Diagnostic and Prognostic Relevance of the Immunophenotype in Acute Myelocytic Leukemia

Flowcytometric immunophenotypic profile of acute leukemia: mansoura experience

Acute leukemia (AL) displays characteristic patterns of antigen expression, which facilitate their identification and proper classification. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic usefulness of commonly used immune-markers for immunophenotyping of AL and to define the best immune-markers to be used for proper diagnosis and classification of AL. Besides, to recognize the frequency of different AL subtypes and the antigen expression profile in our Egyptian patients. We retrospectively analyzed the immunophenotypic data of 164 de novo AL patients from our institution during 2009 and 2010. Among these patients, 68.9% were classified as acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML) while 31.1% classified as acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The commonest FAB subtype in AML group was AML-M4/5 (34.5%) which may differ from most published data. As regard ALL, there were 74.5% with B-ALL and 25.5% with T-ALL. It was found that combined use of HLADR and CD34 was much more helpful in distinguishing APL from non-APL AML than either of these antigens alone. It was found that cCD79a and CD19 were the most sensitive marker for B-ALL while cCD3, CD7 and CD5 were the most sensitive antigens for T-ALL. Our analysis of AL phenotypes proved that employed antibody panels are adequate for proper diagnosis and classification of AL. Flowcytometry was found to be especially useful in the identification of AML-M0 and differentiation of APL from non-APL AML. Immunophenotyping results and FAB classification of our AL patients were comparable to internationally published studies apart from predominance of AML-M4/5 and more frequent APL.

Prognostic factors in adult acute leukemia

The prognostic factors in acute leukemia have undergone a major change over the past decade and are likely to be further refined in the coming years. While age is the single most important prognostic factor in both AML and in ALL, recurring cytogenetic abnormalities and molecular markers have become crucial for the prognosis of patients and for new directions in the development of targeted therapies. No less important is the development of a personalized approach for therapy as determined by the response to therapy using increasingly sensitive technologies. The assessment of MRD is rapidly superseding other prognostic factors in ALL and, somewhat lacking behind, coming into its own in AML. The next decade should see further refinement of response-driven prognostication, to include epigenetics as well as pharmacogenetics and pharmacodynamics of individual drugs used and the responses to them. It is hoped that these refinements and better predictors of response will also lead to a significantly improved overall outcome of patients with both AML and ALL.

The immunophenotype of acute myeloid leukemia: is there a relationship with prognosis?

Immunophenotyping of acute myeloid leukemia has controversial implications with regards to prognosis. Many associations have been described between individual antigen expression on myeloid blasts and prognosis, however few are consistent. Markers with a consistent prognostic association that have been demonstrated in more than one study have been CD13, CD14, and CD15. The association of the expression of CD11b with poor prognosis appears definite, as does CD7 expression. When compared with the expression of a single antigen, a pattern of antigen expression is likely to have a more significant relationship to prognosis. This is exemplified by the panmyeloid phenotype (expression of 5 myeloid antigens) which appears to be associated with a good prognosis and may differentiate a subgroup within an otherwise intermediate prognosis group of patients. Further analysis with the inclusion of novel antibodies and the combination of multiple antibodies to create further subgroups such as the panmyeloid phenotype will continue to enhance knowledge in this area.

Possibilities and limitations of cytochemical methods in diagnosis of acute leukemia

Accurate identification and classification of leukemic blast cells is a very important prerequisite of the precise diagnosis of acute leukemia and has a great impact on therapy and prognosis. The purpose of this review is to consider, in the broad sense of the word, the present possibilities and limitations of enzyme cytochemistry and to emphasize how cytochemistry may contribute, on integration with the other methods of study, to the final classification and differential diagnosis of acute leukemia, a highly variable hematological disorder. In this review, the role of conventional enzyme cytochemistry, either dominant or subsidiary, in the discrimination of acute leukemia subtypes is discussed. The survey confirms the absolute necessity of immunologic marker analysis in the accurate diagnosis of acute lymphoblastic leukemia, undifferentiated or minimally differentiated leukemia and mixed-lineage leukemia because in these cases, the cytochemical evaluation provides insufficiently relevant information regarding blast cell origin, specificity of leukemia subtypes and the discrete stages of leukemic cell maturation. On the other hand, cytochemical investigation is appreciated to be dominant over immunophenotyping in characterizing acute myeloid leukemia, because of the lack of specificity of the majority of immunological markers against myeloid antigens and, because of the availability of standardized and sufficiently specific cytochemical reactions. The cytogenetic, molecular biological and electron microscopic studies mentioned in this review supplement the important information for correct differential diagnosis of acute leukemia. The prognostic impact of enzyme cytochemistry in correlation to other methods is evaluated.

Correlation of morphological FAB classification and immunophenotyping: value in recognition of morphological, cytochemical and immunological characteristics of mixed leukaemias

Correlation between the FAB classification and immunophenotype was studied in 169 consecutive adult patients with acute leukaemia (AL). The lineage of leukaemic cells could be determined in the majority of cases, whereas 3 patients (1.8%) remained unclassified. In 22 out of 71 patients (31%) with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) FAB M1 and M2 types, and in 5 out of 16 patients (31%) with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) in myeloid blast crisis, leukaemic cells did not express myeloid lineage-related markers, indicating asynchronous expression of cell markers in a substantial proportion of patients. Flow cytometric two-colour immunofluorescence revealed mixed AL immunophenotype in 6 out of 169 patients (3.4%). This group included five CD2+AML (5% of AML tested) and one undifferentiated AL expressing CD10(CALLA), CDw65(VIM-2). The former group included FAB M1, M2, M3 and M4 forms of AML with a single cell population, and an AML M2 patient with both cytochemically and immunologically two separate populations of leukaemic cells. This further illustrates the heterogeneity of the target cell(s) for leukaemogenesis and the level of differentiation of AML cells. However, there was no difference in the treatment response and the remission duration between AML patients and patients with mixed phenotype AML.