Clinical effects of hypertonic saline boluses in children with severe traumatic brain injury

AIM

To quantify the effects of 3% hypertonic saline (HTS) boluses on intracranial pressure (ICP) and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) in children.

METHODS

A retrospective study of patients admitted to a regional neurosurgical children's intensive care unit.

RESULTS

A total of 156 HTS boluses were given to children with traumatic brain injury. ICP decreased 6 mmHg (P < 0.01) and CPP increased 4 mmHg (P = 0.003) 1-h post-bolus. Effects persisted for 3 h post-dose ICP was 5 mmHg lower) and 4 h post-bolus CPP was 3 mmHg higher. ICP change was not associated with pre-bolus serum sodium concentration.

CONCLUSIONS

Hypertonic saline 3% at 5 mL/kg is an effective osmolar therapy for reducing ICP and increasing CPP in children for up to 3 h. '53-53' is a suitable guide - 5 mL/kg of 3% HTS will on average decrease ICP by at least 5 mmHg for 3 h. Pre-bolus serum sodium concentration is not correlated with effect size.

Effect of hypertonic saline in the management of elevated intracranial pressure in children with cerebral edema: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective:

To determine the hypertonic saline efficacy in children with cerebral edema and raised intracranial pressure.

Method:

Studies assessing the efficacy and safety of hypertonic saline in children with cerebral edema and elevated intracranial pressure were identified using Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases. Two reviewers independently assessed papers for inclusion. The primary outcome was a reduction of elevated intracranial pressure by the administration of hypertonic saline.

Results:

We initially evaluated 1595 potentially relevant articles, and only 7 studies met the eligibility criteria for the final analysis. Out of the seven studies, three of them were randomized controlled trials. Three of the studies found that hypertonic saline significantly reduced elevated intracranial pressure compared to control. One study reported a resolution of the comatose state as a measure of reduced intracranial pressure. It also found a significantly higher resolution of coma in the hypertonic saline group rather than the control. Three studies reported that the reduction of intracranial pressure was comparable between the groups. The random-effects model using pooled estimates from four studies showed no difference in hypertonic saline and conventional therapy mortality outcomes. Hypertonic saline was administered as bolus-only therapy at a rate of 1–10 mL/kg/dose over 5 min to 2 h and or bolus followed by infusion therapy (0.5–2 mL/kg/h). One study reported a twofold faster resolution of high intracranial pressure following hypertonic saline administration compared to controls. The re-dosing schedule varied greatly in all included studies. However, three studies reported adverse events but not methodically, and there were no reports on neurological sequelae.

Conclusion:

Hypertonic saline appears to reduce intracranial pressure in children with cerebral edema. However, we cannot draw a firm conclusion regarding the safest dose regimens of hypertonic saline, including the safe and effective therapeutic hypernatremia threshold in the management of raised intracranial pressure with cerebral edema. Future clinical trials should focus on the appropriate concentration, dose, duration, mode of administration, and adverse effects of hypertonic saline to standardize the treatment.

The management of pediatric severe traumatic brain injury: Italian Guidelines

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the work was to update the "Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury" published in 2012, to reflect the new available evidence, and develop the Italian national guideline for the management of severe pediatric head injuries to reduce variation in practice and ensure optimal care to patients.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched from January 2009 to October 2017. Inclusion criteria were English language, pediatric populations (0-18 years) or mixed populations (pediatric/adult) with available age subgroup analyses. The guideline development process was started by the Promoting Group that composed a multidisciplinary panel of experts, with the representatives of the Scientific Societies, the independent expert specialists and a representative of the Patient Associations. The panel selected the clinical questions, discussed the evidence and formulated the text of the recommendations. The documentarists of the University of Florence oversaw the bibliographic research strategy. A group of literature reviewers evaluated the selected literature and compiled the table of evidence for each clinical question.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

The search strategies identified 4254 articles. We selected 3227 abstract (first screening) and, finally included 67 articles (second screening) to update the guideline. This Italian update includes 25 evidence-based recommendations and 5 research recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

In recent years, progress has been made on the understanding of severe pediatric brain injury, as well as on that concerning all major traumatic pathology. This has led to a progressive improvement in the clinical outcome, although the quantity and quality of evidence remains particularly low.

