Neoadjuvant Therapy of Rectal Cancer New Treatment Perspectives

Compare clinical efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant therapy and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To compare the efficacy and safety of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in the treatment of middle and low locally advanced rectal cancer. Our study will systematically collect and integrate studies to evaluate the ability of these two treatments to improve tumor shrinkage rates, surgical resection rates, tumor-free survival, and severe adverse events.

AIM

To provide clinicians and patients with more reliable treatment options to optimize treatment outcomes and quality of life for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer by comparing the advantages and disadvantages of the two treatment options.

METHODS

A full search of all clinical studies on the effectiveness and safety of TNT and nCRT for treating locally advanced rectal cancer identified in Chinese (CNKI, Wanfang, China Biomedical Literature Database) and English (PubMed, Embase) databases was performed. Two system assessors independently screened the studies according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Quality evaluation and data extraction were performed for the included literature. We used RevMan 5.3 software to perform a meta-analysis of the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, T stage degradation rate, resection 0 (R0) rate, anal grade 3/4 acute toxicity rate, perioperative complications, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) in the TNT and nCRT groups.

RESULTS

Finally, 14 studies were included, six of which were randomized controlled studies. A total of 3797 patients were included, including 1865 in the TNT group and 1932 in the nCRT group. The two sets of baseline data were comparable. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the pCR rate [odds ratio (OR) = 1.57, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.30-1.90, P < 0.00001], T stage degradation rate (OR = 2.16, 95%CI: 1.63-2.57, P < 0.00001), and R0 resection rate (OR = 1.42, 95%CI: 1.09-1.85, P = 0.009) were significantly greater in the nCRT group than in the nCRT group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of grade 3/4 acute toxicity or perioperative complications between the two groups. The 5-year OS [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.84, 95%CI: 0.69-1.02, P = 0.08] and DFS (HR = 0.94, 95%CI: 0.03-1.39, P = 0.74) of the TNT group were similar to those of the nCRT group.

CONCLUSION

TNT has greater clinical efficacy and safety than nCRT in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer.

The Predictive Value of Clinical Evaluation of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy for Rectal Cancer

Introduction

Multimodality therapy has become the standard treatment for patients with locally advanced (T3 and T4) rectal carcinoma. Accurate preoperative staging of the patients with rectal cancer has increased in importance because the selection of patients with transmural rectal cancer (T3 or T4) or node-positive disease leads to a previous nonsurgical neoadjuvant treatment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of the clinical response to neoadjuvant therapy on the basis of pathological results obtained on rectal cancer patients treated by chemoradiotherapy and surgery.

Methods

From 1994 to 2003, 58 patients with a primary diagnosis of rectal cancer were studied at our department and enrolled in a neoadjuvant protocol of chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. All patients were treated by 30 days of chemoradiotherapy. At the end of the chemoradiotherapy, each patient underwent clinical examination, including digital rectal examination, proctoscopy and abdominal-pelvic computerized tomography to define the clinical response to the chemoradiotherapy. Surgical resection was performed in all patients three weeks after the end of chemoradiotherapy, and histological analysis was performed on all resected specimens.

Results

The clinical complete response rate corresponded to the pathological complete response rate, whereas the clinical evaluation overestimated partial response and stable disease. The pathologic examination revealed that 3.5% of clinical partial responses and 3.4% of clinical stable disease were really pathological progressive disease. Clinical partial response and clinical stable disease positive predictive values were 92.8% and 90.9%, respectively, whereas the clinical progressive disease negative predictive value was 20%. Then, 6.9% of patients believed to have responded to the therapy, or not to have responded or worsened, actually had worsened by the end of the chemoradiotherapy.

Conclusions

Positive and negative predictive values, in particular for partial response and stable disease, of clinical evaluation of the response to chemoradiotherapy were not high enough to consider clinical evaluation accurate enough to make treatment decisions.

A Preliminary Audit Experience of Surgery for Rectal Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy

Aims and background

A surgical audit is a systematic critical analysis of surgical performance, with the goal to improve the quality of patient care. Rectal cancer surgery is one of the most delicate procedures in the field of surgical oncology, with significant variations in terms of complications from center to center. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy leads to a significant reduction in local recurrences in patients with locally advanced lower and medium rectal cancer. The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy on postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients with rectal cancer.

Methods and study design

From January 1,2003, to December 31, 2007, patients who underwent elective surgical resection for lower and medium rectal cancer in our Surgical Unit were prospectively analyzed. Patients (n = 42) were divided into two groups: 1) those treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and consequent surgical resection (19/42); 2) those treated with primary surgical treatment (23/42). P-POSSUM (Portsmouth Physiologic and Operative Severity Score for the Enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity) and CR-POSSUM (ColoRectal-POSSUM) scores were calculated for each patient group. Thirty-day mortality and morbidity rates were prospectively collected in a comprehensive data base. Data were evaluated by comparing the predictions of the two scoring systems in both study groups with clinically observed mortality and morbidity rates.

Results

In group 1, no death was registered (0/19). The P-POSSUM and CR-POSSUM expected mortality was 2.43% and 4.52%, respectively (P >0.05). In group 2, a single death was documented (1/23, 4.35%). The P-POSSUM and CR-POSSUM expected mortality was 2.1% and 4.94%, respectively. The postoperative complications rate for group 1 was 10.52% (2/19) compared to 34.88% as expected from the P-POSSUM score (P <0.05). In group 2, a postoperative complication rate of 39.13% (9/23) was observed compared to 34.26% as expected from the P-POSSUM score (P >0.05).

Conclusions

No significant influence on morbidity or mortality was detected in patients who underwent neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy.

