Significance of physical factors on activities of daily living in patients with tetraplegia after spinal cord injury: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Tetraplegia is a debilitating sequela of spinal cord injury (SCI). However, comprehensive approaches for determining the influence of various factors on activities of daily living (ADL) in patients with tetraplegia are limited. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the influence of physical factors on ADL in patients with tetraplegia after adjusting for demographic, SCI-related, and cognitive factors.

METHODS

This retrospective cross-sectional study enrolled 201 patients with tetraplegia who underwent inpatient rehabilitation at the National Rehabilitation Center in South Korea between 2019 and 2021. Patients' mean age was 50.5 years (standard deviation, 16.3), and 170 (84.6%) were men. The Korean Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (K-SCIM III) was used as the main outcome measure to assess patients' ADL ability. Hierarchical multiple regression modeling was conducted with K-SCIM as the dependent variable to examine the level of functioning and relative influencing factors.

RESULTS

Upper-extremity motor score (UEMS), upper-extremity spasticity and sitting balance scores were significant predictors of self-care; lower-extremity motor score (LEMS), musculoskeletal pain of shoulder, and sitting balance were significant predictors of respiratory and sphincter management; UEMS, LEMS, and sitting balance score were significant predictors of mobility; and UEMS, LEMS, musculoskeletal pain of shoulder, and sitting balance scores were significant predictors of the K-SCIM III total score after adjustment for demographic, SCI-related, and cognitive factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Physical factors had the greatest impact on all subscores and the K-SCIM III total score. Upper- and lower-extremity muscle strength and sitting balance significantly affected functional ability across all subscores.

A multicenter explanatory survey of patients' and clinicians' perceptions of motivational factors in rehabilitation

BACKGROUND

Patient motivation is an important determinant of rehabilitation outcomes. Differences in patients' and clinicians' perceptions of motivational factors can potentially hinder patient-centered care. Therefore, we aimed to compare patients' and clinicians' perceptions of the most important factors in motivating patients for rehabilitation.

METHODS

This multicenter explanatory survey research was conducted from January to March 2022. In 13 hospitals with an intensive inpatient rehabilitation ward, 479 patients with neurological or orthopedic disorders undergoing inpatient rehabilitation and 401 clinicians, including physicians, physical therapists, occupational therapists, and speech-language-hearing therapists, were purposively selected using inclusion criteria. The participants were asked to choose the most important factor motivating patients for rehabilitation from a list of potential motivational factors.

RESULTS

Here we show that realization of recovery, goal setting, and practice related to the patient's experience and lifestyle are the three factors most frequently selected as most important by patients and clinicians. Only five factors are rated as most important by 5% of clinicians, whereas nine factors are selected by 5% of patients. Of these nine motivational factors, medical information (p < 0.001; phi = -0.14; 95% confidence interval = -0.20 to -0.07) and control of task difficulty (p = 0.011; phi = -0.09; 95% confidence interval = -0.16 to -0.02) are selected by a significantly higher proportion of patients than clinicians.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that when determining motivational strategies, rehabilitation clinicians should consider individual patient preferences in addition to using the core motivational factors supported by both parties.

Participatory Methods to Develop Health Education for PW-SCI: Perspectives on Occupational Justice

Background. Many people with spinal cord injury (PW-SCI) in the Gaza Strip in Palestine are discharged from inpatient rehabilitation with limitations in their ability to meet basic needs, and reach their full potential. There is limited evidence of how clinicians can promote occupational justice for PW-SCI. Purpose. To describe participants' perspectives revealed during a participatory action research (PAR) process used to develop an education manual for PW-SCI in Gaza, using Participatory Occupational Justice as a lens. Methods. Following ethical approval, a four-step PAR design was utilized by eight researchers to co-construct the Spinal Cord Injury Activities of Daily Living-education Manual with 54 participants from SCI rehabilitation settings in Gaza. Qualitative data from eight focus groups were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. Findings. Two main themes were evident in the participants' viewpoints: Enabling occupational justice and Removing barriers to occupational justice. Implications. Occupational justice is a central value that needs to be considered when developing occupational therapy educational interventions for this client group. PW-SCI health education may facilitate occupational justice in practical and culturally relevant ways when participatory methods are used to develop educational resources.

What is the volume, diversity and nature of recent, robust evidence for the use of peer support in health and social care? An evidence and gap map

Background

Peer support interventions involve people drawing on shared personal experience to help one another improve their physical or mental health, or reduce social isolation. If effective, they may also lessen the demand on health and social care services, reducing costs. However, the design and delivery of peer support varies greatly, from the targeted problem or need, the setting and mode of delivery, to the number and content of sessions. Robust evidence is essential for policymakers commissioning peer support and practitioners delivering services in health care and community settings. This map draws together evidence on different types of peer support to support the design and delivery of interventions.

Objectives

The aim of this map was to provide an overview of the volume, diversity and nature of recent, high quality evidence on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the use of peer support in health and social care.

