1
|
Sanders JE, Vamos AC, Mertens JC, Allyn KJ, Larsen BG, Ballesteros D, Wang H, DeGrasse NS, Garbini JL, Hafner BJ, Friedly JL. An adaptive prosthetic socket for people with transtibial amputation. Sci Rep 2024; 14:11168. [PMID: 38750086 PMCID: PMC11096356 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-61234-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2024] [Accepted: 05/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
It is essential that people with limb amputation maintain proper prosthetic socket fit to prevent injury. Monitoring and adjusting socket fit, for example by removing the prosthesis to add prosthetic socks, is burdensome and can adversely affect users' function and quality-of-life. This study presents results from take-home testing of a motor-driven adaptive socket that automatically adjusted socket size during walking. A socket fit metric was calculated from inductive sensor measurements of the distance between the elastomeric liner surrounding the residual limb and the socket's inner surface. A proportional-integral controller was implemented to adjust socket size. When tested on 12 participants with transtibial amputation, the controller was active a mean of 68% of the walking time. In general, participants who walked more than 20 min/day demonstrated greater activity, less doff time, and fewer manual socket size adjustments for the adaptive socket compared with a locked non-adjustable socket and a motor-driven socket that participants adjusted with a smartphone application. Nine of 12 participants reported that they would use a motor-driven adjustable socket if it were available as it would limit their socket fit issues. The size and weight of the adaptive socket were considered the most important variables to improve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joan E Sanders
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, 3720 15th Ave NE, Box 355061, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
| | - Andrew C Vamos
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, 3720 15th Ave NE, Box 355061, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Joseph C Mertens
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, 3720 15th Ave NE, Box 355061, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Katheryn J Allyn
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, 3720 15th Ave NE, Box 355061, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Brian G Larsen
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, 3720 15th Ave NE, Box 355061, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Daniel Ballesteros
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, 3720 15th Ave NE, Box 355061, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Horace Wang
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, 3720 15th Ave NE, Box 355061, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Nicholas S DeGrasse
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, 3720 15th Ave NE, Box 355061, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Joseph L Garbini
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, 3900 E Stevens Way NE, Box 352600, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Brian J Hafner
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Box 356490, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Janna L Friedly
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, 325 Ninth Ave, Box 359612, Seattle, WA, 98104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Baldock M, Pickard N, Prince M, Kirkwood S, Chadwell A, Howard D, Dickinson A, Kenney L, Gill N, Curtin S. Adjustable prosthetic sockets: a systematic review of industrial and research design characteristics and their justifications. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2023; 20:147. [PMID: 37926807 PMCID: PMC10626671 DOI: 10.1186/s12984-023-01270-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prosthetic socket is a key component that influences prosthesis satisfaction, with a poorly fitting prosthetic socket linked to prosthesis abandonment and reduced community participation. This paper reviews adjustable socket designs, as they have the potential to improve prosthetic fit and comfort through accommodating residual limb volume fluctuations and alleviating undue socket pressure. METHODS Systematic literature and patent searches were conducted across multiple databases to identify articles and patents that discussed adjustable prosthetic sockets. The patents were used to find companies, organisations, and institutions who currently sell adjustable sockets or who are developing devices. RESULTS 50 literature articles and 63 patents were identified for inclusion, representing 35 different designs used in literature and 16 commercially available products. Adjustable sockets are becoming more prevalent with 73% of publications (literature, patents, and news) occurring within the last ten years. Two key design characteristics were identified: principle of adjustability (inflatable bladders, moveable panels, circumferential adjustment, variable length), and surface form (conformable, rigid multi-DOF, and rigid single DOF). Inflatable bladders contributed to 40% of literature used designs with only one identified commercially available design (n = 16) using this approach. Whereas circumferential adjustment designs covered 75% of identified industry designs compared to only 36% of literature devices. Clinical studies were generally small in size and only 17.6% of them assessed a commercially available socket. DISCUSSION There are clear differences in the design focus taken by industry and researchers, with justification for choice of design and range of adjustment often being unclear. Whilst comfort is often reported as improved with an adjustable socket, the rationale behind this is not often discussed, and small study sizes reduce the outcome viability. Many adjustable sockets lack appropriate safety features to limit over or under tightening, which may present a risk of tissue damage or provide inadequate coupling, affecting function and satisfaction. Furthermore, the relationship between design and comfort or function are rarely investigated and remain a significant gap in the literature. Finally, this review highlights the need for improved collaboration between academia and industry, with a strong disconnect observed between commercial devices and published research studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Baldock
- School of Health and Society at the University of Salford, Salford, UK.
| | - Nicolaas Pickard
- School of Health and Society at the University of Salford, Salford, UK.
