3
|
Richards SH, Anderson L, Jenkinson CE, Whalley B, Rees K, Davies P, Bennett P, Liu Z, West R, Thompson DR, Taylor RS. Psychological interventions for coronary heart disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 4:CD002902. [PMID: 28452408 PMCID: PMC6478177 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd002902.pub4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the most common cause of death globally, although mortality rates are falling. Psychological symptoms are prevalent for people with CHD, and many psychological treatments are offered following cardiac events or procedures with the aim of improving health and outcomes. This is an update of a Cochrane systematic review previously published in 2011. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness of psychological interventions (alone or with cardiac rehabilitation) compared with usual care (including cardiac rehabilitation where available) for people with CHD on total mortality and cardiac mortality; cardiac morbidity; and participant-reported psychological outcomes of levels of depression, anxiety, and stress; and to explore potential study-level predictors of the effectiveness of psychological interventions in this population. SEARCH METHODS We updated the previous Cochrane Review searches by searching the following databases on 27 April 2016: CENTRAL in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ovid), and CINAHL (EBSCO). SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of psychological interventions compared to usual care, administered by trained staff, and delivered to adults with a specific diagnosis of CHD. We selected only studies estimating the independent effect of the psychological component, and with a minimum follow-up of six months. The study population comprised of adults after: a myocardial infarction (MI), a revascularisation procedure (coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)), and adults with angina or angiographically defined coronary artery disease (CAD). RCTs had to report at least one of the following outcomes: mortality (total- or cardiac-related); cardiac morbidity (MI, revascularisation procedures); or participant-reported levels of depression, anxiety, or stress. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently screened titles and abstracts of all references for eligibility. A lead review author extracted study data, which a second review author checked. We contacted study authors to obtain missing information. MAIN RESULTS This review included 35 studies which randomised 10,703 people with CHD (14 trials and 2577 participants added to this update). The population included mainly men (median 77.0%) and people post-MI (mean 65.7%) or after undergoing a revascularisation procedure (mean 27.4%). The mean age of participants within trials ranged from 53 to 67 years. Overall trial reporting was poor, with around a half omitting descriptions of randomisation sequence generation, allocation concealment procedures, or the blinding of outcome assessments. The length of follow-up ranged from six months to 10.7 years (median 12 months). Most studies (23/35) evaluated multifactorial interventions, which included therapies with multiple therapeutic components. Ten studies examined psychological interventions targeted at people with a confirmed psychopathology at baseline and two trials recruited people with a psychopathology or another selecting criterion (or both). Of the remaining 23 trials, nine studies recruited unselected participants from cardiac populations reporting some level of psychopathology (3.8% to 53% with depressive symptoms, 32% to 53% with anxiety), 10 studies did not report these characteristics, and only three studies excluded people with psychopathology.Moderate quality evidence showed no risk reduction for total mortality (risk ratio (RR) 0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77 to 1.05; participants = 7776; studies = 23) or revascularisation procedures (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.11) with psychological therapies compared to usual care. Low quality evidence found no risk reduction for non-fatal MI (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.05), although there was a 21% reduction in cardiac mortality (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.98). There was also low or very low quality evidence that psychological interventions improved participant-reported levels of depressive symptoms (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.27, 95% CI -0.39 to -0.15; GRADE = low), anxiety (SMD -0.24, 95% CI -0.38 to -0.09; GRADE = low), and stress (SMD -0.56, 95% CI -0.88 to -0.24; GRADE = very low).There was substantial statistical heterogeneity for all psychological outcomes but not clinical outcomes, and there was evidence of small-study bias for one clinical outcome (cardiac mortality: Egger test P = 0.04) and one psychological outcome (anxiety: Egger test P = 0.012). Meta-regression exploring a limited number of intervention characteristics found no significant predictors of intervention effects for total mortality and cardiac mortality. For depression, psychological interventions combined with adjunct pharmacology (where deemed appropriate) for an underlying psychological disorder appeared to be more effective than interventions that did not (β = -0.51, P = 0.003). For anxiety, interventions recruiting participants with an underlying psychological disorder appeared more effective than those delivered to unselected populations (β = -0.28, P = 0.03). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS This updated Cochrane Review found that for people with CHD, there was no evidence that psychological treatments had an effect on total mortality, the risk of revascularisation procedures, or on the rate of non-fatal MI, although the rate of cardiac mortality was reduced and psychological symptoms (depression, anxiety, or stress) were alleviated; however, the GRADE assessments suggest considerable uncertainty surrounding these effects. Considerable uncertainty also remains regarding the people who would benefit most from treatment (i.e. people with or without psychological disorders at baseline) and the specific components of successful interventions. Future large-scale trials testing the effectiveness of psychological therapies are required due to the uncertainty within the evidence. Future trials would benefit from testing the impact of specific (rather than multifactorial) psychological interventions for participants with CHD, and testing the targeting of interventions on different populations (i.e. people with CHD, with or without psychopathologies).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne H Richards
