Anesthetic management of the diaphragmatic pacemaker placement surgery. Our experience in the Institut Guttmann

BACKGROUND

The diaphragm pacemaker (DP) has proven its utility in replacing mechanical ventilation in patients with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). The DP improves patient quality of life and reduces morbidity and mortality and their associated health care costs. The anesthetic management of these patients and the particularities of the surgical procedure are challenging. The aim of our study is to analyze anesthetic management and intraoperative complications in patients undergoing DP placement in our hospital.

METHODS

We performed a chart review of patients treated between December 2007 and July 2017, recording the patients' preoperative status, anesthetic management and intraoperative complications.

RESULTS

The study included 16 patients (5 pediatric) undergoing DP implantation for chronic SCI (63%), ALS (25%) and other neurologic conditions (12%). Abdominal laparoscopy was performed under general anesthesia, with intravenous (87%) or inhalational (13%) induction and maintenance using total intravenous (50%) or balanced (50%) anesthesia. Rocuronium was administered in one case to permit airway management. Complications included: hypotension (50%), difficulties in mechanical ventilation during laparoscopy (31%), pneumothorax (12.5%) and autonomic dysreflexia (6%).

CONCLUSIONS

DP placement under general anesthesia is a safe intervention in both adult and pediatric patients. Complications derived from both the underlying disease and the surgical technique may appear, and must be rapidly identified and treated to obtain a satisfactory surgical outcome.

Multicenter review of diaphragm pacing in spinal cord injury: successful not only in weaning from ventilators but also in bridging to independent respiration

BACKGROUND

Ventilator-dependent spinal cord-injured (SCI) patients require significant resources related to ventilator dependence. Diaphragm pacing (DP) has been shown to successfully replace mechanical ventilators for chronic ventilator-dependent tetraplegics. Early use of DP following SCI has not been described. Here, we report our multicenter review experience with the use of DP in the initial hospitalization after SCI.

METHODS

Under institutional review board approval for humanitarian use device, we retrospectively reviewed our multicenter nonrandomized interventional protocol of laparoscopic diaphragm motor point mapping with electrode implantation and subsequent diaphragm conditioning and ventilator weaning.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients with an average age of 31 years (range, 17-65 years) with only two females were identified. Mechanism of injury included motor vehicle collision (7), diving (6), gunshot wounds (4), falls (4), athletic injuries (3), bicycle collision (2), heavy object falling on spine (2), and motorcycle collision (1). Elapsed time from injury to surgery was 40 days (range, 3-112 days). Seven (24%) of the 29 patients who were evaluated for the DP placement had nonstimulatable diaphragms from either phrenic nerve damage or infarction of the involved phrenic motor neurons and were not implanted. Of the stimulatable patients undergoing DP, 72% (16 of 22) were completely free of ventilator support in an average of 10.2 days. For the remaining six DP patients, two had delayed weans of 180 days, three had partial weans using DP at times during the day, and one patient successfully implanted went to a long-term acute care hospital and subsequently had life-prolonging measures withdrawn. Eight patients (36%) had complete recovery of respiration, and DP wires were removed.

CONCLUSION

Early laparoscopic diaphragm mapping and DP implantation can successfully wean traumatic cervical SCI patients from ventilator support. Early laparoscopic mapping is also diagnostic in that a nonstimulatable diaphragm is a convincing evidence of an inability to wean from ventilator support, and long-term ventilator management can be immediately instituted.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, level V.

Diaphragmatic pacing stimulation in spinal cord injury: anesthetic and perioperative management

OBJECTIVE

The standard therapy for patients with high-level spinal cord injury is long-term mechanical ventilation through a tracheostomy. However, in some cases, this approach results in death or disability. The aim of this study is to highlight the anesthetics and perioperative aspects of patients undergoing insertion of a diaphragmatic pacemaker.

METHODS

Five patients with quadriplegia following high cervical traumatic spinal cord injury and ventilator-dependent chronic respiratory failure were implanted with a laparoscopic diaphragmatic pacemaker after preoperative assessments of their phrenic nerve function and diaphragm contractility through transcutaneous nerve stimulation. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01385384.

RESULTS

The diaphragmatic pacemaker placement was successful in all of the patients. Two patients presented with capnothorax during the perioperative period, which resolved without consequences. After six months, three patients achieved continuous use of the diaphragm pacing system, and one patient could be removed from mechanical ventilation for more than 4 hours per day.

CONCLUSIONS

The implantation of a diaphragmatic phrenic system is a new and safe technique with potential to improve the quality of life of patients who are dependent on mechanical ventilation because of spinal cord injuries. Appropriate indication and adequate perioperative care are fundamental to achieving better results.