A comparison of pressure distributions between two types of sockets in a bulbous stump

Assessing Socket Fit Effects on Pressure and Shear at a Transtibial Residuum/Socket Interface

Fluctuations in residuum volume during daily activities are known to occur in lower-limb amputees. This can cause frequent changes to fit, which cannot be accommodated by commonly-used prosthetic sockets. The real-time effects, if any, of these minor socket fit changes on interface biomechanics have not been studied extensively. Amputees commonly use different layers of socks to accommodate frequent volume fluctuations, enabling adjustment of socket fit. We, thus, altered socket fit levels via addition/removal of sock layers to a transtibial amputee who habitually-donned two-sock layers to mimic relatively looser and tighter socket fits. Interface pressure and shear sensors were placed at known prominent load-bearing sites of the transtibial residuum/socket interface, i.e., patellar tendon (PT), popliteal fossa (PF), and anterior-distal (AD) end, to measure real-time biomechanical interactions during standing and level walking. Although socket fit level was only slightly modified, changes in interface pressure and shear across anatomical sites were still observed. Tighter fit corresponds to notable pressure reduction at AD during early stance and pressure increase at PT during terminal stance due to the residuum being pushed up. Shear-to-pressure ratios were used to assess comfort, while pressure- and shear-time integrals were used to assess tissue health. We observed more notable changes at tissue sites (e.g., AD and PF). Combined evaluation of pressure and shear, including shear-to-pressure ratio and time integrals, may offer insight for residuum care.

Design and evaluation of a prosthetic socket for a patient with diabetic‐related transtibial amputation: A case report

This is a report of a diabetic transtibial amputee with severe pain and ulcer in the antero‐distal of the tibia. A novel prosthetic socket with an antero‐distal silicone wall was designed. The result showed that the patient's satisfaction was increased and the average peak pressure was reduced by using the new socket design.

A Preliminary Cost-Utility Analysis of the Prosthetic Care Innovations: Basic Framework

A preliminary cost-utility analysis (CUA) of prosthetic care innovations can provide timely information during the early stage of product development and clinical usage. Concepts of preliminary CUAs are emerging. However, several obstacles must be overcome before these analyses are performed routinely. Disparities of methods and high uncertainty make the outcomes of usual preliminary CUAs challenging to interpret, appraise and share. These shortcomings create opportunities for a basic framework of preliminary CUAs. First, I introduced a basic framework of a preliminary CUA built around a series of constructs and hands-on recommendations. Then, I appraised this framework considering the strengths and weaknesses, barriers and facilitators, and return on investment. The design of the basic framework was determined through the review of health economic and prosthetic-specific literature. A preliminary CUA comparing the costs and utilities between usual intervention and an innovation could be achieved through a 15-step iterative process focusing on feasibility, constructs, analysis, and interpretation of outcomes. This CUA provides sufficient evidence to identify knowledge gaps and improvement areas, educate about the design of subsequent full CUAs, and obtain fast-track approval from governing bodies. Like previous CUAs, the main limitations were inherent to the constructs (e.g., narrow perspective, plausible scenarios, mid-term time horizon, substantial assumptions, data mismatch, high uncertainty). Key facilitators potentially transferable across preliminary CUAs of prosthetic care innovations included choosing abided constructs, capitalizing on prior schedules of expenses, and benchmarking baseline or incremental utilities. This new approach with preliminary CUA can simplify the selection of methods, standardize outcomes, ease comparisons between innovations, and streamline pathways for adoption. Further collegial efforts toward validating standard preliminary CUAs will facilitate access to economic prosthetic care innovations, improving the lives of individuals suffering from limb loss worldwide.

