Diagnostic value of serum pepsinogen I, pepsinogen II, and gastrin-17 levels for population-based screening for early-stage gastric cancer

The role of gastrin 17 and pepsinogen I:pepsinogen II ratio in pathological diagnosis and endoscopic selection in gastritis patients

BACKGROUND

The noninvasive serum markers pepsinogen I (PGI), pepsinogen II (PGII), gastrin-17 (G17), and PGI:PGII ratio (PGR) have recently been proposed as a new tool for predicting various gastric pathologies.

METHODS

A total of 83 gastritis patients confirmed by gastroscopy were enrolled, with 78 undergoing concurrent colonoscopies. The control group included 99 healthy subjects. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to detect PGI, PGII, G17, and PGR. The performance of serological analysis for detecting gastritis pathology was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

The G17 and PGII levels increased significantly (P < .001), whereas PGR levels decreased (P = .001) in the gastritis group. The ROC analysis revealed that PGR had a sensitivity and specificity of 70.83% and 86.67%, respectively, in predicting Helicobacter pylori-infected gastritis and a sensitivity and specificity of 88% and 65.52%, respectively, in predicting active gastritis. The G17 levels were significantly elevated in gastritis patients undergoing concurrent colonoscopies (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Pepsinogen I:pepsinogen II ratio was found to be a useful predictor of active gastritis and H pylori-infected gastritis. Furthermore, G17 was found to be closely related to pathological conditions found by colonoscopy and may provide recommendations for whether gastritis patients should undergo a concurrent colonoscopy.

PG I and PG II show unique value in diagnosing postoperative biochemical recurrence in patients with gastric cancer after total gastrectomy

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the potential of group I pepsinogen (PG I) and group II pepsinogen (PG II) as diagnostic markers for recurrence in gastric cancer (GC) patients post-total gastrectomy.

METHODS

Ninety-six patients who underwent total gastrectomy for GC between June 2022 and June 2023 were included in this study. Clinical data, serum samples, and ascites samples were collected. Patients were categorized based on recurrence status at the time of sample collection and the primary tumor site. PG I and PG II levels were determined using a chemiluminescent immunoassay, and their clinical utility following total gastrectomy for GC was evaluated via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

This study included 96 GC patients who underwent total gastrectomy, 55 of whom experienced postoperative recurrence (57.29%). The levels of serum PG I (27.86 (27.04, 30.97) vs. 26.05 (24.16, 27.09) ng/mL; P < 0.0001) and PG II (1.95 (1.23, 3.05) vs. 0.63 (0.47, 0.90) ng/mL; P < 0.0001) were significantly greater in the recurrent group compared to the non-recurrent group. The secretion of PG I and/or PG II by metastatic cancer cells correlated with the primary lesion site. When the cut-off value for serum PG I was 26.93 ng/mL, the area under the curve (AUC) for PG I was 0.77. When the cut-off value for serum PG II was 0.96 ng/mL, the AUC reached 0.90. The combined AUC was 0.97.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that serum PG I and PG II are valuable biomarkers for identifying GC patients with biochemical recurrence post-total gastrectomy.

Redox probe-free electrochemical immunosensor utilizing electropolymerized melamine on reduced graphene oxide for the point-of-care diagnosis of gastric cancer

