Mitomycin-c, Adriamycin, 5-Fluorouracil and Leucovorin (L-FAM2) in the Treatment of Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Phase II Study

Redefining the Incidence and Profile of Fluoropyrimidine-Associated Cardiotoxicity in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Aim: The cardiac toxicity that occurs during administration of anti-tumor agents has attracted increasing concern. Fluoropyrimidines have been used for more than half a century, but their cardiotoxicity has not been well clarified. In this study, we aimed to assess the incidence and profile of fluoropyrimidine-associated cardiotoxicity (FAC) comprehensively based on literature data. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane library databases and clinical trials on studies investigating FAC. The main outcome was a pooled incidence of FAC, and the secondary outcome was specific treatment-related cardiac AEs. Random or fixed effects modeling was used for pooled meta-analyses according to the heterogeneity assessment. PROSPERO registration number: (CRD42021282155). Results: A total of 211 studies involving 63,186 patients were included, covering 31 countries or regions in the world. The pooled incidence of FAC, by meta-analytic, was 5.04% for all grades and 1.5% for grade 3 or higher. A total of 0.29% of patients died due to severe cardiotoxicities. More than 38 cardiac AEs were identified, with cardiac ischemia (2.24%) and arrhythmia (1.85%) being the most frequent. We further performed the subgroup analyses and meta-regression to explore the source of heterogeneity, and compare the cardiotoxicity among different study-level characteristics, finding that the incidence of FAC varied significantly among different publication decades, country/regions, and genders. Patients with esophagus cancer had the highest risk of FAC (10.53%), while breast cancer patients had the lowest (3.66%). The treatment attribute, regimen, and dosage were significantly related to FAC. When compared with chemotherapeutic drugs or targeted agents, such a risk was remarkably increased (χ2 = 10.15, p < 0.01; χ2 = 10.77, p < 0.01). The continuous 5-FU infusion for 3–5 consecutive days with a high dosage produced the highest FAC incidence (7.3%) compared with other low-dose administration patterns. Conclusions: Our study provides comprehensive global data on the incidence and profile of FAC. Different cancer types and treatment appear to have varying cardiotoxicities. Combination therapy, high cumulative dose, addition of anthracyclines, and pre-existing heart disease potentially increase the risk of FAC.

5-Fluorouracil, epirubicin, and mitomycin C versus 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, mitomycin C, and leucovorin in advanced gastric carcinoma. A randomized trial

Leucovorin (LV) enhances the activity of 5-fluorouracil (5FU). Based on these data, we performed a randomized trial with 5FU, epirubicin (EPI), mitomycin C(MMC) with/ without LV in advanced gastric cancer (AGC). The purpose of our study was to investigate if the addition of LV improved the response rate of the combination 5FU EPI, MMC (FEM) over FEM. From January 1988 until April 1994, 88 patients with recurrent or metastatic AGC were randomly received 5FU, EPI, MMC with (group A) or without (group B) LV. Between the two arms of the study no difference was noticed in sex, performance status, primary site of tumor, and lymph node metastases. Therapy included group A (5FU 600 mg/m2/day, i.v. bolus, on days 1, 8, 29, 36, and EPI 45 mg/m2/day, i.v. bolus, on days 1 and 29, MMC 10 mg/m2/day, i.v. bolus, on day 1) and group B (the same as group A plus LV 200 mg/m2/day by 2 h intravenous infusion with 5FU intravenous push at midinfusion). No significant difference in response rate was noticed between the two treatment arms; there were two (5%) patients with complete response in group A, and five (12%) in A and 11 (26%) partial responders in group B (p < 0.1). A significantly higher number of patients achieving stable disease was observed in group B; 19 (44%) in comparison to group A 10 (24%) (p < 0.048). There were more patients with progressive disease in group A 25 (59%) than in group B 12 (28%) (p < 0.003) (Table 2). No difference was noted in mean duration of response: group A, 15.8 (6-31) weeks; and group B, 17.6 (6-28) weeks. The mean time to progression was for group A [11.4 (6-35) weeks] and for group B [17.6 (8-33) weeks]. Mean survival was for group A [27.4 (12-59) weeks] and for group B [30.6 (17-53) weeks], for 50% of patients. Causes of death were, for group A, 40 patients from disease progression and two sudden deaths; for group B, causes of death were for 41 patients disease progression and two sudden deaths. There were two patients in group A and one in group B that were not evaluable because they abandoned therapy after the first cycle. Toxicity was increased in group B; anemia, nausea and vomiting, and alopecia (p < 0.055) were more severe in group B, but not statistically different when compared to group A. Neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, mucositis, and fatigue of any grade were significantly more common and severe in group B. Significant dose reductions due to toxicity were required more commonly in group B. We conclude that the response rate was increased in the schedule with the addition of LV, at the cost of increased toxicity and with no difference in survival. A randomized trial comparing FEM-LV with new generation regimens would determine whether the addition of LV qualifies FAM equally active with these.