Hyperosmolar Therapy in Pediatric Severe Traumatic Brain Injury-A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

Traumatic brain injury is a leading cause of hospital visits for children. Hyperosmolar therapy is often used to treat severe traumatic brain injury. Hypertonic saline is used predominantly, yet there remains disagreement about whether hypertonic saline or mannitol is more effective.

DATA SOURCES

Literature search was conducted using Pubmed, Cochrane, and Embase. Systematic review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

STUDY SELECTION

Retrospective and prospective studies assessing use of hyperosmolar therapy in pediatric patients with severe traumatic brain injury were included.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two independent authors performed article review. Two-thousand two-hundred thirty unique articles were initially evaluated, 11 were included in the final analysis, with a total of 358 patients. Study quality was assessed using Modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Jadad score.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Of the 11 studies, all evaluated hypertonic saline and four evaluated both hypertonic saline and mannitol. Nine reported that hypertonic saline lowered intracranial pressure and two reported that mannitol lowered intracranial pressure. The studies varied significantly in dose, concentration, and administrations schedule for both hypertonic saline and mannitol. Five studies were prospective, but only one directly compared mannitol to hypertonic saline. The prospective comparison study found no difference in physiologic outcomes. Clinical outcomes were reported using different measures across studies. For hypertonic saline-treated patients, mechanical ventilation was required for 6.9-9 days, decompressive craniectomy was required for 6.25-29.3% of patients, ICU length of stay was 8.0-10.6 days, in-hospital mortality was 10-48%, and 6-month mortality was 7-17%. In mannitol-treated patients, ICU length of stay was 9.5 days, in-hospital mortality was 56%, and 6-month mortality was 19%.

CONCLUSIONS

Both hypertonic saline and mannitol appear to lower intracranial pressure and improve clinical outcomes in pediatric severe traumatic brain injury, but the evidence is extremely fractured both in the method of treatment and in the evaluation of outcomes. Given the paucity of high-quality data, it is difficult to definitively conclude which agent is better or what treatment protocol to follow.

Concentrated hypertonic saline in severe pediatric traumatic brain injury

OBJECTIVE

Describe outcomes associated with bolus and continuous infusions of hypertonic saline (HTS) in children with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).

METHODS

IRB-approved, single-center, retrospective review of children admitted between January 1, 2012 to August 30, 2018 with a diagnosis of severe TBI who received HTS.

RESULTS

Forty-five children (age 9.3 ± 5.8 yr; 60% male) met inclusion criteria. One-hundred eighty-nine equiosmolar bolus doses of HTS were administered to 43 patients (3% HTS, n = 84 doses; 6% HTS, n = 38 doses; 12% HTS, n = 67 doses) for episodes of acute intracranial hypertension (pressure above 20 mmHg). Significant reductions in ICP were observed at 30, 60, and 120 min following HTS boluses with the greatest decrease observed in patients receiving 12%. Thirty-four patients received a continuous infusion of HTS. Higher concentrations of HTS were associated with a more favorable fluid balance (p < .001), fewer episodes of pulmonary edema (p = .003), and higher intake of protein and energy (p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Equiosmolar bolus doses of concentrated HTS were associated with significant reductions in ICP. Benefits of higher concentrations of continuous HTS may include improved fluid balance, less pulmonary edema, and greater amounts of protein and energy intake.

Guidelines for the Management of Pediatric Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Third Edition: Update of the Brain Trauma Foundation Guidelines, Executive Summary

The purpose of this work is to identify and synthesize research produced since the second edition of these Guidelines was published and incorporate new results into revised evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of severe traumatic brain injury in pediatric patients. This document provides an overview of our process, lists the new research added, and includes the revised recommendations. Recommendations are only provided when there is supporting evidence. This update includes 22 recommendations, 9 are new or revised from previous editions. New recommendations on neuroimaging, hyperosmolar therapy, analgesics and sedatives, seizure prophylaxis, temperature control/hypothermia, and nutrition are provided. None are level I, 3 are level II, and 19 are level III. The Clinical Investigators responsible for these Guidelines also created a companion algorithm that supplements the recommendations with expert consensus where evidence is not available and organizes possible interventions into first and second tier utilization. The complete guideline document and supplemental appendices are available electronically (https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000001735). The online documents contain summaries and evaluations of all the studies considered, including those from prior editions, and more detailed information on our methodology. New level II and level III evidence-based recommendations and an algorithm provide additional guidance for the development of local protocols to treat pediatric patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Our intention is to identify and institute a sustainable process to update these Guidelines as new evidence becomes available.