Pepsinogen I (PG I) is a biomarker that plays a crucial role in the diagnosis of gastric cancer. The development of biosensor to monitor PG I overexpression in serum is crucial for early gastric cancer diagnosis, offering a less invasive alternative to the costly and uncomfortable gastroscopy procedure. This study presents a cost-efficient, scalable and disposable label-free biosensing strategy for detecting PG I, utilizing a redox-active polymelamine electrodeposited on a reduced graphene oxide screen-printed electrode surface (PM-rGO/SPE). Under optimized conditions, the conducting polymer PM was deposited on the rGO/SPE via a potentiodynamic method. The structural and morphological features of PM-rGO/SPE were analyzed with the assistance of Raman and Scanning Electron Microscopy analysis. Specific monoclonal anti-PG I antibodies were immobilized on the in situ prepared redox-active layer via EDC/NHS chemistry to develop a novel electrochemical immunosensor. Unlike the traditional immunosensing strategies which utilizes external redox probe solution for measuring the signal, the developed configuration allowed for redox-probe free monitoring of current changes of the redox active PM resulting from the formation of the immunocomplex on the electrode surface. Utilizing this method, PG I detection spanned a clinically relevant concentration range of 0.01-200 ng/mL, with a low limit of detection at 9.1 pg/mL. The electrochemical immunosensor demonstrated specificity against other biomarkers such as PDCD1, ErBb2, and CD28 with negligible interference. The immunosensor exhibited excellent recovery capabilities for PG I detection in serum samples. These findings underscore the potential of the PM-rGO/SPE immunosensor as a point-of-care diagnostic tool for gastric cancer.

Analysis of gastrin-17 and its related influencing factors in physical examination results

BACKGROUND

To analyze the difference of serum gastrin-17 (G17) level in healthy people with different sex, age, and body mass index (BMI), to explore the correlation between G17 and pepsinogen, and to study the influences of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection and various inflammatory factors on G17 secretion level.

METHODS

A total of 531 subjects who received physical examination in our center from April 2019 to December 2019 were enrolled in the study. All subjects were tested for G17, pepsinogen I (PGI), pepsinogen II (PGII), PGI/PGII ratio (PGR), H. pylori, serum amyloid A (SAA), C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). The difference of G17 secretion in different subjects and its correlation with PG were analyzed to investigate H. pylori infection and expound the effects of inflammatory indicators on G17.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in G17 secretion level in people with different sex, age and BMI (p > .05). G17 positively correlated with PGI and PGII, but negatively correlated with PGR. The G17 level of H. pylori-positive subjects was 10.16 ± 12.84, and prominently higher than that of H. pylori-negative subjects (3.27 ± 6.65). SAA and H. pylori infection were the greater risk factors for G17 abnormality among various indicators. CRP and ESR had no effect on G17 abnormality.

CONCLUSIONS

G17 secretion is closely related to PG and H. pylori. Combined screening contributes to early screening of gastrointestinal diseases in normal people or groups at high risk for gastric cancer, but the influence of inflammatory indicators on G17 should be excluded to improve the reliability of the results.

Clinical value of serum pepsinogen in the diagnosis and treatment of gastric diseases

Pepsinogen, secreted from the gastric mucosa, is the precursor of pepsin. It is categorized as pepsinogen 1 and pepsinogen 2 based on its immunogenicity. The pepsinogen content that can enter the blood circulation through the capillaries of the gastric mucosa is approximately 1% and remains stable all the time. The pepsinogen content in serum will change with the pathological changes of gastric mucosa. Therefore, the level of pepsinogen in serum can play a role in serologic biopsy to reflect the function and morphology of different regions of gastric mucosa and serve as an indicator of gastric disease. This study conducts relevant research on serum pepsinogen 1, pepsinogen 2, and the ratio of pepsinogen 1 to pepsinogen 2, and reviews their important value in clinical diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection, gastric ulcer, and even gastric carcinoma, providing ideas for other researchers.

Cancer risk stratification system and classification of gastritis: Perspectives

Kyoto global consensus reports that the current ICD-10 classification for gastritis is obsolete. The Kyoto classification of gastritis states that severe mucosal atrophy has a high risk of gastric cancer, while mild to moderate atrophy has a low risk. The updated Kimura-Takemoto classification of atrophic gastritis considers five histological types of multifocal corpus atrophic gastritis according to stages C2 to O3. This method of morphological diagnosis of atrophic gastritis increases sensitivity by 2.4 times for severe atrophy compared to the updated Sydney system. This advantage should be considered when stratifying the high risk of gastric cancer. The updated Kimura-Takemoto classification of atrophic gastritis should be used as a reference standard (gold standard) in studies of morpho-functional relationships to identify serological markers of atrophic gastritis with evidence-based effectiveness. The use of artificial intelligence in the serological screening of atrophic gastritis makes it possible to screen a large number of the population. During serological screening of atrophic gastritis and risk stratification of gastric cancer, it is advisable to use the Kyoto classification of gastritis with updated Kimura-Takemoto classification of atrophic gastritis.