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Charles Thackrah Building, 101 Clarendon Road, Leeds, UK, LS2 9LJ
- Primary Care, University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke's Campus, Magdalen Road, Exeter, Devon, UK, EX1 2LU
| | - Lindsey Anderson
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Veysey Building, Salmon Pool Lane, Exeter, UK, EX2 4SG
| | - Caroline E Jenkinson
- Primary Care, University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke's Campus, Magdalen Road, Exeter, Devon, UK, EX1 2LU
| | - Ben Whalley
- School of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - Karen Rees
- Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK, CV4 7AL
| | - Philippa Davies
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, UK, BS8 2PS
| | - Paul Bennett
- Department of Psychology, University of Swansea, Singleton Park, Swansea, UK, SA2 8PP
| | - Zulian Liu
- Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Robert West
- Wales Heart Research Institute, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK, CF14 4XN
| | - David R Thompson
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, VIC 3000
| | - Rod S Taylor
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Veysey Building, Salmon Pool Lane, Exeter, UK, EX2 4SG
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Whalley B, Rees K, Davies P, Bennett P, Ebrahim S, Liu Z, West R, Moxham T, Thompson DR, Taylor RS. Psychological interventions for coronary heart disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011:CD002902. [PMID: 21833943 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd002902.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Psychological symptoms are strongly associated with coronary heart disease (CHD), and many psychological treatments are offered following cardiac events or procedures. OBJECTIVES Update the existing Cochrane review to (1) determine the independent effects of psychological interventions in patients with CHD (principal outcome measures included total or cardiac-related mortality, cardiac morbidity, depression, and anxiety) and (2) explore study-level predictors of the impact of these interventions. SEARCH STRATEGY The original review searched Cochrane Controleed Trials Register (CCTR, Issue 4, 2001), MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL to December 2001. This was updated by searching the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL from 2001 to January 2009. In addition, we searched reference lists of papers, and expert advice was sought for the original and update review. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials of psychological interventions compared to usual care, administered by trained staff. Only studies estimating the independent effect of the psychological component with a minimum follow-up of six months. Adults with specific diagnosis of CHD. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Titles and abstracts of all references screened for eligibility by two reviewers independently; data extracted by the lead author and checked by a second reviewer. Authors contacted where possible to obtain missing information. MAIN RESULTS There was no strong evidence that psychological intervention reduced total deaths, risk of revascularisation, or non-fatal infarction. Amongst a smaller group of studies reporting cardiac mortality there was a modest positive effect of psychological intervention (relative risk: 0.80 (95% CI 0.64 to 1.00)). Furthermore, psychological intervention did result in small/moderate improvements in depression, standardised mean difference (SMD): -0.21 (95% CI -0.35, -0.08) and anxiety, SMD: -0.25 (95% CI -0.48 to -0.03). Results for mortality indicated some evidence of small-study bias, though results for other outcomes did not. Meta regression analyses revealed four significant predictors of intervention effects on depression were found: (1) an aim to treat type-A behaviours (ß = -0.32, p = 0.03) were more effective than other interventions. In contrast, interventions which (2) aimed to educate patients about cardiac risk factors (ß = 0.23, p = 0.03), (3) included client-led discussion and emotional support as core therapeutic components (ß = 0.31, p < 0.01), or (4) included family members in the treatment process (ß = 0.26, p < 0.01) were significantly less effective. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Psychological treatments appear effective in treating psychological symptoms of CHD patients. Uncertainly remains regarding the subgroups of patients who would benefit most from treatment and the characteristics of successful interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben Whalley
- Centre for Multilevel Modelling, Graduate School of Education, University of Bristol, 2 Priory Road, Bristol, UK, BS8 1TX
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Greif H, Kreitler S, Kaplinsky E, Behar S, Scheinowitz M. The effects of short-term exercise on the cognitive orientation for health and adjustment in myocardial infarction patients. Behav Med 1995; 21:75-85. [PMID: 8845579 DOI: 10.1080/08964289.1995.9933746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Previous studies have shown that cardiovascular patients benefit from exercise. The explanations are partly physical and partly psychological, yet evidence for the latter is contradictory, possibly because only selected samples start and maintain prolonged exercising. The authors examined psychological effects of short-term exercise started as soon as possible after myocardial infarction, focusing on the motivation for health of 62 male and female patients who had had a myocardial infarction 7 to 10 days earlier. Patients were divided into those who exercised for a week in a recovery camp, those who merely stayed for a week in the camp, and those who did not stay in the camp. Results of before and after tests indicated that two scores of the motivation for health (goals and norms) of patients in the exercise group increased, even when complications, former exercising, and infarct location were considered. A month later, 53 of the patients completed a cardiological adjustment questionnaire. The exercise group scored higher than the others on 8 of 9 domains, including subjective health state, sexuality, and work. Even short-term supervised exercise, if done immediately after infarction, has a great potential for beneficial psychological effects, the authors concluded.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Greif
