Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) in the Follow-Up of Disease-Free Breast Cancer Patients

CEA Determination in the Follow-Up of Extracolorectal Neoplasms

CEA was initially described as a tumor and organ specific colorectal antigen, but later found by more sensitive methods in other tumors (stomach, pancreas, lung, breast) and in minor amounts in inflammatory, normal adult and fetal organs of the gastrointestinal tract. The main clinical application of CEA concerns its pretherapeutic and serial determination as circulating antigen in serum and other body fluids by means of CEA-specific, commercially available test kits. By clinical studies a significant correlation has been proven between the pretherapeutic serum CEA level and tumor stages and prognosis. Moreover, serial CEA level changes have been shown a valuable monitor following operation or during radio/chemotherapy anticipating and reflecting the clinical course of disease. In combination with newly established tumor markers, the main clinical indication for CEA determination in addition to colorectal cancer concerns monitoring of patients with stomach (+ CA 72-4), lung (+ NSE/SCC) and breast cancer (+ CA 15-3/MCA).

American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast cancer

PURPOSE

To update the recommendations for the use of tumor marker tests in the prevention, screening, treatment, and surveillance of breast cancer.

METHODS

For the 2007 update, an Update Committee composed of members from the full Panel was formed to complete the review and analysis of data published since 1999. Computerized literature searches of MEDLINE and the Cochrane Collaboration Library were performed. The Update Committee's literature review focused attention on available systematic reviews and meta-analyses of published tumor marker studies. In general, significant health outcomes (overall survival, disease-free survival, quality of life, lesser toxicity, and cost-effectiveness) were used for making recommendations. Recommendations and

CONCLUSIONS

Thirteen categories of breast tumor markers were considered, six of which were new for the guideline. The following categories showed evidence of clinical utility and were recommended for use in practice: CA 15-3, CA 27.29, carcinoembryonic antigen, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, urokinase plasminogen activator, plasminogen activator inhibitor 1, and certain multiparameter gene expression assays. Not all applications for these markers were supported, however. The following categories demonstrated insufficient evidence to support routine use in clinical practice: DNA/ploidy by flow cytometry, p53, cathepsin D, cyclin E, proteomics, certain multiparameter assays, detection of bone marrow micrometastases, and circulating tumor cells.

Placental isoferritin (PLF) in comparison with MCA and CEA in advanced breast cancer--first data from a pilot study

The development of new and effective marker substances has optimized tumor-marker-guided follow-up programs to monitor generalization of disease and to assess the therapeutic outcome. Isoferritins of placental origin were first determined in the serum of patients with lymphoproliferative disease by way of the recently developed monoclonal antibody CMH-9. We have set up an Austro-Israeli working group and analysed 64 patients in terms of the sensitivity of placental ferritin (PLF) compared with the standard markers carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and mucinous-like cancer-associated antigen (MCA) in patients with metastatic breast cancer. We have additionally evaluated the importance of combined marker determination. Analysis of the data in view of site of metastatic spread yielded satisfying results both for PLF (sensitivity 70.4%) as well as MCA (sensitivity 76.9%) for visceral metastases; a combination of these two markers revealed a striking sensitivity of 88.4%, which, however, could not be improved by adding the third marker (CEA). With regard to non-visceral metastases, CEA and MCA were clearly superior.

A rational postoperative follow-up with carcinoembryonic antigen, tissue polypeptide antigen, and urinary hydroxyproline in breast cancer patients

