Management of Central and Peripheral Nervous System Tumors in Patients with Neurofibromatosis

Neurofibromatosis type I (NF1), neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2), and schwannomatosis represent a diverse group of genetic tumor predisposition syndromes with a shared feature of tumors affecting the peripheral nerve sheaths. PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Many advancements have been made in understanding the biologic underpinnings of these conditions, and in 2016 the first drug was approved by the FDA to treat pediatric symptomatic unresectable plexiform neurofibromas. RECENT FINDINGS: Mek inhibitors have provided a much-needed therapeutic avenue for NF1 patients with unresectable plexiform neurofibromas (PN), both for reduction of tumor bulk and for improvement in symptoms. Selumetinib is the first FDA approved drug for PN, but is only approved for children. Some research suggests that alternative Mek inhibitors and other mixed tyrosine kinase inhibitors may have better efficacy in adults. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor bevacizumab can prolong hearing and delay the need for surgery in NF2 patients with bilateral vestibular schwannomas. This article provides an update regarding considerations and approaches when treating the tumors associated with the neurofibromatoses (NF), including risk and prognosis metrics, clinical trial results, surgical techniques, and radiation therapy recommendations.

Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy Compared to Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannoma in Patients with Type 2 Neurofibromatosis

BACKGROUND

The use of radiotherapy (RT) for the treatment of vestibulocochlear schwannomas is standard in patients with type 2 neurofibromatosis (NF2). In the general population, fractionated RT (FRT) can achieve good results compared to single-dose radiosurgery (SRS). We aimed to assess whether this is true for NF2 patients as well.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 34 patients and 54 lesions treated between 2010 and 2023 in a single university hospital.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patient charts were assessed. The median follow-up was 62.6 months (range, 7.1-135.8 months). Lesion size (median larger diameter, 2.5 cm) was correlated with the use of FRT (P > 0.001). Younger age also was correlated with FRT (P = 0.006). Median overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) were not reached. The overall control rate was 76.5%, and the mean PFS was 49.8 months, compared with . 90.5% and 57.2 months, respectively, for SRS and 66.7% and 44.9 months, respectively, for FRT. There were no differences between the 2 groups in hearing loss, tinnitus, and facial palsy.

CONCLUSIONS

In the NF2 population, FRT may yield worse control rates than SRS. Whenever possible, it is preferable to not fractionate treatment for these patients. Nevertheless, the FRT results were still good. More and larger prospective trials are warranted.

Long-term clinical outcomes of stereotactic radiotherapy for bilateral vestibular schwannomas in neurofibromatosis type 2 patients

PURPOSE

The evidence for treating patients with neurofibromatosis 2-related vestibular schwannoma (VS-NF2) using hypofractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (HSRT) is limited. This study aimed to investigate clinical outcomes in patients with VS-NF2 treated with Robotic HSRT.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 25 NF2 patients with 48 VSs who were treated using Robotic HSRT at Ramathibodi Hospital from January 2009 to January 2020.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 98 months (range, 24-155 months). Median tumor volume was 2.3 cm3 (range, 0.4-28.3 cm3). Median prescribed dose was 18 Gy (range, 18-25 Gy) in three fractions (range, 3-5). The 5- and 10-year local control rates were 87% and 80%, respectively. The 5- and 10-year hearing preservation rates were 59% and 35%, respectively. Three patients developed new symptoms associated with transient volume expansion after treatment: hydrocephalus in one, facial weakness in one, and ataxia in one. No patient developed worsening of trigeminal nerve function. No histologically confirmed of radiation induced malignancy was reported in the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic HSRT demonstrated excellent long-term tumor control with a low non-auditory complication rate in patients with VS-NF2. However, preservation of hearing remains a major concern.

