective study aims to analyze the related risk factors for benign EP.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 135 patients with benign EP admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from January 2012 to December 2020. Univariate and multivariate logistic analysis were performed to estimate risk factors for prognosis of esophageal perforation patients.

RESULTS

There were 118 EP patients with foreign body ingestion and 17 patients with nonforeign body ingestion. Fish bones (78/118) were the most common foreign body and most of the nonforeign EPs were caused by spontaneous esophageal rupture (14/17). Foreign body perforations occurred mostly in the upper thoracic segment (70/118) and middle thoracic segment (31/118), and spontaneous esophageal ruptures occurred mostly in the lower thoracic segment (15/17). Fifteen patients (11.1%) died during hospitalization or within one month of discharge. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that high white blood cell (WBC) levels [odds ratio (OR) = 2.229, 95% confidential interval (CI): 0.776-6.403, P = 0.025], chest or mediastinal emphysema (OR = 7.609, 95% CI: 2.418-23.946, P = 0.001), and time to treatment > 72 h (OR = 3.407, 95% CI: 0.674-17.233, P = 0.018) were independent risk factors for poor prognosis.

CONCLUSION

Foreign body was the major reason for benign EP. High WBC level, chest or mediastinal emphysema and time to treatment > 72 h were risk factors for poor prognosis.

Fish Hook as Foreign Body: Not All Foreign Bodies Can Be Fished Out of the Esophagus With Endoscopy Alone

A 75-year-old male presented to the hospital with acute onset of neck pain. Although the patient did not report known ingestion of a foreign body, there was evidence of a fish hook in the cervical esophagus on plain neck radiography. Due to the location at the upper esophageal sphincter in the hypopharynx, the foreign body was not retrievable by endoscopy alone and required better visualization and airway protection with direct laryngoscopy and rigid esophagoscopy. A fish hook was promptly retrieved within 24 hours of the patient's presentation and his symptoms resolved without complications. We report this unusual case to emphasize the importance of proper food preparation, thoroughly chewing food before swallowing, and prompt management of foreign body ingestion in adults.

Abdominal CT manifestations in fish bone foreign body injuries: What the radiologist needs to know

Fish bone is one of the most common foreign body ingestions encountered in the emergency department. Fish bone perforations occur most commonly in segments with acute angulation like the ileocecal region and rectosigmoid junction and can present acutely with obstruction and free air or with chronic complications like abscess and sepsis. Radiologists should be familiar with the high-risk clinical scenarios, the CT appearance of radiopaque fishbones, and the spectrum of imaging findings related to gastrointestinal (GI) tract so as to direct management and timely referral to GI endoscopists and surgeons.

Upper gastrointestinal foreign bodies in adults: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Foreign body(FB) ingestion in the upper digestive tract is a common emergency that lacks sufficient attention in adult population. Improper management may bring additional injuries and financial burdens to patients. This review was performed to determine the clinical characteristics of upper gastrointestinal FBs, including the demographic of adult patients, the type and location of FBs, underlying diseases of patients and other risk factors, and outcomes.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases with the terms "foreign body AND upper gastrointestinal NOT child". Finally, we got 7 articles between 2001 and 2020 and extracted the information.

RESULTS

A total of 1391 patients were included. 736 (52.9%) patients were males and 655 (47.1%) were females. Fish bone was the most common type of FBs. Esophagus accounts for the most location in the upper digestive tract. 18.2% (235/1291) patients had the underlying diseases, and 11.7% (58/494) had other risk factors. The overall complication rate was 4.5% (63/1391).

Retrospective Analysis of Esophageal Foreign Body Ingestion: Differences Among Weekday, Weekends, and Holidays

Purpose

Current data on the occurrence of EFBs in relation to different time periods are scant. The purpose of this study was to compare the occurrence, type and location of EFBs in people who presented at our center on weekdays, weekends and holidays.

