Single Brain Metastases from Kidney Tumors. Clinico-Pathologic Considerations on a Series of 29 Cases

Renal cell carcinoma and brain metastasis: Questioning the dogma of role for cytoreductive nephrectomy

INTRODUCTION

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) brain metastasis is generally viewed as poor prognostic features and often excludes patients from cytoreductive nephrectomy or participation in clinical trials. We aim to evaluate patients presenting with brain metastasis and their outcomes.

METHODS

Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results-18 registries database was queried for all patients with metastatic RCC from 2010 to 2014. Patients with renal cancer as their only malignancy were included. Information was available for metastatic disease to bone, liver, lung, and brain. Patients were then further stratified into those with isolated brain metastases and those with additional metastasis to other sites as well. Overall survival was compared between groups using logrank analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 6,667 patients were identified with metastatic RCC. Among them, 775 (12.1%) had brain metastasis at time of diagnosis. Of these patients with brain metastasis, 152 (20.4%) had isolated brain metastasis. Only 23.8% of all patients with brain metastasis underwent cytoreductive nephrectomy, compared to 40.8% of patients with isolated brain metastasis. Patients with brain and other metastasis and brain metastasis only treated by cytoreductive nephrectomy exhibited a median survival of 11 and 33 months, respectively. Those patients who did not undergo cytoreductive nephrectomy experienced a median survival of 4 and 5 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

It appears that selected patients with brain metastasis may experience durable long-term survival. This information may be beneficial for patient counseling, surgical planning, and consideration for inclusion in clinical trials.

Extremely Delayed Cerebral Metastasis from Renal Carcinoma Report of Four Cases and Critical Analysis of the Literature

Brain metastases from renal carcinoma may appear even a long time after surgical treatment of the primary tumor. The authors present 2 series of patients, one of which has already been published and the other new, for a total of 4 cases of brain metastasis from renal carcinoma with late onset, which occurred 13, 17, 26 and 12 years after primary surgical treatment. The other cases described in the literature were also critically reviewed.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Renal Cancer Brain Metastasis: Prognostic Factors and the Role of Whole-Brain Radiation and Surgical Resection

Background. Renal cell carcinoma is a frequent source of brain metastasis. We present our consecutive series of patients treated with Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) and analyse prognostic factors and the interplay of WBRT and surgical resection. Methods. This is a retrospective study of 66 patients with 207 lesions treated with the Cyberknife radiosurgery system in our institution. The patients were followed up with imaging and clinical examination 1 month and 2-3 months thereafter for the brain metastasis. Patient, treatment, and outcomes characteristics were analysed. Results. 51 male (77.3%) and 15 female (22.7%) patients, with a mean age of 58.9 years (range of 31–85 years) and a median Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) of 90 (range of 60–100), were included in the study. The overall survival was 13.9 months, 21.9 months, and 5.9 months for the patients treated with SRS only, additional surgery, and WBRT, respectively. The actuarial 1-year Local Control rates were 84%, 94%, and 88% for SRS only, for surgery and SRS, and for WBRT and additional SRS, respectively. Conclusions. Stereotactic radiosurgery is a safe and effective treatment option in patients with brain metastases from RCC. In case of a limited number of brain metastases, surgery and SRS might be appropriate.

Patients undergoing surgery of intracranial metastases have different outcomes based on their primary pathology

OBJECTIVES

Patients with a variety of different primary cancers can develop intracranial metastases. Patients who develop intracranial metastases are often grouped into the same study population, and therefore an understanding of outcomes for patients with different primary cancers remain unclear.

METHODS

Adults who underwent intracranial metastatic tumor surgery from 1997-2011 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Primary pathologies were compared using Fisher's exact and Student's t-test, and Cox regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with survival.

RESULTS

About 708 patients underwent surgery during the reviewed period, where 269 (38%) had non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), 106 (15%) breast cancer (BC), 72 (10%) gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, 88 (12%) renal cell cancer (RCC), and 88 (12%) melanoma. The most notable differences were that NSCLC patients were older, BC younger, BC had more primary tumor control, and NSCLC less extracranial spread. BC had longer survival, RCC had longer local progression free survival (PFS), and NSCLC had longer distal PFS. The factors independently associated with survival for NSCLC (female, recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class, primary tumor control, solitary metastasis, tumor size, adenocarcinoma, radiation, discharge to home), BC (age, no skull base involvement, radiation), GI cancer (age, RPA class, Karnofsky performance scale (KPS), lack of preoperative motor deficit, non-esophageal tumors, non-hemorrhagic tumors, avoidance of new deficits), melanoma (preoperative seizures, solitary metastasis, smaller tumor size, discharge to home, chemotherapy), and RCC (KPS, chemotherapy) were distinctly different.

