Do lung cancer patients require routine anticoagulation treatment? A meta-analysis

Prognostic Significance of Pretreatment Plasma D-dimer Levels in EGFR-Positive Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Osimertinib: A Multicentre Retrospective Study

Purpose

This study examined the association between plasma D-dimer levels and overall survival (OS) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with osimertinib.

Methods

In this multicenter study, 88 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) carrying epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and receiving osimertinib were enrolled. The target independent and dependent variables were the D-dimer levels before osimertinib treatment and OS time, respectively. The t-test or chi-square test was utilized to analyze the variances among various groups. The predictive significance of D-dimer for overall survival (OS) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the Cox proportional hazard regression model.

Results

The selected patients had an average age of 58.01±10.72 years, with females comprising 54.55%. Based on their D-dimer levels, the patients were categorized into three groups: low-level (< 0.6 mg/L), middle-level (0.6 ~ 2 mg/L), and high-level (≥ 2 mg/L). After accounting for possible confounding variables, the Cox proportional hazard model showed that increased D-dimer levels were linked to a greater likelihood of death (HR 2.28, 95% CI = 1.09 ~ 4.76, p = 0.029). Importantly, there was a significant trend indicating that as D-dimer levels rose, the risk of mortality also increased (p for trend, HR 1.15, 95% CI = 1.03 ~ 1.28, p = 0.012). Consistently comparable outcomes were noted in the majority of subcategories. Patients with low-middle and high D dimer levels had a median OS of 28.6 and 17 months, respectively (p =0.014).

Conclusion

In conclusion, elevated levels of D-dimer in the bloodstream were found to have a significant negative correlation with the overall survival (OS) of patients with EGFR-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent treatment with osimertinib.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for Ultra-Central lung Tumors: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis and International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society practice guidelines

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an effective and safe modality for early-stage lung cancer and lung metastases. However, tumors in an ultra-central location pose unique safety considerations. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the current safety and efficacy data and provide practice recommendations on behalf of the International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS).

METHODS

We performed a systematic review using PubMed and EMBASE databases of patients with ultra-central lung tumors treated with SBRT. Studies reporting local control (LC) and/or toxicity were included. Studies with <5 treated lesions, non-English language, re-irradiation, nodal tumors, or mixed outcomes in which ultra-central tumors could not be discerned were excluded. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed for studies reporting relevant endpoints. Meta-regression was conducted to determine the effect of various covariates on the primary outcomes.

RESULTS

602 unique studies were identified of which 27 (one prospective observational, the remainder retrospective) were included, representing 1183 treated targets. All studies defined ultra-central as the planning target volume (PTV) overlapping the proximal bronchial tree (PBT). The most common dose fractionations were 50 Gy/5, 60 Gy/8, and 60 Gy/12 fractions. The pooled 1- and 2-year LC estimates were 92 % and 89 %, respectively. Meta-regression identified biological effective dose (BED10) as a significant predictor of 1-year LC. A total of 109 grade 3-4 toxicity events, with a pooled incidence of 6 %, were reported, most commonly pneumonitis. There were 73 treatment related deaths, with a pooled incidence of 4 %, with the most common being hemoptysis. Anticoagulation, interstitial lung disease, endobronchial tumor, and concomitant targeted therapies were observed risk factors for fatal toxicity events.

CONCLUSION

SBRT for ultra-central lung tumors results in acceptable rates of local control, albeit with risks of severe toxicity. Caution should be taken for appropriate patient selection, consideration of concomitant therapies, and radiotherapy plan design.

Cerebral Microinfarcts Are Common in Undiagnosed Lung Cancer Patients: A Population-Based Study

