Simultaneous bilateral shoulder arthroplasty: a case series

BACKGROUND

Staged bilateral shoulder arthroplasty procedures have been shown to have good functional outcomes. The next step is to explore the option of simultaneous bilateral shoulder arthroplasty (SBSA). We report on the first case series of SBSA in the United States. The purpose of this study was to examine the safety and postoperative complication profile of SBSA and provide a technique reference for surgeons considering performing or investigating this procedure.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective record review of all the SBSA procedures performed by the senior author between 2007 and 2020. Patient demographic characteristics, surgical information, and postoperative data were collected. Data were compiled, and means, standard deviations, and ranges were calculated. Any readmissions or postoperative complications requiring revision were noted. A cohort of patients matched for age, sex, and body mass index with staged (sequential) bilateral total shoulder arthroplasty was analyzed for comparison.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients were identified in the simultaneous group (SBSA). The mean age was 64 ± 15 years, with 9 women (69%) and 4 men (31%); the mean body mass index was 29.1 ± 7.5. The mean American Society of Anesthesiologists score was 2.55 ± 0.7, average blood loss was 364 ± 170 mL (range, 50-600 mL), 5 of 13 patients (38%) underwent blood transfusions, and the mean surgical time was 183 ± 42 minutes. Postoperatively, the mean visual analog scale pain score on postoperative day 1 was 4 ± 2 (range, 0-7), and the mean length of stay was 3.3 days. Postoperative complications included urinary tract infections in 2 patients, urinary retention in 2 patients, and recurrence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in 1 patient. No patient was readmitted within 90 days of surgery. One patient underwent a reoperation 2 years postoperatively for symptomatic hardware removal (cerclage cables around the tuberosities). A matched cohort of staged bilateral total shoulder arthroplasty patients was analyzed for comparison. Postoperative complications in the staged group included 1 reverse total shoulder arthroplasty patient with subjective instability that was managed with additional physical therapy. There were no documented readmissions within 90 days or revision arthroplasty procedures in either cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

SBSA is a reasonable procedure that can be useful in select patients, with promising short-term safety noted in this series. Prospective randomized studies are needed to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of the procedure.

Clinical effect of ultrasound-guided nerve block and dexmedetomidine anesthesia on lower extremity operative fracture reduction

BACKGROUND

Lower extremity fractures are mainly treated by surgical reduction, but this operation is often affected by the patient’s level of agitation and the type of anesthesia used. The main treatment for lower-extremity fractures is operative reduction. However, operations can often be affected by both agitation and the degree of anesthesia. Therefore, it is of great importance to develop an effective anesthesia program to effectively ensure the progress of surgery.

AIM

To discuss the effect of ultrasound-guided nerve block combined with dexmedetomidine anesthesia in lower extremity fracture surgery.

METHODS

A total of 120 hospital patients with lower extremity fractures were selected for this retrospective study and divided into an observation group (n = 60) and a control group (n = 60) according to the anesthesia scheme; the control group received ultrasound-guided nerve block; the observation group was treated with dextromethomidine on the basis of the control group, and the mean arterial pressure, heart rate (HR), and blood oxygen saturation were observed in the two groups.

RESULTS

The mean arterial pressure of T1, T2 and T3 in the observation group were 94.40 ± 7.10, 90.84 ± 7.21 and 91.03 ± 6.84 mmHg, significantly higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05). The observation group’s HR at T1 was 76.60 ± 7.52 times/min, significantly lower than that of the control group (P < 0.05); The observation group’s HR at T2 and T3 was 75.40 ± 8.03 times/min and 76.64 ± 7.11 times/min, significantly higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05). The observation group’s visual analog score at 2 h, 6 h and 12 h after operation was 3.55 ± 0.87, 2.84 ± 0.65 and 2.05 ± 0.40. the recovery time was 15.51 ± 4.21 min, significantly lower than that of the control group (P < 0.05). Six hours post-anesthesia, epinephrine and norepinephrine in the observation group were 81. 10 ± 21.19 pg/mL and 510. 20 ± 98.27 pg/mL, significantly lower than that of the control group (P < 0.05), and the mini-mental state exam score of the observation group was 25. 51 ± 1.15, significantly higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound-guided nerve block combined with dexmedetomidine has a good anesthetic effect in the operation of lower limb fractures and has little effect on the hemodynamics of patients.

Bilateral brachial plexus block in a patient with cervical spinal cord injury: A case report

RATIONALE

Bilateral brachial plexus block (BPB) generally requires a relatively large dose of local anesthetic for a successful block, resulting in a high risk of local anesthetic systemic toxicity. It can also result in inadvertent bilateral phrenic nerve palsy, leading to respiratory failure. Hence, it has not been widely used. However, it can be performed in selected patients. In this report, we present a case of ultrasound-guided BPB for bilateral upper extremity surgery in a patient with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI).

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 25-year-old woman with SCI secondary to traumatic fifth cervical spine fracture scheduled for surgical treatment of bilateral elbow fracture received bilateral BPB.

