1
|
Bashti M, DeLong C, Gurses ME, Lu VM, Merenzon M, Morell A, Daggubati L, Komotar RJ, Shah AH, Ivan ME. Surgical Management of Brain Metastasis from Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Single-Center Experience. World Neurosurg 2024; 187:e568-e576. [PMID: 38704143 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.04.130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2024] [Accepted: 04/21/2024] [Indexed: 05/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Brain metastases from esophageal cancer (BMEC) are rare and aggressive, with limited literature on optimal treatment modalities and a standard of care yet to be established. The objective of this study was to systematically review existing literature and perform a retrospective analysis of our institution's patients to evaluate the influence of different treatment modalities on patient outcomes. METHODS A systematic review of the literature following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines and a retrospective review of our institutional experience with BMEC were both conducted. Data based on mean survival,histology, metastasis location, and treatment modality were abstracted. RESULTS A total of 48 studies representing 136 patients with BMEC were identified, in addition to the 11 patients treated at our institution. There were a total of 100 males (12 unreported), with a median age of 62.2 at diagnosis in our systematic review, along with 8 males with a median age of 62 in our institutional review. Collectively, survival rates observed based on histology were not similar (squamous cell carcinoma: 9.2 months, adenocarcinoma: 13.4 months), however, based on treatment modalities (surgery: 11.6 months, radiation: 10.4 months, chemotherapy: 12.3 months), and metastasis location (supratentorial: 10.5 months, infratentorial: 9.9 months), the survival times were comparable. CONCLUSIONS Our review suggests that causes of death were often independent of brain metastases highlighting the need for further studies on early detection and prevention of primary esophageal cancer, as well as improved treatment modalities for BMECs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malek Bashti
- Department of Neurosurgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA.
| | - Chase DeLong
- Department of Neurosurgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Muhammet Enes Gurses
- Department of Neurosurgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Victor M Lu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Martín Merenzon
- Department of Neurosurgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Alexis Morell
- Department of Neurosurgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Lekhaj Daggubati
- Department of Neurosurgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Ricardo Jorge Komotar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA; Sylvester Cancer Center, University of Miami Health System, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Ashish H Shah
- Department of Neurosurgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Michael E Ivan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA; Sylvester Cancer Center, University of Miami Health System, Miami, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Merchant SJ, Kong W, Mahmud A, Booth CM, Hanna TP. Palliative Radiotherapy for Esophageal and Gastric Cancer: Population-Based Patterns of Utilization and Outcomes in Ontario, Canada. J Palliat Care 2023; 38:157-166. [PMID: 35043749 PMCID: PMC10026159 DOI: 10.1177/08258597211072946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patients with incurable esophageal and gastric cancer may develop local symptoms for which palliative radiotherapy (PRT) may be considered. We sought to evaluate patterns in utilization and outcomes of patients receiving PRT for incurable esophageal and gastric cancer in Ontario, Canada using health administrative data. METHODS Linked health administrative databases were used to identify patients receiving PRT for incurable esophageal and gastric cancer. Primary outcomes were utilization and delivery of PRT, utilization of endoscopic dilation with or without stent insertion after completion of PRT and survival from 1) date of diagnosis and 2) start of PRT. RESULTS We identified 2500 patients who received PRT. Mean age was 70 ± 13 years and the majority (75%, n = 1873/2500) were male. Over half of the patients had a diagnosis of gastric cancer (58%, n = 1453/2500) and began PRT within 6 months of cancer diagnosis (85%, n = 2125/2500). Of the 2500 patients in the cohort, 2174 patients received EBRT with few receiving brachytherapy (n = 326) or EBRT and brachytherapy combined (n = 88). Over the study period, there was an increase in the number of patients receiving PRT (136 in 2007 to 290 in 2016), as well as in the use of advanced conformal radiotherapy techniques. Only 5% (115/2500) required dilation with or without stent insertion after completion of PRT. Median overall and cancer-specific survival of the cohort was 205 days and 209 days from date of diagnosis and 108 days and 110 days from start of PRT. CONCLUSIONS PRT is an important treatment for patients with incurable esophageal and gastric cancer who present with local symptoms. Utilization of PRT and advanced EBRT techniques increased over the study period. Few patients require endoscopic dilation with or without stent insertion after completion of PRT suggesting that PRT provides favorable symptom control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaila J Merchant
- Division of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Weidong Kong
- Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aamer Mahmud
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christopher M Booth
- Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Timothy P Hanna
- Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cheng S, Yang L, Dai X, Wang J, Han X. The risk and prognostic factors for brain metastases in esophageal cancer patients: an analysis of the SEER database. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:1057. [PMID: 34563149 PMCID: PMC8465786 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08802-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Brain metastases were rare in esophageal cancer patients. Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, the present study investigated the incidence, risk and prognostic factors of brain metastases in esophageal cancer patients. METHODS Retrieving esophageal cancer patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2018 from the SEER database, univariable and multivariable logistic and cox regression models were used to investigate the risk factors for brain metastases development and prognosis, respectively. The brain metastases predicting nomogram was constructed, evaluated and validated. The overall survival (OS) of patients with brain metastases was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS A total of 34,107 eligible esophageal cancer patients were included and 618 of them were diagnosed with brain metastases (1.8%). The median survival of the brain metastatic esophageal cancer patients was 5 (95% CI: 5-7) months. The presence of bone metastases and lung metastases were the homogeneously associated factors for the development and prognosis of brain metastases in esophageal cancer patients. Patients younger than 65 years, American Indian/Alaska Native race (vs. White), overlapping lesion (vs. Upper third), esophageal adenocarcinoma histology subtype, higher N stage, and liver metastases were positively associated with brain metastases occurrence. The calibration curve, ROC curve, and C-index exhibited good performance of the nomogram for predicting brain metastases. CONCLUSIONS Homogeneous and heterogeneous factors were found for the development and prognosis of brain metastases in esophageal cancer patients. The nomogram had good calibration and discrimination for predicting brain metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shizhao Cheng
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tianjin Chest Hospital, Tianjin, 300222, China
| | - Lei Yang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, 518035, China
| | - Xin Dai
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, 300052, China
| | - Jing Wang
- Department of Pathology, Tianjin Chest Hospital, Tianjin, 300222, China
| | - Xingpeng Han
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tianjin Chest Hospital, Tianjin, 300222, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jiao W, Lin C, Xiao L, Zhang X, Hu M, Zhao M, Wang J. Clinicopathological Features and Prognoses in Patients With Brain Metastases From Small-Cell Esophageal Carcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis of 18 Patients. Front Oncol 2021; 11:654727. [PMID: 33937062 PMCID: PMC8085384 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.654727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2021] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to examine the clinical characteristics of patients with brain metastases (BM) from small-cell esophageal carcinoma (SCEC) and to explore the association of the corresponding factors with overall survival (OS). Methods: The data of 18 patients with brain metastases from SCEC, diagnosed from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2018, in the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University were analyzed retrospectively. Results: The 18 patients who were included in this study accounted for 6.7% of the patients with SCEC diagnosed from 2006 to 2018. Of the 18 patients, 8 (44.4%) were females. For the entire cohort, the median OS was 7 months, the 1-year OS was 22.2%, and the 2-year OS was 0%. For patients who received whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and for those who did not (13 vs. 5), the median OS was 11.9 and 3 months, respectively, and the 1-year OS was 30.8 and 0%, respectively. When comparing diagnosis-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (DS-GPA) scores of patients with BM from SCEC ranging from 2.5 to 4 and from 0 to 2, the median OS was 13.1 and 4 months, respectively, and the 1-year OS was 57.1 and 0%, respectively. In the univariable regression, patients who received WBRT had improved OS compared to those who did not (HR = 0.249, p = 0.018), and patients with a DS-GPA score of 2.5–4 were associated with improved OS compared with patients with a DS-GPA score of 0–2 (HR = 0.050, p = 0.005). Conclusion: The incidence of brain metastases in patients with SCEC is low, but the prognosis in those patients is very poor. The DS-GPA score may be a prognostic factor of patients with BM from SCEC. Brain radiotherapy could improve the survival of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenpeng Jiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Chi Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States
| | - Linlin Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Xinyuan Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Mengzhu Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Min Zhao
- Department of Oncology, Hebei Chest Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Jun Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| |
Collapse
|