Search Methods

We searched MEDLINE, seven further bibliographic databases, and Epistemonikos for systematic reviews (in October 2020), randomised controlled trials (in March 2021) and economic evaluations (in May 2021) on the effectiveness of peer support interventions in health and social care. We also conducted searches of Google Scholar, two trial registers, PROSPERO, and completed citation chasing on included studies.

Selection Criteria

Systematic reviews, randomised controlled trials and economic evaluations were included in the map. Included studies focused on adult populations with a defined health or social care need, were conducted in high-income countries, and published since 2015. Any measure of effectiveness was included, as was any form of peer support providing the peer had shared experience with the participant and a formalised role.

Data Collection and Analysis

Data were extracted on the type of peer support intervention and outcomes assessed in included studies. Standardised tools were used to assess study quality for all studies: assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews 2 for systematic reviews; Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomised controlled trials; and consensus health economic criteria list for economic evaluations.

Main Results

We included 91 studies: 32 systematic reviews; 52 randomised controlled trials; and 7 economic evaluations. Whilst most included systematic reviews and economic evaluations were assessed to be of low or medium quality, the majority of randomised controlled trials were of higher quality. There were concentrations of evidence relating to different types of peer support, including education, psychological support, self-care/self-management and social support. Populations with long-term health conditions were most commonly studied. The majority of studies measured health-related indicators as outcomes; few studies assessed cost-effectiveness. Studies were unevenly distributed geographically, with most being conducted in the USA. Several gaps were evident regarding the delivery of peer support, particularly the integration of peers and professionals in delivering support and interventions of longer duration.

Authors' Conclusions

Although there is evidence available to inform the commissioning and delivery of peer support in health and social care, there are also clear gaps that need to be addressed to further support provision, particularly regarding cost-effectiveness. The effectiveness of peer support in different countries, with varying health and social care systems, is a priority for future research, as is the integration of peers with professionals in delivering peer support.

The Impact of an Evidence-Informed Spinal Cord Injury Activities of Daily Living Education Manual (SADL-eM): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a catastrophic injury associated with functional loss and life-threatening complications. Many people with SCI in the Gaza Strip of Palestine are discharged from inpatient rehabilitation to the community while still lacking many daily life skills. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) seeks to test the impact of the Spinal Cord Injury Activities of Daily Living Education Manual (SADL-eM)-an evidence-based occupational therapy patient educational intervention-on rehabilitation outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

The proposed trial aims to evaluate the SADL-eM intervention compared with standard treatment among people with SCI.

METHODS

This is a parallel RCT with two study arms: intervention and control. A total of 90 patients treated in inpatient rehabilitation settings will be randomly allocated to two study groups. Both groups will receive standard care. The intervention group will also use the SADL-eM with their treating occupational therapist during rehabilitation. The SADL-eM is a comprehensive activities of daily living (ADL) educational tool that was codeveloped with people with SCI and stakeholders across Gaza. The self-report version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure will be used on admission (ie, baseline measure) and after 6 weeks as the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcomes include the third version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure, the Private Religiousness Practices Scale, the Organizational Religiousness Short-Form, additional ADL domains covered by the education manual, and adherence to the intervention. The effect of the intervention will be determined using repeated-measures analysis of variance.

RESULTS

This study will be conducted from April 2021 through December 2022, with results expected to be available in January 2023.

CONCLUSIONS

If the SADL-eM is demonstrated as clinically effective, this will have significant implications for occupational therapy interventions in low- and middle-income countries.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04735887; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04735887.

Research on Rehabilitation Effect Prediction for Patients with SCI Based on Machine Learning

OBJECTIVE

Due to the complex condition of Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) patients, it is difficult to accurately calculate the Activity of Daily Living (ADL) score of discharged patients. In view of the above problem, this research proposes a prediction model of discharged ADL score based on machine learning, in order to get the rehabilitation effect of patients after rehabilitation training.

METHODS

Firstly, the medical records of 1231 SCI patients were collected, and the corresponding data preprocessing was carried out. Secondly, Pearson Correlation Coefficient method (PCC) was combined with feature selection method based on Random Forest (RF) to screen out six features closely related to discharged ADL score. Then RF and RF optimized by Harris Hawks Optimizer (HHO-RF) were used to predict discharged ADL score of SCI patients. The Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) and Coefficient of determination () were used as evaluation indicators of the model.

RESULTS

The prediction features selected by feature extraction were ADL score on admission, age, injury segment, injury reason, injury position, and injury degree. After 10-fold cross-validation, MAE, RMSE and of RF were 0.0875, 0.1346 and 0.7662. MAE, RMSE and of HHO-RF were 0.0821, 0.1089 and 0.8537. The prediction effect of HHO-RF has been greatly improved.

CONCLUSIONS

In clinical treatment, HHO-RF can accurately predict discharged ADL score and provide a reasonable direction for patients to choose rehabilitation programs.