The effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on postoperative renal function: a meta-analysis

The Effect of a Local Injection of Flurbiprofen Ester Microspheres on Systemic Inflammatory Model Rats With a Closed Femoral Shaft Fracture

Background: Periarticular injections with a combination of local anesthetics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory analgesics (NSAIDs), and epinephrine are becoming increasingly popular in the perioperative analgesia of artificial joint replacement. However, data on the efficacy and safety of local injection NSAIDs are still scarce. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of a local injection of Flurbiprofen Ester Lipid microspheres into the inflammatory model of femoral shaft closed fractures in rats.

Methods: A systemic inflammatory model was induced in SD rats (60) by closed femoral shaft fracture; 12 non-fractured rats were used as the blank control group (group A). The systemic inflammation model of 60 rats was divided into 5 groups (12 in each group); Group B: intramuscular injectionof the same amount of normal saline at different time points as a negative control; Group C: intravenous injection of Flurbiprofen Ester microspheres (4.5 mg/kg) at different time points; Group D: intramuscular injection of Flurbiprofen Ester microspheres (2.25 mg/kg) at different time points; Group E: intramuscular injection of Flurbiprofen Ester microspheres (4.5 mg/kg) at different time points; Group F: intramuscular injection of Flurbiprofen Ester microspheres (9 mg/kg) at different time points. The behavioral test observed the behavior of the rats. Then, the inflammation factors of CRP, IL-6, COX-1, COX-2 and TNF-αby ELISA were recorded.

Results: Through the behavioral test it could be found that the effect of the intramuscular and intravenous injections of Flurbiprofen Ester microspheres was similar. Fracture rats with a local injection of Flurbiprofen Ester microspheres showed lower inflammation levels measured by COX-1, CRP, and TNF-α compared with the control group. Pathological sections at 24, 48, and 96 h after surgery did not display any local muscle necrosis at the local injection site. These findings suggested that a Flurbiprofen Ester microsphere muscular injection exhibited a similar effect to an intravenous injection.

Conclusion: The local injection of Flurbiprofen Ester microspheres significantly reduced the inflammatory response in fracture rats and did not increase the risk of muscle necrosis, suggesting its feasibility in local injection analgesia.

Coronary Risks Associated with Diclofenac and Other NSAIDs: An Update

The risk of coronary events with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs has been the subject of much debate since the original trial of rofecoxib raised the issue. Since then, over almost 20 years, such risks have been shown in clinical trials of long-term high-dose users, and in observational studies comparing users with non-users. The roles of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2/COX-1 selectivity and COX-2 inhibitory potency have been proposed to explain this increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI). Among NSAIDs, diclofenac appeared to be associated with a relatively higher risk of MI, similar to that of rofecoxib, compatible with the drug's high COX-2 inhibitory potency. Recent studies have resulted in further information being available. A study in the Danish healthcare system using active comparators found a slightly increased risk of MI in healthy persons. However, risk decreased with increasing baseline cardiovascular risk, to the point that in patients at high cardiovascular risk, there was no additional risk associated with diclofenac compared with paracetamol or other NSAIDs. The other major study, from the SOS project, studied several million persons in four countries in Europe, comparing the use of many NSAIDs with non-use. That study found a slightly increased risk with diclofenac compared with non-use, but this was not different from other NSAIDs. Comparing risks with selectivity or potency found no effect of either. These studies refute the main hypotheses to explain the coronary risk of NSAIDs. Finding risk in healthy low-risk patients only questions the reality of a link between the use of the drugs and the occurrence of MI in these conditions. Biases or confounding may be the major reason for small increases in cardiovascular risks in healthy users of NSAIDs in real life.

Postoperative pain management

Postoperative pain is a very important issue for several patients. Indifferent of the surgery type or method, pain management is very necessary. The relief from suffering leads to early mobilization, less hospital stay, reduced hospital costs, and increased patient satisfaction. An individual approach should be applied for pain control, rather than a fix dose or drugs. Additionally, medical, psychological, and physical condition, age, level of fear or anxiety, surgical procedure, personal preference, and response to agents given should be taken into account. The major goal in the management of postoperative pain is minimizing the dose of medications to lessen side effects while still providing adequate analgesia. Again a multidisciplinary team approach should be pursued planning and formulating a plan for pain relief, particularly in complicated patients, such as those who have medical comorbidities. These patients might appear increase for analgesia-related complications or side effects.