The relationship of serum gastrin-17 and oral mucositis in head and neck carcinoma patients receiving radiotherapy

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship of serum gastrin-17 (G-17) and oral mucositis in head and neck carcinoma (HNC) patients receiving radiotherapy.

METHODS

Serum G-17 were detected in patients before and after radiotherapy. Patients were divided into high G-17 group (baseline serum G-17 ≥ 5pmol/L) and low G-17 group (baseline serum G-17 < 5pmol/L). The severity of oral mucositis was analyzed between the two groups. Other complications such as dysphagia, salivary gland, mandible, thyroid function, larynx, pain, and weight loss were also investigated.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients were analyzed in this study. The level of serum G-17 had a significant decrease after radiotherapy (7.29 ± 5.70pmol/L versus 4.93 ± 4.46pmol/L, P = 0.038). In low serum G-17 group, the incidences of grade 0, 1-2 and 3-4 of oral mucositis were 0%, 30.4%, and 69.6%, respectively. In high serum G-17 group, the incidences of grade 0, 1-2 and 3-4 of oral mucositis were 0%, 63.2%, and 36.8%, respectively. Pearson correlation analysis showed that serum G-17 was negatively correlated with oral mucositis (r=-0.595, P < 0.01). Weight loss of low G-17 group was more serious than that of high G-17 group.

CONCLUSION

Serum G-17 has a close relationship with oral mucositis. Baseline serum G-17 may be a potential predictor for the severity of oral mucositis in HNC patients receiving radiotherapy.

Value of serum G-17, PGⅠ, PGⅡ, Hp-IgG in the screening of gastric cancer and precancerous lesions and its relationship with the depth of tumor invasion

BACKGROUND

Screening for gastric cancer is an effective method for early diagnosis of gastric cancer. Studies at home and abroad have found significant differences in serum gastrin-17, pepsinogen Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) IgG (Hp-IgG) antibody levels between patients with gastric cancer and precancerous lesions. It is speculated that screening can be used in the diagnosis and evaluation of gastric cancer.

AIM

To explore the screening of gastric cancer and precancerous lesions by serum gastrin-17 (G-17), pepsinogen (PG) I, PG II, Hp-IgG antibody levels value and its relationship with the depth of tumor invasion.

METHODS

From August 2019 to March 2021, 90 patients with gastric cancer in our hospital were selected as the research group, 90 patients with gastric precancerous lesions during the same period were selected as the control group A, and 90 healthy subjects were selected as the control group B. Compare 3 groups of general information, serum G-17, PG Ⅰ, PG Ⅱ levels, Hp-IgG positive rate, compare serum G-17, PG Ⅰ, PG Ⅱ levels of Hp-IgG positive and negative patients, and analyze serum G-17, PG Ⅰ, PG Ⅱ The relationship between the level and Hp-IgG positive, analyze the value of each index in the diagnosis of gastric cancer and the relationship with the depth of gastric cancer tumor invasion.

