Paracetamol preceding very preterm birth: Is it safe?

INTRODUCTION

The use of paracetamol for pain relief in pregnancy is common. However, the influence of paracetamol on the perinatal adaptation of high-risk infants has not been studied. These data are important for safety, since another inhibitor of prostaglandin synthesis is harmful to infants born very preterm and increases serious morbidity. We studied whether the use of paracetamol had an adverse influence on neonatal adaptation and the outcomes of infants during the first hospitalization.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We studied the patient records of high-risk mothers and their infants born before 32 weeks of gestation for multiple variables over a period of 84 months in Oulu University Hospital, a regional tertiary care hospital caring for high-risk deliveries and providing neonatal intensive care. In a matched cohort setting, the exposition was defined as paracetamol use <24 h before childbirth. The controls had consumed no paracetamol up to 1 week before delivery. Infants with major anomalies were excluded. The primary outcome was defined as the need for early interventional treatments for the preterm infants. Outcomes during the first hospitalization were also studied.

RESULTS

Altogether, 170 fetuses from 149 mothers were exposed to paracetamol during the study period. The control population, delivering during the same period, consisted of 118 non-exposed fetuses from 104 mothers. Among them, the mothers were pairwise matched according to their medications, amniotic fluid leakage time, clinical infections, and delivery mode. After matching, 72 mothers/group remained, resulting in 88 paracetamol-exposed infants and 85 controls. No perinatal adverse reactions were detected. There were no differences in either circulatory support during the first postnatal day or in the risk for major diseases during the first hospitalization. Paracetamol-exposed infants needed fewer acute delivery room therapies (51.1% vs 65.9%, mean difference -14.89; 95% confidence interval -0.29 to -0.003). Maternal total paracetamol dose in the 1 week before delivery correlated positively with Apgar scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Antenatal paracetamol given within 24 h before birth had no adverse effects on extremely or very preterm infants. The long-term safety of paracetamol and the potential acute benefits for preterm infants during perinatal transition remain to be proven in larger, prospective settings.

Effect of intravenous dexmedetomidine and remifentanil on neonatal outcomes after caesarean section under general anaesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Various strategies have been used to mitigate haemodynamic instability during general anaesthesia for caesarean section. However, the safety of these strategies for neonates remains controversial.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of intravenous dexmedetomidine and remifentanil on neonatal outcomes during caesarean section under general anaesthesia.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

DATA SOURCES

Databases of PubMed, EMBASE and CENTRAL were searched until March 2020 and updated in February 2021.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials were included if they compared dexmedetomidine and remifentanil infusion on neonatal outcomes after elective caesarean section under general anaesthesia. Primary outcomes were 1 and 5 min Apgar scores. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of neonatal mask ventilation or endotracheal intubation, and pH of the umbilical artery and vein. Studies that did not report primary outcomes were excluded.

RESULTS

Five studies with 258 patients in total were included. The Apgar score at 1 min in the remifentanil group was lower than that in the dexmedetomidine group for both quantitative [weighted mean difference (WMD): 0.75; 95% CI, 0.44 to 1.07; τ2 = 0.00] and categorical outcomes (≥Apgar 7 vs.

CONCLUSION

In our study, Apgar score at 1 min reported using both quantitative and categorical variables were lower in the remifentanil group than in the dexmedetomidine group but TSA showed that these differences were inconclusive for categorical variables. Data for other outcomes were scarce and did not allow any conclusions to be drawn. Thus, further studies with larger numbers of parturients and with neonatal outcomes as a primary endpoint are warranted to clarify the effects of intravenous dexmedetomidine and remifentanil.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The protocol of this study has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD42019141102).

Collapse

Key Words Collapse

MESH Headings

• Anesthesia, General/adverse effects
• Cesarean Section
• Dexmedetomidine/adverse effects
• Female
• Humans
• Infant, Newborn
• Piperidines/adverse effects
• Pregnancy
• Remifentanil

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Myeongjong Lee From the Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (ML), Research Institute of Medical Science, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Chungju (ML), Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Songpa-gu, Seoul (HK), Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Wonkwang University School of Medicine, Muwang-ro, Iksan (CL) and Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea (HK)
Hyungtae Kim
Cheol Lee
Hyun Kang

Collapse

General Anesthesia with the Use of SUPREME Laryngeal Mask Airway for Emergency Cesarean delivery: A Retrospective Analysis of 1039 Parturients

In comparison to elective cesarean delivery, emergency cesarean delivery under endotracheal intubation is associated with higher risk of life-threatening airway problems. In this retrospective study, we evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of using SUPREME laryngeal mask airway (SLMA) in emergency cesarean delivery under general anesthesia (GA). The study included a total of 1039 paturients undergoing emergency cesarean delivery under GA with SLMA from January 2015 to December 2015 at Quanzhou Children’s and Women’s Hospital. Outcome measures included incidence of the adverse events related to using SLMA, maternal mortality, and neonatal outcomes. Briefly, no aspiration or regurgitation was noticed; the first attempt was successful in all but 2 subjects, both because of incorrect location, one was detected by decreasing oxygenation and the other by high airway pressure, the second attempt was successful in both cases. No subject was switched to endotracheal intubation. No laryngospasm or bronchospasm was detected. No maternal death occurred. There were 1139 neonates (including 944 single birth, 92 twins, 3 triplets) in this study, 5-min Apgar score was 7–10 in 1092 (96.72%) neonates. Thirty-seven (3.28%) neonates received endotracheal intubation. In conclusion, this retrospective study showed that the SLMA was used successfully in 1039 patients undergoing emergent cesarean delivery without any major complications. Vigilant attention by attending anesthesiologists is warranted.