Usage patterns of 'over-the-counter' vs. prescription-strength nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in France

AIMS

Most risks of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are pharmacological, dose and duration dependent. Usage patterns of prescription-only (POM) or 'over-the-counter (OTC)' NSAIDs may influence risks, but are not commonly described.

METHODS

The Echantillon Généraliste de Bénéficiaires database, the permanent 1/97 representative sample from the French national healthcare insurance systems, was queried over 2009-2010 to identify usage patterns, concomitant chronic diseases and cardiovascular medication in OTC and POM NSAID users.

RESULTS

Over 2 years, 229 477 of 526 108 patients had at least one NSAID dispensation; 44 484 patients (19%) were dispensed only OTC NSAIDs (93% ibuprofen) and 121 208 (53%) only POM NSAIDs. The OTC users were younger (39.9 vs. 47.4 years old) and more often female (57 vs. 53%); 69% of OTC users and 49% of POM users had only one dispensation. A mean of 14.6 defined daily doses (DDD) were dispensed over 2 years for OTC vs. 53 for POM; 93% OTC vs. 60% POM patients bought ≤ 30 DDD over 2 years, and 1.5 vs. 12% bought ≥ 90 DDD. Chronic comorbidities were found in 19% of OTC users vs. 28% of POM users; 24 vs. 37% had at least one dispensation of a cardiovascular drug over the 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Most of the use of NSAIDs appears to be short term, especially for OTC-type NSAIDs, such as ibuprofen. The validity of risk estimates for NSAIDs extrapolated from clinical trials or from observational studies not including OTC-type usage may need to be revised.

[Validity and reliability of bladder ultrasound imaging for noninvasive estimation of urine volume in a major outpatient surgery department]

OBJECTIVE

To assess the validity and reliability of bladder ultrasound imaging for noninvasive estimation of urine volume, residual volume after voiding, volume before anesthetic induction and after surgery, and volume on sensing an urge to void.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Study of a prospective series of 47 ASA 1-3 patients aged 18 to 79 years undergoing major outpatient surgical procedures under general anesthesia (n = 24) or regional anesthesia and sedation (n = 23). Urine volume was measured at baseline and on recovery (bladder volume by ultrasound and voided volume in a flask) and at the end of surgery (ultrasound only). The reliability and validity of the ultrasound estimation was calculated.

RESULTS

Agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]) between 4 ultrasound-image estimations at baseline and the measured amount collected in a flask ranged from 0.70 to 0.86. The inter- and intra-measurement reliability was high, with ICC values greater than 0.80. The median error of estimation by ultrasound, with respect to measurement in the flask, was 23% at baseline and 29% after recovery. The amount in the flask was greater.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound monitoring of urine in the bladder is reliable and valid, particularly for small volumes. The procedure is tolerated by patients.

[Risk factors for renal dysfunction after total hip arthroplasty]

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative renal dysfunction (PRD) is well-documented after cardiovascular surgery but there are only limited available data concerning major orthopedic surgery, although patients may have several risk factors prone to impair renal function. We designed an epidemiologic prospective study to assess the incidence of PRD after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and to determine risk factors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Were included in the study 755 patients scheduled for THA in a single centre, over a 14 months period. Thirty-one demographic, clinical and biological parameters were collected for each patient. PRD was defined by a value of glomerular filtration, determined by the Cockroft and Gault formula<or=60 ml/min per 1.73 m2, on the seventh postoperative day. Risk factors were determined by univariate and then multivariate analyses using a linear regression model.

RESULTS

Pre- and postoperatively (POD7), respectively 22.4% and 31.4% of the patients, had a creatinine clearance less than 60 ml/min per 1.73 m2. Univariate analysis documented age, ASA score, diabetes mellitus, chronic hypertension, the use of diuretics and NSAID, anemia, and an increased value of plasma urea as risk factors. Risk factors documented by multivariate analysis were: preoperative creatinine clearance less than 60 ml/min per 1.73 m2, (OR: 5.8, 95% confidence interval: [1.6-8.1], p=0.0006), preoperative plasma urea greater than 7.49 mmol/l (2.1 [1.4-11.1], p=0.04), age above 70 years (1.8 [1.1-4.3], p=0.02), and duration of NSAID's treatment beyond 5 days (3.2 [1.4-7.1], p=0.02).