DISCUSSION

These differences between patients with different primary cancers support the fact that patients with intracranial disease are not all the same and should be studied by their primary pathology.

Brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma. Should we change the current standard?

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is one of the most common sources of brain metastases, with an incidence that varies widely from 4% to 48% according to different studies. In addition, asymptomatic metastases occur in up to 33% of patients with metastatic RCC, further complicating the decision-making process in this poor prognosis population. The purpose of this review is to cover in depth the present state of knowledge on the diagnosis and management of patients with brain metastases from RCC, in order to assess whether the current standard should be challenged. The existing systems to predict response and survival will be reviewed, as well as the available therapeutic options regarding local treatment and systemic therapy, all within the context of updated data from clinical trials. In this regard, the role of novel targeted agents for the treatment of brain metastases from RCC, such as the multi-targeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors sunitinib and sorafenib, will be updated and discussed.

[Brain metastases in cases of renal cell carcinoma]

Brain metastases represent the most common intracranial neoplasia. The lung, breast and kidney are the primary tumor locations most often associated with brain metastasis. Seizures and neurological impairment are typical manifestations of neoplastic cerebral dissemination, which, when untreated, usually lead to death within a few months. In this review, we discuss whole brain radiotherapy, surgical resection and stereotactic radiosurgery as the currently used therapeutic options for renal cell cancer metastasis in the brain.

[Standards, options, and recommendations for radiotherapy of kidney cancer]

CONTEXT

The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR), initiated in 1993, is a collaborative project between the Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), the 20 French Cancer Centres and specialists from French Public Universities, General Hospitals and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary expert group, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery.

OBJECTIVES

To develop clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis, management and treatment of patients with renal cancer. This review is part of previously published complete guidelines and focuses on the place of radiotherapy in this disease.

METHODS

The data was identified by literature search using Medline (up to June 1999) and personal reference lists. The main endpoints considered were survival, risk factors for late effects of radiotherapy, safety and quality of life.

RESULTS

The key recommendations are: 1) In localised renal cancer, adjuvant radiotherapy has a limited role: it is not indicated for T1 and T2 tumours and there is no proof of a survival benefit for T3 N1-N2 tumours. Postoperative radiotherapy can be considered in young patients without risk factors for the development of post-radiotherapy complications and without loco-regional invasion (renal capsule, renal pelvis, vena cava, regional lymph nodes); 2) For metastatic tumours, the multidisciplinary team must decide whether palliative radiotherapy is appropriate after consideration of the prognostic factors. An isolated metastasis can be treated by radiosurgery and stereotaxic radiosurgery may be of benefit in the case of one or two cerebral metastasis. The optimal dose for palliative treatment is not known. Radiotherapy followed by immunotherapy can also be considered if the patient has no contraindication to such treatments.

Gamma surgery for intracranial metastases from renal cell carcinoma

OBJECT

The goal of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and limitations of gamma surgery (GS) in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma that has metastasized to the brain.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective analysis of a consecutive series of 21 patients with 37 metastatic brain deposits from renal cell carcinoma who were treated with GS at the University of Virginia from 1990 to 1999. Clinical data were available in all patients. No patient died of progression of intracranial disease or deteriorated neurologically following GS. Eight patients clinically improved. Follow-up imaging studies were available for 23 tumors in 12 patients. Nine patients did not undergo follow-up imaging. One patient lived 17 months and succumbed to systemic disease: no brain imaging was performed in this case. Another patient refused further imaging and lived 7 months. Seven patients lived up to 4 months after the procedure; however, their physicians did not require these patients to undergo follow-up imaging examinations because of their general conditions-all had systemic progression of disease. Of the 23 tumors that were observed posttreatment, one remained unchanged in volume, 16 decreased in volume, and six disappeared. No tumor progressed at any time, and there were no radiation-induced changes on follow-up imaging an average of 21 months after GS (range 3-63 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Gamma surgery provides an alternative to surgical resection of metastatic brain deposits from renal cell carcinoma. Neurological side effects were seen in only one case; freedom from progression of disease was achieved in all cases.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastasis from renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The authors evaluated results after stereotactic radiosurgery (SR) for brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and identified factors associated with improved survival and tumor control.