Patients and Methods

A retrospective analysis of patients (n=1353) received rigid esophagoscopy for foreign body extraction under general anesthesia from January 2018 to 2020 December.

Results

The occurrence of EFB ingestion was significantly higher (p<0.05) on holidays (2.75/day) than on weekdays (0.91/day) and weekends (1.46/day). Patients were much older on holidays, with a mean age of 58.18 ± 17.34 years, than patients on weekdays (54.71 ± 16.71 years) and weekends (55.05 ± 17.36 years).

Conclusion

Our findings demonstrate that EFB ingestion is most likely to occur on weekends and holidays, and elderly patients should be advised to chewing slowly and eating non-nuclear jujube, especially during holidays, to minimize their risk.

Esophageal Obstruction and Death in a Nonverbal Patient

BACKGROUND

There are more than 100,000 cases of esophageal foreign body in the United States each year. Most cases resolve spontaneously; however, complete esophageal obstruction is a medical emergency. Patients with developmental disabilities are at high risk, because a large percentage of this population is effected by dysphagia, pica, tooth loss, or impulsive swallowing. In some cases, the diagnosis of esophageal foreign body can be made clinically, with the typical presentation including coughing, inability to tolerate secretions, drooling, vomiting, and dysphagia. In other instances, imaging is needed to confirm the diagnosis.

CASE REPORT

A nonverbal adult patient with history of mental retardation and dysphagia presented to the emergency department (ED) after a choking episode with persistent coughing. An x-ray study of the chest showed mild opacity at the left lung base and she was discharged with antibiotics. She returned to the ED that day with worsening symptoms suggestive of aspiration pneumonia. A computed tomography scan of the chest revealed numerous cylindrical objects in the esophagus, later identified as crayons. At least 28 crayons were removed via 3 endoscopies. During this time, the patient developed aspiration pneumonia, respiratory distress, and septic shock. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: Delayed recognition of foreign body puts patients at risk for esophageal perforation, aspiration, airway compromise, infection, sepsis, and death. In nonverbal patients presenting with upper respiratory symptoms, it is especially important to consider esophageal foreign body in the differential diagnosis, because this group is high risk for missed diagnosis and complications secondary to the foreign body.

Complication rates in emergent endoscopy for foreign bodies under different sedation modalities: A large single-center retrospective review

BACKGROUND

Foreign object ingestion (FOI) and food bolus impaction (FBI) are common causes of emergent endoscopic intervention. The choice of sedation used is often dictated by physician experience. Many endoscopists frequently prefer to use monitored anesthesia care (MAC) and general anesthesia (GA) as opposed to conscious sedation (CS) due to the concern for inadequate airway protection. However, there is insufficient data examining the safety of different sedation modalities in emergent endoscopic management of FOI and FBI.

AIM

To investigate the complication rates of emergent endoscopic extraction performed under different sedation modalities.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients presenting with acute FBI and FOI between 2010 and 2018 in two hospitals. A standardized questionnaire was utilized to collect data on demographics, endoscopic details, sedation practices, hospital stay and adverse events. Complications recognized during and within 24 h of the procedure were considered early, whereas patients presenting with a procedure-related adverse event within two weeks of the index event were considered delayed complications. Complication rates of patients who underwent emergent endoscopic retrieval were compared based on sedation types, namely CS, MAC and GA. Chi-square analysis and multiple logistic regression were used to compare complication rate based on sedation type.

RESULTS

Among the 929 procedures analyzed, 353 procedures (38.0%) were performed under CS, 278 procedures (29.9%) under MAC and the rest (32.1%) under GA. The median age of the subjects was 52 years old, with 57.4% being male. The majority of the procedures (64.3%) were FBI with the rest being FOI (35.7%). A total of 132 subjects (14.2%) had chronic comorbidities while 29.0% had psychiatric disorders. The most commonly observed early complications were mucosal laceration (3.8%) and bleeding (2.6%). The most common delayed complication was aspiration pneumonia (1.8%). A total of 20 patients (5.6%) could not adequately be sedated with CS and had to be converted to MAC or GA. Patient sedated with MAC and GA were more likely to require hospitalization, P < 0.0001. Analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in the complication rate between patients sedated under CS (14.7%), MAC (14.7%) and GA (19.5%), P = 0.19.