RESULTS

Serum G-17, PGII levels and Hp-IgG positive rate in the study group were all > control group A > control group B, serum PG Ⅰ level < control group A < control group B (P < 0.05); the serum G-17 and PGⅡ levels of Hp-IgG positive patients in the study group Both were higher than in negative patients, and serum PG Ⅰ levels were lower than in negative patients (P < 0.05); serum G-17 and PG Ⅱ levels were positively correlated with Hp-IgG positive, and serum PG Ⅰ was negatively correlated with Hp-IgG positive (P < 0.05); The area under curve (AUC) of serum G-17, PG Ⅰ, PG Ⅱ, and Hp-IgG positive diagnosis of gastric cancer were 0.828, 0.845, 0.821, 0.650, respectively. The combined diagnosis of each index had the largest AUC, which was 0.887. The best diagnostic sensitivity and specificity The levels were 80.03% and 84.46%, respectively; serum G-17, PG Ⅱ levels, and Hp-IgG positive rates gradually increased with the increase of gastric cancer tumor invasion depth, and serum PG Ⅰ levels gradually decreased with the increase of gastric cancer tumor invasion depth (P < 0.05); The depth of gastric cancer tumor invasion was positively correlated with serum G-17, PG Ⅱ, Hp-IgG positive, and negatively correlated with serum PG Ⅰ (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Serum levels of G-17, PG Ⅰ, PG Ⅱ, and Hp-IgG have certain diagnostic value in the screening of gastric cancer and precancerous lesions, and are closely related to the depth of gastric cancer tumor invasion.

Serum Assay Findings after Successful Helicobacter pylori Eradication

Serum pepsinogen (PG), anti-Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) immunoglobulin G (IgG), and gastrin-17 (G-17) are plasma biomarkers for gastritis. H. pylori serology titers and PG levels increase during active H. pylori infection; moreover, elevated PG II levels indicate a high risk for diffuse-type gastric cancer in East Asian populations. Serum PG I/II ratios and PG I levels decrease with the progression of gastric corpus atrophy; thus, a combination of serum PG I levels ≤70 ng/mL and a PG I/II ratio ≤3 (serologic atrophy) indicates a high risk of intestinal-type gastric cancer. Serum G-17 is often not used as an indicator in H. pylori-seroprevalent populations because it is usually elevated in subjects with H. pylori infections. When H. pylori is eradicated, most patients show a rapid decrease in serum PG II levels and anti-H. pylori IgG titers within a few months. Seroreversion is required for several months to years after regression of H. pylori. Moreover, seroreversion may not always be achieved in all eradicated cases. The serum PG I/II ratio starts to increase after eradication; therefore, serologic atrophy improves accordingly, unless severe atrophy is present. Thus, some eradicated patients may show normal serum assay findings but have a higher risk for developing gastric cancer than H. pylori-naive subjects. Furthermore, serum PG levels decrease after gastrectomy and increase with the intake of certain drugs (e.g., aspirin or acid suppressants) or in renal failure patients. Due to such wide variations, serum assays are inadequate for the confirmation of H. pylori eradication. It is useful when interpreted with gastroscopy and other H. pylori test findings.

Screening and surveillance for gastric cancer: Does family history play an important role in shaping our strategy?

Family history is an important risk factor of gastric cancer. No guidelines have been developed that target gastric cancer with a family history; only hereditary familial gastric cancer is targeted. We review the available evidence regarding the familial aggregation mechanisms of gastric cancer and a strategy of screening and surveillance for gastric cancer in individuals with a positive family history of the disease. As there is a synergic effect of Helicobacter pylori infection and family history on the increased risk of gastric cancer, Helicobacter pylori eradication should be considered in all infected individuals with a family history of gastric cancer. Currently, there is weak evidence indicating that suitable timing to initiate eradication therapy is at the age of 20, when precancerous lesions, including significant gastric atrophy and intestinal metaplasia, have not been established. Reasonable timing to initiate screening for gastric cancer in individuals with a family history of gastric cancer is 10 years prior to the age of onset of gastric cancer in affected relatives. A 2-year surveillance interval, instead of the 3-year interval recommended in the present guidelines, may be better to detect early gastric cancer in those individuals who have already developed precancerous gastric lesions.