Outcome after Radiotherapy for Vestibular Schwannomas (VS)—Differences in Tumor Control, Symptoms and Quality of Life after Radiotherapy with Photon versus Proton Therapy

Background: To evaluate differences in local tumor control (LC), symptoms and quality of life (QOL) of 261 patients with VS after stereotactic radiosurgery/hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRS/HFSRT) vs. fractionated radiotherapy (FRT) vs. fractionated proton therapy (FPT) were studied. Methods: For SRS/HFSRT (n = 149), the median fraction dose applied was 12 Gy. For FRT (n = 87) and FPT (n = 25), the median cumulative doses applied were 57.6 Gy and 54 Gy (RBE), respectively. FRT and FPT used single median doses of 1.8 Gy/Gy (RBE). Median follow-up was 38 months. We investigated dosimetry for organs at risk and analyzed toxicity and QOL by sending out a questionnaire. Results: LC was 99.5% at 12 months after RT with no statistical difference between treatment groups (p = 0.19). LC was significantly lower in NF2 patients (p = 0.004) and in patients with higher tumor extension grade (p = 0.039). The hearing preservation rate was 97% at 12 months after RT with no statistical difference between treatment groups (p = 0.31). Facial and trigeminal nerve affection after RT occurred as mild symptoms with highest toxicity rate in FPT patients. Conclusion: SRS/HFSRT, FRT and FPT for VS show similar overall clinical and functional outcomes. Cranial nerve impairment rates vary, potentially due to selection bias with larger VS in the FRT and FPT group.

Effectiveness and Toxicity of Fractionated Proton Beam Radiotherapy for Cranial Nerve Schwannoma Unsuitable for Stereotactic Radiosurgery

Purpose

In this benign tumor entity, preservation of cranial nerve function is of special importance. Due to its advantageous physical properties, proton beam radiotherapy (PRT) is a promising approach that spares healthy tissue. Could PRT go along with satisfactory preservation rates for cranial nerve function without compromising tumor control in patients with cranial nerve schwannoma unsuitable for stereotactic radiosurgery?

Methods

We analyzed 45 patients with cranial nerve schwannomas who underwent PRT between 2012 and 2020 at our institution. Response assessment was performed by MRI according to RECIST 1.1, and toxicity was graded following CTCAE 5.0.

Results

The most common schwannoma origin was the vestibulocochlear nerve with 82.2%, followed by the trigeminal nerve with 8.9% and the glossopharyngeal nerve as well as the vagal nerve, both with each 4.4%. At radiotherapy start, 58% of cranial nerve schwannomas were progressive and 95.6% were symptomatic. Patients were treated with a median total dose of 54 Gy RBE in 1.8 Gy RBE per fraction. MRI during the median follow-up period of 42 months (IQR 26–61) revealed stable disease in 93.3% of the patients and partial regression in 6.7%. There was no case of progressive disease. New or worsening cranial nerve dysfunction was found in 20.0% of all patients, but always graded as CTCAE °I-II. In seven cases (16%), radiation-induced contrast enhancements (RICE) were detected after a median time of 14 months (range 2–26 months). RICE were asymptomatic (71%) or transient symptomatic (CTCAE °II; 29%). No CTCAE °III/IV toxicities were observed. Lesions regressed during the follow-up period in three of the seven cases, and no lesion progressed during the follow-up period.

Conclusion

These data demonstrate excellent effectiveness with 100% local control in a median follow-up period of 3.6 years with a promising cranial nerve functional protection rate of 80%. RICE occurred in 16% of the patients after PRT and were not or only mildly symptomatic.

Intraoperative Cochlear Nerve Monitoring for Vestibular Schwannoma Resection and Simultaneous Cochlear Implantation in Neurofibromatosis Type 2: A Case Series

BACKGROUND

Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) often results in profound hearing loss and cochlear implantation is an emerging hearing rehabilitation option. However, cochlear implant (CI) outcomes in this population vary, and intraoperative monitoring to predict cochlear nerve viability and subsequent outcomes is not well-established.

OBJECTIVE

To review the use of intraoperative electrically evoked cochlear nerve monitoring in patients with NF2 simultaneous translabyrinthine (TL) vestibular schwannoma (VS) resection and cochlear implantation.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of 3 patients with NF2 that underwent simultaneous TL VS resection and cochlear implantation with electrical auditory brainstem response (eABR) measured throughout tumor resection. Patient demographics, preoperative assessments, surgical procedures, and outcomes were reviewed.