CONCLUSION

PRD is common after THA and is prone to develop in aged patients with comorbidities. Duration of NSAID's administration should be limited in those patients.

Effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on postoperative renal function in adults with normal renal function

BACKGROUND

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can play a major role in the management of acute pain in the peri-operative period. However, there are conflicting views on whether NSAIDs are associated with adverse renal effects.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this review was to determine the effects of NSAIDs on postoperative renal function in adults with normal preoperative renal function.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic searches for relevant randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials in Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE and EMBASE were performed. Attempts were also made to identify trials from citation lists of relevant trials, review articles and clinical practice guidelines. Handsearching of conference abstracts published in major anaesthetic journals was also performed. Date of most recent search: May 2006

SELECTION CRITERIA

The inclusion criteria were randomised or quasi-randomised comparisons of individual NSAIDs with either each other or placebo for treatment of postoperative pain, with relevant postoperative renal outcome measures, in adult surgical patients with normal renal function.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The data were extracted independently by two authors. The primary outcome measure was creatinine clearance within the first two days after surgery. Secondary outcome measures included serum creatinine, urine volume, urinary sodium level, urinary potassium level, fractional excretion of sodium, fractional excretion of potassium and need for dialysis. Weighted mean differences for continuous outcomes and relative risk (RR) and risk difference (RD) for dichotomous outcomes were estimated with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-three trials (1459 patients) fulfilled the selection criteria for this review. NSAIDs reduced creatinine clearance by 16 mL/min (95%CI 5 to 28) and potassium output by 38 mmol/day (95%CI 19 to 56) on the first day after surgery compared to placebo. There was no significant difference in serum creatinine on the first day (0 umol/L, 95%CI -3 to 4) compared to placebo. No significant reduction in urine volume during the early postoperative period was found. There was no significant difference in serum creatinine in the early postoperative period between patients receiving diclofenac, ketorolac, indomethacin, ketoprofen or etodolac. No cases of postoperative renal failure requiring dialysis were described. The trials were not heterogeneous for the primary outcome.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

NSAIDs caused a clinically unimportant transient reduction in renal function in the early postoperative period in patients with normal preoperative renal function. NSAIDs should not be withheld from adults with normal preoperative renal function because of concerns about postoperative renal impairment.

Ibuprofen does not affect serum electrolyte concentrations after an ultradistance run

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effects of ibuprofen on serum electrolyte concentrations after a 160 km running race.

METHODS

Twenty nine subjects (mean (SD) age 47.9 (7.4) years) ingested 600 mg ibuprofen the day before, and 1200 mg ibuprofen during, a 160 km competitive trail running race (approximately every 4 h in 200 mg doses). Twenty five control subjects (mean (SD) age 46.8 (10.3) years) avoided ingestion of ibuprofen before or during the race. Blood was drawn on the day before the race and immediately after the race. Serum biochemical profiles were analysed by a clinical laboratory. Significant effects of treatment and time were determined with a general linear model with repeated measures.

RESULTS

Subjects in the two groups did not differ by age, training volume, race experience, body mass index, body fat, or finishing time (25.8 (3.3) vs 25.6 (3.9) h). Body weight did not change significantly over the race (measured before, mid-race (90 km), and after). Ibuprofen ingestion did not significantly affect any of the serum markers including creatine kinase (p = 0.16). A significant decrease in serum sodium (p = 0.006), potassium (p = 0.001), chloride (p<0.001), calcium (p<0.001), albumin (p<0.001) and globulin (p<0.001) was observed after the race. Increases were seen in creatine kinase (p<0.001), creatinine (p<0.001), blood urea nitrogen (p<0.001), uric acid (p<0.001) and glucose (p<0.001) as the result of the race.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that the non-specific cyclo-oxygenase inhibitor, ibuprofen, does not alter serum electrolyte concentrations during ultradistance running. However, the stress of ultradistance running appears to be related to significant changes in certain serum markers.

