Cross-sectional study of drug utilisation in a Chinese neonatal unit

Quality assessment of paediatric randomized controlled trials published in China from 1999 to 2022: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are usually the basis of evidence-based medicine, but whether the results of RCTs can be correctly translated into clinical practice depends on the quality of the literature reported. In this study, we evaluated the general characteristics and quality of paediatric RCTs published in China to provide evidence for the reporting of paediatric RCTs and their application in clinical practice.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional observational study of paediatric RCTs published in paediatric journals in China between January 1, 1999, and December 30, 2022. All RCTs that included children (younger than 18 years old) were retrieved, and the general characteristics of the RCTs were extracted and analysed. The quality of the RCTs was assessed by the Cochrane quality assessment protocol.

RESULTS

After screening 20 available paediatric journals, 3545 RCTs were included for analysis. The average annual growth rate of the number of published paediatric RCTs from 1999 to 2022 was 7.8% (P = 0.005, R2 = 0.311). Most of the studies were carried out in East China [1148 (32.4%]; the centres of the RCTs were mainly single-centre [3453 (97.4%], and the interventions were mainly medication [2442 (68.9%)]. Comparing RCTs published in 2017-2022 with RCTs published in 1999-2004, the quality of RCTs significantly improved in terms of random sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding participants and personnel, incomplete outcome data and selective outcome reporting. RCTs published in multiple centres from the Chinese Science Citation Database were identified, and the approval of the ethics committee was of better quality for all the analysed risk of bias items.

CONCLUSION

The number and quality of paediatric RCTs reported in China have improved in recent years, but the overall quality was relatively low. Special attention should be given to allocation concealment and blinding outcome assessment, and dropouts, adverse effects and sample size calculations should be reported. Promoting government policies, strengthening the standardization of journal publishing and advancing the registration of clinical trials are feasible measures.

Pattern of hospital antibiotic use in term neonates using WHO Access, Watch and Reserve Classification (AWaRe)

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Pakistan has high neonatal mortality rate and antibiotic utilization data in hospitalized term neonates from Pakistan is lacking. The study aimed to determine the pattern of hospital antibiotic use in term neonates using World Health Organization (WHO) Access, Watch, and Reserve classification (AWaRe).

METHODS

This cross-sectional chart review study was conducted at the neonatal unit of Pediatric Medicine Department of University Hospital over a period of one year from 1^st January 2020 to 31^st December 2020. Hospitalized full term newborns up to 28-days of life, of either gender were consecutively included in the study. Data on demographic characteristics, admission diagnoses and antibiotic prescribed (class, agent and duration) were extracted from clinical charts. Descriptive statistics in the form of mean ± SD and frequency and percentages were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 2276 term neonates consisting of 69% (n=1570) males were included in the study. Antibiotic prescription rate was 92.8%. Most common reason for admission was birth asphyxia (36.1%) followed by sepsis (33%). Most commonly prescribed antibiotic Ampicillin (84%) belonged to Access group of WHO - AWaRe classification. More than 97% of prescriptions were two or more antimicrobial combinations belonging to Watch group. Ampicillin and Cefoperazone was the most commonly prescribed (42.8%) two drug combination. Meropenem and vancomycin was prescribed to 20% of the neonates - mostly for sepsis and pneumonia. Mortality rate was 7.7% in current study.

CONCLUSION

High antibiotic prescription rate particularly from Watch-group is demonstrated in this study. There is high need of antimicrobial stewardship program in neonatal units.

Review of Drug Utilization Studies in Neonatal Units: A Global Perspective

Rational prescribing is challenging in neonatology. Drug utilization studies help identify and define the problem. We performed a review of the literature on drug use in neonatal units and describe global variations. We searched databases (EMBASE, CINAHL and Medline) from inception to July 2020, screened studies and extracted relevant data (two reviewers). The search revealed 573 studies of which 84 were included. India (n = 14) and the USA (n = 13) reported the most. Data collection was prospective (n = 56) and retrospective (n = 26), mostly (n = 52) from one center only. Sixty studies described general drug use in 34 to 450,386 infants (median (IQR) 190 (91-767)) over a median (IQR) of 6 (3-18) months. Of the participants, 20-87% were preterm. The mean number of drugs per infant (range 11.1 to 1.7, pooled mean (SD) 4 (2.4)) was high with some reporting very high burden (≥30 drugs per infant in 8 studies). This was not associated with the proportion of preterm infants included. Antibiotics were the most frequently used drug. Drug use patterns were generally uniform with some variation in antibiotic use and more use of phenobarbitone in Asia. This study provides a global perspective on drug utilization in neonates and highlights the need for better quality information to assess rational prescribing.