Aminoglutethimide as Second-Line Endocrine Treatment in Metastatic Breast Cancer

Aminoglutethimide in Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Refractory to Multiple Hormonal and Cytostatic Treatments

Eighty-seven consecutive patients with metastatic breast cancer were treated with aminoglutethimide plus hydrocortisone. All patients were postmenopausal and had progressive disease following prior chemotherapy and endocrine therapy. Eighty-five women were evaluable for drug response. One patient showed complete remission and 14 patients partial response, for an overall response rate of 17%. The median duration of response was 11+ months. The response rate was highest in the presence of soft tissue involvement (36%). The most common side effects were transient skin rash, lethargy, and dizziness. Two patients discontinued treatment because of cutaneous allergy. Aminoglutethimide can be considered a moderately active agent when utilized as second- or third-line hormonal therapy.

The definition of the 'no change' category in patients treated with endocrine therapy and chemotherapy for advanced carcinoma of the breast

In the criteria used for assessment of response to treatment for advanced breast cancer the definition of no change (NC) is clear; however, there is no indication of the duration of stabilization required for patients to qualify for this category of response. We have made the assumption that NC is a worthwhile category of response if the overall time to progression (TTP) and survival of this group is not significantly different from patients with partial remissions (PR). Two hundred and sixty-three evaluable patients treated with endocrine therapy and 302 evaluable chemotherapy-treated patients were studied and the TTP and survival curves for PR and periods of NC from 1 to 6 months compared. For the endocrine-treated patients the TTP and survival curves for NC became non-significantly different from the PR curves after 4 and 5 months respectively. For chemotherapy-treated patients the TTP curves became non-significantly different from PR at 4 months and for survival the period was 3 months. In order to define NC as a useful category of response and to eliminate the possibility that NC taken for a shorter period could simply represent a slowly progressive tumour, we suggest that the minimum period of disease stabilization be taken as 5 months for both endocrine- and chemotherapy-treated patients.