1
|
Azzarelli A, Guzzon A, Pilotti S, Quagliuolo V, Bono A, Di Pietro S. Accuracy of Breast Cancer Diagnosis by Physical, Radiologic and Cytologic Combined Examinations. TUMORI JOURNAL 2018; 69:137-41. [PMID: 6679432 DOI: 10.1177/030089168306900209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Physical examination, mammography and fine-needle aspiration cytology were performed in 1498 consecutive cases with a solitary solid lump of the female breast. The intent was to verify the validity of this diagnostic triplet in the accuracy of the preoperative diagnosis of breast cancer. Clinically sure cancers were excluded from the study. The collected data were evaluated in terms of sensitivity, specificity and predictivity of any procedure alone or in combination. In 1138 cases confirmed by histology (514 carcinomas and 669 benign or non-neoplastic lesions), the physical examination and mammography were very sensitive (respectively 96% and 84%) but with a high rate of false-positive reports (respectively 20% and 18%). The cytologic diagnosis was less sensitive (65%), mostly due to many inadequate smears, but highly specific (93%) and predictive for malignancy (99%) when the cytologic report was frankly positive. Any single procedure improved the overall sensitivity, and taken together this triplet appears to be the most effective noninvasive diagnostic combination that provides in a short time with minimal cost and discomfort, a diagnosis of certain malignancy in about 50% of carcinomas with a predictivity close to 100%, when cytology detected malignancy.
Collapse
|
2
|
Di Pietro S, Re A. Further Trial of Clinical Diagnostic Index for the Malignancy Diagnosis of Mammary Nodules. TUMORI JOURNAL 2018; 61:5-16. [PMID: 775711 DOI: 10.1177/030089167506100102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The results of a further trial of a clinical diagnostic index (CDI) for ill-defined mammary nodules, based on the algebrical results of positive numerical values (for a suspect feature), or negative numerical values (for non suspect feature), attributed to 10 characteristic semeiological features, previously described, are reported. 222 nodules were clinically examined, all subsequently subjected to mammography and 188 of them to ther-mograpy; they were then operated and examined histologically. Of 106 malignant nodules the accuracy of the CDI was 88.6 % with 4.7 % false negatives; for mammography 65 % with 21.7 % false negatives; for termography (out of 87 cases) 66.6 with 23 % false negatives. The accuracy in 116 benign nodules was 45.6 % for the CDI, 32.7 % for mammography and 29.7 % for termography (out of 101 cases). In three cases of malignant nodules in women below 35 years of age, all three examinations gave negative results. The relations between the diagnostic errors of the three examinations, as well as the dimensions and histo-type of the nodules are also considered. It may be concluded, that the CDI is a simple rapid and highly accurate clinical investigation for early diagnosis of mammary carcinoma.
Collapse
|