Trends and Opportunities in Health Economic Evaluations of Prosthetic Care Innovations

Overcoming obstacles to prosthetic fittings requires frequent tryouts of sockets and components. Repetitions of interventions are upsetting for users and place substantial economic burden on healthcare systems. Encouraging prosthetic care innovations capable of alleviating clinical and financial shortcomings of socket-based solutions is essential. Nonetheless, evidence of socio-economic benefits of an innovation are required to facilitate access to markets. Unfortunately, complex decisions must be made when allocating resources toward the most relevant health economic evaluation (HEE) at a given stage of development of an innovation. This paper first, aimed to show the importance and challenges of HEEs of intervention facilitating prosthetic fittings. Next, the main trends in HEEs at various phases of product development and clinical acceptance of prosthetic care innovations were outlined. Then, opportunities for a basic framework of a preliminary cost-utility analysis (CUA) during the mid-stage of development of prosthetic care innovations were highlighted. To do this, fundamental and applied health economic literature and prosthetic-specific publications were reviewed to extract and analyse the trends in HEEs of new medical and prosthetic technologies, respectively. The findings show there is consensus around the weaknesses of full CUAs (e.g., lack of timeliness, resource-intensive) and strengths of preliminary CUAs (e.g., identify evidence gaps, educate design of full CUA, fast-track approval). However, several obstacles must be overcome before preliminary CUA of prosthetic care innovations will be routinely carried out. Disparities of methods and constructs of usual preliminary CUA are barriers that could be alleviated by a more standardized framework. The paper concludes by identifying that there are opportunities for the development of a basic framework of preliminary CUA of prosthetic care innovations. Ultimately, the collaborative design of a framework could simplify selection of the methods, standardise outcomes, ease comparisons between innovations and streamline pathways for adoption. This might facilitate access to economical solutions that could improve the life of individuals suffering from limb loss.

A Preliminary Cost-Utility Analysis of the Prosthetic Care Innovations: Case of the Keep Walking Implant

Several obstacles must be overcome before preliminary cost-utility analyses (CUA) of prosthetic care innovations can be routinely performed. The basic framework of preliminary CUAs and hands- on recommendations suggested previously might contribute to wider adoption. However, a practical application for an emerging intervention is needed to showcase the capacity of this proposed preliminary CUA framework. This study presented the outcomes of preliminary CUA of the distal weight bearing Keep Walking Implant (KWI), an emerging prosthetic care innovation that may reduce socket fittings for individuals with transfemoral amputation. The preliminary CUAs compared the provision of prosthetic care without (usual intervention) and with the KWI (new intervention) using a 15-step iterative process focused on feasibility, constructs, analysis, and interpretations of outcomes from an Australia government prosthetic care perspective over a six-year time horizon. Baseline and incremental costs were extracted from schedules of allowable expenses. Baseline utilities were extracted from a study and converted into quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Incremental utilities were calculated based on sensible gains of QALY from baselines. The provision of the prosthetic care with the KWI could generate an indicative incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) of -$36,890 per QALY, which was $76,890 per QALY below willingness-to-pay threshold, provided that the KWI reduces costs by $17,910 while increasing utility by 0.485 QALY compared to usual interventions. This preliminary CUA provided administrators of healthcare organizations in Australia and elsewhere with prerequisite evidence justifying further access to market and clinical introduction of the KWI. Altogether, this work suggests that the basic framework of the preliminary CUA of a prosthetic care innovation proposed previously is feasible and informative when a series of assumptions are carefully considered. This study further confirms that preliminary CUAs prosthetic care interventions might be a relevant alternative to full CUA for other medical treatments.

Textile-based Pressure Sensors for Monitoring Prosthetic-Socket Interfaces

Amputees are prone to experiencing discomfort when wearing their prosthetic devices. As the amputee population grows this becomes a more prevalent and pressing concern. There is a need for new prosthetic technologies to construct more comfortable and well-fitted liners and sockets. One of the well-recognized impediments to the development of new prosthetic technology is the lack of practical inner socket sensors to monitor the inner socket environment (ISE), or the region between the residual limb and the socket. Here we present a capacitive pressure sensor fabricated through a simple, and scalable sewing process using commercially available conductive yarns and textile materials. This fully-textile sensor provides a soft, flexible, and comfortable sensing system for monitoring the ISE. We provide details of our low-power sensor system capable of high-speed data collection from up to four sensor arrays. Additionally, we demonstrate two custom set-ups to test and validate the textile-based sensors in a simulated prosthetic environment. Finally, we utilize the textile-based sensors to study the ISE of a bilateral transtibial amputee. Results indicate that the textile-based sensors provide a promising potential for seamlessly monitoring the ISE.

