1
|
Troisi N, Bertagna G, Tomei F, Adami D, Cioni R, Perrone O, Juszczak M, Berchiolli R. Long-term Outcome Comparison of 2 Techniques for Embolization of Splenic Artery Aneurysms. J Endovasc Ther 2024:15266028241255531. [PMID: 38813950 DOI: 10.1177/15266028241255531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of the study is to analyze our single-center experience in endovascular treatment of splenic artery aneurysms (SAAs) with transcatheter coil embolization, comparing long-term outcomes of packing and sandwich techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between January 2010 and December 2021, 28 patients with certain diagnosis of non-ruptured asymptomatic SAA were treated with 2 different embolization techniques (packing, n=10, and sandwich, n=18). Early outcomes assessed were technical success, overall mortality, mean hospital stay, post-embolization syndrome rate, and freedom from splenectomy rate. Estimated 5-year outcomes in terms of freedom from sac reperfusion, and freedom from reintervention were evaluated and compared between the 2 different embolization techniques. RESULTS The mean SAA diameter was 2.8±0.8 cm. Overall technical success rate was 100%. Intraoperative and 30-day mortality rates were 0 in both groups. One patient in the sandwich group required a postoperative splenectomy. The mean follow-up period was 58.3±44.5 months. Estimated overall 5-year survival was 86.7%. Five-year freedom from sac reperfusion was 100% in the sandwich group, and 85.7% in the packing group, with no difference between the 2 groups (p=0.131), whereas freedom from reintervention was 100% in the sandwich group, and 75% in the packing group with a statistically significant difference (p=0.049; log-rank=3.750). CONCLUSIONS Embolization of SAAs seemed to be safe and effective with 100% of technical success rate and good perioperative results. Both sandwich and packing techniques yielded promising results also in the long-term period. CLINICAL IMPACT Transcatheter coil embolization of splenic artery aneurysms seems to be a safe and effective procedure with a 100% technical success and satisfactory perioperative outcomes. Sandwich and packing techniques offer good results in the long-term period. Freedom from reintervention seems to be optimal and comparable between the 2 techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Troisi
- Vascular Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Giulia Bertagna
- Vascular Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Francesca Tomei
- Vascular Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Daniele Adami
- Vascular Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Roberto Cioni
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Orsola Perrone
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Maciej Juszczak
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Raffaella Berchiolli
- Vascular Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pratesi C, Esposito D, Martini R, Novali C, Zaninelli A, Annese AL, Baggi P, Bellosta R, Bianchini Massoni C, Bonardelli S, Carriero S, Cervelli R, Chisci E, Cioni R, Corvino F, DE Cobelli F, Fanelli F, Fargion AT, Femia M, Freyrie A, Gaggiano A, Gallitto E, Gennai S, Giampalma E, Giurazza F, Grego F, Guazzarotti G, Ierardi AM, Kahlberg AL, Mascia D, Mezzetto L, Michelagnoli S, Nardelli F, Niola R, Lenti M, Perrone O, Piacentino F, Piffaretti G, Pulli R, Puntel G, Puppini G, Rossato D, Rossi M, Silingardi R, Sirignano P, Squizzato F, Tipaldi MA, Venturini M, Veraldi GF, Vizzuso A, Allievi S, Attisani L, Fino G, Ghirardini F, Manzo P, Migliari M, Steidler S, Miele V, Taurino M, Orso M, Cariati M. Guidelines on the diagnosis, treatment and management of visceral and renal arteries aneurysms: a joint assessment by the Italian Societies of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (SICVE) and Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM). THE JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY 2024; 65:49-63. [PMID: 38037721 DOI: 10.23736/s0021-9509.23.12809-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2023]
Abstract
The objective of these Guidelines is to provide recommendations for the classification, indication, treatment and management of patients suffering from aneurysmal pathology of the visceral and renal arteries. The methodology applied was the GRADE-SIGN version, and followed the instructions of the AGREE quality of reporting checklist. Clinical questions, structured according to the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome) model, were formulated, and systematic literature reviews were carried out according to them. Selected articles were evaluated through specific methodological checklists. Considered Judgments were compiled for each clinical question in which the characteristics of the body of available evidence were evaluated in order to establish recommendations. Overall, 79 clinical practice recommendations were proposed. Indications for treatment and therapeutic options were discussed for each arterial district, as well as follow-up and medical management, in both candidate patients for conservative therapy and patients who underwent treatment. The recommendations provided by these guidelines simplify and improve decision-making processes and diagnostic-therapeutic pathways of patients with visceral and renal arteries aneurysms. Their widespread use is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Pratesi
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Davide Esposito
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy -
| | - Romeo Martini
- Department of Angiology, San Martino Hospital, Belluno, Italy
| | - Claudio Novali
- Department of Vascular Surgery, GVM Maria Pia Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Antonio L Annese
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Paolo Baggi
- Department of Vascular Surgery, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | - Raffaello Bellosta
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | | | | | - Serena Carriero
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Rosa Cervelli
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, A.O.U. Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Emiliano Chisci
- Department of Vascular Surgery, S. Giovanni di Dio Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Roberto Cioni
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, A.O.U. Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Fabio Corvino
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, AORN Cardarelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco DE Cobelli
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Fanelli
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Aaron T Fargion
