Renal cell carcinoma diagnosed during pregnancy: a case report and literature review

Diagnosis and Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma During Pregnancy

Renal cell carcinoma during pregnancy is extremely rare, but it is the commonest urological malignancy reported in pregnancy. Currently, no uniform domestic or international diagnostic or treatment criteria exist for these patients, so their diagnosis and treatment are challenging for urologists. The health and reproductive needs of these patients have improved in recent years because of the continuous development of medical technology. This article reviews the epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of renal cell carcinoma during pregnancy.

Management of renal tumors during pregnancy: case reports

BACKGROUND

Renal tumors during pregnancy are rare and the treatment requires evaluation of both the patient and the fetus. No consensus or guidelines has been proposed or verified in this field. We successfully managed three renal tumor cases during pregnancy and reviewed the relative literature.

CASE PRESENTATION

In the first renal cell carcinoma case diagnosed in the 21st week of pregnancy, laparoscopic retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy was performed in the 26th week of pregnancy. In the second renal cell carcinoma case diagnosed in the 3rd week of pregnancy, laparoscopic retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy was carried out after the abortion. In the third angiomyolipoma case who was diagnosed before pregnancy but received no treatment, we performed laparoscopic retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy during the 17th week of pregnancy due to the rapid enlargement of the tumor.

CONCLUSION

Although no consensus or guidelines for the management of renal tumors in pregnant patients has been proposed or verified, the general rules of kidney tumor management in non-pregnant patients and the guidelines for surgery in pregnancy could be referred to. Renal tumors found in pregnant patients require an individualized treatment regimen involving surgical timing, routes, techniques, and excision ranges, which should be decided by both the patients and the surgical teams.

Post-partum occurrence of Wunderlich syndrome and microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia (MAHA): a case report

This is a case of a 27-year-old primigravida with monochorionic diamniotic twin gestation who was admitted to the hospital for induction of labour. Her postpartum course was complicated by microangiopathic haemolytic anemia (MAHA). The etiology for the MAHA was initially thought to be secondary to pre-eclampsia and vitamin B12/folate deficiency. However, she had persistent anemia and further workup demonstrated that she had a left renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with perinephric haemorrhage consistent with Wunderlich syndrome. This case was intriguing because of its unusual presentation and the several diagnostic and therapeutic challenges along the way. Abbreviations: MAHA: microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia; RCC: renal cell carcinoma; BP: blood pressure; WS: Wunderlich syndrome; CT: computed tomography; LFTs: liver function tests; LDH: lactate dehydrogenase; HELLP: haemolysis elevated liver enzymes, low platelets; DIC: disseminated intravascular coagulation; PLASMIC: score for TTP - includes platelet count <30 x 109/L, evidence of haemolysis (reticulocyte count >2.5%, haptoglobin undetectable, or indirect bilirubin >2mg/dL), active cancer, history of solid organ transplant, mean corpuscular volume (MCV) <90fL, INR <1.5, creatinine <2mg/dL. Each item is sored as being present (YES) or not (NO). Absence of active cancer and solid organ transplant gets scored with a point each. The total points are added up to categorize the severity and risk of TTP. Low risk <4, Intermediate 5, high risk >6; TTP: thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura; APLA- anti-phophospholipid antibody; BMI: body mass index; TMAs: thrombotic microangiopathies; HUS: haemolytic uremic syndrome; vWF: von Willebrand factor.