Standardized Volume Dosing Protocol of 23.4% Hypertonic Saline for Pediatric Critical Care: Initial Experience

Background: Standardized volume dosing of 23.4% hypertonic saline (HTS) exists for adults, but the concentration, dosing and administration of HTS in pediatrics is variable. With emerging pediatric experience of 23.4% HTS, a standard volume dose approach may be helpful. Objective: To describe initial experience with a standardized 23.4% HTS weight-based volume dosing protocol of 10, 20, or 30 mL in the pediatric intensive care unit. Methods: Standard volume doses of 23.4% HTS were developed from weight dosing equivalents of 3% HTS. Pre and post sodium and intracranial pressure (ICP) measurements were compared with paired t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test. The site of administration and complications were noted. Results: A total of 16 pediatric patients received 37 doses of 23.4% HTS, with the smallest patient weighing 11 kg. For protocol compliance, 17 doses (46%) followed recommended dosing, 19 were less volume than recommended (51%), and 1 dose (3%) was more than recommended. Mean increase in sodium was 3.5 mEq/L (95% CI = 2-5 mEq/L); P < 0.0001. The median decrease in ICP was 10.5 mm Hg (interquartile range [IQR] 8.3-19.5) for a 37% (IQR 25%-64%) reduction. Most doses were administered through central venous access, although peripheral intravenous administrations occurred in 4 patients without complication. Conclusion and Relevance: Three standard-volume dose options of 23.4% HTS based on weight increases sodium and reduces ICP in pediatric patients. Standard-volume doses may simplify weight-based dosing, storage and administration for pediatric emergencies, although the optimum dose, and safety of 23.4% HTS in children remains unknown.

Hyperosmolar Therapy for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in Pediatrics: A Review of the Literature

Traumatic brain injury remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in children. The use of hyperosmolar therapy to offset increased intracranial pressure (ICP) is described in pediatric guidelines, yet some controversy remains regarding which option to select. A search was conducted using the PubMed, MEDLINE, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health, Academic Search Premier, PsycInfo, and Cochrane Library databases. Studies were included if they described the hyperosmolar therapy use, involved severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), and patient age was 0 to 18 years. A total of 331 studies published between 1987 and 2017 were retrieved; of these, 9 met the inclusion criteria. Included studies were evaluated for the type and concentration of hyperosmolar therapy, associated mortality outcomes, ICP and coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) measurements, concurrent medications, and reported serum sodium and serum osmolarity or osmolality values. Hypertonic saline was the most commonly reported hyperosmolar therapy. Mannitol was less studied, but collectively demonstrated a higher incidence of mortality than hypertonic saline. There were several studies that did not report monitoring outcomes associated with serum sodium and/or serum osmolarity, despite the use of hyperosmolar therapies. Inconsistencies were noted between the studies in the overall study design as well as reported monitoring parameters and length of stay. Hypertonic saline appears to be safe and efficacious at several concentrations for treatment of increased ICP associated with severe TBI in pediatric patients. The limited available data regarding the use of mannitol do not allow a strong conclusion to be made regarding its use.

23.4% Hypertonic Saline and Intracranial Pressure in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Among Children: A 10-Year Retrospective Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To explore the effect of 23.4% hypertonic saline for management of elevated intracranial pressure in children admitted to our institution for severe traumatic brain injury.

DESIGN

Single-center, retrospective medical chart analysis.

SETTING

A PICU at a level 1 pediatric trauma center in the United States.