Gastrin-17 Combined with CEA, CA12-5 and CA19-9 Improves the Sensitivity for the Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer

Background

Previous studies reported the utility of serum tumor markers (such as CEA, CA12-5 and CA19-9) and gastrin-17 in the diagnosis of gastric cancer (GC). However, the value of these serum markers for diagnosing GC is still under debate. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of gastrin-17, CEA, CA12-5 and CA19-9 in the diagnosis of GC.

Methods

The level of CEA, CA12-5, CA19-9 and gastrin-17 was tested in 230 GC patients and 99 healthy people. The value of the four markers for diagnosing GC was analyzed.

Results

The positive rate of Gastrin-17, CEA, CA19-9 and CA12-5 was much higher in GC group (22.61%, 22.61%, 20.00% and 8.26%, respectively) than that of healthy control group (5.05%, 2.02%, 1.01% and 2.02%, respectively). The sensitivity of Gastrin-17, CEA, CA12-5 and CA19-9 in the diagnosis of GC was 22.61%, 22.61%, 6.96% and 20.00%, respectively, and the corresponding specificity was 94.95%, 97.98%, 98.99% and 98.99%, respectively. By using the optimal cut-off value derived from the area under curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic curve, the AUC of gastrin-17, CEA, CA12-5, CA19-9 increased to 0.72, 0.64, 0.61 and 0.65, respectively. After combining the four markers, the AUC increased to 0.79 (95% CI: 0.75-0.84), and the corresponding sensitivity and specificity were 65.22% (95% CI: 58.70-71.40%) and 84.85% (95% CI: 76.20-91.30%), respectively, which were significantly higher than those of separate markers (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

CEA, CA12-5, CA19-9 and gastrin-17 were all valuable in the diagnosis of GC, and gastrin-17 had the best diagnostic value among the four markers. Gastrin-17 combined with CEA, CA12-5 and CA19-9 could improve the diagnostic value of GC significantly. Prospective, multi-center studies are needed to validate our findings.

Development of a time-resolved fluorescence immunoassay based on immunomagnetic beads for gastrin-17

OBJECTIVE

In this study, a novel, simple, and rapid immunoassay for the determination of gastrin-17 (G-17) in human serum was established by combining immunomagnetic beads with time-resolved fluorescence immunoassay (TRFIA).

METHODS

Immunomagnetic beads were coated with anti-G-17 M01 antibody, anti-G-17 M02 antibody was labeled with Eu³⁺ chelates. The concentration of G-17 in the serum was detected with the double-antibody sandwich method.

RESULTS

The limit of background(LOB), limit of detection (LOD), and limit of quantification (LOQ) were 0.09, 0.104, and 0.39 pmol/L, respectively. The detection range of G-17-TRFIA was 0.39-100 pmol/L. The average intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation (CV) were 5.95%-9.07% and 6.09%-8.14%, respectively. The recoveries for the serum samples ranged from 94.70% to 100.95%. The specificity of our G-17-TRFIA was acceptable. The correlation coefficient between G-17-TRFIA and commercial G-17-ELISA methods was R² = 0.9092.

CONCLUSIONS

A novel G-17-TRFIA detection method was successfully established to provide a reference for the early diagnosis of patients with atrophic gastritis in clinical research.

Application of serum pepsinogen and carbohydrate antigen 72-4 (CA72-4) combined with gastrin-17 (G-17) detection in the screening, diagnosis, and evaluation of early gastric cancer

Background

Gastric cancer is a common malignant tumor. The aim of the present study was to analyze the application value of serum pepsinogen (PG), carbohydrate antigen 72-4 (CA72-4), and gastrin-17 (G-17) detection in the screening, diagnosis, and evaluation of early gastric cancer.

