Ring versus non-ring plate for the treatment of displaced scapular body fractures: a retrospective study with a mean follow-up of 5 years

Finite element analysis of titanium anatomic plate and titanium reconstructive plate for treatment of extra-articular fractures of the scapula

BACKGROUND

Due to the lack of postoperative reporting outcomes and bio-mechanical studies, an optimal management of scapular fractures has not been well-established in clinical treatment, even though there are many options available. This study aimed to compare the stability of the new titanium anatomic and traditional titanium reconstructive plates for extra-articular scapular fractures through finite element analysis.

METHODS

Two models of scapular assembly were constructed, including one anatomic plate (AP model) and one reconstructive plate (RP model). After meshing, material parameter, and boundary condition settings, we applied four loading conditions to simulate forces acting on the scapula and osteosynthesis material. To evaluate the bio-mechanical properties, the equivalent von Mises stress, equivalent elastic strain, and total deformation were investigated.

RESULT

The stress and strain distribution of model AP has better performance than model RP, with more uniform and lower values. The maximum stress value of the scapula in model AP is smaller than that of the scapula in model RP (102.83 MPa vs. 166.71 MPa). The maximum stress of the anatomic plate is half that of the reconstructive plate (218.34 MPa vs. 416.01 MPa). The maximum strain of the scapula in model AP is smaller than that of the scapula in model RP (0.0071 vs. 0.0106). The maximum strain of the anatomic plate is half that of the reconstructive plate (0.0019 vs. 0.0037). The maximum displacement of each model is all at the acromion, with a similar value (2.2947 mm vs. 1.8308 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

With sufficient bio-mechanical stability, the anatomic plate to support scapular fracture fragments was superior to that of the reconstructive plate.

A comparative analysis of titanium anatomic plate and titanium reconstructive plate for treatment of extra-articular fractures of the scapula (Miller types IIb, IIc, and IV)

BACKGROUND

Because of the irregular shape of the scapula and the different types of fractures, a standard internal fixation device is lacking in clinical practice, even though there are many options available. This study aimed to compare the therapeutic efficacy of titanium anatomic and reconstructive plates for extra-articular fractures of the scapula (Miller types IIb, IIc, and IV).

METHODS

A retrospective study of 41 patients who underwent treatment for extra-articular fractures of the scapula between March 2017 and March 2020 was conducted. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the fixation device: titanium anatomic plate group (20 patients) and titanium reconstructive plate group (21 patients). After follow-up for 12-18 months, the general characteristics, perioperative characteristics, postoperative follow-up findings, and imaging data of the 2 groups were compared.

RESULTS

The surgical procedures were uneventful in both groups. The anatomic plate group significantly outperformed the reconstructive plate group with respect to surgical duration and intraoperative blood loss (P < .001). At 3-month postoperative follow-up, the Constant-Murley score (P = .026), shoulder flexion range of motion, and shoulder abduction range of motion in the anatomic plate group were all significantly better than those in the reconstructive plate group (P < .001). The postoperative Western Ontario Shoulder Instability scores of the 2 groups were similar. Imaging showed functional recovery and stable and reliable fixation in both groups. Time to bone union was similar in both groups (9.10 ± 1.25 weeks in anatomic plate group and 9.24 ± 1.41 weeks in reconstructive plate group, P = .742). No complications occurred in any patient, such as fixation failure, instability, or bone nonunion.

CONCLUSION

Surgeons should favorably consider titanium anatomic plates for the treatment of extra-articular scapular fractures owing to their clear efficacy associated with a shorter surgical time, less intraoperative blood loss, better fixation, and rapid short-term functional recovery.

Functional Outcome of Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Displaced Extra-Articular Scapula Fractures

BACKGROUND

Scapular fractures are uncommon injuries of upper extremity resulting mostly from high-energy trauma. Extra-articular fractures form the majority of them. Un-displaced fractures can be managed conservatively with good results. But displaced fracture does not yield satisfactory results and needs surgical fixation. In this case series, we report our experience about such fractures.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 12 patients with displaced scapular body and neck fractures treated between 2015 and 2018. Scapular fractures were exposed by modified Judet approach and fixed with either 3.5 mm T buttress or recon locking plate and screws. One case had associated clavicle fracture which was fixed along with scapula. Patients were put on structured rehabilitation and followed up regularly. Functional outcome and range of motion were analyzed.

RESULTS

The patients included 10 males and two females. Mean age was 42 years. Average follow-up was 33 months. Average constant and Murley score was 80. Excellent results were seen in four patients, good results in seven patients and one patient has got fair result. The mean post-operative range of motion of the shoulder at the time of final follow-up was 140° of forward flexion, 136° of abduction, and 34° of external rotation.

CONCLUSION

Displaced extra-articular scapular fractures managed by internal fixation using T buttress locking plates and reconstruction plates give good functional outcome.