A double-blind trial of penbutolol: a new beta-receptor blocking agent in the treatment of angina pectoris

Buccal nitroglycerin in congestive cardiac failure: a multicentre study

One-hundred-and-ninety-two elderly patients with symptoms of congestive cardiac failure, despite therapy with diuretics and inotropic agents, received buccal nitroglycerin as additional medication. They were assessed for up to 6 months. Improvements in symptoms and functional classification were apparent within 14 days, and were maintained for the duration of the study.

Double-blind comparison of prenylamine and penbutolol in patients with angina pectoris

This study was performed to re-evaluate the clinical position of prenylamine in the management of angina pectoris. After 1 week withdrawal of all anti-anginal agents, followed by another week of placebo administration, seventeen patients were allocated at random to 6 weeks treatment with either penbutolol 40 mg once a day or prenylamine 60 mg t.i.d. Clinical examination, exercise test and anginal attack rate were recorded every 2 weeks. Both drugs reduced the anginal attack rate. None of the drugs caused a significant increase in maximal workload or a significant change in ST-segment depression. Beside a substantially lower rate-pressure product at maximal comparable workload in the penbutolol group (p less than 0.001), no significant differences were observed between the two drugs. No adverse reactions were reported. From these results one can conclude that prenylamine and penbutolol do not differ in their anti-anginal effect. Therefore we are of the opinion that prenylamine has a place in the therapeutic armamentarium for the management of angina pectoris, particularly in patients where beta-blocking agents are contraindicated or in patients who have experienced side-effects of beta-blocking or calcium-entry blocking agents.

Efficacy of once daily penbutolol in chronic stable angina. An objective comparison with long-acting propranolol

The effects of penbutolol (40 mg daily) and long-acting propranolol (160 mg daily) were assessed in 26 patients with chronic stable angina in a placebo-controlled randomised double-blind crossover study with 2-weekly treatment periods. In addition to conventional subjective assessment, serial multistage treadmill exercise was used to obtain objective data on drug efficacy and 24-hr ambulatory electrocardiography performed for diurnal heart rate analysis. The mean exercise time of 6.3 +/- 0.5 (SEM) min on placebo increased to 7.3 +/- 0.6 min on penbutolol (P less than 0.01) and to 7.9 +/- 0.5 min on propranolol (P less than 0.001). The pre-exercise resting heart rate was 73 +/- 2 beats/min on placebo and decreased to 63 +/- 2 beats/min on penbutolol (P less than 0.001) and 58 +/- 2 beats/min on propranolol (P less than 0.001). The maximum exercise heart rate was similarly reduced by both drugs and there was a corresponding reduction in peak exercise double product. The time-corrected maximum ST segment depression was reduced by both drugs and neither produced a delay in ST segment recovery. Both drugs effected significant reductions in ambulatory maximum hourly heart rates throughout 24 hr. The lowest observed heart rate on penbutolol was 40 beats/min and 34 beats/min on propranolol. Penbutolol is an effective antianginal agent with a profile of action similar to that of propranolol.

Haemodynamic dose-response effects of i.v. penbutolol in angina pectoris

The haemodynamic dose-response effects of intravenous penbutolol, a newer beta-adrenoceptor antagonist with intrinsic sympathomimetic activity but without cardioselectivity, were evaluated in 10 patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease. Following four logarithmetically cumulative i.v. boluses (0.5-4 mg dosage range) there was a log linear increase in plasma penbutolol concentration; the levels achieved (51 +/- 8 to 219 +/- 19 ng/ml) were in the therapeutic range (12 to 250 ng/ml). Penbutolol resulted in a linear decrease in heart rate (maximum delta HR - 4 beats/min; P less than 0.01); there was a small increase in pulmonary artery occluded pressure which reached its maximum at the lower doses (maximum delta PAOP + 1 mm Hg; P less than 0.01). The resting cardiac output, blood pressure and calculated systemic vascular resistance were unchanged. During 4 min steady-state supine bicycle exercise there was attenuation of exercise cardiac output (delta C.I. - 0.6 1 min-1 m-2; P less than 0.01) and systolic pressor response (delta SBP - 13 mm Hg; P less than 0.01) compared with control observations without change in other measured or derived variables. The haemodynamic profile of penbutolol compared favourably with other beta-adrenoceptor antagonists previously evaluated under similar conditions in patients with ischaemic heart disease. Over the i.v. dose-range evaluated penbutolol attenuated exercise-induced angina with a relatively modest depression of cardiac performance; the small change induced in resting haemodynamic variables may, in part, have been contributed to by the intrinsic sympathomimetic activity of penbutolol.

Penbutolol: a preliminary review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in hypertension and angina pectoris

Penbutolol is a non-selective beta-blocking drug with 'moderate' intrinsic sympathomimetic (partial agonist) properties, and a relatively narrow dose-response range. In many other aspects its pharmacological profile resembles that of propranolol. Significant beta-blockade, as demonstrated by reduction in heart rate during exercise in healthy subjects, persists for at least 24 hours after penbutolol administration, and thus the recommended dosage schedule in both hypertension and angina involves single daily doses (20 or 40mg daily) in most patients, with a divided dose (40mg twice daily) if a higher dose is needed. However, most angina prophylaxis studies to date have not been designed to clearly demonstrate that the beneficial effects of beta-blockade with a single dose of penbutolol extend throughout a 24-hour dosing interval. Further studies are needed to provide such evidence. As might be expected, penbutolol appears to be about as effective as usual doses of propranolol in both mild to moderate hypertension and in angina, but much of the clinical experience with the drug is in unpublished form and is thus somewhat difficult to evaluate in detail. The choice of a beta-blocking drug should be based on a knowledge of the characteristic pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of the individual drugs within this group, and on careful consideration of how these properties might be used to benefit the individual patient. As is the case with most other beta-blocking drugs, penbutolol has some specific properties (e.g. relatively narrow dose-response range minimising the difficulty of dose titration, moderate intrinsic sympathomimetic activity) which may be used to advantage in certain patients.

A double-blind study of the peripheral vasoconstrictor effects of the beta-blocking drug penbutolol in patients with Raynaud's phenomenon

A double-blind, placebo-controlled study was carried out in 10 hypertensive patients who were subject to frequent attacks of Raynaud's phenomenon and suffered from cold hands, to assess the peripheral vasoconstrictor effects of penbutolol. After a wash-out period of 2 weeks on placebo, patients received two 14-day treatment periods, in random order, with either 20 mg penbutolol twice daily or placebo separated by a second 2-week single-blind wash-out period on placebo. The results of digital blood flow measurements showed that penbutolol did not produce any additional vasoconstrictor effect on digital circulation. The significance of these findings is discussed.