CONCLUSION

For patients who present with FOI or FBI and undergo emergent endoscopic treatment, there is no significant difference in adverse event rates between CS, MAC and GA.

Food bolus and oesophageal foreign body: a summary of the evidence and proposed management process

PURPOSE

Food bolus and oesophageal foreign bodies are a common presentation that may be managed by otolaryngologists, gastroenterologists, acute medicine physicians and accident and emergency. The condition is highly variable with presentations ranging from well patients whose obstruction spontaneously passes to peri-arrest with severe aspiration or impending airway compromise. Management of this condition is heterogeneous and often depends on the specialty the patient is originally admitted under. There exist European and American guidelines from the perspective of gastroenterology, but there are no UK-based guidelines and limited consideration of the role of the otolaryngologists and rigid oesophagoscopy.

METHODS

An extensive literature search was carried out to generate conclusions on key management questions for food bolus and oesophageal foreign bodies. This was then summarised into both a written summary of the evidence and a graphical decision tree.

RESULTS

This paper is a review article and presents conclusions regarding management options for food bolus and oesophageal foreign bodies.

CONCLUSION

This article considers the current evidence surrounding investigation and management of oesophageal food bolus and foreign body. It draws conclusions regarding presentation, investigation and subsequent operative treatment. As part of this process, we propose a graphical decision tree to assist in management decisions.

Individualized endoscopic management strategy for impacting jujube pits in the upper gastrointestinal tract: a 3-year single-center experience in northern China

Background

Impaction of jujube pits in the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract is a special clinical condition in the northern Chinese population. Endoscopic removal is the preferred therapy, but there is no consensus on the management strategies. We reported our individualized endoscopic strategies on the jujube pits impacted in the upper GI tract.

Methods

In this retrospective study, we included 191 patients (male: 57; female: 134) who presented to our hospital with ingestion of jujube pits between January 2015 and December 2017. Demographic information, times of hospital visiting, locations of jujube pits, endoscopic procedures, post-extraction endoscopic characteristics were analyzed. Management strategies including sufficient suction, repeated irrigation, jejunal nutrition and gastrointestinal decompression were given based on post-extraction endoscopic characteristics and impacted locations.

Results

Peak incidence was in the second quarter of each year (85/191 cases, 44.5%). Among the 191 cases, 169 (88.5%) showed pits impaction in the esophagus, 20 (10.5%) in the prepyloric region and 2 (1.0%) in the duodenal bulb. A total of 185 patients (96.9%) had pits removed with alligator jaw forceps, and 6 (3.1%) underwent suction removal with transparent caps placed over the end of the endoscope to prevent injury on removal of these pits with two sharp painted edges. Post-extraction endoscopic manifestations included mucosal erosion (26.7%), mucosa laceration (24.6%), ulceration with a white coating (18.9%) and penetrating trauma with pus cavity formation (29.8%). All patients received individualized endoscopic and subsequent management strategies and showed good outcomes.

Conclusions

Individualized endoscopic management for impacted jujube pits in the upper GI tract based on post-extraction endoscopic characteristics and impacted locations was safe, effective, and minimally invasive.

[Diagnostic and treatment of foreign bodies of the upper digestive tract]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the results of diagnosis and treatment of foreign bodies of the upper gastrointestinal tract.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

There were 1187 patients aged 15-99 years with suspected foreign body of the upper gastrointestinal tract. In 536 patients (266 men, 270 women), foreign bodies were detected. Ingestion of a foreign body was more common in patients aged 46-65 years. In 516 patients, foreign bodies were detected in the esophagus (pharyngo-esophageal junction - 25, upper third of the esophagus - 426, middle third of the esophagus - 34, lower third of the esophagus - 21, esophageal-gastric junction - 10). Four patients admitted with esophageal wall perforation. In 3 cases, foreign bodies were localized in the throat, 15 patients - in the stomach, 2 patients - in the duodenum.