Methods

In total, 122 patients with gastric cancer treated in our hospital from January 2018 to January 2021 were selected as the gastric cancer group and subdivided into the early gastric cancer (group A) and advanced gastric cancer (group B) groups. Sixty-five patients with benign gastric disease treated in the same hospital during the same period were selected as the control group, and 122 healthy people who underwent physical examination during the same period were allocated to the control group. The differences in the levels of G-17, PGI, PGII, PGI/PGII, and CA72-4 were compared; receiver-operating characteristic curves were drawn; and the efficacy of different factors in the diagnosis of early gastric cancer was calculated.

Results

G-17, PGI, and PGI/PGII levels in the gastric cancer group were significantly lower than those in the healthy group, and CA72-4 was significantly higher than that in the healthy group (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in PGII between the 2 groups (P>0.05). G-17, PGI, and PGI/PGII levels in groups A and B were significantly lower than those in the control group. CA72-4 in groups A and B was significantly higher than that of the control group, and was highest in group B (P<0.05). The areas under the curve (AUC) of G-17, PGI, PGI/PGII, and CA72-4 were 0.671, 0.726, 0.769, and 0.602, respectively, and the AUC of combined detection was 0.883, which was significantly higher than that of single detection.

Conclusions

Serum PG, CA72-4 combined with G-17 detection has high sensitivity and specificity in the screening and diagnosis of early gastric cancer, and has high clinical application value.

A point-of-care chemiluminescence immunoassay for pepsinogen I enables large-scale community health screening

Pepsinogen I (PGI) can reflect the morphology and function of the gastric mucosa. Accordingly, the large-scale community health screening of PGI can dramatically increase the early diagnosis rate of gastric cancer. However, PGI testing can only be carried out in comprehensive hospitals and health examination centers. To ameliorate this issue, a point-of-care chemiluminescent immunoassay for PGI was developed in a fully automated miniaturized instrument. This instrument was especially developed for health check-ups in the grassroots communities; its volume of which is only 0.18 m³. Critically, the entire detection process for a single sample only requires 20 min, and the samples can be loaded continuously, making the method suitable for high-throughput analysis. The assay displayed an excellent detection limit of 0.048 ng/mL with a broad detection range of 0-200 ng/mL. Furthermore, this assay exhibited high sensitivity and specificity, had low intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation (<10%), and was not affected after storage at 37 °C for 7 days. The assay was used to detect PGI in 95 clinical serum samples, and the results were highly correlated with those that were clinically tested (correlation coefficient, R² = 0.998). Hence, the method established in this work has great application value and can be broadly applied for the large-scale screening of gastric cancer in resource-limited areas.

Screening for gastric cancer in China: Advances, challenges and visions

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the major cancers in China and all over the world. Most GCs are diagnosed at an advanced stage with unfavorable prognosis. Along with some other countries, China has developed the government-funded national screening programs for GC and other major cancers. GC screening has been shown to effectively decrease the incidence of and mortality from GC in countries adopting nationwide screening programs (Japan and Korea) and in studies based on selected Chinese populations. The screening of GC relies mostly on gastroendoscopy, the accuracy, reliability and safety of which have been indicated by previous studies. However, considering its invasive screening approach, requirements on skilled endoscopists and pathologists, and a high cost, developing noninvasive methods to amend endoscopic screening would be highly needed. Numerous studies have examined biomarkers for GC screening and the combination of biomarkers involving pepsinogen, gastrin, and Helicobacter pylori antibodies has been proposed for risk stratification, seeking to narrow down the high-risk populations for further endoscopy. Despite all the achievements of endoscopic screening, evidence on appropriate screening age, intervals for repeated screening, novel biomarkers promoting precision prevention, and health economics need to be accumulated to inform policymakers on endoscopic screening in China. With the guide of Health China 2030 Planning Outline, we have golden opportunities to promote prevention and control of GC. In this review, we summarize the characteristics of screening programs in China and other East Asian countries and introduce the past and current approaches and strategies for GC screening, aiming for featuring the latest advances and key challenges, and illustrating future visions of GC screening.