Reconstruction of coronoid process of the ulna: a literature review

Treatment of Ulnar Coronoid Process Fracture Using the Anterior Neurovascular Interval Approach: A Retrospective Clinical Study with Short- to Mid-term Follow-up

OBJECTIVE

Numerous surgical techniques for addressing ulnar coronoid process fractures are available; however, a consensus on the optimal approach remains elusive. This study aimed to use the anterior neurovascular interval approach for the surgical management of ulnar coronoid process fractures and to evaluate its clinical outcomes over short- to mid-term follow-up.

METHODS

This retrospective clinical study included 20 patients with ulnar coronoid process fractures who were treated using the anterior neurovascular interval approach between January 2018 and December 2022. Participants comprised 16 males and four females, aged between 20 and 64 years (mean, 34.3 ± 12.44 years). Clinical and radiological evaluations were based on elbow joint range of motion (ROM), Visual analogue scale (VAS), and Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS). A paired t-test was used to compare the pre-operative and final follow-up VAS and MEPS scores.

RESULTS

The follow-up duration for all patients was at least 12 months (average, 12.65 ± 1.60 months). At the final follow-up, measurements of elbow ROM included a mean extension of 2.85 ± 3.17°, mean flexion of 135 ± 7.25°, mean pronation of 86.4 ± 4.56°, and mean supination of 84.85 ± 5.54°. All participants reached their target MEPS, with an average score of 97.25 ± 4.72 points, and the final mean VAS score was 0.2 ± 0.52 points. The VAS score was significantly lower and MEPS score was higher at the final follow-up than those before surgery (p < 0.05). Throughout the follow-up period, all the fractures united, and the stability of the affected elbows was satisfactory.

CONCLUSION

Employing the anterior neurovascular interval approach for open reduction and internal fixation to manage coronoid process fractures effectively facilitates anatomical restoration and robust fixation of ulnar coronoid process fractures.

Could medial malleolus fracture be combined with deltoid ligament injury?: A rare case report

RATIONALE

Medial malleolus injuries mainly comprise of fractures and deltoid ligament ruptures. Medial malleolus fractures, as a kind of common ankle fractures, could occur separately or be accompanied by lateral and posterior malleolus fractures. It is generally agreed that medial malleolus fracture and deltoid ligament rupture could not occur simultaneously.

PATIENT CONCERNS

In our study, we report a case of 36 year-old man diagnosed with trimalleolar fracture accompanying ankle dislocation initially. The patient was admitted to our hospital due to traffic accident.

DIAGNOSIS

The patient was diagnosed with trimalleolar fracture accompanying ankle dislocation initially. We missed the diagnosis of accompanied deltoid ligament due to the arthralgia of medial ankle and the widened medial articular space in X-ray after operation.

INTERVENTION

As we missed the diagnosis of accompanied deltoid ligament, we only selected open reduction and internal fixation for trimalleolar fracture at first. After we realized the existence of deltoid ligament rupture, the patient refuse further diagnosis and treatment in our hospital.

OUTCOMES

During the rehabilitation exercise, the patient had medial arthralgia in his right ankle. He complained it and refuse further diagnosis and treatment in our hospital.

LESSONS

The newfound injury pattern, medial malleolus fracture accompanying deltoid ligament rupture, has not been reported in previous studies. The injury pattern needs further researches to explore the mechanism and it should be taken seriously in clinical practice.

Evaluation of Surgical Approaches to Management of Traumatic Posteromedial Elbow Instability Syndrome: A Systematic Literature Review Protocol