RESULTS

Patients 1 and 3 had a reliable eABR throughout tumor removal. Patient 2 had eABR pretumor removal, but post-tumor removal eABR presence could not be reliably determined because of electrical artifact interference. All patients achieved auditory percepts upon CI activation. Patients 1 and 2 experienced a decline in CI performance after 1 yr and after 3 mo, respectively. Patient 3 continues to perform well at 9 mo. Patients 2 and 3 are daily users of their CI.

CONCLUSION

Cochlear implantation is attainable in cases of NF2-associated VS resection. Intraoperative eABR may facilitate cochlear nerve preservation during tumor removal, though more data and long-term outcomes are needed to refine eABR methodology and predictive value for this population.

Giant intercostal nerve schwannoma in a patient with neurofibromatosis type 2

PURPOSE

To describe a case of giant intercostal nerve schwannoma successfully resected in a patient with neurofibromatosis type 2.

METHODS

A 44-year-old woman, with a history of neurofibromatosis type 2, presented with chest discomfort and mild dyspnea. She had undergone a recent resection of a large frontal parasagittal benign meningioma. Radiologic examinations showed a large lesion (9×12×9 cm) of the left hemithorax causing a complete atelectasis of left upper lobe. Bronchoscopy did not show any endobronchial alterations, apart from an ab estriseco compression of the left upper bronchial tree. A transthoracic needle biopsy was then performed and microscopic examination revealed a mesenchymal tumor composed of spindle-like cells.

RESULTS

A video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery procedure was proposed. The tumor mass appeared to be tenaciously adherent to the parietal pleura in its anterolateral aspect, confirming the radiologic appearance. No invasion of the lung parenchyma or parietal pleural metastases were visible. Therefore, a left posterolateral thoracotomy at the fifth intercostal space was performed and a macroscopic complete resection was carried out. The recovery was uneventful and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 5. The histologic examination revealed a moderate cellular proliferation of spindle-shaped and oval to polygonal cells with frequent Verocay bodies; mitotic figures were rare. The tumor cells were strongly S-100 positive. The microscopic features were consistent with benign intercostal schwannoma. Eight years later, the patient is disease-free and asymptomatic.

CONCLUSIONS

An unusual case of giant intercostal nerve schwannoma successfully resected in a patient with neurofibromatosis type 2 is described.

Anti-VEGF treatment improves neurological function in tumors of the nervous system

Research of various diseases of the nervous system has shown that VEGF has direct neuroprotective effects in the central and peripheral nervous systems, and indirect effects on improving neuronal vessel perfusion which leads to nerve protection. In the tumors of the nervous system, VEGF plays a critical role in tumor angiogenesis and tumor progression. The effect of anti-VEGF treatment on nerve protection and function has been recently reported - by normalizing the tumor vasculature, anti-VEGF treatment is able to relieve nerve edema and deliver oxygen more efficiently into the nerve, thus reducing nerve damage and improving nerve function. This review aims to summarize the divergent roles of VEGF in diseases of the nervous system and the recent findings of anti-VEGF therapy in nerve damage/regeneration and function in tumors, specifically, in Neurofibromatosis type 2 associated schwannomas.

Hearing optimisation in neurofibromatosis type 2: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

It is common for patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 to develop bilateral profound hearing loss hearing loss, and this is one of the main determinants of quality of life in this patient group.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this systematic review was to review the current literature regarding hearing outcomes of treatments for vestibular schwannomas in neurofibromatosis type 2 including conservative and medical management, radiotherapy, hearing preservation surgery and auditory implantation in order to determine the most effective way of preserving or rehabilitating hearing.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A MESH search in PubMed using search terms (('Neurofibromatosis 2' [Mesh]) AND 'Neuroma, Acoustic'[Mesh]) AND 'Hearing Loss' [Mesh] was performed. A search using keywords was also performed. Studies with adequate hearing outcome data were included. With the exception of the cochlear implant studies (cohort size was very small), case studies were excluded.

EVALUATION METHOD

The GRADE system was used to assess quality of publication. Formal statistical analysis of data was not performed because of very heterogenous data reporting.