Modern concepts of acute and chronic pain management

Both, acute and chronic pain should be treated using appropriate pain management as they may cause several negative reactions and jeopardise the health or at least the quality of life of the patients. Nowadays there are many analgesics and treatment tools available to provide sufficient pain relief for almost all patients. Unfortunately there are still patients suffering from pain due to inadequate or/and inconsequent pain therapy.

Premedication with intravenous ketorolac trometamol (Toradol) in colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a prospective double-blinded placebo-controlled randomized trial to investigate the effect of ketorolac trometamol (KT) administered intravenously as premedication in colonoscopy.

METHODS

One hundred and forty patients undergoing colonoscopy were randomized to receive either 60 mg of KT (KT group (KTG), n=70) or placebo (normal saline group (NSG), n=70) intravenously as premedication 30 min prior to procedure. Patient-controlled sedation (PCS) was used as the mode of sedation. Outcome measures included patient self-assessed pain score in a 10-cm unscaled visual analog scale (VAS), endoscopist assessment of patient pain score in VAS, patient's willingness to repeat colonoscopy, administered and demanded doses of PCS, patient satisfaction score in VAS, and hemodynamic changes during and after the procedure.

RESULTS

The mean patient self-assessed pain score (SD) during procedure was significantly lower in KTG than NSG: 5.08 (2.74) vs 6.62 (2.45); p=0.001. The mean endoscopist assessment of patient pain score (SD) was significantly lower in KTG than NSG as well: 3.99 (2.80) vs 5.28 (2.71); p=0.006. More patients in KTG were willing to repeat procedure as compared with NSG (80.0%vs 57.1%; p=0.004). No significant difference was found in the administered and demanded doses of PCS, mean satisfactory scores and hemodynamic changes in both groups. No serious complication related to intravenous (IV) KT was noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Premedication with IV KT (Toradol) improves pain control during colonoscopy with no associated serious complications.

Prevention and treatment of postoperative pain with particular reference to children

Pain therapy is an important aspect of medical practice for patients of all ages, to optimize care, to obtain an adequate quality of life and to improve their general conditions. Pain is among the most prevalent symptoms experienced by patients undergoing surgery. The success of postoperative pain therapy depends on the ability of the clinician to assess the presenting problems, identify and evaluate pain syndromes and formulate a plan for comprehensive continuing care. The prevalence of acute pain has led to the need to develop techniques for the assessment and management of this symptom in order to focus the attention on an interdisciplinary therapeutic approach (including pharmacologic, cognitive-behavioral, psychologic and physical treatment) and on the timing of different interventions (pre and postoperative). In this chapter we describe the principal therapeutic approaches to control pain in post-operative patients, such as non-opioid, opioid and adjuvant analgesics with particular attention in paediatric age. Moreover we report the principal scales to assess the pain intensity in the post-operative period. The need of a multidisciplinatory team and of a pre and postoperative pain management program represents an important goal in order to obtain effective pain relief and optimize pediatric care and rapid recovery. The introduction of a perioperative team service will improve the approach to pain management programs and it is considered the most important challenge for future.

Strategies for postoperative pain management

Despite advances in our understanding of the neurobiology of nociception, postoperative pain continues to be undertreated. There are many modalities that may provide effective postoperative analgesia, including systemic (e.g. opioids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents) and regional analgesic options. The particular modality or modalities utilized for a particular patient will depend on the risk-benefit profile and patient preferences. Ideally, analgesic options should be incorporated into a multimodal approach to facilitate patient recovery after surgery.

[Non-opioid analgesics for perioperative pain therapy. Risks and rational basis for use]

Non-opioid analgesics play a central role in the management of postoperative pain. In this review, the pharmacology, the analgesic efficacy and the side-effects of non-opioid analgesics are summarized. First, the pharmacology of diclofenac, acetyl salicylic acid, dipyrone, acetaminophen and the COX-2 inhibitors is described. Second, the analgesic efficacy of non-opioid analgesics is analyzed for moderate pain (e.g. ambulatory surgery) and for moderate to severe pain (e.g. abdominal surgery-in combination with opioids). There is limited evidence for an additive analgesic effect of two non-opioid analgesics. Third, the major side-effects of non-opioid analgesics are discussed in relation to the pathophysiology, the frequency and the clinical relevance of these effects. In particular, side-effects on the gastrointestinal tract (ulcus formation), on coagulation (bleeding and thrombosis), on the renal (renal insufficiency), the pulmonary (bronchospasm) and the hematopoetic systems (agranulocytosis) are described. Recommendations for the clinical use of non-opioid analgesics for perioperative pain therapy are given.