Posteromedial Instability Syndrome of the Elbow (PMIE) is a condition that arises from injuries to the stabilizing structures of the elbow joint, such as the coronoid process or ulnar lateral collateral ligament. Surgical treatment is commonly performed, but there is uncertainty regarding its results. This systematic review will synthesise the available evidence regarding the efficacy of surgical approaches to PMIE. Published and unpublished primary studies that regard outcomes of patients treated for PMIE, irrespective of approach, will be considered for inclusion. Iterative searches will be performed in the PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL repositories from their inception to May 2023. Grey literature repositories will also be searched. The Cochrane risk of bias tool will be used to assess the quality of eligible interventional studies, while the MINORS tool will be employed for observational studies. If possible, a meta-analysis based on the random-effects model will be conducted. Heterogeneity will be assessed using Cochrane's Q and I2 statistics, and explored through subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses. Relevant outcomes will include elbow joint functionality as assessed by validated scales, the proportion of patients returning to usual daily life activities, the development of recurrent joint instability in the postoperative period, quality of life and the development of postoperative arthritis. This protocol has been registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) at the University of York. Its registration number is CRD42023451516.

Comparison of buttress plate and cannulated screw in the treatment of anteromedial coronoid fracture with elbow posteromedial rotatory instability

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of buttress plate and cannulated screw in the treatment of anteromedial coronoid fracture with posteromedial rotatory instability (PMRI).

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated patients who were diagnosed with O'Driscoll type 2 fractures combined with elbow posteromedial rotatory instability and underwent surgery for anteromedial coronoid fracture between August 2014 and March 2019. They were divided into buttress plate (n=16) and cannulated screw (n=11) groups. The elbow range of motion, visual analog scale (VAS), Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS), and disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand score (DASH) were used for clinical outcome assessment.

RESULT

There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes. However, the surgical time was significantly shorter in cannulated screw group (85.45±4.156) compared to the buttress plate group (93.81±8.863, P=0.008), and the surgical time was associated with internal fixation (P=0.008).

CONCLUSION

Although there was selection of cases in that small fragments were treated with buttress plate and large fragments with cannulated screw, the buttress plate and cannulated screw have comparable functional outcomes on fixation of the anteromedial coronoid fracture with elbow PMRI. The fixation of the anteromedial coronoid fracture with large fragments using the cannulated screw has a shorter operation time.

Classification of coronoid process fractures: A pending question

Ulna coronoid fracture is a complicated elbow injury. Comprehensive classification of coronoid fracture can assist diagnosis, guide treatment, and improve prognosis. Existing coronoid fracture classifications are insufficient to interpret all fracture patterns. The coronoid fracture classification is associated with elbow-specific trauma patterns. Coronoid fractures are often associated with other elbow injuries, commonly with radial head fractures, which makes the clinical strategies inconsistent and prognosis poor. The current fracture classifications do not contain information about combined injuries. Preservation of ulnohumeral joint contact after trauma is critical to elbow mechanical and kinematic stability. Important fracture types for treatment include terrible-triad injuries and anteromedial facet fractures. Open reduction and internal fixation of these two fractures should be conducted when marked displacement of the fragment, elbow instability under stress, and complicated associated injuries. The current surgical tactics based on classifications are still controversial.

Reconstruction of the coronoid process with the olecranon tip for chronic elbow dislocation in children: A rare case report and literature review

The coronoid process of the ulna, as a key part of the elbow joint, plays an important role in maintaining elbow joint stability. Reconstruction of the coronoid process is necessary in both acute and chronic coronoid defects to restore elbow stability and avoid early joint degeneration. The olecranon tip may be a useful autologous osteochondral graft for reconstructing the same shape of the ulna coronoid process. The purpose of this report was to verify if reconstruction of the coronoid process with the olecranon tip can restore elbow stability and kinematics. Here, we report a 13-year-old boy who had undergone Kirschner-wire fixation for a left supracondylar fracture of the left humerus 9 years previously. After that, the right elbow dislocation and varus deformity gradually appeared. Imaging revealed posterolateral dislocation of the left elbow due to the absence of the coronoid process of the ulna. We reconstructed the ulnar coronoid process by intercepting the ipsilateral olecranon tip. After 22 months of follow-up, the range of motion of the left elbow joint was normal, and the cubitus varus deformity disappeared. The results of this report suggest that olecranon tip autografts are suitable to replace transverse coronoid defects. Given the patient's satisfactory clinical results, this reconstruction technique is safe and effective for the treatment of chronic elbow instability due to coronoid process defects of the ulna.