Rivaroxaban versus nadroparin for preventing deep venous thrombosis after total hip arthroplasty following femoral neck fractures: A retrospective comparative study

The effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants compared to conventional pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in hip fracture patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are recommended as a possible pharmacologic venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, current guidelines did not introduce recommendations for administration of DOACs as an option for pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery (HFS). The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of DOACs administered for pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis in patients undergoing HFS to conventional pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis, as well as mortality between these thromboprophylaxis medications.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of multiple electronic databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including patients who were subjected to HFS and prescribed either DOACs as pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis or a conventional VTE prophylaxis drug. We conducted a meta-analysis comparing effectiveness, safety and mortality of these agents between the patient groups studied. Three endpoints were studied. The first one regarding the effectiveness of the agents included clinical manifestations of VTE. The second one regarding the safety of the agents included clinical presentation of bleeding. The latter endpoint studied was mortality of patient groups studied. We generated forest plots to depict the relative risk of the above clinical manifestations between the two studied patient groups and to investigate if there is statistical significance for each patient group to present any of these clinical manifestations. Additionally, we calculated the inconsistency (I²) statistic and assessed the risk of bias of RCTs included in our meta-analysis by using the modified Cochrane collaboration tool.

RESULTS

We selected 2 RCTs in this review including 279 patients totally. Patients of control groups in both eligible studies were administered enoxaparin, which is a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). The meta-analysis found no statistically significant difference between patients prescribed DOACs and patients prescribed LMWH for VTE (95% CI 0.19 to 1.13, RR=0.46, p=0.09), deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (95% CI 0.21 to 1.32, RR=0.53, p=0.17) and pulmonary embolism (PE) (95% CI 0.03 to 3.12, RR=0.33, p=0.33), major bleeding events (95% CI 0.57 to 1.78, RR=1.01, p=0.97), minor bleeding events (95% CI 0.72 to 1.64, RR=1.09, p=0.69), all bleeding events (95% CI 0.79 to 1.38, RR=1.05, p=0.74) and mortality (95% CI 0.01 to 8.0, RR=0.33, p=0.5). The major risk of bias of the selected RCTs was the fact that either the researchers or the patients could have knowledge whether the latter were administered DOACs or LMWHs.

DISCUSSION

DOACs are not inferior compared to LMWHs regarding their effectiveness, safety and mortality in patients subjected to HFS. Further studies with larger patient samples should be conducted in the future, so that safer results and conclusions could be reached.

Equivalence of DOACS and LMWH for thromboprophylaxis after hip fracture surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with hip fractures (HF) have an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). In elective orthopedic surgery direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have proven to be similarly or more effective compared to low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), but DOACs are not yet approved for thromboprophylaxis in trauma patients with HF. The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature comparing the effectiveness of DOACs and LMWH for thromboprophylaxis in trauma patients with surgically treated HF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase. The primary outcome was the incidence of VTE (symptomatic and asymptomatic combined). Secondary outcomes were symptomatic VTE; a symptomatic VTE, symptomatic deep venous thrombosis (DVT); symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE); major, clinically relevant non-major (CRNM), and minor bleeding. Meta-analysis was performed to compare the odds of VTE and secondary outcomes between DOACs and LMWH.

RESULTS

The search resulted in 738 titles. Five studies matched inclusion criteria. In total, 4748 hip fracture patients were analyzed (DOACs: 2276 patients, LMWH: 2472 patients). The pooled odds ratio for the risk of VTE for DOAC use was 0.52 (95% confidence interval 0.25-1.11, p = 0.09) compared to LMWH. No statistically significant differences between DOAC and LMWH were found for asymptomatic VTE, symptomatic DVT, PE, major or CRNM bleeding, and minor bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

Meta-analysis of the literature suggests that DOACs are associated with equivalent effectiveness and safety compared to LMWH.

Predictive value of miR-374a-5p of peripheral blood mononuclear cells in deep venous thrombosis for elderly patients after total hip arthroplasty

OBJECTIVE

This study analyzed the predictive value of peripheral blood mononuclear cells' (PBMCs) miR-374a-5p in deep vein thrombosis (DVT) after total hip arthroplasty in the elderly.

METHODS

There was a total of 112 elderly patients that underwent elective total hip arthroplasty in our hospital and were enrolled as the research subjects. According to the color Doppler ultrasound of lower limbs 5 d postoperatively, subjectswere classified into thrombosis group (n=31) and non-thrombosis group (n=81). We detected the expression levels of miR-374a-5p in PBMCs and plasma D-dimer of the two groups of patients 1 d before surgery, and 1 d, 3 d, and 5 d after surgery, and analyzed the predictive value, and the correlation between miR-374a-5p and plasma D-dimer for DVT by ROC curve.

RESULTS

The relative expression of miR-374a-5p in PBMCs and plasma D-dimer of the two groups 1 d, 3 d, and 5 d after surgery were higher than those on the 1 d before surgery (P<0.05), and the indexes of thrombus-group-patients were higher than those in the non-thrombosis group at various time points after surgery (P<0.05). We analyzed the predictive value of miR-374a-5p for DVT by ROC curve, and the areas under the predictive curve of miR-374a-5p on 1 d pre-surgery, and 1 d, 3 d and 5 d post-surgery for DVT were 0.435, 0.820, 0.974 and 0.782 respectively. The areas under the predictive curve of D-dimer for DVT was 0.470, 0.834, 0.863 and 0.790 respectively on 1 d pre-surgery, and 1 d, 3 d and 5 d post-surgery. The correlation analysis indicated that miR-374a-5p was extremely positively correlated with D-dimer (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

miR-374a-5p is of important value in the prediction of DVT in elderly patients with total hip arthroplasty. Its expression level has a critically positive correlation with D-dimer degree, which is likely to be abiologic indicator for the early diagnosis and treatment of DVT.

The Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Following Lower Limb Fracture Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a well-established complication after many orthopaedic injuries, such as hip and lower limb fractures. The use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs, previously termed novel oral anticoagulants) is well-established as thromboprophylaxis after major elective orthopaedic surgery, but not in the nonelective setting. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness and safety of DOACs after nonelective lower limb fracture surgery.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic literature search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and CENTRAL databases was conducted. No limitation was placed on publication date, with only manuscripts printed in English were eligible.

STUDY SELECTION

Included studies were either randomized controlled trials or prospective and retrospective comparative studies. Included studies compared DOACs to conventional methods of thromboprophylaxis in the postoperative period after surgical management of lower limb fractures.

DATA EXTRACTION

Outcomes included VTE, bleeding, wound complications, mortality, and adverse events. Eight studies met inclusion criteria, of which 7 compared direct factor Xa inhibitors (XaIs) with conventional VTE prophylaxis and one study compared a direct thrombin inhibitor with conventional VTE prophylaxis.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Revman 5.3 (Nordic Cochrane Centre, Denmark) was used to complete the meta-analysis and generate forest plots.

CONCLUSIONS

XaIs were shown to have lower rates of deep vein thrombosis (Odds ratio 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.46-0.76; P < 0.0001) and less pharmacologically attributable adverse events (Odds ratio 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.46-0.82; P = 0.0007). There was difference between DOACs and conventional VTE prophylaxis regarding mortality, PE, symptomatic deep vein thrombosis, or bleeding events. The results generally support the use of DOACs for VTE prophylaxis after nonelective lower limb fracture surgery, such after hip fracture. The results more strongly support the use of XaIs; however, more evidence is needed to fully assess DOACs' role in clinical practice.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

[Comparison of hemostatic effect and safety in primary unilateral total hip arthroplasty receiving different anticoagulants after anti-fibrinolysis with tranexamic acid]

Objective

To compare the hemostatic effect and safety in primary unilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA) receiving nadroparin calcium, enoxaparin sodium, rivaroxaban, or apixaban after anti-fibrinolysis with tranexamic acid (TXA) and explore the best anticoagulant.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 184 patients who underwent the primary unilateral THA between January 2014 and December 2018, administrated 15 mg/kg TXA before surgery and received nadroparin calcium, enoxaparin sodium, rivaroxaban, or apixaban. The patients were divided into four groups based on the different anticoagulants: 46 patients received nadroparin calcium; 45 patients received enoxaparin sodium; 47 patients received rivaroxaban; the other 46 patients received apixaban. There was no significant difference in age, gender, body mass, body mass index, the types of hip joint diseases, complications, anesthesia mode, operation time, and preoperative laboratory indexes (hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelet, prothrombin time, activated partial prothrombin time, blood volume) ( P>0.05). Perioperative blood data (total blood loss, hidden blood loss, dominant blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, maximum loss of hemoglobin, and blood transfusion rate) and complications (incision, bleeding, and thrombosis) were recorded and compared between groups.

Results

There was no significant difference in total blood loss, hidden blood loss, dominant blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, maximum loss of hemoglobin, and blood transfusion rate between groups ( P>0.05). The comparison of postoperative complications showed that 1 case (2.1%) of redness and swelling of incision occurred in the rivaroxaban group, and 1 case (2.2%) of the other 3 groups each had poor incision healing. No incision infection, fat liquefaction, or other incision complications occurred in the 4 groups. There was no significant difference in incision complication between groups ( P>0.05). There were 2 cases (4.3%) bleeding events (1 case of right inguinal hematoma and 1 case of subcutaneous ecchymosis in front of left leg) in the nadroparin calcium group, while no bleeding event occurred in the other 3 groups, which had no significant difference in bleeding complication between groups ( χ ²=5.612, P=0.132). There was 1 case (2.2%) of intermuscular vein thrombosis of the lower extremity in the nadroparin calcium group and no case in the other 3 groups, which had no significant difference between groups ( χ ²=2.789, P=0.425). Neither deep venous thrombosis nor pulmonary embolism occurred in any group.

Conclusion

No significant difference in the hemostatic effect and incidences of complications for patients underwent primary unilateral THA receiving nadroparin calcium, enoxaparin sodium, rivaroxaban, or apixaban after anti-fibrinolysis with TXA. One of the four anticoagulants can be selected to prevent thrombosis after anti-fibrinolysis with TXA, which has certain safety.

Effect of 3 different anticoagulants on hidden blood loss during total hip arthroplasty after tranexamic acid

Comparison of different anticoagulants in blood management and complications with tranexamic acid (TXA) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is unclear. Our aim was to compare the efficacy and safety among receiving nadroparin calcium, enoxaparin sodium or rivaroxaban after TXA in THA.150 patients undergoing primary unilateral THA were received 15 mg/kg intravenous TXA (IV-TXA) before skin incision, followed by 1 of nadroparin calcium (Group A), enoxaparin sodium (Group B), or rivaroxaban (Group C) randomly during hospitalization. The primary outcome was hidden blood loss (HBL). Other outcomes such as the maximum hemoglobin (Hb) drop, total blood loss (TBL), the volume of drainage, transfusion rate, length of hospital stay (LOS), and complications were also compared.There were no statistically significant differences in HBL, the maximum hemoglobin (Hb) drop, transfusion rate, and complications among 3 groups. LOS was significantly higher for patients in Group B than Group A (P = .026). Neither deep venous thrombosis (DVT) nor pulmonary embolism (PE) occurred in any group.There were no differences in efficacy and safety in patients undergoing THA receiving nadroparin calcium, enoxaparin sodium, or rivaroxaban after anti-fibrinolysis with TXA.