| | - Michael Prince
- School of Health and Society at the University of Salford, Salford, UK
| | - Sarah Kirkwood
- School of Health and Society at the University of Salford, Salford, UK
| | - Alix Chadwell
- School of Health and Society at the University of Salford, Salford, UK
- School of Engineering at Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - David Howard
- School of Health and Society at the University of Salford, Salford, UK
| | - Alex Dickinson
- School of Engineering at the University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Laurence Kenney
- School of Health and Society at the University of Salford, Salford, UK
| | - Niamh Gill
- School of Health and Society at the University of Salford, Salford, UK
| | - Sam Curtin
- School of Health and Society at the University of Salford, Salford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Youngblood RT, Hafner BJ, Czerniecki JM, Larsen BG, Allyn KJ, Sanders JE. Mechanically and physiologically optimizing prosthetic elevated vacuum systems in people with transtibial amputation: a pilot study. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETICS AND ORTHOTICS : JPO 2022; 34:194-201. [PMID: 36582938 PMCID: PMC9793861 DOI: 10.1097/jpo.0000000000000396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Introduction The most suitable elevated vacuum (EV) pressure may differ for each individual prosthesis user depending on suspension needs, socket fit, prosthetic components, and health. Mechanical and physiological effects of EV were evaluated in an effort to determine the optimal vacuum pressure for three individuals. Methods Instrumented EV sockets were created based on the participants' regular EV sockets. Inductive distance sensors were embedded into the wall of the socket at select locations to measure limb movement relative to the socket. Each participant conducted an activity protocol while limb movement, limb fluid volume, and user-reported comfort were measured at various socket vacuum pressure settings. Results Increased socket vacuum pressure resulted in reduced limb-socket displacement for each participant; however, 81-93% of limb movement was eliminated by a vacuum pressure setting of 12 (approximately -9 inHg). Relative limb-socket displacement by sensor location varied for each participant, suggesting distinct differences related to socket fit or residual limb tissue content. The rate of limb fluid volume change and the change in socket comfort did not consistently differ with socket vacuum pressure, suggesting a more complex relationship unique to each individual. Conclusions Practitioners may use individual responses to optimize socket vacuum pressure settings, balancing mechanical and physiological effects of EV for improved clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Brian J Hafner
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Joseph M Czerniecki
- VA Center for Limb Loss and Mobility, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Brian G Larsen
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Katheryn J Allyn
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Joan E Sanders
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Design of adjustable frame-type prosthetic socket for lower limb. Ing Rech Biomed 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.irbm.2022.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
5
|
Ballesteros D, Youngblood RT, Vamos AC, Garbini JL, Allyn KJ, Hafner BJ, Larsen BG, Ciol MA, Friedly JL, Sanders JE. Cyclic socket enlargement and reduction during walking to minimize limb fluid volume loss in transtibial prosthesis users. Med Eng Phys 2022; 103:103787. [DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2022.103787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2021] [Revised: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
6
|
Won NY, Paul A, Garibaldi M, Baumgartner RE, Kaufman KR, Reider L, Wrigley J, Morshed S. Scoping review to evaluate existing measurement parameters and clinical outcomes of transtibial prosthetic alignment and socket fit. Prosthet Orthot Int 2022; 46:95-107. [PMID: 35412519 DOI: 10.1097/pxr.0000000000000061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2021] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Fit and alignment are observable objectives of the prosthesis rendering process for individuals with lower limb amputation. Nevertheless, there is a dearth of validated measures to directly assess the quality of this clinical procedure. OBJECTIVES The objectives of this scoping review are to evaluate existing measurement parameters and clinical outcomes used in investigations of transtibial socket fit or prosthetic alignment and to identify gaps in the literature regarding tools for evaluation of prosthetic fitting. STUDY DESIGN Scoping literature review. METHODS A comprehensive search was conducted in the following databases: MEDLINE (through PubMed), Embase (through Elsevier), Scopus (through Elsevier), and Engineering Village (through Elsevier), resulting in 6107 studies to be screened. RESULTS Sixty-three studies were included in the review. When measuring fit, studies most frequently reported on patient-reported comfort (n = 22) and socket size compared with the residual limb volume (n = 9). Alignment was most frequently measured by the prosthetists' judgment and/or use of an alignment jig (n = 34). The measurement parameters used to determine alignment or fit varied greatly among the included studies. CONCLUSION This review demonstrated that most measures of socket fit rely on a patient's self-report and may vary with biopsychosocial factors unrelated to the socket fitting process. Meanwhile, alignment is determined mostly by the prosthetist's judgment, paired with objective measurements, such as alignment jigs and gait analysis. Efforts to standardize and validate measures of these parameters of prosthetic fitting are vital to improving clinical practice and reporting outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nae Yeon Won
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Alexandra Paul
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Matthew Garibaldi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | - Lisa Reider
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jordan Wrigley
- Norlin Library, University of Colorado- Boulder Libraries, CO
| | - Saam Morshed
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Effects of a modified passive socket system on short-term changes in residuum volume and comfort: A preliminary study in transtibial amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 2022; 46:54-60. [PMID: 34772866 DOI: 10.1097/pxr.0000000000000053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2020] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Changes in residuum volume are a common problem in lower-limb amputees during prosthesis usage, and can lead to poor suspension, impaired gait, and tissue damage. Residuum volume can be affected by the in-socket air pressure, which will influence fluid flow in and around the residuum. The use of "active" pumps to reduce air pressure has been shown to conserve the residuum volume, but these are expensive and unlikely to be widely available. An alternative, passive approach, based on Boyles' law, is to introduce a larger distal void volume at the end of the socket and hence reduce the change in pressure for a given change in volume. OBJECTIVES To compare the performance across three test conditions (passive-conventional, with standard distal void; passive-with increased distal void; and active system) in terms of residuum volume changes and comfort. STUDY DESIGN Repeated-measures experiment under three test conditions. METHODS Five transtibial amputee participants (three males and two females), aged between 27 and 67 years, and of mobility grade K2 or K3, were fitted with a bespoke test prosthesis that was adapted to include the three test conditions. Residuum volume was measured before and after walking under each test condition (presented in a random order). Comfort was also assessed after walking with each test condition. RESULTS The reduction in residuum volume, relative to the baseline volume, was higher for the conventional passive system (4.2% ± 2.8%) compared with the modified passive (1.4% ± 1.4%) and active (1.6% ± 1.1%) systems. CONCLUSION The use of a passive suspension system with an increased distal void within the socket may help to stabilize the residuum volume during prosthesis usage.
