Lehoczky O, Pulay T. [Evaluation of second-line chemotherapies most often used in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer].
Orv Hetil 2007;
148:2337-42. [PMID:
18048113 DOI:
10.1556/oh.2007.28132]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Second-line chemotherapies result in a progression-free interval of 2,3-42 months.
AIM
The authors evaluated the efficacy of second-line paclitaxel-carboplatin, topotecan, and cisplatin-epirubicin-etoposide combinations.
METHODS
Paclitaxel-carboplatin (175 mg/m2 and AUC 5) in 3-week intervals and topotecan (1.5 mg/m2/d1-3) in 3-week intervals was given to 13 and 16 patients. The triple combination of cisplatin-epirubicin-etoposide was applied in 48 patients in 4-week courses, with doses of 33 mg/m2/d1-3, 60 mg/m2/d1, and 100 mg/m2/d1-3., respectively. The progression-free interval was calculated by the product limit method of Kaplan-Meier.
RESULTS
A significantly better progression-free interval was observed in treatments with paclitaxel-carboplatin and cisplatin-epirubicin-etoposide compared to the topotecan chemotherapy (5 and 5.5 months vs. 4 months, respectively, p = 0.0324 and p = 0.0087). A better progression-free interval was found in the platinum-sensitive tumors compared to the platinum-resistant ones by the above mentioned combinations (6 and 3.5 months, 7 and 4 months, and 6.5 and 3.5 months, respectively).
CONCLUSION
The lower priced cisplatin-epirubicin-etoposide combination resulted in a slightly better efficacy compared to the 2 other treatments both in platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant tumors.
Collapse