Ovarian Ablation for Premenopausal Early-Stage Breast Cancer: An Update

Laparoscopic salpingo-oophorectomy for ovarian ablation in women with hormone-sensitive breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate institutional experiences regarding laparoscopic salpingo-oophorectomy in breast cancer patients and to compare the technique with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogs among premenopausal women with hormone-sensitive breast cancer.

METHODS

Between 2004 and 2009, 103 women with breast cancer underwent laparoscopic salpingo-oophorectomy at Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK. All relevant medical records-including reasons for salpingo-oophorectomy, peri-operative events, and subsequent follow-up-were reviewed.

RESULTS

In the study period, 3 (2.9%) women experienced a recurrence of breast cancer but none had primary peritoneal/ovarian cancer within a median follow-up interval of 34 months (range, 0-70 months). No operative complications were noted among these women and all of them went home on the day of their operation.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic salpingo-oophorectomy seems to be a safe, permanent, and cost-effective method of ovarian ablation compared with the use of GnRH analogs. Salpingo-oophorectomy also considerably reduces the risk of subsequent ovarian/fallopian tube malignancy in this high-risk population.

Management of premenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer: is there a role for ovarian suppression?

There is an overwhelming body of evidence that adjuvant ovarian ablation/suppression has a favorable impact on survival for premenopausal women with hormone-responsive early-stage breast cancer. This article reviews the randomized controlled trials that provide these data and the indirect evidence suggesting that much of the benefit seen for adjuvant chemotherapy in estrogen receptor-positive patients < 50 years of age is an indirect consequence of a chemical castration. Therefore, carefully selected women may have a choice of ovarian suppression with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue, such as goserelin, as an alternative to chemotherapy, which would allow younger premenopausal women to retain fertility. In addition, if chemotherapy is selected and the patient does not develop permanent amenorrhoea, then additional treatment with a GnRH analogue is indicated.

Raloxifene administration in women treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist for uterine leiomyomas: effects on bone metabolism

This prospective randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy of raloxifene in preventing the bone loss associated with GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) administration. One hundred premenopausal women with uterine leiomyomas were treated with leuprolide acetate depot at a dosage of 3.75 mg/d for 28 d and then randomized into two groups to receive raloxifene hydrochloride at 60 mg/d (group A) or placebo (1 tablet/d; group B). Bone mineral density (BMD) and serum bone metabolism markers were evaluated at admission and after six treatment cycles. Posttreatment BMD differed significantly from baseline BMD in group B but not in group A. BMD was significantly higher in group A than in group B. In group A, serum osteocalcin and bone alkaline phosphatase levels and urinary deoxypyridinoline and pyrilinks-D excretion were unchanged vs. baseline. Differently, posttreatment concentrations of these bone turnover markers were significantly lower in group B compared with baseline and group A values. In conclusion, raloxifene prevents GnRH-a related bone loss in premenopausal women with uterine leiomyomas.