Diagnosis and First-Line Treatment of Breast Cancer in Italian General Hospitals

Quality of Care of Colorectal Cancer Patients in General Hospitals: Diffusion and Impact of Management Guidelines

Over the last ten years the Italian National Research Council (C.N.R.) has launched an educational program aimed at favoring the delivery of the most up to date care for cancer patients in community hospitals. Among various tumors for which this effort was undertaken, management guidelines for colorectal cancer were developed in 1978 by a multidisciplinary team of national experts and reported in booklets distributed nationwide under the aegis of the Colorectal Cancer Task Force. In 1988, the C.N.R. funded an evaluation to learn whether: a) the guidelines were widely diffused in the target physician populations; b) their content was accepted by those who received them and, c) practice patterns were consistent with the recommendations in the guidelines. Overall results indicate only a limited effect. Despite clear evidence of a positive self-selection in the physicians’ survey, guidelines were familiar to only 47% of responders. Although acceptance of at least some specific recommendations was good among doctors aware of the guidelines (≥ 60% responders), this finding loses relevance since a not negligible proportion of those not aware of them had the same convictions. Finally, analysis of practice patterns showed serious deficiencies (mostly in terms of thoroughness of operative staging) even in centers where more widespread knowledge of the guidelines should have led to better quality of care. The paper also discusses the comparability of our findings to results of a similar evaluation carried out in the U.S.A. Our results underscore the importance of analyzing the process of diffusion in any assessment of interventions based on knowledge dissemination.

Trends in Patterns of Care for Breast Cancer in Italy (1979-1987)

We reviewed care delivered to about 2,500 breast cancer patients in general hospitals over the period 1979-1987 using data from three surveys. The most important and consistent failure was in diagnostic timeliness: about one out of four patients was diagnosed six or more months after the first symptom leading to an almost doubled probability of being diagnosed with more advanced disease. Acceptance of treatment recommendations seemed less satisfactory for surgery than for adjuvant treatments. Conservative surgery still appeared to have limited acceptance for patients with small primary tumor (21 and 23% in 1983 and 1987, respectively) although, starting 1983, there was a shift from the Halsted to the Patey type of radical mastectomy. Follow-up was routine in most node-negative patients and adjuvant chemotherapy was already well established treatment for most pre-menopausal node-positive women (64, 79 and 76% in 1979, 1983 and 1987, respectively). Some form of adjuvant treatment in postmenopausal node-positive women was already present In 1983 but became more widespread in 1987 (82%): this being mostly accounted for by the increase in the use of tamoxifen (delivered alone or in combination with chemotherapy to 53% of women). Overall, our results suggest that areas of care more dependent on organization or doctors’ and patients’ education (i.e. diagnostic timeliness and accessibility) are those where deficiencies seen to be least amenable to change in the absence of concerted intervention. Among more narrowly defined clinical issues, there appeared to be some dissonance between the rapid acceptance of adjuvant treatments and the still slow pace of acceptance of less aggressive procedures by surgeons.

Treatment Patterns in Elderly Patients (≥70 YEARS) with Breast Carcinoma. A Retrospective Study of the Gruppo Oncologico Clinico Cooperativo del Nord-est (Goccne)

The pattern of treatment used in elderly women affected by breast carcinoma was evaluated in a retrospective study by the North-East Clinical Cooperative Group in Italy (GOCCNE). Six divisions were involved in the study. The medical records of 115 elderly women were reviewed; the women's median age was 75 years (range, 70-93). Surgery was used in 70/72 operable patients (97 %), although limited surgery plus radiotherapy was used in only 7.5 %. Most stage II patients were treated with adjuvant tamoxifen, as were younger postmenopausal patients, according to the guidelines of the Bethesda Consensus Meeting. Comorbid conditions are of particular concern in therapy planning, considering that more stage III patients died of competing causes than for disease progression. The role of chemotherapy was very marginal.

Analysis of the Recourse to Conservative Surgery in the Treatment of Breast Tumors

Aims and Background

Conservative surgery is the treatment of choice for malignant tumors, at least up to stage II. The aim of this study was to analyze the recourse to conservative surgery for breast tumors and its determinants (ie, characteristics of hospitals and patients).

Methods

The study was conducted in Italy's Lazio region and was based on administrative data of the regional Hospital Information System, a database on hospitalizations. We selected all regional hospitalizations for therapeutic breast surgery over 1997, classifying them as either “conservative” or “non-conservative”. The other variables considered were type of hospital, number of beds, volume of activity (average annual number of hospitalizations for breast cancer surgery), specific diagnosis, severity of cancer, and patient's age, place of residence, and socioeconomic level. A logistic model was used for multivariate analysis.

