Feasibility of full and rapid neuromuscular blockade recovery with sugammadex in myasthenia gravis patients undergoing surgery - a series of 117 cases

Purpose

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease interfering with neuromuscular transmission. Patients are at risk of postoperative residual curarization (PORC) if nondepolarizing muscle relaxants are used. Clinically inapparent insufficient muscle strength may result in hypoventilation and postoperative bronchopneumonia. We describe a cohort of 117 cases in which sugammadex was used in MG patients undergoing surgery with muscle relaxation with rocuronium.

Methods and patients

We anesthetized 117 patients with MG using rocuronium and sugammadex as neuromuscular blockade reversal agent. One hundred five patients underwent surgical thymectomy and 12 underwent cholecystectomy (five laparotomic and seven laparoscopic). We measured time from sugammadex administration to recovery and to extubation, using the TOF-Watch^® (series of four consecutive electrical impulses [the train-of-four] >0.9). We tracked peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO₂) <95%, elevation of partial pressure of carbon dioxide (pCO₂) >10% above baseline, number of reintubations within the first 48 hours, and number of pneumonias within 120 hours, postoperatively. Results were processed as average, minimum, and maximum values.

Results

The period needed to reach train-of-four of 0.9 following sugammadex administration was on average 117 seconds (minimum of 105 seconds/maximum of 127 seconds) and differed within deviation <10%. The time to extubation following sugammadex administration was on average 276 seconds (minimum of 251 seconds/maximum of 305 seconds) and differed minimally among patients as well. We observed no SpO₂ <95%, no pCO₂ elevation >10% above a baseline, no emergent reintubation within the first 48 hours, and no pneumonia diagnosed on clinical basis within 120 hours, postoperatively in all 117 patients.

Conclusion

In this cohort of MG patients undergoing surgery using rocuronium and sugammadex, we did not observe any signs of postoperative residual curarization and respiratory depression. The neuromuscular blockade recovery was reliable, predictable, and rapid.

Safety and Efficacy of Sugammadex for Neuromuscular Blockade Reversal

Since its first human use in 2005, the γ-cyclodextrin sugammadex (Org 25969) has had the potential to become the reversal agent of choice, for rocuronium- or vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade. Sugammadex binds to the aminosteroid neuromuscular blocker, encapsulating it and extracting it from the neuromuscular junction, effectively ceasing activity and allowing neuromuscular transmission to recover rapidly. Phases I–III and subsequent trials have found sugammadex to be safe and effective in a wide range of doses and for the reversal of a range of depth of muscle relaxation in healthy volunteers and a variety of disease states. Sugammadex use may allow refinement of anesthetic practice and improvement in surgical conditions, through the maintenance of deep neuromuscular blockade right to the end of surgery, with subsequent rapid reversal. Debate remains about the use of sugammadex in the treatment of rocuronium anaphylaxis and airway emergencies. The high price of sugammadex currently prohibits its routine use, but if the price falls, after expiry of its patent, it may become cost-effective as a readily available agent in certain specific clinical situations. Serious adverse reactions have occurred in less than 1% of patients and are most commonly because of hypersensitivity. No deaths have been reported, but caution is advised in neonates, pediatrics, and pregnancy where data are lacking.

[Perioperative care of palliative patients by the anesthetist : medical, psychosocial and ethical challenges]

Anesthetists will encounter palliative patients in the daily routine as palliative patients undergo operations and interventions as well, depending on the state of the disease. The first challenge for anesthetists will be to recognize the patient as being palliative. In the course of further treatment it will be necessary to address the specific problems of this patient group. Medical problems are optimized symptom control and the patient's pre-existing medication. In the psychosocial domain, good communication skills are expected of anesthetists, especially during the preoperative interview. Ethical conflicts exist with the decision-making process for surgery and the handling of perioperative do-not-resuscitate orders. This article addresses these areas of conflict and the aim is to enable anesthetists to provide the best possible perioperative care to this vulnerable patient group with the goal to maintain quality of life and keep postoperative recovery as short as possible.