Evaluating shear and normal force with the use of an instrumented transtibial socket: A case study

Patients with transtibial amputation experience ulcers on their residual limb. The loading between the device and underlying material plays a role in loads transmitted to the skin. The objective was to evaluate normal and shear forces at the socket/liner interface during walking. A 53 year old male (85.45 kg and 177.8 cm) with a transtibial amputation participated in this case study. A transtibial prosthesis was instrumented with a load cell to measure normal and shear forces at the socket interface. Three conditions were evaluated during walking: gel liner, additional three ply sock and a hole in the gel liner. Shear and normal forces were highest with the addition of a three ply. Longitudinal shear stresses ranged from 0.4-7.66 kPa, transverse shear stresses ranged from 0.01-7.79 kPa and normal stresses ranged from 2.7-61.9 kPa. Increased shear and normal forces can cause a significant decrease in blood perfusion, linked to an increased risk of ulcer formation. Experimental force results are also important for future work involving finite element modeling of the skin/liner/device interface.

Mechanical and Finite Element Analysis of an Innovative Orthopedic Implant Designed to Increase the Weight Carrying Ability of the Femur and Reduce Frictional Forces on an Amputee's Stump

This study was designed to test the hypothesis that: "A properly designed implant that harnesses the principle of the incompressibility of fluids can improve the weight carrying ability of an amputee's residual femur and reduce the frictional forces at the stump external socket interface." The hypothesis was tested both mechanically on an Amputee Simulation Device (ASD) and through Finite Element Analysis (FEA) modeling software. With the implant attached to the femur, the FEA and ASD demonstrated that the femur carried 90% and 93% respectively of the force of walking. Without the implant, the FEA model and ASD femur carried only 35% and 77%, respectively, of the force of walking. Statistical calculations reveal three (3) degrees of separation (99% probability of non-random significant difference) between with and without implant data points. FEA modeling demonstrates that the normal contact forces and shear forces are pushed the distal weight-bearing area of the amputee stump, relieving the lateral stump of frictional forces. The ASD mechanical and FEA modeling data validate each other with both systems supporting the hypotheses with confidence intervals of three degrees of separation between with implant and without implant models.

Evaluation of Force Sensing Resistors for the Measurement of Interface Pressures in Lower Limb Prosthetics

Understanding pressure distributions at the limb-socket interface is essential to the design and evaluation of prosthetic components for lower limb prosthesis users. Force sensing resistors (FSRs) are employed in prosthetics research to measure pressure at this interface due to their low cost, thin profile, and ease of use. While FSRs are known to be sensitive to many sources of error, few studies have systematically quantified these errors using test conditions relevant to lower limb prosthetics. The purpose of this study was to evaluate FSR accuracy for the measurement of lower limb prosthetics interface pressures. Two FSR models (Flexiforce A201 and Interlink 402) were subjected to a series of prosthetic-relevant tests. These tests included: (1) static compression, (2) cyclic compression, and (3) a combined static and cyclic compression protocol mimicking a variable activity (Walk-Sit-Stand) procedure. Flexiforce sensors outperformed Interlink sensors and were then subjected to two additional tests: (4) static curvature and (5) static shear stress. Results demonstrated that FSRs experienced significant errors all five tests. We concluded that: (1) if used carefully, FSRs can provide an estimate of prosthetic interface pressure, but these measurements should be interpreted within the expected range of possible measurement error given the setup; (2) FSRs should be calibrated in a setup that closely matches how they will be used for taking measurements; and (3) both Flexiforce and Interlink sensors can be used to estimate interface pressures, however in most cases Flexiforce sensors are likely to provide more accurate measurements.