PATIENTS

Children admitted for severe traumatic brain injury from 2006 to 2016 who received 23.4% hypertonic saline and whose intracranial pressures were measured within 5 hours of receiving 23.4% hypertonic saline.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Over the 10-year period, 1,587 children were admitted for traumatic brain injury, 155 of whom were deemed severe per this study's criteria. Forty of these children received at least one dose of hypertonic saline, but 14 were excluded for insufficient intracranial pressure data. Among the remaining 26 children, one hundred one 23.4% hypertonic saline boluses were used in the analysis. Use of 23.4% hypertonic saline was associated with a decrease in intracranial pressure of approximately 7 mm Hg at both within 1 hour after the bolus (p < 0.01) and 4 hours after the bolus (p < 0.01) when compared with the intracranial pressure measured within 1 hour before the hypertonic saline bolus. These effects remained significant after adjusting for Functional Status Scale score and CT Marshall scores. There was no statistically significant association between adjunctive therapies, such as antiepileptics and analgesics, and changes in intracranial pressure. There was no laboratory evidence of hyperkalemia or renal injury after use of 23.4% hypertonic saline. Across all hospitalizations, 65% of the study population demonstrated an abnormally elevated creatinine at least once, but only three episodes of acute kidney injury occurred in total, all before hypertonic saline administration. Eight of the 26 children in this analysis died during their hospitalization. The Functional Status Scale scores ranged from 6 to 26 with a mean of 12.2 and SD of 5.7.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of 23.4% hypertonic saline with children admitted for severe traumatic brain injury is associated with a statistically significant decrease in intracranial pressure within 1 hour of use.

Management of Pediatric Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: 2019 Consensus and Guidelines-Based Algorithm for First and Second Tier Therapies

OBJECTIVES

To produce a treatment algorithm for the ICU management of infants, children, and adolescents with severe traumatic brain injury.

DATA SOURCES

Studies included in the 2019 Guidelines for the Management of Pediatric Severe Traumatic Brain Injury (Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤ 8), consensus when evidence was insufficient to formulate a fully evidence-based approach, and selected protocols from included studies.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Baseline care germane to all pediatric patients with severe traumatic brain injury along with two tiers of therapy were formulated. An approach to emergent management of the crisis scenario of cerebral herniation was also included. The first tier of therapy focuses on three therapeutic targets, namely preventing and/or treating intracranial hypertension, optimizing cerebral perfusion pressure, and optimizing partial pressure of brain tissue oxygen (when monitored). The second tier of therapy focuses on decompressive craniectomy surgery, barbiturate infusion, late application of hypothermia, induced hyperventilation, and hyperosmolar therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

This article provides an algorithm of clinical practice for the bedside practitioner based on the available evidence, treatment protocols described in the articles included in the 2019 guidelines, and consensus that reflects a logical approach to mitigate intracranial hypertension, optimize cerebral perfusion, and improve outcomes in the setting of pediatric severe traumatic brain injury.

Guidelines for the Management of Pediatric Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Third Edition: Update of the Brain Trauma Foundation Guidelines, Executive Summary

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this work is to identify and synthesize research produced since the second edition of these Guidelines was published and incorporate new results into revised evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of severe traumatic brain injury in pediatric patients.

METHODS AND MAIN RESULTS

This document provides an overview of our process, lists the new research added, and includes the revised recommendations. Recommendations are only provided when there is supporting evidence. This update includes 22 recommendations, nine are new or revised from previous editions. New recommendations on neuroimaging, hyperosmolar therapy, analgesics and sedatives, seizure prophylaxis, temperature control/hypothermia, and nutrition are provided. None are level I, three are level II, and 19 are level III. The Clinical Investigators responsible for these Guidelines also created a companion algorithm that supplements the recommendations with expert consensus where evidence is not available and organizes possible interventions into first and second tier utilization. The purpose of publishing the algorithm as a separate document is to provide guidance for clinicians while maintaining a clear distinction between what is evidence based and what is consensus based. This approach allows, and is intended to encourage, continued creativity in treatment and research where evidence is lacking. Additionally, it allows for the use of the evidence-based recommendations as the foundation for other pathways, protocols, or algorithms specific to different organizations or environments. The complete guideline document and supplemental appendices are available electronically from this journal. These documents contain summaries and evaluations of all the studies considered, including those from prior editions, and more detailed information on our methodology.