Background. Cerebral microinfarcts (CMI) represent covert brain ischemia and were associated with stroke risk and cognitive impairment. Magnetic resonance imaging diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) hyperintensities have been suggested to represent acute CMI. The relationship between malignancy and CMI is unknown. Aims. We aimed to examine whether CMI is more common in patients with undiagnosed lung cancer, and therefore might serve as a prediction marker for cognitive impairment or cancer-related stroke. Methods. We used the computerized database of Clalit Health Services (the largest healthcare provider in Israel) to identify adults diagnosed with lung cancer who had an MRI brain scan for any indication prior to cancer diagnosis. We analyzed DWI sequences, in order to evaluate CMI incidence in this population, and compared it to control groups of patients with other undiagnosed malignancies and patients without known cancer. Results. Altogether, we reviewed 1822 MRI brain scans, of which 497 scans were taken in patients with undiagnosed lung cancer, 543 scans of noncancer patients, and 793 scans of patients with other undiagnosed malignancies. In the lung cancer group, we found 24 CMI, compared with 4 in the noncancer group ( $p=0.04$ ) and 8 in the other cancer group ( $p=0.07$ ). Conclusions. CMI is common in undiagnosed lung cancer patients compare to other undiagnosed cancer types or noncancer patients. At the time of lung cancer diagnosis patients may be at risk for future stroke or cognitive decline.

Small cell lung cancer: circulating tumor cell lines and expression of mediators of angiogenesis and coagulation

Aim

Coagulation is frequently activated in cancer patients and has been correlated with an unfavorable prognosis. To evaluate whether a putative release of tissue factor (TF) by circulating tumor cells (CTCs) represents a target to impair the dissemination of small cell lung cancer (SCLC), the expression of relevant proteins in a panel of permanent SCLC and SCLC CTC cell lines that have been established at the Medical University of Vienna.

Methods

Five CTC and SCLC lines were analyzed using a TF enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) tests, RNA sequencing, and western blot arrays covering 55 angiogenic mediators. Furthermore, the influence of topotecan and epirubicin as well as hypoxia-like conditions on the expression of these mediators was investigated.

Results

The results demonstrate that the SCLC CTC cell lines express no significant amounts of active TF but thrombospondin-1 (TSP-1), urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR), vascular endothelial-derived growth factor (VEGF) and angiopoietin-2 in two cases. The major difference between the SCLC and SCLC CTC cell lines found was the loss of the expression of angiogenin in the blood-derived CTC lines. Topotecan and epirubicin decreased the expression of VEGF, whereas hypoxia-like conditions upregulated VEGF.

Conclusions

Active TF capable of triggering coagulation seems not to be expressed in SCLC CTC cell lines in significant levels and, thus, CTC-derived TF seems dispensable for dissemination. Nevertheless, all CTC lines form large spheroids, termed tumorospheres, which may become trapped in clots of the microvasculature and extravasate in this supportive microenvironment. The contribution of clotting to the protection and dissemination of CTCs in SCLC may be different from other solid tumors such as breast cancer.

Coagulation parameters in lung cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Hypercoagulability in lung cancer patients is associated with a high incidence of mortality and morbidity in the world. Therefore, this meta‐analysis aimed to explore the correlation of the basic coagulation abnormalities in lung cancer patients compared with the control.

Method

PubMed, Scopus, and other sources were employed to identify eligible studies. The outcome variable was expressed using mean ± standard deviation (SD). Heterogeneity among studies and publication bias were evaluated. The quality of included studies was also assessed based on Newcastle–Ottawa Scale checklist.

Result

Finally, through a total of eight studies, prolonged prothrombin time (PT; standard mean difference [SMD]: 1.29; 95% CI: 0.47–2.11), plasma D‐dimer value (SMD 3.10; 95% CI 2.08–4.12), fibrinogen (SMD 2.18; 95% CI:1.30–3.06), and platelet (PLT) count (SMD 1.00; 95% CI 0.84–1.16) were significantly higher in lung cancer patients when compared with the control group. The single‐arm meta‐analysis also showed that compared with control, lung cancer patients had high pooled PT 13.7 (95% CI:12.2–15.58) versus 11.79 (95% CI = 10.56–13.02), high D‐dimer 275.99 (95% CI:172.9–11735.9) versus 0.2 (95% CI:0.20–0.37), high plasma fibrinogen 5.50 (95% CI:4.21–6.79) versus 2.5 (95% CI:2.04–2.91), and high PLT count 342.3 (95% CI:236.1–448.5) versus 206.6 (95% CI:176.4–236.7).

Conclusion

In conclusion, almost all the coagulation abnormalities were closely associated with lung cancer, and hence coagulation indexes provide an urgent clue for early diagnosis and timely management.

