Little words BIG impact: Perioperative communication for children with burns

Therapeutic communication improves patient comfort during venipuncture in children: a single-blinded intervention study

The aim of this study was to examine whether therapeutic communication improves children's comfort during venipuncture compared to standard communication. This study was registered in the Dutch trial register (NL8221), December 10, 2019. This single-blinded interventional study was carried out in an outpatient clinic of a tertiary hospital. Inclusion criteria were age between 5 and 18 years, use of topical anesthesia (EMLA) and sufficient understanding of the Dutch language. 105 children were included, 51 assigned to the standard communication group (SC group) and 54 patients to the therapeutic communication group (TC group). The primary outcome measure was self-reported pain based on the Faces Pain Scale Revised (FPS-R). Secondary outcome measures were observed pain (numeric rating scale (NRS)), self-reported/observed anxiety in child and parent (NRS), self-reported satisfaction in child, parent and medical personnel (NRS), and procedural time. No difference was found for self-reported pain. Self-reported and observed anxiety (by parents and medical personnel) was lower in the TC group (p-values ranged from p = 0.005 to p = 0.048). Procedural time was lower in the TC group (p = 0.011). Satisfaction level of medical personnel was higher in the TC group (p = 0.014).   Conclusion: TC during venipuncture did not result in lower self-reported pain. However, secondary outcomes (observed pain, anxiety and procedural time) were significantly improved in the TC group. What is Known: • Medical procedures, especially needle related procedures, cause anxiety and fear in children and adults. • In adults communication techniques based on hypnosis are effective in reducing pain and anxiety during medical procedures. What is New: • Our study found that with a small change in communication technique (called therapeutic communication or TC), the comfort of children during venipuncture improves. • This improved comfort was mainly reflected by reduced anxiety scores and shorter procedural time. This makes TC suitable for the outpatient setting.

Quality of anesthetist communication with surgical patients in the perioperative setting: a survey at an academic tertiary referral hospital in Ethiopia

BACKGROUND

Effective communication is a fundamental step in providing best medical care and recognized as vital component of clinical anesthesia practice. Poor communication adversely affects patients' safety and outcome. The objective of this study was to investigate the quality of anesthetist communication from patients' perspectives at University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital (UoGCSH), Northwest Ethiopia.

METHODOLOGY

A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted on 423 surgical patients from April 1, - May 30, 2021. Perioperative patient-anesthetist communication (PPAC) was measured by using 15-items Communication Assessment Tool graded by 5-points Likert scale. Data collection was executed during postoperative time as the patients were optimally recovered from anesthesia. The collected data were cleaned and descriptive analysis was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 400 (94.6% response rate) patients included and 226 (56.7%) were female. The median (IQR) age was 30 (25 - 40) years. Three-hundreds and sixty-one (90.3%) patients had reported good PPAC and 39 (9.8%) reported poor PPAC. The median (IQR) of PPAC scores was 53.0 (48.0 - 57.0) and range from 27 to 69. Highest mean score was observed for the item "Talked in terms I could understand" (4.3 ± 0.7). Lowest mean scores were observed for the item "Checked to be sure I understood everything" (1.9 ± 0.9). Patients who had underwent emergency surgery, no previous anesthetic exposure, had significant preoperative anxiety, no history of previous hospital admission, and moderate-severe preoperative pain were found to have poor PPAC compared to their counterparts in the proportions of 82.1%, 79.5%, 69.2%, 64.1%, and 59.0% respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

There was good PPAC in our hospital from patients' perspective. However, there should be improvements in checking the degree of understanding of the delivered information, encouraging to question, disclosing next steps and involving in decision-making. Patients who underwent emergency surgery, had no previous anesthetic exposure, had clinically significant level of preoperative anxiety, had no history of previous hospital admission, and had moderate-severe preoperative pain were found to have poor PPAC.

Nocebo language in anaesthetic patient written information

Recent evidence suggests that how anaesthesia information is presented may influence patient treatment outcomes. We conducted an observational study of anaesthetic-based patient information leaflets across NHS Trusts in England for their nocebo terms vs. therapeutic terms, and how adverse effects were presented. In this study, 'nocebo' is wording that may predispose the patient to expect adverse events such as pain or nausea. Data were extracted and analysed for word frequency, weighted proportion and thematic analysis. In total, 42 patient information leaflets from 61 NHS Trusts were analysed. 'Pain' was the second most common word across the leaflets, median (IQR [range]) 0.82 (0.50-1.0 [0.12-1.47]) per 100 words, second only to 'anaesthesia'. In comparison, 'safe' was the most common positively valanced word which featured eight times less frequently than 'pain' 0.10 (0.07-0.18 [0.0-0.84]) and 'comfort' featured 16.5 times less than 'pain' 0.02 (0.0-0.05 [0.0-0.13]). Multiple examples of phrasing that could have potential nocebo effects included, 'you will need strong painkillers' suggesting 'strong pain' and the need for 'painkillers' rather than using therapeutic terms focusing on 'comfort', 'healing' and 'recovery'. Our results suggest a dominance of phrases with negative content in the presentation of anaesthesia information provided to patients. Clinicians need to be aware of inadvertent generation of nocebo-weighted vs. comfort-weighted communication with patients. Our study findings suggest an opportunity for more emphasis to be placed on therapeutic outcomes and effective mitigation strategies of anaesthesia risks to avoid potential unintended nocebo effects of anaesthesia information leaflets or websites.

Effectiveness of Hypnoanalgesia in Paediatric Dermatological Surgery

Background and objective. Stress in surgical settings has subtle psychological and physiological repercussions in children. The objective is to evaluate whether hypnosedation is effective in reducing the doses of sedation and analgesia required during the periprocedural period in children undergoing dermatological surgery, without negatively affecting pain and satisfaction. Patients and methods: A prospective, longitudinal, observational study where paediatric patients (aged 5–16 years) scheduled for dermatological surgery were analysed according to whether they received hypnosis or distraction during surgery (both common procedures at the centre). As outcome measurements we used sedation doses (propofol) during surgery and the need for analgesia; pain assessment post-surgery and at 24 h using a visual analogue scale (VAS) or revised face pain scale (FPS-r) (both 0–10) depending on age, as well as patient and guardian satisfaction (on a scale of 0–10). Results: Of the 68 patients eligible during the follow-up period, 65 were included. Of these, 33 were treated with hypnosis and 32 with distraction. Children who underwent hypnosis required less total propofol (45.5 ± 11.8 mg vs. 69.3 ± 16.8 mg; p < 0.001) and metamizole in the immediate postoperative period (34.4% vs. 65.6%; p = 0.018). After 24 h, they required less ibuprofen (9.1% vs. 28.1%; p = 0.048) and paracetamol (48.5% vs. 75.0%; p = 0.028). Mean pain according to VAS or FPS-r at 24 h was 3.1 with hypnosis vs. 4.3 with distraction (p < 0.001). Overall satisfaction was higher in the hypnosis group (8.7 ± 0.1 vs. 8.1 ± 0.2; p = 0.009). Conclusions: Hypnoanalgesia in children undergoing dermatological outpatient surgery could not only reduce sedation and analgesia requirements, but also improve child and guardian(s) satisfaction.