RESULTS

In most cases, foreign bodies were organic (n=506). Removal was successful in 530 cases. In 4 patients with esophageal wall perforation and mediastinitis, removal was performed intraoperatively. Flexible endoscope was used in 500 cases. In 86 patients, foreign bode was displaced in the stomach using flexible endoscopy. Foreign body removing wasn't successful in 4 cases. In 2 patients, extraction was followed by esophageal wall damage. In 4 patients, esophagotomy was applied to extract foreign body. Suturing the esophageal wall defect was carried out in 2 cases. Abrasion and erosive esophagitis were the most common injuries of esophageal mucosa. Esophageal diseases were detected in 75 cases after foreign body removal (67 cases - benign esophageal diseases). One patient died from bedsore of innominate artery complicated by acute hemorrhage.

CONCLUSION

Foreign bodies of the upper gastrointestinal tract are observed in 45% of patients at admission. Neck and chest X-ray examination is obligatory before endoscopy. Flexible endoscopy is a gold standard for diagnosis and extraction of foreign bodies. Repeated endoscopy after foreign body extraction should be mandatory. It is necessary to visualize complications associated with foreign body and identify esophageal diseases.

A Hard Case to Swallow: Crucifix Esophageal Foreign Body in a Nonverbal Patient

Delayed presentation of esophageal foreign bodies places patients at high risk for esophageal perforation and infection. In nonverbal patients as well as children and adults with other concomitant illnesses, it is important to consider a broad differential diagnosis for presentations with upper respiratory complaints. The authors present a case of a nonverbal, elderly woman who presented after several days of mild, dry cough and was ultimately found to have a large esophageal foreign body that had been present for an unclear amount of time.

Differences between intentional and accidental ingestion of foreign body in China

Backgrounds

Previous reports of foreign-body ingestion focused primarily on accidental ingestion and very few studies focused on intentional ingestion of foreign body (FB) in China. Our study aimed to compare the prevalence of different age, gender, types, locations and management of FB ingested between intentional ingestion and accidental ingestion of FB in Northern China.

Methods

A retrospective case series studied all patients with suspected FB ingestion in Digestive Endoscopy Center of Beijing Friendship Hospital, between January 2011 and January 2019. The patients were divided into 2 groups. Group A included the patients who intentionally ingested FBs, and Group B included the patients who accidentally ingested FBs. Patients’ database (demographics, past medical history, characteristics of FB, endoscopic findings and treatments) were reviewed. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS software.

Results

Group A consisted of 77 prisoners, 2 suspects and 11 psychologically disabled persons. Group B consisted of 1020 patients with no prisoners, suspects or psychologically disabled persons. In Group A, there were no food-related foreign bodies, and the majority of FBs were metallic objects (54.44%). However in Group B, food-related FBs were the most common (91.37%). In Group A, 58 cases (64.44%) were located in the stomach, while in Group B, 893 cases (87.55%) were located in the esophagus (P < 0.05). 1096 patients successfully underwent endoscopic removal and 14 failed, including 9 cases in Group A and 5 cases in Group B. The duration of FBs impaction was longer in Group A than that in Group B (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

In our study, the patients who intentionally ingested FB were mainly prisoners, FBs were mostly sharp metallic objects, the duration of FBs impaction was longer, and the rate of successful endoscopic treatment was lower than that of the general population. Attention should be focused on these patients.

