A Pilot Study of Mitomycin, Ifosfamide and Cisplatin as Outpatient Combination Chemotherapy for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

A phase II trial of tamoxifen, ifosfamide, epirubicin, and cisplatin combination chemotherapy for inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer

A phase II trial of tamoxifen, ifosfamide, epirubicin, and cisplatin (TIEP) chemotherapy was conducted in patients with chemonaive inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to assess response and toxicity. From October 1997 to August 1998, 19 patients were treated. The treatment schema included tamoxifen 60 mg twice daily by mouth on days 1 to 3, ifosfamide 3 g/m2 intravenous infusion (IV) 60 minutes with mesna on day 2, epirubicin 50 mg/m2 IV bolus on day 2, and cisplatin 60 mg/m2 IV 60 minutes on day 2 every 4 weeks for up to six cycles. All patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. The major toxicity was myelosuppression; grade 3 or 4 leukopenia or neutropenia occurred in 14 of 19 (73.7%) patients during treatment, and 6 patients (31.6%) experienced fever in association with the neutropenia; no toxic deaths occurred. Grade 3 anemia occurred in six patients (31.6%) during the treatment. Grade 3 or 4 nausea/vomiting occurred in only one patient. Toxicities other than neutropenia and anemia were minimal. After two cycles of treatment, 9 of 19 patients attained a partial response (47.4%, 95% confidence interval 24.9%-69.9%) in this study. The median time to disease progression was 6 months and median survival time was 12 months. We conclude that TIEP is an active combination regimen with an acceptable toxicity profile in Chinese patients with inoperable NSCLC.

Efficient designs for testing new agents and regimens

Current clinical chemotherapy trial procedures in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) require large numbers of patients and last up to 10 years before providing results that are often disappointing. Different designs are available that offer the advantages of smaller numbers of patients, shorter duration, and earlier identification of ineffective or highly active agents and regimens. An alternative method is proposed, combining phase II screening, randomized phase II studies, and multicenter, comparative, randomized phase III trials. Issues under discussion included the combined study in phase II of different disease stages and the need for recruitment to larger trials.