Breast cancer patients (n = 224) aged 28 to 81 were postoperatively followed up with serial determinations of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA), and urinary hydroxyproline (OHP). The clinical usefulness of these tumor markers to diagnose and monitor distant metastases was compared with that of the imaging techniques commonly used to monitor breast cancer patients (bone scanning [BS], liver echography [LE], chest radiograph, and skeletal radiograph). So far, 23 patients withdrew from the study, and distant metastases occurred in 33 patients. In 91% of the metastatic patients, constant elevation or progressive increase in serum CEA and/or TPA levels were the first pathologic findings of the relapse. Of the remaining 168 nonrelapsed patients, 122 were followed up longer than 24 months (43 +/- 17 months; mean +/- SD). In these 122 patients the false-positive results of CEA, TPA, and OHP were 0.8%, 2.4%, and 0%, respectively, when used simultaneously with clinical examination and the common laboratory examinations. BS and LE are the only imaging techniques that showed such a high sensitivity to be suitable in the postoperative follow-up of breast cancer patients. Nevertheless, because BS has a low specificity and is not harmless, it should be performed at longer intervals than tumor markers. Eventually, in the relapsed patients, TPA and OHP well reflected the response to treatment better than CEA and prevented useless radiologic examinations.

The role of serum CEA as a prognostic indicator in stage II and III breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) values in 529 patients treated in two consecutive adjuvant chemotherapy protocols were analyzed to determine if CEA values correlated with disease-free status or prognostic utility. CEA values were evaluated preoperatively, before chemotherapy, at the conclusion of chemotherapy, and during postchemotherapy followup. The sensitivity of CEA for predicting disease recurrence was low; however, any abnormal CEA at the conclusion of chemotherapy and during followup significantly correlated with reduced disease-free and overall survival. A CEA value greater than or equal to 20 ng/ml at the end of chemotherapy or during followup was highly specific and a strongly positive predictor for the presence of metastases. Abnormal CEA values before chemotherapy that became normal at the conclusion of chemotherapy were associated with a significantly reduced recurrence rate. An abnormal CEA value obtained before or after adjuvant chemotherapy is clinically useful and can provide prognostic information.

Prognostic value of CEA and ferritin assay in breast cancer: a multivariate analysis

The prognostic significance of preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and ferritin levels was evaluated in 191 women operated for breast cancer. The influence of CEA, ferritin and another 11 clinical and pathological features on the disease-free survival was investigated in a multivariate analysis, using Cox's proportional hazard model. Axillary node status (P = 0.004), CEA level (P = 0.011), and the histological grade of the tumor (P = 0.029) emerged as independent prognostic factors. By contrast, no significant relationship was found between ferritin and disease-free survival. These three parameters were used to derive a prognostic index (I) for each patient. Multivariate analysis showed that its prognostic value was better than the value of any single factor (P less than 0.0001). The I score was used to divide patients into groups at different risk of recurrence: low, moderate and high (97.5%, 45% and 22.5% of recurrence-free patients at 3 years respectively). The data showed that the prognosis of patients with different combinations of node status and tumor grade was related to the level of CEA. Only women with very good (node-negative with well-differentiated tumors) or very bad prognosis (node-positive with four or more metastatic nodes and poorly differentiated tumors) had a disease-free survival independent of CEA values. These findings suggest that the preoperative measurement of CEA enhances the possibility of correctly predicting outcome and hence could be of assistance in the planning of adjuvant therapies.

Carcinoembryonic antigen in breast cancer. Clinical review

Carcinoembryonic antigen is widely used as a tumor marker for gastrointestinal neoplasms. Its role in the management of other tumors is poorly defined. This review considers the place of carcinoembryonic antigen measurement in the management of breast cancer and concludes that sufficient data exist to support its use in clinical practice. Of the many potential uses, the major role for carcinoembryonic antigen measurement in breast cancer is in following patients with advanced disease, especially patients with bone metastases.

Follow-Up after Mastectomy for Breast Cancer. Observations in 96 Patients

From 1978 to 1982 at the Oncology Unit of the Rho Hospital, we followed 96 women who had been operated for breast cancer. In 22 cases (23%) the first signs of recurrence were changes in the following: physical examination (9), symptoms (7), ESR (3), bone scan (2), alkaline phosphatase (1), chest X-ray (1). An adequate follow-up schedule is based on the following: a) limited examinations causing little disturbance to the patient, easily feasible, sensitive, specific, and of limited cost; b) lead-intervals of various tests set according to the risk of relapse; c) critical periodic review of the series, with constant updating of information in the literature.