1
|
Kamil R, McKenna E, Romeo P, Burke O, Zakusylo A, Andemichael A, Badalyan N, Stamos T, Shah A, Katt BM. The Role of External Fixation in the Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures. Cureus 2024; 16:e64346. [PMID: 39130948 PMCID: PMC11316601 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.64346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/10/2024] [Indexed: 08/13/2024] Open
Abstract
There are numerous internal fixation (IF) options available for distal radius fractures (DRFs). The choice of fixation method depends on factors such as fracture morphology, soft tissue integrity, the patient's clinical status, and the surgeon's training. While volar plate fixation has become the primary approach for addressing these fractures, alternative IF methods like K-wire fixation, fragment-specific fixation, and dorsal bridge plating continue to be effective. Despite the versatility of IF, there are certain clinical situations where prompt and conclusive management through open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is not suitable. These instances include the treatment of polytraumatized patients, individuals with compromised soft tissues, or those medically unstable to tolerate lengthy anesthesia. In such cases, proficiency in closed reduction and external fixation (EF) proves invaluable. Being able to identify these clinical scenarios and comprehend the efficacy and safety of EF in addressing DRFs is valuable for any surgeon handling such injuries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Kamil
- Orthopedic Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, USA
| | - Elise McKenna
- Orthopedic Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, USA
| | - Paul Romeo
- Orthopedic Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, USA
| | - Orett Burke
- Orthopedic Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, USA
| | - Anna Zakusylo
- Orthopedic Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, USA
| | - Aman Andemichael
- Orthopedic Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, USA
| | - Nicole Badalyan
- Orthopedic Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, USA
| | - Thomas Stamos
- Orthopedic Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, USA
| | - Ajul Shah
- Plastic Surgery, Center for Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery, Shrewsbury, USA
| | - Brian M Katt
- Orthopedic Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Biz C, Cerchiaro M, Belluzzi E, Bortolato E, Rossin A, Berizzi A, Ruggieri P. Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures with Bridging External Fixator with Optional Percutaneous K-Wires: What Are the Right Indications for Patient Age, Gender, Dominant Limb and Injury Pattern? J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12091532. [PMID: 36143316 PMCID: PMC9503670 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12091532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Revised: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the medium-term clinical and functional outcomes of patients with closed, displaced, and unstable, simple or complex, intra- and extra-articular distal radius fractures (DRFs) treated with a bridging external fixator (BEF) and optional K-wires (KWs). AO classification was used to differentiate the injuries radiographically. Clinical-functional outcomes were evaluated using the Patient-Rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation Score (PRWHE Score) and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand Score (QuickDASH). A total of 269 dorsally displaced fractures of 202 female (75%) and 67 male subjects (25%) were included, with a mean follow-up of 58.0 months. Seventy-five patients (28%) were treated by additional KWs. No differences were found comparing the two groups of patients (BEF vs. BEF + KWs) regarding age, sex, and fracture side (dominant vs. non-dominant). PRWHE and QuickDASH scores were lower in the BEF + KWs group compared to the BEF group (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0007, respectively). Thus, patients treated with KWs had a better clinical outcome. Beta multivariate regression analysis confirmed that patients of the BEF + KWs group exhibited a better PRWHE score but not a better QuickDASH score. Patients treated by the BEF + KWs with the fracture on the dominant site were characterised by better clinical outcomes. Older patients had a better PRWHE score independently from the treatment. Our findings suggest that the use of BEF for DRFs with optional KWs can be indicated in both young and elderly patients of any gender, independent of limb side and fracture pattern. As the best functional results were achieved in the elderly when KWs were added, the combination of BEF and KWs seems to be mainly indicated for the treatment of DRF, also complex, in the elderly population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Biz
- Orthopedics and Orthopedic Oncology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 3, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Mariachiara Cerchiaro
- Orthopedics and Orthopedic Oncology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 3, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Elisa Belluzzi
- Orthopedics and Orthopedic Oncology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 3, 35128 Padova, Italy
- Musculoskeletal Pathology and Oncology Laboratory, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 3, 35128 Padova, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-049-821-3348
| | - Elena Bortolato
- Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Padova, 35121 Padova, Italy
| | - Alessandro Rossin
- Orthopedics and Orthopedic Oncology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 3, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Antonio Berizzi
- Orthopedics and Orthopedic Oncology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 3, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Pietro Ruggieri
- Orthopedics and Orthopedic Oncology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 3, 35128 Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Effects and Anti-rotation Stabilization of the Non-bridging External Fixation for Pronation-Abduction Stage III Ankle Fracture: A Cadaveric Study. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2021; 2021:9966344. [PMID: 34046502 PMCID: PMC8128611 DOI: 10.1155/2021/9966344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2021] [Revised: 04/20/2021] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Objective This study is aimed at providing a nonbridging external fixation technique with pinning fixation for the pronation-abduction stage III ankle fracture. The secondary purpose was to evaluate its effect on anatomic reduction and fracture fragment stability against cadaveric models' rotation. Method A paired design study was conducted using 14 pairs of the cadaveric model which had been modeled for pronation-abduction stage III ankle fracture. One fracture model from each pair was randomly allocated to receive an open reduction and internal fixation, while the other was reduced and stabilized with the external fixation technique. After the surgery, the antirotational stability tests were performed with external rotation torques of 10 nm, 15 nm, and 20 nm applied, respectively. The postoperation reduction rate and ankle parameters were recorded in anteroposterior and lateral radiographs before and after the antirotational stability experiment. Result The outcomes were assessed according to Burwell-Charnley's radiographic criteria of reduction. It showed no statistically significant differences in reduction between the two groups (P < 0.05). The displacement of lateral fragment following a reduction in the external fixation group was significantly larger than that of the internal fixation group (3.14 ± 0.56 vs. 1.49 ± 0.39, P < 0.05). After applying rotational torques of 10 nm, 15 nm, and 20 nm, the results of other parameters showed no significant differences between the two groups. Conclusion This nonbridging external fixation method with pin fixation of fracture fragments might have the same effect as that of internal fixation on the reduction rate of pronation-abduction stage III ankle fracture.
Collapse
|