Ketorolac: Safe and Effective Analgesia for the Management of Renal Cortical Tumors With Partial Nephrectomy

PURPOSE

Ketorolac has demonstrated advantages as a supplement to opioid based analgesia in several surgical settings, including donor nephrectomy. To our knowledge there has been no published data to date on the use of ketorolac in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy. We compared analgesia with ketorolac and opioids to analgesia with opioids alone with regard to pain control, postoperative recovery and effects on renal function in patients with renal cortical tumors surgically managed by partial nephrectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Records for 154 patients treated with partial nephrectomy for renal cortical tumors were retrospectively analyzed. Clinicopathological variables examined were age, gender, medication use, comorbidity profile, operation side, estimated blood loss, hospital stay, operative duration, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, histopathology results, perioperative transfusion status, ischemia type (warm vs cold vs none), duration of renal artery cross clamping, tumor size and intraparenchymal location, pathological stage and perioperative complications. Postoperative duration to the initiation of solid diet, discontinuation of patient controlled analgesia and overall pain control were assessed. Serum creatinine was measured during the preoperative period, and at 1, 3 or greater and 30 or greater days postoperatively.

RESULTS

Patients who received ketorolac demonstrated superior postoperative recovery with an earlier return to solid diet and earlier discontinuation of patient controlled analgesia. Treatment groups were similar with respect to changes in serum creatinine, blood loss, transfusion rates and complication rates. Ketorolac was not associated with an increased risk of acute renal failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Ketorolac is a safe and effective supplement to opioid based analgesia for pain control after partial nephrectomy.

Effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on postoperative renal function in adults with normal renal function

BACKGROUND

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can play a major role in the management of acute pain in the peri-operative period. However, there are conflicting views on whether NSAIDs are associated with adverse renal effects.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this review was to determine the effects of NSAIDs on postoperative renal function in adults with normal preoperative renal function.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic searches for relevant randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials in Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE and EMBASE were performed. Attempts were also made to identify trials from citation lists of relevant trials, review articles and clinical practice guidelines. Handsearching of conference abstracts published in major anaesthetic journals was also performed. (Search date: 7 February 2003)

SELECTION CRITERIA

The inclusion criteria were randomised or quasi-randomised comparisons of individual NSAIDs with either each other or placebo for treatment of postoperative pain, with relevant postoperative renal outcome measures, in adult surgical patients with normal renal function.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The data was extracted independently by two reviewers. The primary outcome measure was creatinine clearance within the first two days after surgery. Secondary outcome measures included serum creatinine, urine volume, urinary sodium level, urinary potassium level, fractional excretion of sodium, fractional excretion of potassium, need for dialysis and need for diuretic or dopamine treatment for renal insufficiency. Weighted mean differences for continuous outcomes and relative risk for dichotomous outcomes were estimated.

MAIN RESULTS

Nineteen trials ( n = 1204) fulfilled the selection criteria for this review. NSAIDs reduced creatinine clearance by 16 ml/min (95%CI 5 to 28) and potassium output by 38 mmol/day (95%CI 19 to 56) on the first day after surgery compared to placebo. There was no significant difference in serum creatinine on the first day (0 umol/L, 95%CI -5 to 4) compared to placebo. No significant reduction in urine volume during the early postoperative period was found. There was no significant difference in serum creatinine in the early postoperative period between patients receiving diclofenace and ketorolac (or indomethacin). No cases of postoperative renal failure requiring dialysis were described. The trials were homogeneous for the primary outcome.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

NSAIDs caused a clinically unimportant transient reduction in renal function in the early postoperative period in patients with normal preoperative renal function. NSAIDs should not be withheld from adults with normal preoperative renal function because of concerns about postoperative renal impairment.