Results

A total of 7235 hospitalizations were analyzed, 3570 (49%) for malignant tumors and 3665 (51%) for benign disease. The logistic model showed that the factors most closely correlated with conservative surgery were age (OR = 2.2; 95% Cl: 1.8-2.6, for the age group <50 years compared to >70 years); severity of cancer (OR = 0.6; 95% Cl: 0.5-0.8, for non-localized compared to localized tumors), and volume of activity of the hospital (OR = 1.3; 95% Cl: 1.0-1.6, for hospitals with >70 operations/year compared to those with <20 operations/year). The study also revealed that surgery for malignant tumors was performed by both high-volume and low-volume hospitals throughout the region.

Conclusions

The association between conservative surgery and younger age, even after controlling for the severity of cancer, points to the need to encourage adherence to the existing guidelines. The association between conservative surgery and high-volume hospitals and the finding that a high proportion of breast operations is performed in low-volume facilities suggest that further efforts should be made to promote admission to high-volume hospitals.

Performance of General Hospitals in Delivering Adjuvant Chemotherapy to Breast Cancer Patients

Indications for and modes of delivery of adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer were assessed in a group of 353 patients followed within a cohort of 1110 newly diagnosed cases in 54 Italian general hospitals. Among node-positive patients 79 % pre- and 44 % postmenopausal women had the treatment. Only a few node-negative women (10 % pre- and 5 % post-menopausal) were treated. The multidrug combination CMF was by far the most commonly employed (89 %) in its two types: cCMF (the classic combination where cyclophosphamide is given orally on days 1–14 and the two other drugs i.v. on days 1 and 8 every 28 days for either 6 or 12 cycles) to 33 % women and nCMF (the more recent combination where all three drugs are given i.v. on day 1 every 21 days for 12 cycles) to 63 %. The mode of delivery of treatment was consistent with the Italian National Breast Cancer Task Force (F.O.N. Ca. M.) recommendations for the cCMF combination, but the lack of clear guidelines on the use of nCMF led to wide variations in the total number of cycles administered. At present, however, it is hard to establish whether this will have any impact on patients’ outcome. Overall the study suggests that adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer has entered general practice and can be satisfactorily delivered at the community level. However, better guidelines need to specify more precisely the treatment indications (i.e. subgroups with greater expected benefits), regimen type (is nCMF still experimental or already standard?) and treatment duration, in view of the present uncertainty about what should be the standard for general practice. The paper finally discusses the feasibility of the treatment comparing general hospitals’ performance with that achieved in controlled clinical trials of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Current treatment modalities of breast-cancer patients in Alexandria, Egypt

Despite great advances in the treatment of breast cancer during recent years, many breast cancer patients still do not receive appropriate treatment. Data were collected during a 1-year period from nine general hospitals aiming at evaluating the quality of care delivered to breast cancer patients in Alexandria, Egypt. A total of 565 breast cancer patients were involved. The highest frequency of cases was diagnosed in stage II followed by stage III. Patey's modified radical mastectomy was the most commonly performed operation (82.65% of cases), regardless of the clinical stage or health facilities. Hormonal receptor status was rarely performed. There was no consensus regarding the type of systemic therapy (hormonal, chemotherapy or combined) to be administered for each clinical stage and menopausal status. Concerning postoperative radiotherapy, it was invariably the rule, regardless of the clinical stage. We conclude that, despite some improvement over the last few years (shorter diagnostic delay, larger use of standard classifications, and less radical surgery), the quality of management of breast cancer in Egyptian general hospitals is still not satisfactory.

Survival of women with breast cancer in Europe: variation with age, year of diagnosis and country. The EUROCARE Working Group

Breast cancer is the most frequent malignancy among women in developed countries. Prognosis is better than for other major cancers, and an improvement in survival has been reported for several populations in recent decades. Within the framework of EUROCARE, a population-based project concerned with the survival and care of cancer patients in Europe, we analysed data from 119,139 women diagnosed with breast cancer between 1978 and 1985 in 12 countries and followed for at least 6 years. Multiple regression models of relative survival, which take mortality from all other causes in each area into account, were used to estimate the effect of age, period of diagnosis and country on survival. For the comparison between countries, survival rates were age-standardised to the age structure of the entire study population. Women aged 40-49 years at diagnosis had the best prognosis in all countries and throughout the study period. Women younger than 30 years at diagnosis had a worse prognosis than those aged 30-39. The highest relative survival at 5 years was in Finland and Switzerland (about 74%), intermediate levels were found for Italy, France, The Netherlands, Denmark and Germany (about 70%) and the lowest rates were in Spain, the United Kingdom, Estonia and Poland (55-64%). During the 6 months following diagnosis, survival was highly dependent on age and was sharply lower in women older than 49 years. For women surviving more than 6 months after diagnosis, survival was similar for all ages, although women aged 40-49 still had the better prognosis. The average rate of death from breast cancer fell by about 2.5% for each year of diagnosis between 1978 and 1985. This improvement manifested mainly in younger and older women, for whom survival was initially less good. The largest improvement was seen in Poland (-15% death risk per year). We suggest that the better survival of women aged 40-49 at diagnosis is related to lower levels of circulating sex hormones, resulting in reduced stimulation of tumour cell growth. Early diagnosis may also be important in the peri-menopausal period due to increased diagnostic attention. Low survival in the United Kingdom may be due to inadequate adherence to consensus treatment guidelines and greater variation in treatment.