METHODS

The authors reviewed the management results from a total of 52 RCC brain metastases in 35 consecutive patients who underwent stereotactic radiosurgery (SR) during a 9-year interval. Twenty-eight patients also underwent whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT). The mean tumor volume was 2.4 mL (range, 0.1-14.1 mL). The mean dose delivered to the tumor margin was 17 gray (Gy) (range, 13-20 Gy). Univariate and multivariate testing was performed to determine significant prognostic factors.

RESULTS

The median survival was 11 months after SR and 14 months after brain tumor diagnosis. Only 2 patients (8%) died of progression of the irradiated tumor. Age < 55 years, lack of active systemic disease, and use of chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy after SR were significant favorable prognostic factors in multivariate testing. Post-SR imaging was evaluated in 26 patients (39 tumors). The local control rate from the 39 treated tumors imaged was 90% (tumor disappearance, 21%; tumor regression, 44%; and stable disease, 26%). Local recurrence developed in 3 patients (4 lesions) and remote brain disease in 12 patients. No patient developed a new focal neurologic deficit due to SR. Patients were classified into two groups: SR with and SR without WBRT. The addition of WBRT to SR did not improve survival. Distant failure occurred similarly in both groups (46% vs. 50%). WBRT combined with SR may contribute to local control, but did not prevent the development of new remote tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

SR for brain metastasis from RCC results in brain disease control in the majority of patients and was associated with few complications. Early detection of brain metastases and treatment with SR provides extended quality survival.

Surgical resection of brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma in 50 patients

OBJECTIVES

Metastases are frequently diagnosed among patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Of 709 patients with brain metastases (BMET) who were operated on at our institution between 1974 and 1993, 50 (7%) were of renal origin.

METHODS

Medical records were reviewed retrospectively. Survival time was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

There were 38 men and 12 women. The median age was 60 years. The primary RCC was resected in 47 patients. Forty patients had a metachronous diagnosis of RCC and BMET. Median interval between the diagnosis of RCC and BMET was 17 months. In all 50 patients overall median survival (MS) from diagnosis of primary RCC was 31.4 months and from craniotomy was 12.6 months. Postoperative mortality was 10% (5 patients). In patients with primary RCC in the left kidney (n=25) versus right kidney (n=25) median survival from craniotomy was longer; 21.3 versus 7.4 months (P<0.014). Twenty-three patients (46%) had intratumoral hemorrhage. Eight patients had cerebellar metastasis (MS, 3.0 months) and 9 had multiple metastases resected (MS, 7.6 months). Thirty-eight patients had both brain and pulmonary metastases, and 16 of them had pulmonary resection (MS, 18.6 versus 8.0 months; P<0.03). Twenty-two patients received whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) after craniotomy and 18 did not receive WBRT (MS, 13.3 versus 14.5 months; P<0.62). The 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival was 51%, 24%, 22%, and 8.5% respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Only the resection of lung metastasis, supratentorial location of BMET, left-sided localization of primary RCC, and lack of neurologic deficit before craniotomy were statistically significant prognostic factors in Cox regression analysis. In the absence of effective systemic treatment, we suggest that patients with BMET from RCC be considered for operative resection for treatment and palliation.

The role of adjuvant radiation and multiple resection within the surgical management of brain metastases

Cerebral metastases occur in 25% to 35% of all cancer patients. The advances in systemic and topical treatment as well as the rising incidence of lung cancer and melanomas are associated with an increasing incidence of cerebral metastases. More than 20,000 patients die every year in the Federal Republic of Germany of this disease. This retrospective analysis covers 145 patients who underwent surgery. Survival analysis of different subgroups was performed. The patients were grouped according to their clinical status and the different therapeutical procedures which were performed. Group A, consisting of all those patients where a gross total resection could be performed and where no systemic disease was apparent at the time of craniotomy showed the best results, having the highest portion of long term survivors. Group B, consisting of those patients who underwent a subtotal resection and who had no systemic disease at the time of craniotomy, had a worse outcome. Group C patients (gross total resection and systemic disease) as well as Group D (subtotal resection and systemic disease) presented the poorest results with respect to survival. A benefit was mediated by adjuvant radiation as well as multiple resections. Surgery is the method of choice for the treatment of a single metastasis. Advances in microsurgery nowadays sometimes justify even the removal of multiple metastases, depending on their location, on the general condition of the patient and on prognosis.