Long-lasting Response with Metronomic Capecitabine in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Effective and safe systemic treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with severe underlying cirrhosis is not yet available. Sorafenib, an oral multikinase inhibitor, has proved to be effective in the treatment of patients affected by HCC with Child-Pugh class A liver function. For patients with cirrhosis-associated HCC having Child-Pugh class B and C liver function, no systemic treatments of documented efficacy and safety exist. We report a case of metastatic HCC associated with Child-Pugh class B cirrhosis that was treated with low, “metronomic” doses of capecitabine (1000 mg/day continuously). This treatment was effective and well tolerated and the response was maintained for 18 months. Metronomic capecitabine may represent a possible alternative in the treatment of those patients with advanced cirrhosis-associated HCC who cannot be treated with sorafenib. Free full text available at www.tumorionline.it

Metronomic chemotherapy from rationale to clinical studies: a dream or reality?

Metronomic chemotherapy (MC) refers to the close administration of a chemotherapeutic drug for a long time with no extended drug-free breaks. It was developed to overcome drug resistance, partly by shifting the therapeutic target from tumor cells to the tumor vasculature, with less toxicity. Because of this peculiar way of administration, MC can be viewed as a form of long-term 'maintenance' treatment, and can be integrated with standard and conventional chemotherapy in a "chemo-switching" strategy. Additional mechanisms are involved in its antitumor activity, such as activation of immunity, induction of tumor dormancy, chemotherapy-driven dependency of cancer cells, and the '4D effect'. In this paper we report the most important studies that have analyzed these processes. In fact, a number of preclinical and clinical studies in solid tumors as well as in multiple myeloma, have been reported regarding several chemotherapy drugs which have been proposed with a metronomic schedule: vinorelbine, cyclophosphamide, capecitabine, methotrexate, bevacizumab, etoposide, gemcitabine, sorafenib, everolimus and temozolomide. The results of these studies have been sometimes conflicting, highlighting the need to develop reliable tools for patient selection and stratification. However, a more precise evaluation of MC strategies with the ongoing randomized phase II/III clinical is fundamental, because of the strict correlation of this approach with translational research and target therapy. Moreover, because of the low toxicity of MC, these studies will also help to better evaluate the clinical benefit of this treatment, with a special focus on elderly and low performance status patients.

Metronomic chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer: impact on VEGF

BACKGROUND

Anticancer chemotherapy is thought to be effective by means of direct cytotoxicity on tumor cells. Alternative mechanisms of efficacy have been ascribed to several common anticancer agents; including cyclophosphamide (CTX) and capecitabine (Cap) when given at lower doses for prolonged period (metronomic chemotherapy) postulating an antiangiogenic activity as well.

AIM OF WORK

To evaluate the action and tolerability of metronomic chemotherapy (MC) and its impact on serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this study we evaluated the clinical efficacy and tolerability of low dose, capecitabine (500mg twice daily) together with oral cyclophosphamide (CTX) (a dose of 50mg once daily) in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), an angiogenic marker, was measured in the serum samples; at base line, and after 2 and 6months of therapy.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were evaluable. One achieved complete response (CR), 12 partial responses (PR), and 21 stable diseases (SD), while 26 were with progressive disease (PD). The overall response rate was 21.7% with overall disease control (CR, PR, and SD) 56.7%. The median time to progression was 7±2.59months and overall survival 16±8.02months. Toxicity was mild, Palmar-plantar erythrodythesia was the most common side effect and was observed in 22 patients (37%), leucopenia (G1+2) was the most common hematological toxicity, and it was reported in 27% of the cases. The median VEGF level was significantly declined after 2 and 6months of therapy compared to the base line among the patients with disease control (CR, PR, and SD). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, patients with post-menopausal, positive hormonal receptors, negative HER-2/Neu, and one metastatic site, were statistically significant and have a better disease control rate.

CONCLUSIONS

MC induced drop in VEGF, and was effective, minimally toxic regimen for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer patients.