Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy in Gastric Cancer: A Report of Four Cases and Analysis of the Literature

Molecular targets and mechanisms of different aberrant alternative splicing in metastatic liver cancer

Metastasis remains a major challenge in the successful management of malignant diseases. The liver is a major site of metastatic disease and a leading cause of death from gastrointestinal malignancies such as colon, stomach, and pancreatic cancers, as well as melanoma, breast cancer, and sarcoma. As an important factor that influences the development of metastatic liver cancer, alternative splicing drives the diversity of RNA transcripts and protein subtypes, which may provide potential to broaden the target space. In particular, the dysfunction of splicing factors and abnormal expression of splicing variants are associated with the occurrence, progression, aggressiveness, and drug resistance of cancers caused by the selective splicing of specific genes. This review is the first to provide a detailed summary of the normal splicing process and alterations that occur during metastatic liver cancer. It will cover the role of alternative splicing in the mechanisms of metastatic liver cancer by examining splicing factor changes, abnormal splicing, and the contribution of hypoxia to these changes during metastasis.

Identifying Optimal Surgical Intervention-Based Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer Patients With Liver Metastases

Background

This study aimed at evaluating the effects of surgical treatments-based chemotherapy in the treatment of gastric cancer with liver metastases (GCLM). It has not been established whether Liver-directed treatment (LDT) options such as hepatectomy and gastrectomy plus chemotherapy (HGCT), radiofrequency ablation and gastrectomy plus chemotherapy (RFAG), transarterial chemoembolization and gastrectomy plus chemotherapy (TACEG), gastrectomy plus chemotherapy (GCT) enhance the survival of GCLM patients.

Methods

We performed systematic literature searches in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library from inception to September 2021. We created a network plot to comprehensively analyze the direct and indirect evidence, based on a frequentist method. A contribution plot was used to determine inconsistencies, a forest plot was used to evaluate therapeutic effects, the publication bias was controlled by funnel plot, while the value of surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA) was calculated to estimate rank probability.

Results

A total of 23 retrospective studies were identified, involving 5472 GCLM patients. For OS and 1-, 2-, 3-year survival rate of all trials, meta-analysis of the direct comparisons showed significant better for HGCT treatments compared with GCT or PCT. In the comparison of the 5 treatments for 1-, 2-, 3-year survival rate, HGCT and RFAG were found to be more effective than GCT and PCT, respectively. By OS and 2-, 3-year survival rate analysis, RFAG was identified as the best option, followed by HGCT, TACEG, GCT and PCT. By 1-year survival rate analysis, HGCT and RFAG were identified as the most effective options.

Conclusion

HGCT and RFAG has remarkable survival benefits for GCLM patients when compared to TACEG, GCT and PCT. HGCT was found to exhibit superior therapeutic effects for GCLM patients for 1-year survival rate while RFAG was found to be a prospective therapeutic alternative for OS and 2-, 3-year survival rate.

Systematic Review Registration

identifier [10.37766/inplasy2020.12.0009].

Urinary Neopterin in Patients with Liver Tumors

Aims and background

Primary and secondary liver tumors are associated with poor prognosis. Neopterin is an indicator of systemic immune activation, and increased neopterin concentrations have been associated with poor prognosis in a wide range of malignant tumors.

Methods

Urinary neopterin was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography in 154 patients with primary and secondary liver tumors. The survival of different groups of patients was compared by log-rank test, and Cox regression was used for multivariate analysis.

Results

Urinary neopterin was significantly increased in patients compared to controls. A statistically significant correlation was observed between urinary neopterin and age of the patients, hemoglobin concentration, mean erythrocyte volume and peripheral blood leukocyte or platelet count. In univariate analysis, urinary neopterin below 214 μmol/mol creatinine, peripheral blood leukocytes below 8 x 109/L, hemoglobin equal to or above 125 g/L, no extrahepatic tumor, stage of liver involvement, and colorectal, breast or ovarian primary were significant prognostic factors for survival. In multivariate analysis, Bengtsson stage, presence of extrahepatic involvement, primary other than colorectal, breast or ovarian carcinoma, peripheral blood leukocyte count and urinary neopterin were independent prognostic factors. Increased urinary neopterin during and at the end of follow-up was also associated with poor prognosis.

Conclusions

Urinary neopterin is increased in patients with liver tumors. Neopterin is an independent prognostic indicator in patients with liver tumors along with Bengtsson stage, presence of extrahepatic disease, primary site and peripheral blood leukocyte count.

Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy for Liver Metastases from Gastric Cancer: An Analysis in Western Patients

Aims and background

The advantage of administering chemotherapy by hepatic arterial infusion is the achievement of high drug concentrations in the liver. Oxaliplatin, irinotecan and 5-flourouracil are active agents in advanced gastric cancer. Therefore a retrospective analysis was performed to investigate the effects of these drugs administered by hepatic arterial infusion in heavily pretreated gastric cancer patients with predominant hepatic metastases. Very limited data about hepatic arterial infusion exist in western gastric cancer patients.

