Clonal evolution of AML1-ETO coexisting with BCR-ABL and additional chromosome abnormalities in a blastic transformation of chronic myeloid leukemia

Transformation into acute myeloid leukemia with t(8;21)(q22;q22.1); RUNX1::RUNX1T1 from JAK2-mutated essential thrombocythemia: a case report

BACKGROUND

Blast transformation is a rare but well-recognized event in Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms associated with a poor prognosis. Secondary acute myeloid leukemias evolving from myeloproliferative neoplasms are characterized by a unique set of cytogenetic and molecular features distinct from de novo disease. t(8;21) (q22;q22.1); RUNX1::RUNX1T1, one of the most frequent cytogenetic abnormalities in de novo acute myeloid leukemia, is rarely observed in post-myeloproliferative neoplasm acute myeloid leukemia. Here we report a case of secondary acute myeloid leukemia with t(8;21) evolving from JAK2-mutated essential thrombocythemia.

CASE PRESENTATION

The patient was a 74-year-old Japanese woman who was referred because of thrombocytosis (platelets 1046 × 109/L). Bone marrow was hypercellular with increase of megakaryocytes. Chromosomal analysis presented normal karyotype and genetic test revealed JAK2 V617F mutation. She was diagnosed with essential thrombocythemia. Thrombocytosis had been well controlled by oral administration of hydroxyurea; 2 years after the initial diagnosis with ET, she presented with leukocytosis (white blood cells 14.0 × 109/L with 82% of blasts), anemia (hemoglobin 91 g/L), and thrombocytopenia (platelets 24 × 109/L). Bone marrow was hypercellular and filled with 80% of myeloperoxidase-positive blasts bearing Auer rods. Chromosomal analysis revealed t(8;21) (q22;q22.1) and flow cytometry presented positivity of CD 13, 19, 34, and 56. Molecular analysis showed the coexistence of RUNX1::RUNX1T1 chimeric transcript and heterozygous JAK2 V617F mutation in leukemic blasts. She was diagnosed with secondary acute myeloid leukemia with t(8;21)(q22;q22.1); RUNX1::RUNX1T1 evolving from essential thrombocythemia. She was treated with combination chemotherapy with venetoclax and azacytidine. After the first cycle of the therapy, blasts disappeared from peripheral blood and decreased to 1.4% in bone marrow. After the chemotherapy, RUNX1::RUNX1T1 chimeric transcript disappeared, whereas mutation of JAK2 V617F was still present in peripheral leukocytes.

CONCLUSIONS

To our best knowledge, the present case is the first one with JAK2 mutation preceding the acquisition of t(8;21). Our result suggests that t(8;21); RUNX1::RUNX1T1 can be generated as a late event in the progression of JAK2-mutated myeloproliferative neoplasms. The case presented typical morphological and immunophenotypic features associated with t(8;21) acute myeloid leukemia.