Collapse
|
8
|
Weathersby EJ, Vamos AC, Larsen BG, McLean JB, Carter RV, Allyn KJ, Ballesteros D, Wang H, deGrasse NS, Friedly JL, Hafner BJ, Garbini JL, Ciol MA, Sanders JE. Performance of an auto-adjusting prosthetic socket during walking with intermittent socket release. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng 2022; 9:20556683221093271. [PMID: 35558157 PMCID: PMC9087223 DOI: 10.1177/20556683221093271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction A challenge in the engineering of auto-adjusting prosthetic sockets is to maintain stable operation of the control system while users change their bodily position and activity. The purpose of this study was to test the stability of a socket that automatically adjusted socket size to maintain fit. Socket release during sitting was conducted between bouts of walking. Methods Adjustable sockets with sensors that monitored distance between the liner and socket were fabricated. Motor-driven panels and a microprocessor-based control system adjusted socket size during walking to maintain a target sensed distance. Limb fluid volume was recorded continuously. During eight sit/walk cycles, the socket panels were released upon sitting and then returned to position for walking, either the size at the end of the prior bout or a size 1.0% larger in volume. Results In six transtibial prosthesis users, the control system maintained stable operation and did not saturate (move to and remain at the end of the actuator's range) during 98% of the walking bouts. Limb fluid volume changes generally matched the panel position changes executed by the control system. Conclusions Stable operation of the control system suggests that the auto-adjusting socket is ready for testing in users' at-home settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ethan J Weathersby
- Department of Bioengineering, University of
Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Andrew C Vamos
- Department of Bioengineering, University of
Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Brian G Larsen
- Department of Bioengineering, University of
Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jake B McLean
- Department of Bioengineering, University of
Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ryan V Carter
- Department of Bioengineering, University of
Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Katheryn J Allyn
- Department of Bioengineering, University of
Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Daniel Ballesteros
- Department of Bioengineering, University of
Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Horace Wang
- Department of Bioengineering, University of
Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Janna L Friedly
- Department of Rehabilitation
Medicine, University of
Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Brian J Hafner
- Department of Rehabilitation
Medicine, University of
Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Joseph L Garbini
- Department of Mechanical
Engineering, University of
Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Marcia A Ciol
- Department of Rehabilitation
Medicine, University of
Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Joan E Sanders
- Department of Bioengineering, University of
Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Safari R. Lower limb prosthetic interfaces: Clinical and technological advancement and potential future direction. Prosthet Orthot Int 2020; 44:384-401. [PMID: 33164655 DOI: 10.1177/0309364620969226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
The human-prosthesis interface is one of the most complicated challenges facing the field of prosthetics, despite substantive investments in research and development by researchers and clinicians around the world. The journal of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics, Prosthetics and Orthotics International, has contributed substantively to the growing body of knowledge on this topic. In celebrating the 50th anniversary of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics, this narrative review aims to explore how human-prosthesis interfaces have changed over the last five decades; how research has contributed to an understanding of interface mechanics; how clinical practice has been informed as a result; and what might be potential future directions. Studies reporting on comparison, design, manufacturing and evaluation of lower limb prosthetic sockets, and osseointegration were considered. This review demonstrates that, over the last 50 years, clinical research has improved our understanding of socket designs and their effects; however, high-quality research is still needed. In particular, there have been advances in the development of volume and thermal control mechanisms with a few designs having the potential for clinical application. Similarly, advances in sensing technology, soft tissue quantification techniques, computing technology, and additive manufacturing are moving towards enabling automated, data-driven manufacturing of sockets. In people who are unable to use a prosthetic socket, osseointegration provides a functional solution not available 50 years ago. Furthermore, osseointegration has the potential to facilitate neuromuscular integration. Despite these advances, further improvement in mechanical features of implants, and infection control and prevention are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reza Safari
- Health and Social Care Research Centre, University of Derby, Derby, UK
| |
Collapse
|