Methods

Seven patients with advanced gastric cancer were included in the retrospective analysis. All patients had proven progressive disease prior to initiation of hepatic arterial infusion. All had an ECOG performance status of ≤2 and had received at least two previous systemic chemotherapy regimens, including the combination of cisplatin/5-fluorouracil. Patients were given chemotherapy by hepatic arterial infusion: 5-fluorouracil, 600 mg/m2, together with folinic acid, 300 mg/m2/2 h, followed by oxaliplatin, 85 mg/m2/2 h, every 2 weeks.

Results

Fifty-four cycles of hepatic arterial infusion (range, 2–21) with a median treatment duration of 6 cycles were administered in 7 patients. The treatment was feasible and safe, no grade 3–4 toxicity was observed. One patient showed stabilization of liver metastases over 7 months. In 6 of the 7 patients there was radiologically proven progressive disease after a median treatment time of 10 weeks.

Conclusions

Chemotherapy by hepatic arterial infusion is modestly effective in heavily pretreated gastric cancer patients. Hepatic arterial infusion has a very favorable toxicity profile and can be safely administered even in elderly patients. It might be an additional therapeutic option and should be further investigated. The literature on hepatic arterial infusion in gastric cancer patients is reviewed. Free full text available at www.tumorionline.it

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy using fluorouracil, epirubicin, and mitomycin C for patients with liver metastases from gastric cancer after treatment failure of systemic S-1 plus cisplatin

BACKGROUND

For patients with liver metastases from gastric cancer (LMGC), combination chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidines and platinum agents has been recognized as standard treatment. However, the prognosis of hepatic progression after first-line treatment failure remains poor. When hepatic progression occurs, hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) chemotherapy may be helpful for preventing disease progression.

PURPOSE

To retrospectively assess the feasibility and efficacy of HAI chemotherapy using 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and mitomycin C (FEM) for patients with LMGC after failure of systemic S-1 plus cisplatin.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We reviewed the records of patients who received HAI chemotherapy using FEM for LMGC that progressed during systemic S-1 plus cisplatin treatment while extrahepatic disease was decreased or did not appear. HAI chemotherapy was given as second-line therapy using 5-fluorouracil (330 mg/m(2) weekly), epirubicin (30 or 40 mg/m(2) every 4 weeks), and mitomycin C (2.7 mg/m(2) biweekly).

RESULTS

Fourteen patients were analyzed. Toxicity of HAI chemotherapy was generally mild. The objective response rate was 42.9%, including a complete response rate of 14.3%. Median times to hepatic and extrahepatic progression were 9.2 and 7.4 months, respectively. Of 12 patients with documented progression after HAI chemotherapy, 10 patients (83.3%) received additional treatment, including irinotecan or taxanes. Overall, median survival was 12.7 months.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that HAI chemotherapy using FEM is a feasible and effective treatment for patients with LMGC after failure of systemic S-1 plus cisplatin. HAI chemotherapy employed in the second-line setting is useful for achieving long-term disease control of LMGC.

Phase I trial of hepatic arterial infusion of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel: toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and activity

Because liver involvement in patients with metastatic cancer has limited options and poor outcomes, we conducted a phase I study to determine the safety, activity, and pharmacokinetic characteristics of hepatic arterial infusion of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (HAI nab-paclitaxel). Cohorts of three patients having predominant hepatic metastases received HAI nab-paclitaxel at three dose levels (180, 220, and 260 mg/m(2), respectively) infused for more than 1 hour every 3 weeks (3 + 3 design). Some patients participated in comparative pharmacokinetic studies (i.v. vs. HAI), receiving their first course i.v., to determine peak concentrations and effect of first-pass hepatic extraction compared with subsequent courses administered by HAI. The highest dose level was expanded to determine the safety and activity of HAI nab-paclitaxel. Thirty-eight patients were treated. There were no dose-limiting toxicities at doses up to 260 mg/m(2). Common adverse events included alopecia, fatigue, myelosuppresion, nausea, and vomiting. Three patients had stable disease for 4 or more months and 2 patients (1 of 12 with breast cancer and 1 of 1 with cervical cancer) achieved a partial response lasting for 5 and 15 months, respectively. Peak concentrations were lower (∼50%) with greater hepatic extraction of drug (∼42%) following HAI than i.v. infusion based on area under the curve comparison of drug exposure. HAI nab-paclitaxel showed partial hepatic extraction. At doses 260 mg/m(2) or less given for 1 hour every 3 weeks, the treatment was well-tolerated and showed activity in advanced cancer patients with predominant liver metastases.