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Marco Femia
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Freyrie
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Andrea Gaggiano
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Umberto I Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Enrico Gallitto
- Department of Vascular Surgery, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Stefano Gennai
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Baggiovara Hospital, Modena, Italy
| | - Emanuela Giampalma
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy
| | - Francesco Giurazza
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, AORN Cardarelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Franco Grego
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Giorgia Guazzarotti
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna M Ierardi
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Daniele Mascia
- Department of Vascular Surgery, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Mezzetto
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Floriana Nardelli
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Raffaella Niola
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, AORN Cardarelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Massimo Lenti
- Department of Vascular Surgery, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Orsola Perrone
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, A.O.U. Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Filippo Piacentino
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Circolo Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | | | - Raffaele Pulli
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Gino Puntel
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Puppini
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Denis Rossato
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Michele Rossi
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Marcello A Tipaldi
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Massimo Venturini
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Circolo Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Gian F Veraldi
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Antonio Vizzuso
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy
| | - Sara Allievi
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Luca Attisani
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Gianluigi Fino
- Department of Vascular Surgery, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | | | - Paola Manzo
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Umberto I Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Mattia Migliari
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Baggiovara Hospital, Modena, Italy
| | - Stephanie Steidler
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Vittorio Miele
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Maurizio Taurino
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Orso
- Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Umbria e delle Marche, Perugia, Italy
| | - Maurizio Cariati
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rinaldi LF, Brioschi C, Marone EM. Endovascular and Open Surgical Treatment of Ruptured Splenic Artery Aneurysms: A Case Report and a Systematic Literature Review. J Clin Med 2023; 12:6085. [PMID: 37763025 PMCID: PMC10531855 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12186085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Revised: 09/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ruptured splenic artery aneurysms (r-SAA), although rare, are burdened by high morbidity and mortality, even despite emergent surgical repair. It is suggested that endovascular treatment can achieve reduction in peri-operative death and complication rates, as in other vascular diseases, but evidence of such benefits is still lacking in this particular setting. We report a case of an r-SAA treated by trans-arterial embolization and then converted to open surgery for persistent bleeding, and we provide a systematic review of current results of open and endovascular repair of r-SAAs. MATERIALS AND METHODS A 50-year-old male presenting in shock for a giant r-SAA underwent emergent coil embolization and recovered hemodynamic stability. On the following day, he underwent laparotomy for evacuation of the huge intraperitoneal hematoma, but residual bleeding was noted from the splenic artery, which was ligated after coil removal, and a splenectomy was performed. A systematic literature review of the reported mortality and complications of r-SAA undergoing open (OSR) or endovascular (EVT) treatment was performed using the main search databases. All primary examples of research published since 1990 were included regardless of sample size. The main outcome measures were mortality and reinterventions. Secondary outcomes were post-operative complications. RESULTS We selected 129 studies reporting on 350 patients-185 treated with OSR and 165 with EVT. Hemodynamically unstable patients and ruptures during pregnancy were more frequently treated with open repair. Overall, there were 37 deaths (mortality: 10.6%)-24 in the OSR group and 13 in the EVTr group (mortality: 12.9% and 7.8% respectively, p-value: 0.84). There were 37 reinterventions after failed or complicated endovascular repair -6 treated with endovascular re-embolization and 31 with laparotomy and splenectomy (22.4%); there were 3 (1.6%) reinterventions after open repair. Overall complication rates were 7.3% in the EVT group (n: 12) and 4.2% in the OSR group (n: 7), and did not require reintervention. No significant differences in overall complications or in any specific complication rate were observed between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Current results of r-SAA treatment show equipoise terms of morbidity and mortality between open and endovascular repair; however, in case of hemodynamic instability and rupture during pregnancy, open surgery might still be safer. Moreover, endovascular repair is still burdened by a significantly higher rate of reinterventions, mostly with conversions to open surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Federico Rinaldi
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Integrated Surgical and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy
- Vascular Surgery, Ospedale Policlinico di Monza, 20900 Monza, Italy; (C.B.); (E.M.M.)
| | - Chiara Brioschi
- Vascular Surgery, Ospedale Policlinico di Monza, 20900 Monza, Italy; (C.B.); (E.M.M.)
| | - Enrico Maria Marone
- Vascular Surgery, Ospedale Policlinico di Monza, 20900 Monza, Italy; (C.B.); (E.M.M.)
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Clinical-Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|