Patient recollections of perioperative anaesthesia risks

Exploring patients' experiences of analgesia after major lower limb amputation: a qualitative study

OBJECTIVES

To explore patient experiences, understanding and perceptions of analgesia following major lower limb amputation.

DESIGN

Qualitative interview study, conducted as part of a randomised controlled feasibility trial.

SETTING

Participants were recruited from two general hospitals in South Wales.

PARTICIPANTS

Interview participants were patients enrolled in PLACEMENT (Perineural Local Anaesthetic Catheter aftEr Major lowEr limb amputatioN Trial): a randomised controlled feasibility trial comparing the use of perineural catheter (PNC) versus standard care for postoperative pain relief following major lower limb amputation. PLACEMENT participants who completed 5-day postoperative follow-up, were able and willing to participate in a face-to-face interview, and had consented to be contacted, were eligible to take part in the qualitative study. A total of 20 interviews were conducted with 14 participants: 10 male and 4 female.

METHODS

Semi-structured, face-to-face interviews were conducted with participants over two time points: (1) up to 1 month and (2) at least 6 months following amputation. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using a framework approach.

RESULTS

Interviews revealed unanticipated benefits of PNC usage for postoperative pain relief. Participants valued the localised and continuous nature of this mode of analgesia in comparison to opioids. Concerns about opioid dependence and side effects of pain relief medication were raised by participants in both treatment groups, with some reporting trying to limit their intake of analgesics.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings suggest routine placement of a PNC following major lower limb amputation could reduce postoperative pain, particularly for patient groups at risk of postoperative delirium. This method of analgesic delivery also has the potential to reduce preoperative anxiety, alleviate the burden of pain management and minimise opioid use. Future research could further examine the comparison between patient-controlled analgesia and continuous analgesia in relation to patient anxiety and satisfaction with pain management.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN: 85710690; EudraCT: 2016-003544-37.

Effects of a short message service (SMS) by cellular phone to improve compliance with fasting guidelines in patients undergoing elective surgery: a retrospective observational study

Background

Contemporary perioperative fasting guidelines aim to alleviate patient discomfort before surgery and enhance postoperative recovery whilst seeking to reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration during anesthesia. The impact of a short message service (SMS) reminder on fasting guideline compliance is unknown. Therefore, we performed a retrospective observational study and quality improvement project aiming to quantify the extent of excessive and prolonged fasting, and then assessed the impact of a SMS reminder in reducing fasting times.

Methods

After ethics committee approval we performed a retrospective observational study investigating preoperative fasting times of adult patients undergoing elective surgery. First, we assessed whether the fasting guideline times were adhered to (Standard Care group). All patients received internationally recommended fasting guidelines in the form of a written hospital policy document. We then implemented an additional prompt via a mobile phone SMS 1 day prior to surgery containing a reminder of fasting guideline times (SMS group). The primary aims were to compare fasting times between the Standard Care group and the SMS group.

Results

The fasting times of 160 patients in the Standard Care group and 110 patients in the SMS group were evaluated. Adherence to the fasting guidelines for solids occurred in 14 patients (8.8%) in the Standard Care group vs. Twenty-two patients (13.6%) in the SMS group (p=0.01). Adherence to the fasting guidelines for fluids occurred in 4 patients (2.5%) in the Standard Care group vs. Ten patients (6.3%) in the SMS group (p=0.023). Patients in the Standard Care group had a longer median (inter-quartile range (IQR)) fasting time for fluids compared the SMS group [6.5 h (IQR 4.5:11) vs 3.5 h (IQR 3:8.5), p< 0.0001]. Median fasting times for solids were 11 h (IQR 7:14) in the Standard Care group and 11.5 h (IQR 7:13.5) in the SMS group (p=0.756).

Conclusion

Adherence to internationally recommended fasting guidelines for patients undergoing elective surgery is poor. The introduction of a fasting guideline reminder via a mobile phone SMS in addition to a written hospital policy improved adherence to fasting advice and reduced the fasting times for fluids but not for solids. The use of an SMS reminder of fasting guidelines is a simple, feasible, low-cost, and effective tool in minimising excessive fasting for fluids among elective surgical patients.

Trial registration

ACTRN12619001232123 (Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry). Registered 6th September 2019 (retrospectively registered).

Evaluation of anesthesia informed consent in pediatric practice - An observation cohort study

Background and Aims

An informed consent requires active participation by both physicians and patients. It is the responsibility of the physician to give the complete disclosure of information in easy language for the parent to understand. An informed consent process can be a challenge especially for the anesthetists when time is a limiting factor for patient-anesthetist interaction especially in same day admission and day surgery. The aim of this study was to subjectively evaluate the understanding and recall of the informed consent by the parents.

Material and Methods

The validated survey was conducted over 10 weeks and was limited to one parent per child and to the parent who was directly involved in the consent process.