Retrospective observational analysis of esophageal foreign bodies: a novel characterization based on shape

This single-center retrospective study aims to investigate the clinical features of esophageal foreign bodies (EFBs) and determine the influence of EFB shapes on management and prognosis. A total of 427 patients aged 13 to 95 years with suspected EFB ingestion were enrolled between January 2013 and June 2018, 183 of whom were male. EFBs were divided into six shapes: pin (n = 161), sheet (n = 97), trident (n = 51), spindle (n = 66), irregular (n = 46), and sphere (n = 6). Spindle-shaped EFBs correlated with a significantly higher rate of perforation and severe complications (P < 0.001 and P = 0.021, respectively) than any other EFB shape, while sheet-shaped EFBs were linked to less severe complications (P = 0.006). The number of pressure points was provided to stratify the risk of poor prognosis for each shape. EFBs with only two pressure points (pin and spindle EFBs) required more advanced management strategies and were correlated with a higher number of patients suffering esophageal perforation (27.11%) and severe complications (12.44%) when compared with other shapes (χ² = 11.149 and P = 0.001; χ² = 5.901 and P = 0.015, respectively). Spindle shape was an independent risk factor for poor prognosis, and contributed a more clinical risk than the pin shape. In conclusion, clinical features, management, perforation rate, and severe complications differed based on EFB shape. The EFBs with two pressure points, especially the spindle-shaped EFBs, were more dangerous compared with those with more pressure points.

Radio-opacity of the Bones of Commonly Consumed Fish from the Red Sea

Introduction

Foreign body (FB) ingestion is one of the most common complaints presenting at an emergency department (ED), with fish bone impaction being a frequent cause of presentation. Fish bones might be challenging to identify on routine radiography and ED physicians are often left in a state of uneasiness owing to the fear of complications occurring if the fish bone is not removed.

Objective

This study aimed to establish the factors affecting the radio-opacity of fish bones on X-ray.

Materials and methods

The study involved the top three fish species consumed on Saudi Arabia’s western coast. Fish bones from three specimens of each species were radiographically examined by hand-picking bones from different parts of the fish, with particular attention paid to bones that are difficult to spot. Bones were then arranged beside each other, and radiographs were taken for comparison. Inter-species and intra-species radio-opacity variation was tested. Further, the weight of each fish and method of cooking (baked vs. fried) were tested for their effect on radio-opacity.

Results

No significant difference in radio-opacity was found among and between different species, and the method of cooking did not alter the radio-opacity of fish bones. Significant differences in radio-opacity were noted with the difference in the diameter and size of the fish bones, which tended to be less radio-opaque in smaller-sized fish, regardless of the species.

Conclusion

The exact fish species and method of cooking did not alter the fish bone density on an X-ray. The size of the fish and the size of the fish bone are better predictors of higher fish bone density.

Clinical Analysis of Denture Impaction in the Esophagus of Adults

Denture impacted in the esophagus of adults has been a complex foreign body for otolaryngologists. We reviewed clinical characteristics, diagnosis, and treatment of these patients and evaluated computed tomography (CT) scans to identify a better method of dealing with such tricky situations. Twenty-nine patients who underwent rigid esophagoscopy were included in this retrospective study conducted at the University hospital. The patients underwent preoperative tests and examinations, including complete blood count, blood type and coagulation, electrocardiogram, and CT. The commonest symptoms were retrosternal pain, dysphagia, and odynophagia. Duration of the foreign body impacted within 24 h was 65.5%. CT findings revealed that 4 of 24 cases had complications in the upper esophagus, with 3 of the 4 cases in the mid-esophagus and 1 in the lower esophagus. Complications were related to the duration and location of the obstruction (P < 0.05). The location and complications based on CT findings were coherent with rigid esophagoscopy findings. Denture impaction in the esophagus can be fatal. Early intervention is crucial for prognosis. CT is used for diagnosing and guiding doctors in managing. The commonest location of impacted dentures was the upper esophagus with a lower incidence of complications. The incidence of an impacted denture in the mid-esophagus was low but with a high risk of complications. The incidence of an impacted denture in the lower esophagus was rare. Surgery and proper treatment ensure a good prognosis.