Do specialists do it better? The impact of specialization on the processes and outcomes of care for cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of specialization on processes and outcomes of care for cancer patients.

DATA SOURCE

Papers published in English between 1980 and 1995 and identified through MEDLINE and Embase (MeSH terms: NEOPLASM (exploded), and PHYSICIAN PRACTICE PATTERNS (or DECISION MAKING, ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL, QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE, DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE, HEALTH EDUCATION or OUTCOME ASSESSMENT HEALTH CARE), or through the reference lists of review articles.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies providing information on the association between quality of care indicators for cancer patients and clinician/centre degree of specialization. A total of 47 papers concerning 46 empirical studies were considered.

DATA EXTRACTION

For studies using process of care indicators, the proportion of specific procedures performed by specialists and non-specialists was abstracted. For studies using outcome indicators (e.g., mortality), the effect of specialization was quantified in terms of odds ratio (OR) expressing relative reduction in risk of death. The quality of individual studies using process or outcome indicators was assessed according to study design, avoidance of selection bias in patient identification and data analysis, degree of adjustment of the comparison between clinicians/centres with different levels of specialization.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Specialized centres/clinicians fared better both when process and outcome indicators were used. While the former varied widely in different studies and their clinical relevance was often questionable, mortality was consistently lower when care was provided by specialized centres/clinicians, with the effect size being greater in smaller studies. For breast cancer, where all the studies were of sufficiently good quality, a pooled estimate of the effect of specialization was performed which showed that specialized cancer care was associated with an 18% (95% CI: 12%-23%) reduction in mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the fact that care provided by specialized centres/clinicians appeared to be better both when assessed in relation to process indicators and to mortality, this evidence should be considered far from conclusive because of major methodological flaws in these studies. Relative to current efforts to promote evidence-based policy-making, this review underscores the limited capability of scientific information to provide reliable guidelines for structuring better health care systems.

A retrospective comparison of detection and treatment of breast cancer in young and elderly patients

The medical records of all women (297 cases) with breast cancer > or = 70 years of age, presenting at our Institute from January 1980 to December 1989, were reviewed. Data from 226 elderly women was compared to that from 100 stage-matched patients < 50 years of age, presenting during the same 10-year study interval. Conservative surgery was significantly more frequent in young patients (71.1%) compared to elderly women (26.1%) and radical mastectomy according to Halsted was undertaken in 34.3% of the elderly group compared to 8.9% of young patients (p < 0.001). Since 'incidental' diagnosis was significantly more frequent in the elderly group (59.9% versus 6.0%) (p < 0.001), primary care physicians may play an important role in the early diagnosis of breast cancer in the majority of elderly women.

The influence of patient characteristics on the appropriateness of surgical treatment for breast cancer patients. Progetto Oncologia Femminile

BACKGROUND

Within the framework of a multi-annual educational intervention sponsored by the Ministry of Health and regional health authorities, patterns of the care delivered to breast cancer patients in Italian general hospitals were monitored in order to identify areas of practice whose quality was in need of improvement.

DESIGN

Information on the diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in 63 general hospitals in eight Italian regions performed in 1724 consecutive breast cancer patients were retrospectively gathered from medical records. Quality of care was assessed by a diagnostic and therapeutic score based on the observed degree of compliance with previously established courses of action.

RESULTS

The median value of the overall diagnostic and staging score was 60%. About one-third of surgical operations (38%) were inappropriate: one-fourth (24%) of patients with stage I-II disease had unnecessarily radical surgery (i.e., Halsted mastectomy), and limited surgery in patients with small tumors (i.e., < or = 2 cm) was under utilized. Chronological age influenced physicians' behaviour: elderly patients were more likely to have a less intensive diagnostic work-up and less appropriate surgical treatment (with more frequent performance of an unnecessary radical operation and a less frequent utilization of limited surgery), independently of their overall health status. The presence of one or more co-existent diseases was associated with a failure to undergo axillary clearance and with a lower utilization of conservative surgery independently of age.

