Strategies in the clinical diagnosis and surgical treatment of OSAHS with multilevel obstruction

Assessing the contribution of mild high-altitude exposure to obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome comorbidities

Background

Obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) is a common sleep disorder. The lower atmospheric pressure and decreased oxygen levels of high-altitude areas can exacerbate the severity of OSAHS, but research into OSAHS in high-altitude areas remains limited. This study, from June 2015 to January 2020, involved 4,667 patients with suspected OSAHS and 38 healthy volunteers. The non-OSAHS group (AHI <5/h) had 395 patients, while the larger OSAHS group (AHI ≥5/h) comprised 4,272 patients. The significant size difference between the groups emphasized the study's focus on OSAHS, using the non-OSAHS mainly for comparison.

Methods

Sleep technicians monitored the OSAHS patient group overnight by polysomnography (PSG), the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), the mean oxygen saturation (MSpO2), lowest oxygen saturation (LSpO2), the oxygen desaturation index (ODI) and the total sleep time with oxygen saturation less than 90% (TST-SpO2 <90%). Healthy volunteers self-monitored sleep patterns at home, using the CONTEC RS01 respiration sleep monitor with a wristwatch sleep apnea screen meter. The RSO1 wristwatch-style device has already been studied for consistency and sensitivity with the Alice-6 standard multi-lead sleep monitor and can be used for OSAHS screening in this region.

Results

LSpO2 recordings from healthy volunteers (86.36 ± 3.57%) and non-OSAHS (AHI <5/h) cohort (78.59 ± 11.99%) were much lower than previously reported normal values. Regression analysis identified no correlations between AHI levels and MSpO2 or TST-SpO2 <90%, weak correlations between AHI levels and LSpO2 or MSpO2, and a strongly significant correlation between AHI levels and the ODI (r = 0.76, p < 0.05). The data also indicated that the appropriate clinical thresholds for OSAHS patients living at mild high altitude are classified as mild, moderate, or severe based on LSpO2 saturation criteria of 0.85-0.90, 0.65-0.84, or <0.65, respectively.

Conclusion

The study findings suggest that individuals with an AHI score below 5 in OSAHS, who reside in high-altitude areas, also require closer monitoring due to the elevated risk of nocturnal hypoxia. Furthermore, the significant correlation between ODI values and the severity of OSAHS emphasizes the importance of considering treatment options. Additionally, the assessment of hypoxemia severity thresholds in OSAHS patients living in high-altitude regions provides valuable insights for refining diagnostic guidelines.

Referral of adults with obstructive sleep apnea for surgical consultation: an American Academy of Sleep Medicine systematic review, meta-analysis, and GRADE assessment

INTRODUCTION

This systematic review provides supporting evidence for the accompanying clinical practice guideline on the referral of adults with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) for surgical consultation.

METHODS

The American Academy of Sleep Medicine commissioned a task force of experts in sleep medicine. A systematic review was conducted to identify studies that compared the use of upper airway sleep apnea surgery or bariatric surgery to no treatment as well as studies that reported on patient-important and physiologic outcomes pre- and postoperatively. Statistical analyses were performed to determine the clinical significance of using surgery to treat obstructive sleep apnea in adults. Finally, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) process was used to assess the evidence for making recommendations.

RESULTS

The literature search resulted in 274 studies that provided data suitable for statistical analyses. The analyses demonstrated that surgery as a rescue therapy results in a clinically significant reduction in excessive sleepiness, snoring, blood pressure (BP), apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), respiratory disturbance index (RDI), and oxygen desaturation index (ODI); an increase in lowest oxygen saturation (LSAT) and sleep quality; and an improvement in quality of life in adults with OSA who are intolerant or unaccepting of positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy. The analyses demonstrated that surgery as an adjunctive therapy results in a clinically significant reduction in optimal PAP pressure and improvement in PAP adherence in adults with OSA who are intolerant or unaccepting of PAP due to side effects associated with high pressure requirements. The analyses also demonstrated that surgery as an initial treatment results in a clinically significant reduction in AHI/RDI, sleepiness, snoring, BP, and ODI and an increase in LSAT in adults with OSA and major anatomical obstruction. Analysis of bariatric surgery data showed a clinically significant reduction in BP, AHI/RDI, sleepiness, snoring, optimal PAP level, BMI, and ODI and an increase in LSAT in adults with OSA and obesity. Analyses of very limited evidence suggested that upper airway surgery does not result in a clinically significant increase in risk of serious persistent adverse events and suggested that bariatric surgery may result in a clinically significant risk of iron malabsorption that may be managed with iron supplements. The task force provided a detailed summary of the evidence along with the quality of evidence, the balance of benefits and harms, patient values and preferences, and resource use considerations.