A fish bone induced aortic arch pseudoaneurysm in a male patient: A case report

RATIONALE

Esophageal foreign body is a commonly seen in China. However, pseudoaneurysm of the aortic arch caused by ingestion of fish bones is a rare, life-threatening condition.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 71-year-old male was admitted to the Ear, Nose, and Throat department with a 4-day history of chest pain after eating fish.

DIAGNOSES

After taking out the fish bone by rigid endoscopy, magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomography angiography (CTA) scans revealed the presence of an aortic arch pseudoaneurysm, which was likely caused by the fish bone.

INTERVENTIONS

A successful endovascular graft exclusion surgery was performed to block the aorta ulcer.

OUTCOMES

The patient recovered and was discharged 20 days after hospitalization. The patient was healthy and had no fever or chest pain 4 months after discharge from the hospital.

LESSONS

Esophageal foreign bodies may lead to life-threatening impairment of the aorta or other big arteries. When esophageal foreign bodies puncture the esophageal wall, especially in the second stenosis of the esophagus, an enhanced-contrast computed tomography scan or a CTA scan may be necessary to exclude any potential impairment of the arteries.

Esophageal foreign bodies in adults: systematic review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

Esophageal Foreign Body (FB) impaction represents a major challenge for healthcare providers. Aim of this systematic review was to analyse the current literature evidence on prevalence, presentation, treatment, and outcomes of impacted esophageal FB.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Literature search was conducted between 2000 and 30th June 2018 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement.

RESULTS

Sixty-one studies matched the inclusion criteria. The total number of included patients was 13,092. The cervical esophagus was the most frequent impaction site (67%) and sharp-pointed objects were the most common FB (38.1%). Retrosternal pain (78%), dysphagia (48%), and odynophagia (43.4%) were the most common symptoms. A flexible or rigid endoscopic approach was adopted in 65.1% and 16.8% of patients, respectively. Overall, 17.8% of patients had a complication related to the impacted esophageal FB or to the endoscopic manoeuvers. A surgical approach was required in 3.4% of patients. The overall mortality was 0.85%.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery is the upfront treatment in patients with esophageal perforation or endoscopically irretrievable esophageal FB. A minimally invasive approach can be adopted in selected patients. Effective prevention of FB impaction should focus on accurate diagnostic work-up to search for an underlying motility disorder after a first episode of esophageal impaction, even if transient and self-resolving.

Foreign object ingestion and esophageal food impaction: An update and review on endoscopic management

Foreign body ingestion encompasses both foreign object ingestion (FOI) and esophageal food impaction (EFI) and represents a common and clinically significant scenario among patients of all ages. The immediate risk to the patient ranges from negligible to life-threatening, depending on the ingested substance, its location, patient fitness, and time to appropriate therapy. This article reviews the FOI and EFI literature and highlights important considerations and implications for pediatric and adult patients as well as their providers. Where published literature is insufficient to provide evidence-based guidance, expert opinion is included to supplement the content of this comprehensive review.

Fish Bone Foreign Body: The Role of Imaging

Introduction  Fish bone foreign body (FFB) impaction in the upper aerodigestive tract is a common cause for emergency department referral. Its management varies in both diagnosis and treatment paradigms. Fish bone foreign bodies are more commonly found in the oropharynx in cases of patients < 40 years old, and in the esophagus in cases of patients > 40 years old. Symptoms are typically non-indicative for the location of the FFB, with the exception of foreign body sensation at/superior to the cervical esophagus. A lack of findings during the physical examination is routinely followed by imaging, with computed tomography (CT) being the preferred modality. In practice, many patients undergo unnecessary imaging studies, including CT scans.

Objectives  To identify patients with suspected fish bone impaction who do not require CT imaging and can be safely discharged.

Data Synthesis  We have searched the PubMed database for the following medical subject headings (MeSH) terms: fish bone , fish foreign body AND oropharynx , hypopharynx , esophagus , flexibleesophagoscopy , and rigidesophagoscopy . Our search in the English language yielded 32 papers. Case reports were included, since they highlighted rare and serious complications.