DIAGNOSES

Due to the complications of SCI, the patient had incomplete sensory loss, loss of motor function, and complete diaphragmatic paralysis on the right side.

INTERVENTIONS

Right infraclavicular and left axillary BPB was performed as the sole anesthetic procedure for bilateral upper extremity surgery.

OUTCOMES

Bilateral BPB was successful for bilateral upper extremity surgery. The surgery was uneventful and without further complications.

LESSONS

Patients with cervical SCI have a high risk of respiratory complications. Bilateral BPB can be a suitable option for bilateral upper extremity surgery in selected patients. It is imperative to select an appropriate anesthetic technique that preserves respiratory function to minimize the potential risk of respiratory complications.

Bilateral Brachial Plexus Block Using Chloroprocaine For Surgery Of Bilateral Radial Fractures

We report a case of a 41-year-old male with anticipated difficult airway undergoing a repair of a bilateral radial fracture under bilateral sequential brachial plexus block. Anesthesiologists are reluctant to perform bilateral blocks because of the fear of complications like diaphragmatic paralysis, local anesthetic (LA) toxicity, and pneumothorax. We advise that with the correct application of LA pharmacokinetics, careful patient selection and usage of ultrasound, bilateral blocks can be done safely. We used chloroprocaine as an LA in one of the blocks to reduce the dose required for the more toxic LAs. chloroprocaine’s fast metabolism also helped us to prevent the overlapping of peak plasma concentration of different LAs. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case in the literature where chloroprocaine was used for bilateral brachial plexus block.

The efficacy of simultaneous bilateral axillary brachial plexus block under the guidance of neurostimulator or ultrasound: a prospective study

PURPOSE

This study was designed to investigate the risk of local anesthetic toxicity and efficacy of simultaneous bilateral axillary brachial plexus block performed under the guidance of ultrasound or a neurostimulator.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty patients who were anesthetized with bilateral axillary plexus block simultaneously between February 2012 and March 2014 were enrolled in the study. The patients were anesthetized under the guidance of a neurostimulator (group N, n = 60) or ultrasound (group U, n = 60). The block performance time, procedure-related pain, adverse events, total and free plasma concentrations of ropivacaine, and other data were recorded. The comparison was analyzed statistically.

RESULTS

The block performance time, and onset of the sensory and motor block, of group N was longer than that of group U (p < 0.001). The procedure-related pain of group N was more serious than that of group U (p < 0.05). The patient satisfaction rate of group U was higher than that of group N (p < 0.05). The total plasma concentrations of ropivacaine in group N were comparable to those of group U, except for the value at 50 min after injection (p < 0.05). The free plasma concentrations of ropivacaine of group N at 5 min were significantly higher than that of group U (p < 0.001). No apparent serious adverse events were observed perioperatively in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneous bilateral axillary brachial plexus block guided by neurostimulator or ultrasound in bilateral distal upper extremity surgery seems to have a low risk of local anesthetic toxicity and to be effective. The ultrasound-guided block is superior in terms of providing the same degree of anesthesia with shorter duration, less pain, and faster onset of sensory and motor blockades, which is important in clinical practice.

Intravenous lipid administration for drug-induced toxicity: a critical review of the existing data

Following the discovery that administration of intravenous lipid emulsion (ILE) may reverse the cardiac and neurological toxicity of certain local anesthetic agents, ILE's potential role has recently been explored in the setting of toxicity attributed to a variety of different drugs. The potential mechanisms, safety and efficacy of this approach are considered in this review. Data are reviewed from 76 published reports involving ILE administration for severe drug toxicity, including 55 where toxicity was due to nonanesthetic agents. ILE was reported to exert a positive therapeutic effect in only a proportion of the reported cases, with greatest evidence of efficacy concerning local anesthetic agents. Administration has typically involved bolus administration followed by continuous maintenance infusion, and a number of different mechanisms are proposed, from preferential partitioning of the drug from cardiac tissue to the circulating lipid fraction and direct inotropic effects related to carnitine pathways and fatty acid oxidative metabolism. No major adverse effects have been encountered, but too few data exist to adequately address the safety profile of ILE.

Sequential bilateral upper extremity intravenous regional anesthesia with chloroprocaine

PURPOSE

This case report describes the novel use of sequential bilateral upper extremity intravenous regional anesthesia with 2-chloroprocaine for bilateral endoscopic carpal tunnel decompression.

CLINICAL FEATURES

A 49-yr-old female, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I, presented for outpatient bilateral carpal tunnel release. Sequential bilateral intravenous regional anesthesia was performed with 0.5% 2-chloroprocaine 30 mL per arm using a double upper arm tourniquet. Intraoperative sedation consisted of midazolam and fentanyl. Tourniquet times for the right and left arms were 28 and 19 min, respectively. After deflation of each tourniquet, mild limb twitching occurred but resolved immediately after administration of intravenous midazolam. The patient made a rapid recovery, and she was discharged home uneventfully.

CONCLUSIONS

Bilateral sequential intravenous regional anesthesia with 2-chloroprocaine is effective for upper extremity surgery of short duration. Recommendations to minimize the risk of local anesthetic toxicity are reviewed.