CONCLUSIONS

New level II and level III evidence-based recommendations and an algorithm provide additional guidance for the development of local protocols to treat pediatric patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Our intention is to identify and institute a sustainable process to update these Guidelines as new evidence becomes available.

Use of 23.4% Saline in Symptomatic Vasospasm and Cushing's Triad to Prevent Herniation and Death: A Case Report

A 53-year-old woman with migraines presented with Hunt-Hess grade 5 and Fisher grade 4 subarachnoid hemorrhage with intraventricular hemorrhage. She experienced severe vasospasm requiring intra-arterial medications. Continued vasospasm and edema resulted in Cushing's triad with profound tachypnea. Three percentage saline was administered twice without improvement. Despite the general practice to wait until complete neurologic deterioration before administering 23.4% saline, it was administered on 2 separate occasions, once after the failure of the 2 boluses of 3% saline and once on the reappearance of Cushing's triad 24 hours later, and on each occasion produced overall clinical improvement. The patient was subsequently discharged to a rehabilitation facility and then home. A paradigm shift to earlier intervention with 23.4% saline may improve overall outcomes in patients with severe intracranial hypertension refractory to 3% saline and impending herniation.

Pre-treatment with nimodipine and 7.5% hypertonic saline protects aged rats against postoperative cognitive dysfunction via inhibiting hippocampal neuronal apoptosis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the effects of pre-treatment with nimodipine and 7.5% hypertonic saline (HS) on postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) in aged rats.

METHODS

Healthy Sprague-Dawley aged rats were randomly assigned into 4 groups: POCD group, nimodipine group, HS group, and nimodipine+HS group. Rats in POCD group received normal saline injection and then splenectomy 30min later under 1.8% isoflurane inhalation for 2h. In remaining groups, rats received injection of 1mg/kg nimodipine (i.p) and/or 4ml/kg 7.5% HS (i.v) and then splenectomy. Morris water maze test was performed before and after surgery. The hippocampus was harvested for the detection of neuronal apoptosis rate (AR), cytoplasmic calcium ([Ca²⁺]_i), Bcl-2 and Bax mRNA expression and hippocampal neuronal ultrastructure.

RESULTS

When compared with POCD group, the latency to escape, neuronal AR, [Ca²⁺]_i, Bax mRNA expression and Bax/Bcl-2 ratio reduced dramatically, but the times of crossing the platform and Bcl-2 mRNA expression increased significantly (P<0.05) in nimodipine group, NS group and nimodipine+HS group. In addition, the latency to escape, neuronal AR, [Ca²⁺]_i, Bax mRNA expression and Bax/Bcl-2 ratio reduced markedly, but the times of crossing the platform and Bcl-2 mRNA expression increased significantly in nimodipine+HS group as compared to nimodipine group and NS group (P<0.05). Hippocampal neuronal ultrastructure damage was observed in all 4 groups, but it was the mildest in nimodipine+HS group.

CONCLUSION

Pre-treatment with both nimodipine and 7.5% HS exerts better protective effects, which is related to the inhibition of hippocampal neuronal apoptosis.

Effectiveness of 7.5% hypertonic saline in children with severe traumatic brain injury

PURPOSE

Hyperosmolar therapies aim at controlling increased intracranial pressure (ICP) in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of 7.5% hypertonic saline (HTS) on ICP and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) in children with severe TBI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Medical records of patients 14 years or younger with severe TBI, admitted in the pediatric intensive care unit of "Aghia Sophia" Children's Hospital, Athens, Greece, during 2009 to 2015, and received HTS apart from mannitol were retrospectively reviewed. The ICP and CPP pre-HTS and 30, 60, and 120 minutes post-HTS infusion were evaluated. Furthermore, the presence of adverse effects, the long-term neurological outcome, and survival were recorded.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients requiring in total 136 HTS infusions were analyzed. The ICP was significantly reduced and CPP elevated at 30, 60, and 120 minutes postinfusion; and furthermore, postadministration ICP and CPP were predominantly within acceptable limits. No significant adverse effects were recorded and most of the patients survived, however, one third had severe neurological impairment at 6 months postinjury.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, 7.5% HTS infusion as a second-tier osmotic therapy was associated with significant reduction of ICP and increase of CPP in children with severe TBI.