Conclusion  In patients > 40 years old suspected of fish bone impaction, non-contrast CT is recommended and should be urgently performed, even in the presence of ambiguous symptoms. However, in patients < 40 years old presenting within 24 hours from ingestion, imaging has little diagnostic value due to the low probability of esophageal fish bones. For this specific subgroup, in the absence of clinical findings, discharge without imaging studies may be considered safe.

Analysis of the management and risk factors for complications of esophageal foreign body impaction of jujube pits in adults

Introduction

Foreign body impaction is a common emergency in the field of otolaryngology. The prevalence of a jujube pit as an esophageal foreign body has increased in the Jiaodong Peninsula. However, reports on this are scarce.

Aim

To investigate the methods for diagnosing and treating esophageal foreign body impaction of a jujube pit and to determine the risk factors for complications.

Material and methods

We conducted a retrospective review of the medical records of patients who were diagnosed with esophageal impaction of a jujube pit. Demographic, clinical, radiological, and endoscopic data were collected and analyzed.

Results

Neither plain radiography nor esophagogram provided enough information on the surrounding issues and complications. The rate of secondary radiological examination was 51.61% for the patients who did not undergo prior computed tomography. The success rate of rigid esophagoscopy was 95.45%; 18 of these patients (27.27%) had previously undergone flexible esophagoscopy without foreign body removal. Logistic regression showed that the time from ingestion to presentation and the jujube pit size were independent risk factors for complications.

Conclusions

Computed tomography without contrast material is the preferred diagnostic method for adults with esophageal jujube pit impaction, and rigid esophagoscopy can be used for therapy even though the first flexible esophagoscopy failed. Large diameter of the jujube pit constituting the esophageal foreign body (≥ 25 mm) and long duration between pit ingestion and presentation (> 12 h) were associated with increased complications in the patients in this study.

Clinical features and standardized diagnosis and treatment of esophageal foreign bodies

AIM

To summarize the clinical characteristics of esophageal foreign bodies and to explore their standardized diagnosis and treatment.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted at our hospital from July 2011 to July 2017, and we reviewed the clinical data for 1190 patients with esophageal foreign bodies with regard to their sex, age, department patients first visited, treatment time, type, incarcerated site, treatment plan, and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

Of 1190 patients included, 568 were male and 622 were female, with a male-to-female ratio of 1.0:1.1. They aged from 2 mo to 99 years (mean, 45 years ± 28.44 years), with a median age of 54 years; 293 (24.6%) patients were under 15 years, 293 (24.6%) were between 15 and 55 years, and 604 (50.8%) over 55 years. Otolaryngology and head surgery department was the most first-visited department (966, 81.2%), followed by gastroenterology department (138, 11.6%), thoracic surgery department (46, 3.4%), and others (40, 3.4%). There were 716 (60.2%) patients who visited hospital within 24 h, 126 (10.6%) in 24 to 72 h, and 348 (29.2%) over 72 h. The foreign bodies were plant-based in 448 (37.6%) patients, animal-based in 403 (33.9%), metallic in 200 (16.8%), and composite material-based in 139 (11.7%), with jujube pits, chicken bones, and coins accounting for 62.9% (750 patients) of all cases. The foreign bodies were most commonly located in the upper orifice of the esophagus (827, 69.5%), followed by the upper part (245, 20.6%), the middle and lower parts (94, 7.8%), and others (25, 2.1%). We treated 1088 (91.4%) patients by endoscopy and 41 (3.4%) by surgery. The duration of hospitalization ranged from 1 to 71 d (median, 5 d; mean, 5.9 d ± 4.9 d).

CONCLUSION

Esophageal foreign bodies most commonly occur in the upper orifice of the esophagus. Standardized diagnosis and treatment are important. Esophageal foreign bodies should be taken out within 24 h. Timely correction of water and electrolyte disturbance, effective antibiotic therapy, high nutrition support, and temporary esophageal, if necessary, are beneficial to the patient's recovery.