Instrumental clinical restaging, pathological evaluation, and tumor regression grading: how to assess the response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer

INTRODUCTION

The object of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimens is a downstaging or downsizing of advanced rectal tumor to increase the rate of curative resection and reduce loco-regional failure. A reliable method of assessing response to adjuvant therapies is required to help standardize the assessments of new multimodality therapies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role played by tumor regression grading on the evaluation of pathological response to chemoradiotherapy, compared with both the predicting value of the clinical response to neoadjuvant therapy and pathologic response evaluation.

METHODS

From 1994 to 2003, 58 patients with a primary diagnosis of rectal cancer were studied at our department and enrolled in a single center, not randomized study based on 5-week sessions of radiotherapy associated with a 30-day 5-fluorouracil (FU) infusion, followed by surgical resection. Instrumental restaging and routine histological examination, including tumor regression grading, were performed to asses the response to neoadjuvant therapy.

RESULTS

The cCR rate corresponds to pCR rate, while a 3.5% of cPR and a 3.4% of cSD corresponded to a pPD. cPR and cSD show a PPV of 92.8% and 90.9% respectively, while cPD NPV is 20%. No case was found with no regression (grade 0). Tumor regression was defined grade 1 in 24.5% of cases, grade 2 was found in 58.5% of cases, 7.5% were grade 3, and 9.5% showed complete regression (grade 4). Pathologic response resulted to be associated with regression grade (p=0.006). Tumor regression grading is an independent variable for pT (p=0.0002), pN status (p=0.00004), pathologic staging (p=0.000001) and local recurrence (p=0.003).

CONCLUSION

Our results lead us to consider only pathologic evaluation to determine the response to neoadjuvant treatment: the application of tumor regression grading on the specimens obtained after combined neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery is useful to plan a better therapeutic strategy on the ground of a quantitative evaluation of the response to neoadjuvant treatment; it shows it is an important comparable pathological feature, useful in comparing different protocols' results and differences between patient's response as well as prognostic factors.

Prognostic Significance of Postoperative Morbidities in Patients With Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Delayed Primary Surgical Debulking

BACKGROUND

To examine the prognostic significance of postoperative morbidities in patients with ovarian cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval surgical debulking.

METHODS

Retrospective chart reviews of all patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval debulking were performed from 1999 to 2002. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the distributions of important clinical variables. Logistic regression was used to identify statistically significant predictors of postoperative morbidities. Cox regression was used to model time to first clinical progression. Survivals were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log rank test. P < .05 was considered to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients were treated with neoadjuvant platinum-taxane combination chemotherapy. Major surgical complications were observed in four patients (6.8%). There were no perioperative deaths. The presence of concurrent medical comorbidities was associated with the development of significant postoperative morbidities (P = .038). Cox regression showed any macroscopic residual disease (P = .04) and the presence of significant postoperative morbidities (odds ratio, 4.7, 95% confidence interval, 1.8-12.7, P = .002) to be predictive of a shorter progression-free interval.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval surgical debulking carried a low risk for postoperative morbidity. The adverse influence of marked postoperative morbidity on progression-free survival needs further study.

A Phase II study of preoperative radiotherapy and concomitant weekly irinotecan in combination with protracted venous infusion 5-fluorouracil, for resectable locally advanced rectal cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with irinotecan (CPT-11) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with resectable rectal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with resectable T3-T4 rectal cancer and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status <2 were included. CPT-11 (50 mg/m(2) weekly) and 5-FU (225 mg/m(2)/day continuous infusion, 5 days/week) were concurrently administered with radiation therapy (RT) (45 Gy, 1.8 Gy/day, 5 days/week), during 5 weeks.

RESULTS

A total of 74 patients were enrolled: mean age, 59 years (20-74 years; SD, 11.7). Planned treatment was delivered to most patients (median relative dose intensity for both drugs was 100%). Grade 3/4 lymphocytopenia occurred in 35 patients (47%), neutropenia in 5 (7%), and anemia in 2 (3%). Main Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicities were diarrhea (14%), asthenia (9%), rectal mucositis (8%), and abdominal pain (8%). Of the 73 resected specimens, 13.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.8-23.7) had a pathologic complete response and 49.3% (95% CI, 37.4-61.3) were downstaged. Additionally, 66.7% (95% CI, 51.1-80.0) of patients with ultrasound staged N1/N2 disease had no pathologic evidence of nodal involvement after CRT.

CONCLUSIONS

This preoperative CRT schedule has been shown to be effective and feasible in a large population of patients with resectable rectal cancer.

Pharmacogenomics in colorectal carcinomas: Future perspectives in personalized therapy

The recent introduction of new drugs such as capecitabine, irinotecan, and oxaliplatinum has greatly improved the clinical outcome of patients with advanced/metastatic colorectal cancer. Nevertheless, some patients may suffer from the adverse drug reactions which will probably be the main cause of chemotherapy failure. The goal of pharmacogenomics is to find correlations between therapeutic responses to drugs and the genetic profiles of patients; the different responses to a particular drug are due, in fact, not only to the specific clinico-pathological features of the patient or to environmental factors, but also to the ethnic origins and the particular individual's genetic profile. Genes which codify for the metabolism enzymes, receptor proteins, or protein targets of chemotherapy agents often present various genetic polymorphisms. The main aim of this review is to provide an overview of the known polymorphisms present in the genes which codify for factors (thymidylate synthase dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, uridine diphosphate (UDP)-glucuronosyl-transferase 1A1, enzymes implicated in DNA repair) involved in the action mechanisms of the drugs now utilized in chemotherapeutic treatment of colorectal carcinoma, such as fluoropyrimidines, irinotecan, and platinum agents.