RESULTS

Conservative management offers the best chance of hearing preservation in stable tumours. The use of bevacizumab probably improves the likelihood of hearing preservation in growing tumours in the short term and is probably more effective than hearing preservation surgery and radiotherapy in preserving hearing. Of the hearing preservation interventions, hearing preservation surgery probably offers better hearing preservation rates than radiotherapy for small tumours but recurrence rates for hearing preservation surgery were high. For patients with profound hearing loss, cochlear implantation provides significantly better auditory outcomes than auditory brainstem implantation. Patients with untreated stable tumours are likely to achieve the best outcomes from cochlear implantation. Those who have had their tumours treated with surgery or radiotherapy do not gain as much benefit from cochlear implantation than those with untreated tumours.

CONCLUSIONS

This review summarises the current literature related to hearing preservation/rehabilitation in patients with NF2. Whilst it provides indicative data, the quality of the data was low and should be interpreted with care. It is also important to consider that the management of vestibular schwannomas in NF2 is complex and decision-making is determined by many factors, not just the need to preserve hearing.

Does Proton Therapy Have a Future in CNS Tumors?

OPINION STATEMENT

Proton therapy is characterized by certain physical properties leading to a reduction in integral dose. As proton therapy becomes more widely available, the ongoing discussion on the real indications for proton therapy becomes more important. In the present article, data on proton therapy for tumors of the central nervous system (CNS) is summarized and discussed in view of modern photon treatments. Still today, no randomized controlled trials are available confirming any clinical benefit of protons in CNS tumors. For certain skull base lesions, such as chordomas and chondrosarcomas, dose escalation is possible with protons thus patients should be referred to a proton center if readily available. For vestibular schwannoma, at present, proton data are inferior to advanced photons. For glioma patients, early data is present for low-grade gliomas, presenting comparable results to photons; dose escalation studies for high-grade gliomas have led to significant side effects, thus strategies of dose-escalation need to rethought. For skull base meningiomas, data from stereotactic series and IMRT present excellent local control with minimal side effects, thus any improvement with protons might only be marginal. The largest benefit is considered in pediatric CNS tumors, due to the intricate radiation sensitivity of children's normal tissue, as well as the potential of long-term survivorship. Long-term data is still lacking, and even recent analyses do not all lead to a clear reduction in side effects with improvement of outcome; furthermore, clinical data seem to be comparable. However, based on the preclinical evidence, proton therapy should be evaluated in every pediatric patient. Protons most likely have a benefit in terms of reduction of long-term side effects, such as neurocognitive sequelae or secondary malignancies; moreover, dose escalation can be performed in radio-resistant histologies. Clinical data with long-term follow-up is still warranted to prove any superiority to advanced photons in CNS tumors. If available, protons should be evaluated for chordoma or chondrosarcoma of the skull base and pediatric tumors. However, many factors are important for excellent oncology care, and no time delay or inferior oncological care should be accepted for the sake of protons only.

The Solid Component of Radiographically Non-Growing, Post-Radiated Vestibular Schwannoma Retains Proliferative Capacity: Implications for Patient Counseling

OBJECTIVE

Nearly all radiated vestibular schwannomas (VS) have solid tissue remaining at the radiation bed. The viability and proliferation capacity of this tissue has never been objectively assessed. The goals of our study were to (1) determine whether this tissue retains the morphological and immunohistochemical features of VS and (2) evaluate whether the tissue is capable of proliferation in cell culture.

METHODS

Case history, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), cell culture, histology, and immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

We report the first case of a post-radiated, sporadic VS patient whose non-growing, residual MR-enhancing solid tissue was examined histologically and in cell culture. These cells were architecturally identical to non-radiated VS, had a Ki67 proliferative index similar to non-radiated sporadic and NF2-associated VS, were S100 positive, and grew in culture with kinetics comparable to non-radiated VS.

CONCLUSION

The long-term risk for delayed tumor growth and/or secondary malignancy in radiated VS patients is unknown. Because the average life span in the United States is nearly 80 years, patients should be informed that (1) residual VS cells are viable even when tumors appear to be non-growing on MRI, (2) post-radiation surveillance imaging is required indefinitely, and (3) radiation may incur more risk in those patients with life expectancy>20-25 years.