CITATION

Kent D, Stanley J, Aurora RN, et al. Referral of adults with obstructive sleep apnea for surgical consultation: an American Academy of Sleep Medicine systematic review, meta-analysis, and GRADE assessment. J Clin Sleep Med. 2021;17(12):2507-2531.

Effectiveness of drug-induced sleep endoscopy in improving outcomes of barbed pharyngoplasty for obstructive sleep apnea surgery: a prospective randomized trial

PURPOSE

To observe the effectiveness of preoperative drug-induced sleep endoscopy in improving surgical results of patients undergoing single-level barbed pharyngoplasty surgery for OSA, using a prospective randomized model.

METHODS

A single-center randomized controlled trial with two prospective arms was carried out to compare functional results in patients treated with barbed reposition pharyngoplasty (BRP) surgery without a preoperative drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) evaluation vs patients treated with BRP surgery performed after DISE evaluation of sites/patterns of collapse.

RESULTS

We compared 50 patients who underwent BRP without a preoperative DISE evaluation (Group A) and 42 patients (Group B) treated with BRP surgery but preoperatively selected by means of a preoperative DISE. In this second group of patients, after DISE evaluation, 70% of patients were selected for single-level BRP surgery because they showed an isolated velopharyngeal collapse at the DISE evaluation, without obstruction at other upper airway levels evaluated. Both groups of patients showed a statistically significant difference between preoperative and postoperative values of AHI, ODI, and LOS (p<0.05 in all cases). Comparing Group A and Group B patients, the therapeutic success rate was found to be 60% in patients treated without preoperative DISE evaluation and 83% in patients treated with preoperative DISE (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

DISE appears to improve the surgical results of single-level velopharyngeal surgery due to the possibility of excluding patients with obstruction of the base of the tongue, the hypopharynx, and the epiglottis/larynx.

Efficacy of Low-Temperature Plasma-Assisted Unilateral/Bilateral Tonsillectomy and Adenoidectomy in Children with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Hypopnea Syndrome

Background

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of low-temperature plasma-assisted bilateral or unilateral tonsillectomy (LTPABT or LTPAUT) and adenoidectomy in treatment of children with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS).

Material/Methods

The present observational cohort study included a total of 244 children with OSAHS during December 2017 to December 2018. The patients were divided into the LTPABT group, the LTPAUT group, and the control group that received traditional bilateral tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy. The apnea hypopnea index (AHI) and the lowest oxygen saturation (LSaO₂) were measured. The patients’ pain condition was determined using the Visual Analog Score (VAS) and intraoperative indices were collected. Patients’ quality of life was assessed by OSA-18 scale and patients’ immune function was determined.

Results

The postoperative VAS scores were remarkably lower in the LTPABT and LTPAUT groups. At 6 months after surgery, the AHI significantly had decreased and LSaO₂ levels were significantly enhanced for all groups, and the AHI was significantly lower and LSaO₂ was markedly higher in the LTPABT group. The ratio of patients with efficacy of cured and remarkably effective was remarkably higher in the LTPABT group. The rates of postoperative hemorrhage and infection were significantly lower in the LTPABT and LTPAUT groups, and 4 cases showed tonsillar hyperplasia. OSA-18 scores were lowest in the LTPABT group. No significant difference was found in levels of IgM, IgA and IgG, and T lymphocyte subtypes.

Conclusions

The low-temperature plasma-assisted bilateral tonsillectomy combined with adenoidectomy had the best efficacy. None of the surgery methods influenced the patients’ immune function.

MEntA Program Based on Motivational Interview to Improve Adherence to Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea With Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP): A Randomized Controlled Trial

Introduction

The first-line treatment for obstructive sleep apnoea is (OSA) continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy, which achieves a high level of efficacy with continuous use. However, daily application of this therapy requires a motivated patient profile, as lack of adherence is the main problem with this therapy. The aim of this study was to determine whether an educational and training program based on motivational interviewing and proper feedback, improved adherence.

Methods

A randomized, controlled, single-center trial design was performed. The interventions were standard of care vs MEntA Program based on motivational interview for adherence. The main outcome was the adherence with the CPAP therapy after 90 days of treatment. Secondary outcomes were the motivation, perceived competence, quality of life, sleepiness, emotional state, activities and social relations.

Results

For adherence, statistically significant results were obtained in favor of the interventional arm with the MEntA (p < 0.01), with a mean difference of 1.60 h (95% CI, 0.60 to 2.61). The Questionnaire of Evaluation of Perceived Competence in Adherence to CPAP in OSA show also a statistically significant change in favor of the MEntA intervention with a mean difference of 4.61 (95% CI, 3.49 to 5.72) (p < 0.001), as well as quality of life p < 0.001.

Conclusions

The MEntA intervention included as part of an educational and training program for patients with OSA with CPAP therapy shows solid results in terms of its efficacy.