CONCLUSION

In accord with others, this study confirms the existence of a clinically important effect of patient age on diagnostic and therapeutic behaviour and the use of unnecessarily radical surgery procedures. The paper discusses the implications of these findings for the next stage of the educational project, in which practice guidelines will be developed and implemented to improve the quality of care for breast cancer patients.

Treatment of breast cancer in two teaching hospitals: a comparison with consensus guidelines

We compared the initial treatment of 383 patients with breast cancer in two central London teaching hospitals during 1986 with the guidelines of the King's Fund Consensus Conference for breast cancer treatment held in London the same year. The majority of patients (68%) received lumpectomy and 18% received mastectomy. Lumpectomy was followed by radiotherapy for 95% of cases but 30% of mastectomy patients also received radiotherapy. Only 42% of the patients had surgical sampling of the axillary nodes. Cytotoxic chemotherapy was recorded for 27% women under 50, but also for 16% women age 50 or more. Tamoxifen was given to 58% of women aged 50 or more, but also to 26% of women under 50. We conclude that there are discrepancies between consensus guidelines and clinical practice. Further study is needed to determine whether these variations are clinically important, and whether similar variations exist elsewhere in Europe.

The role of attitudes, beliefs, and personal characteristics of Italian physicians in the surgical treatment of early breast cancer

The influence of Italian physicians' attitudes, beliefs, and personal characteristics on medical decision making is examined in the case of surgical treatment of early breast cancer. Responses to a mail survey of 657 physicians from different specialties were analyzed comparing doctors recommending a radical procedure (9%) to those preferring a conservative procedure for younger patients only (25%), and those considering conservative surgery the treatment of choice regardless of patients' age (66%). The findings suggest that the likelihood of physicians' preferring a conservative procedure is influenced by their specialty and the extent to which they feel that a patient should have a role in the treatment decision more than by differences in the beliefs of treatment outcomes. Only preferences of the small group indicating radical surgery as the sole admissible treatment can be accounted for by ignorance or distrust of results of recent trials. These findings suggest that other than scientific factors guide many doctors in their decision making; they may help to explain why the diffusion of research results into clinical practice is often disappointingly slow.

Patterns of surgical treatment of breast cancer in Victoria

We analysed data on admissions to Victorian public hospitals for surgical treatment of breast cancer over the period July 1985 to December 1988. Of the 2993 women admitted, 28.7% received breast-preserving surgery. The probability of a woman being treated conservatively was dependent on age, with women aged less than 50 or more than 70 years more likely to receive breast-preserving surgery than women aged 50-69. There was an age-specific change, of marginal statistical significance, in the proportion of women receiving breast-preserving surgery over the period. The public hospitals admissions database is a potentially useful means of monitoring patterns of surgical treatment.

The impact of cancer treatment guidelines on actual practice in Italian general hospitals: the case of ovarian cancer

Over the past ten years the Italian National Research Council (C.N.R.) has carried out an educational program based on the preparation and dissemination of guidelines to facilitate delivery in community hospitals of the most up-to-date care to patients with ovarian cancer. In 1988 an assessment was begun to determine (a) whether the guidelines reached the target physician population; (b) whether they were accepted by those they reached, and (c) whether treatment patterns thereafter conformed to the guidelines. Overall results of this evaluation provide no evidence of clinically relevant effects of the program. The guidelines were not widely disseminated: only 44% of responders were aware of them. Moreover, analysis of practice patterns showed serious deficiencies in diagnostic procedure and surgical staging (information on grading and residual tumour was available only in 30% and 45% of cases, respectively, and only 10% of the patients had random biopsies as part of their surgical staging). The only observation supporting some effect of this educational intervention in terms of knowledge modification was of certain therapeutic preferences among those aware of the guidelines. This finding, however, is highly susceptible to confounding by other factors (e.g. physicians' greater expertise, spillover effect of the program) not entirely avoidable in an observational study. We conclude that any assessment of procedures based on dissemination of information must include a careful analysis of the method of dissemination. The availability of clinically applicable information must also be realistically appraised before the guidelines approach can be accepted as the most effective.

Conservative Treatment of breast Cancer in Italy. A Survey

The authors evaluated the diffusion of conservative treatment of breast cancer in Italian radiotherapy departments during 1984–1985. T1 and small T2 (less than 3 cm in maximal diameter) cases were particularly considered. Conservative surgery and radiotherapy of breast cancer was adopted in 88.4% of the Italian radiotherapy centers. Quadrantectomy and axillary dissection was the surgical procedure routinely adopted. Large differences emerged in radiation treatment among the different departments, particularly with regard to the irradiation of regional lymph nodes. A total of 1561 T1 and 279 T2 cases were submitted to a conservative treatment in 1984, and respectively 2185 and 334 in 1985. The 1985 versus 1984 increase in cases treated was 40% for T1 and 18% for T2.