Results

Majority of parents rated positively for adequate disclosure of all items of information. Consent process done on day of surgery was found to be associated with lower parental rating in adequacy of disclosure of pain relief options. Seniority of anesthetists was associated with higher parental rating of adequacy of information regarding post operative plan, specific risk of child and overall consent process. Consent for minor surgeries, on day of surgery, did not significantly affect the parental performance in their recall of disclosed information but was associated with significant lower rating of adequacy of postoperative plan. Postoperative pain is among the areas for improvement especially in day surgery cases.

Conclusion

Consent taken on day of surgery was found to be associated with lower parental rating. Postoperative plan for pain required improvement especially in day surgery cases.

The efficacy of mobile application use on recall of surgical risks in nasal bone fracture reduction surgery

Background

The number of surgical risks recalled by a patient after surgery can be used as a parameter for assessing how well the patient has understood the informed consent process. No study has investigated the usefulness of a self-developed mobile application in the traditional informed consent process in patients with a nasal bone fracture. This study aimed to investigate whether delivery of information, such as surgical risks, through a mobile application is more effective than delivery of information through only verbal means and a paper.

Methods

This prospective, randomized study included 60 patients with a nasal bone fracture. The experimental group (n=30) received preoperative explanation with the traditional informed consent process in addition to a mobile application, while the control group (n=30) received preoperative explanation with only the traditional informed consent process. Four weeks after surgery, the number of recalled surgical risks was compared for analysis. The following six surgical risks were explained: pain, bleeding, nasal deformity, numbness, nasal obstruction, and nasal cartilage necrosis.

Results

The mean number of recalled surgical risks among all patients was 1.58±0.56. The most frequently recalled surgical risk was nasal deformity in both groups. The mean number of recalled surgical risks was 1.72±0.52 in the experimental group and 1.49±0.57 in the control group. There was a significant association between mobile application use and the mean number of recalled surgical risks (p=0.047). Age, sex, and the level of education were not significantly associated with the mean number of recalled surgical risks.

Conclusion

This study found that a mobile application could contribute to the efficient delivery of information during the informed consent process. With further improvement, it could be used in other plastic surgeries and other surgeries, and such an application can potentially be used for explaining risks as well as delivering other types of information.

The Effect of Written Information on Recall of Surgical Risks of Carpal Tunnel Release Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Study

BACKGROUND

Written information has been thought to help patients recall surgical risks discussed during the informed consent process, but has not been assessed for carpal tunnel release, a procedure with the rare but serious risk of complex regional pain syndrome. The authors' objective was to determine whether providing a pamphlet would improve patients' ability to remember the risks of surgery.

METHODS

Sixty patients seen for carpal tunnel release were included in this prospective, single-blind, randomized study. Patients received either a written pamphlet of the risks of surgery or no additional information following a standardized consultation. Two weeks after the initial consultation, patients were contacted to assess their risk recall and whether they had read about the operation from any source.

RESULTS

There was no difference in terms of the number of risks recalled between pamphlet (1.33 ± 1.21) or control groups (1.45 ± 1.22; p = 0.73). Recall of infection was better in the pamphlet group (p < 0.05). No patients remembered complex regional pain syndrome. There was no difference in the proportion of people who read additional information about carpal tunnel release surgery between the pamphlet (34.8 percent) and control groups (21.4 percent; p = 0.39), but reading about carpal tunnel release surgery was associated with improved recall (2.45 ± 1.13 versus 0.77 ± 0.91; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Reading about surgery improved risk recall, but providing this information in the form of a pamphlet did not, nor did it affect patients' ability to recall the risk of complex regional pain syndrome. These results demonstrate that surgeons should implement additional measures to improve comprehension of surgical risks.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, I.

The role of informed consent in patient complaints: Reducing hidden health system costs and improving patient engagement through shared decision making

INTRODUCTION

Patient complaints about physicians are strongly associated with malpractice risk. Physicians at high risk for lawsuits tend to have poor communication skills and are more commonly the subject of patient complaints about communication issues. If a malpractice action does not arise, patient complaints nonetheless represent significant prelitigation transaction costs for the healthcare system that have not been previously quantified. Informed consent complaints represent a unique constellation of clinical communication skills clearly tied to malpractice risk. The goal of this study was to measure institutional resource consumption allocated to informed consent (IC) complaints, which are both costly and preventable.

METHODS

We compared IC complaints to other complaints about medical care in a single medical center in the United States, estimating the absolute and relative burden of IC deficiencies within this healthcare system.

RESULTS

Resource consumption for the resolution of IC complaints far exceeded their proportional representation of complaints, representing half of all complaints, while disproportionately absorbing two-thirds of staff time devoted to complaint resolution.

CONCLUSIONS

Complaint resolution represents an unrecognized remediable cost and an underappreciated opportunity for reducing waste in healthcare. We suggest that healthcare systems can reduce costs and elevate their patient-centered care practices by improving patient-provider communication during medical decision making via engagement strategies such as shared decision making.