Shen H, Mei Q, Chai X, Jiang Y, Liu A, Liu J. The prognostic significance of synchronous metastasis in glioblastoma multiforme patients: a propensity score-matched analysis using SEER data.
Front Neurol 2024;
15:1429826. [PMID:
39440248 PMCID:
PMC11493671 DOI:
10.3389/fneur.2024.1429826]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 09/19/2024] [Indexed: 10/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Background
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) with synchronous metastasis(SM) is a rare occurrence. We extracted the data of GBM patients from the SEER database to look into the incidence of SM in GBM, determine the prognostic significance of SM in GBM, and assess therapeutic options for patients presenting with SM.
Methods
From 2004 to 2015, information on GBM patients was obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The propensity score matching (PSM) method was employed to mitigate confounding factors between SM and non-SM groups, subsequently investigating the prognostic significance of SM in patients with GBM. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were employed to identify independent prognostic variables for GBM patients with SM. A forest plot was used to visualize the results.
Results
A cohort of 19,708 patients was obtained from the database, among which 272 (1.4%) had SM at the time of diagnosis. Following PSM at a 3:1 ratio, in both univariate and multivariate cox regression analysis, SM (HR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.09-1.46) was found to be an independent predictive predictor for GBM patients. Furthermore, the Cox proportional hazard forest plot demonstrated that independent risk variables for GBM patients with SM included age (Old vs. Young, HR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.11-1.88), surgery (biopsy vs. no surgery, HR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.46-0.96;Subtotal resection vs. no surgery, HR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.32-0.68;Gross total resection vs. no surgery, HR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.31-0.62), radiotherapy (HR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.41-0.83), and chemotherapy (HR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.36-0.72).
Conclusion
The predictive value of SM in GBM was determined by this propensity-matched analysis using data from the SEER database. Radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and surgery constitute an effective treatment regimen for patients with SM. A more positive approach toward the use of aggressive treatment for GBM patients with SM may be warranted.
Collapse