Advanced pneumonic type of lung adenocarcinoma: survival predictors and treatment efficacy of the tumor

Combined CT-Based Radiomics and Clinic-Radiological Characteristics for Preoperative Differentiation of Solitary-Type Invasive Mucinous and Non-Mucinous Lung Adenocarcinoma

Purpose

The clinical, pathological, gene expression, and prognosis of invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (IMA) differ from those of invasive non-mucinous adenocarcinoma (INMA), but it is not easy to distinguish these two. This study aims to explore the value of combining CT-based radiomics features with clinic-radiological characteristics for preoperative diagnosis of solitary-type IMA and to establish an optimal diagnostic model.

Methods

In this retrospective study, a total of 220 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to a training cohort (n = 154; 73 IMA and 81 INMA) and a testing cohort (n = 66; 31 IMA and 35 INMA). Radiomics features and clinic-radiological characteristics were extracted from plain CT images. The radiomics models for predicting solitary-type IMA were developed by three classifiers: linear discriminant analysis (LDA), logistic regression-least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LR-LASSO), and support vector machine (SVM). The combined model was constructed by integrating radiomics and clinic-radiological features with the best performing classifier. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate models' performance, and the area under the curve (AUC) were compared by the DeLong test. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was conducted to assess the clinical utility.

Results

Regarding CT characteristics, tumor lung interface, and pleural retraction were the independent risk factors of solitary-type IMA. The radiomics model using the SVM classifier outperformed the other two classifiers in the testing cohort, with an AUC of 0.776 (95% CI: 0.664-0.888). The combined model incorporating radiomics features and clinic-radiological factors was the optimal model, with AUCs of 0.843 (95% CI: 0.781-0.906) and 0.836 (95% CI: 0.732-0.940) in the training and testing cohorts, respectively.

Conclusion

The combined model showed good ability in predicting solitary-type IMA and can provide a non-invasive and efficient approach to clinical decision-making.

Construction of the optimization prognostic model based on differentially expressed immune genes of lung adenocarcinoma

Background

Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is the most common pathology subtype of lung cancer. In recent years, immunotherapy, targeted therapy and chemotherapeutics conferred a certain curative effects. However, the effect and prognosis of LUAD patients are different, and the efficacy of existing LUAD risk prediction models is unsatisfactory.

Methods

The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) LUAD dataset was downloaded. The differentially expressed immune genes (DEIGs) were analyzed with edgeR and DESeq2. The prognostic DEIGs were identified by COX regression. Protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was inferred by STRING using prognostic DEIGs with p value< 0.05. The prognostic model based on DEIGs was established using Lasso regression. Immunohistochemistry was used to assess the expression of FERMT2, FKBP3, SMAD9, GATA2, and ITIH4 in 30 cases of LUAD tissues.

Results

In total,1654 DEIGs were identified, of which 436 genes were prognostic. Gene functional enrichment analysis indicated that the DEIGs were involved in inflammatory pathways. We constructed 4 models using DEIGs. Finally, model 4, which was constructed using the 436 DEIGs performed the best in prognostic predictions, the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was 0.824 for 3 years, 0.838 for 5 years, 0.834 for 10 years. High levels of FERMT2, FKBP3 and low levels of SMAD9, GATA2, ITIH4 expression are related to the poor overall survival in LUAD (p < 0.05). The prognostic model based on DEIGs reflected infiltration by immune cells.

Conclusions

In our study, we built an optimal prognostic signature for LUAD using DEIGs and verified the expression of selected genes in LUAD. Our result suggests immune signature can be harnessed to obtain prognostic insights.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-07911-8.