- Heart Institute, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rosen SD, King JC, Nixon PG. Hyperventilation in Patients Who Have Sustained Myocardial Infarction after a Work Injury. Med Chir Trans 1994; 87:268-71. [PMID: 8207722 PMCID: PMC1294518 DOI: 10.1177/014107689408700511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Patients who present with acute myocardial infarction after a work injury (AMI-WI) often report symptoms consistent with chronic hyperventilation which date back as far as the work injury itself, rather than to the AMI. The aim of the study was to test the hypothesis that hyperventilation significantly contributes to the symptoms of AMI-WI patients. The prevalence of hyperventilation was assessed by clinical capnography in 12 AMI-WI patients, 20 normal controls, 15 AMI patients whose AMI was conventional and not subsequent to a work injury (AMI-C) and 14 patients with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). End-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure (PetCO2) was measured at rest, after 1 min hyperventilation (FHPT), after recall of the relevant stressor (Think) and when the breathing was felt to be normal (MBIN). PetCO2 levels after FHPT were: 29.0±1.5 (mean±SD) mmHg for AMI-WI; 26.7±1.9 mmHg for PTSD; 32.1± 4.1mmHg for AMI-C and 33.7±1.4 mmHg for the controls ( P< 0.05 and P< 0.01 for AMI-WI and PTSD, respectively, versus controls). After Think, the levels were 25.8±1.6 mmHg for AMI-WI, 24.6±1.4 mmHg for PTSD, 31.2±4.1mmHg for AMI-C and 31.2± 1.5 mmHg for normals ( P<0.05 and P<0.01 for AMI-WI and PTSD, respectively, versus controls). For MBIN, values of PetCO2 were 26.8±1.7 mmHg and 26.7±1.5mmHg for AMI-WI and PTSD versus 33.8±1.2 mmHg for normals, ( P< 0.01 for both versus controls). Ten AMI-WI and 12 PTSD were positive for hyperventilation versus four AMI-C patients and four controls ( P< 0.01). The implications for rehabilitation, compensation and pathophysiology of AMI-WI are discussed, both from a medical-scientific perspective and in terms of admissible legal evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S D Rosen
- MRC Cyclotron Unit, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cleophas TJ, de Jong SJ, Niemeyer MG, Tavenier P, Zwinderman K, Kuypers C. Changes in life-style in men under sixty years of age before and after acute myocardial infarction: a case-control study. Angiology 1993; 44:761-8. [PMID: 8214773 DOI: 10.1177/000331979304401001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
A case-control study was conducted to examine the presence of psychosocial factors before, during, and after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in Dutch men under sixty years of age. The study included 42 AMI patients and 48 individuals in an age-adjusted sampled control group. The psychological factors included high level of psychological stress, of social isolation, type A1 and A2 behavior, and mental depression. They were assessed by means of the Health Insurance Questionnaire of Greater New York. Univariate analysis indicated that the presence of psychological factors was common at the onset of the myocardial infarction (MI). It clearly diminished, however, after the MI had taken place. In a stepwise logistic regression analysis after adjustment for the independent variables hypertension, cholesterol, and smoking, the following three characteristics were independently related to the risk of MI: no talking (item of social isolation, P = 0.008), need to excel (item of type A1 behavior, P = 0.04), and blue feeling (item of mental depression, P = 0.09). The authors conclude that in men under 60 with AMI, the presence of psychosocial characteristics is common and that this group is going to change its life-style soon after the MI, even without any psychosocial rehabilitation therapy. Follow-up studies investigating the influence of psychological factors on survival and reinfarction should be adjusted for these changes in life-style.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T J Cleophas
- Department of Medicine, Merwede Hospital Sliedrecht-Dordrecht, Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
van Dixhoorn J, Duivenvoorden HJ, Pool J, Verhage F. Psychic effects of physical training and relaxation therapy after myocardial infarction. J Psychosom Res 1990; 34:327-37. [PMID: 2187982 DOI: 10.1016/0022-3999(90)90089-m] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
The psychological impact of exercise training and relaxation therapy was investigated in 156 myocardial infarction patients. They were randomly assigned to either exercise plus relaxation and breathing therapy (Treatment A: n = 76) or exercise training only (Treatment B: n = 80). Patients in Treatment A improved on three out of eight psychological measurements (anxiety, well-being, feelings of invalidity). No change was demonstrable in Treatment B. The difference between the treatments was significant for wellbeing (p less than 0.005). Physical outcome, measured by exercise testing was positive in about half of the patients (Treatment A: 55%, Treatment B: 46%). A negative outcome occurred less in Treatment A (p less than 0.05). Training success was not associated with psychic benefit. The association differed for the two treatments. It was concluded that exercise training was effective for some but not for all cardiac patients, and that a psychic effect of exercise could not be demonstrated. Relaxation therapy enhanced physical and psychic outcome of rehabilitation.
Collapse
|