Advances in the Prediction and Risk Assessment of Lung Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism

According to the most recent data from the National Cancer Center, venous thromboembolism (VTE) has unsurprisingly become one of the most common complications in lung cancer. VTE not only interferes with the equilibrium of the clotting system but it also affects tumor progression and prognosis. For the identification of high-risk patients, many clinical risk assessment models have been developed and validated based on the risk factors found in previous studies. In this review, we will summarize advances in prediction and risk assessment of VTE, with a focus on early diagnosis and therapy, reduction of mortality, and the burden of medical costs in lung cancer patients.

Risk of arterial and venous thromboembolic events among patients with colorectal carcinoma: a real-world, population-based study

Objective: To assess real-world patterns of arterial and venous thromboembolism among patients with colorectal carcinoma. Methods: The Alberta provincial cancer registry and other provincial medical records were used to identify patients with colorectal cancer (2004-2018) with no preceding or succeeding cancer diagnosis. The incidence of both arterial and venous thromboembolism in this patient population as well as factors associated with these thromboembolic events were examined through logistic regression analysis. Results: A total of 17,296 patients were found eligible and were included into the current study. We observed that 1564 patients (9%) experienced a thromboembolic event and 15,732 patients (91%) did not. The following factors were associated with any thromboembolic event: male sex (odds ratio [OR]: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.08-1.34), higher comorbidity (OR: 1.36; 95% CI: 1.31-1.41), metastatic disease (OR for nonmetastatic vs metastatic disease: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.47-0.60), living within North zone (OR for Edmonton zone vs North zone: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.59-0.84), treatment with fluoropyrimidines (OR for no fluoropyrimidines vs fluoropyrimidines: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.47-0.60) and treatment with bevacizumab (OR: for no bevacizumab vs bevacizumab: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.47-0.60). Factors associated with venous thromboembolism include, younger age (continuous OR with increasing age: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.98-0.99), higher comorbidity (OR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.04-1.17), metastatic disease (OR for nonmetastatic disease vs metastatic disease: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.35-0.47), North zone (OR for Edmonton zone vs North zone: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.56-0.86), treatment with fluoropyrimidines (OR for no fluoropyrimidines vs fluoropyrimidines: 0.45; 95% CI: 0.39-0.53) and treatment with bevacizumab (OR for no bevacizumab vs bevacizumab: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.58-0.93). Conclusion: Thromboembolic events are not uncommon among colorectal cancer patients, and the risk is increased with male sex, higher comorbidity, presence of metastatic disease, living within the North zone of the province (where there is limited access to tertiary care centers) and treatment with fluoropyrimidines or bevacizumab.

Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: A Clinical Scoping Review of the Risk Assessment Models Across Solid Tumours and Haematological Malignancies

Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) is a leading cause of death in cancer patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy. The latest guidelines emphasize stratifying the patients in terms of CAT risks periodically. Multiple risk assessment models (RAMs) were developed to classify patients and guide thromboprophylaxis to high-risk patients. This study aimed to discuss and highlight different RAMs across various malignancy types with their related advantages and disadvantages. A scoping review was conducted using predefined search terms in three scientific databases, including Google Scholar, Science Direct, and PubMed. The search for studies was restricted to original research articles that reported risk assessment models published in the last thirteen years (between 2008 and 2021) to cover the most recently published evidence following the development of the principal risk assessment score in 2008. Data charting of the relevant trials, scores, advantages, and disadvantages were done iteratively considering the malignancy type. Of the initially identified 1115 studies, 39 studies with over 67,680 patients were included in the review. In solid organ malignancy, nine risk assessment scores were generated. The first and most known Khorana risk score still offers the best available risk assessment model when used for high-risk populations with a threshold of 2 and above. However, KRS has a limitation of failure to stratify low-risk patients. The COMPASS-CAT score showed the best performance in the lung carcinoma patients who have a higher prevalence of thrombosis than other malignancy subtypes. In testicular germ cell tumours, Bezan et al RAM is a validated good discriminatory RAM for this malignancy subtype. CAT in haematological malignancy seems to be under-investigated and has multiple disease-related, and treatment-related confounding factors. AL-Ani et al score performed efficiently in acute leukemia. In multiple myeloma, both SAVED and IMPEDED VTE scores showed good performance. Despite the availability of different disease-specific scores in lymphoma-related thrombosis, the standard of care needs to be redefined.