Ketorolac use in the national football league: prevalence, efficacy, and adverse events

Researchers who surveyed usage patterns, effectiveness, and possible adverse effects of ketorolac tromethamine among National Football League players found some common themes among the 31 teams that responded. Though isolated adverse events were noted, most team healthcare providers felt that ketorolac is effective and safe when the team physician directs its use.

Effect of ketorolac on renal function after donor nephrectomy

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety of ketorolac, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, that is being used more frequently for postoperative analgesia, we performed a detailed analysis of healthy patients undergoing open donor nephrectomy.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of 198 consecutive patients who underwent open living donor nephrectomy between January 1998 and July 2000. We compared patients who were and were not given ketorolac. Regression analysis was used to determine whether any significant interactions were present between ketorolac and donor age, sex, weight, estimated surgical blood loss, or operative time in terms of its effect on renal function. Creatinine clearance was calculated by the Gault-Cockcroft equation.

RESULTS

Among the 83 patients given ketorolac, the mean amount received was 200 mg (range 30 to 360, median 210). No differences were found in the preoperative creatinine clearance between patients who did (118 +/- 29 mL/min) or did not (118 +/- 27 mL/min, P = 0.89) receive ketorolac. Patients who received ketorolac had a slightly lower creatinine clearance on the second postoperative day relative to patients who did not receive ketorolac (66% versus 72% of preoperative calculated creatinine clearance, P = 0.05). However, at a minimum of 3 months postoperatively, the creatinine clearance did not differ between the two groups (70% versus 73%, P = 0.92). Among patients who received ketorolac, no significant association was found between the amount received and renal function at any point tested. In the regression analysis, no significant interactions were found between ketorolac and the clinical variables of age, sex, weight, estimated surgical blood loss, or operative time. Moreover, in an analysis of only the patients who received ketorolac, no significant interactions were found between the amount of ketorolac received and the clinical variables of age, sex, weight, estimated surgical blood loss, or operative time.

CONCLUSIONS

Ketorolac use was not associated with any long-term impairment in renal function when used during the first 2 postoperative days in healthy patients undergoing open donor nephrectomy. Moreover, in the range administered, no subset of patients or maximal ketorolac dose was identified at which ketorolac use was not safe.

Ketorolac-based analgesia improves outcomes for living kidney donors

BACKGROUND

To reduce the morbidity of living kidney donors we introduced ketorolac-based analgesia for patients undergoing open donor nephrectomy in August 1999. There are no prior reports on the use of ketorolac for patients undergoing donor nephrectomy.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of all 198 consecutive patients who underwent open living donor nephrectomy between January 1998 and July 2000 at our institution. We compared patients who underwent surgery before and after introduction of ketorolac-based analgesia.

RESULTS

The introduction of ketorolac-based analgesia resulted in a reduction in length of postoperative stay from 3.7+/-0.1 to 3.1+/-0.1 days (P<0.001). Patients who underwent surgery after ketorolac introduction required 58% less narcotics (P<0.001), recalled having less postoperative pain, and stopped taking pain medications sooner than patients before routine ketorolac use. Moreover, these patients drank 38% more liquids on the first postoperative day (P<0.001) and were able to resume a regular diet sooner than patients who were not managed with ketorolac. Patients who received ketorolac had a slightly lower creatinine clearance on the second postoperative day relative to patients who did not (66 vs. 72% of preoperative calculated creatinine clearance, P=0.05). However at a minimum of 3 months postoperatively, creatinine clearance did not differ between the two groups (70 vs. 73%, P=0.92). There were no differences in the rates of complications between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of ketorolac to control postoperative pain for patients undergoing open donor nephrectomy reduced morbidity and was not associated with any effect on long-term renal function or increased risk of complications. This is the first study to demonstrate the safety of using ketorolac at the time of donor nephrectomy.

Comparative effect of paracetamol, NSAIDs or their combination in postoperative pain management: a qualitative review

BACKGROUND

Quantitative reviews of postoperative pain management have demonstrated that the number of patients needed to treat for one patient to achieve at least 50% pain relief (NNT) is 2.7 for ibuprofen (400 mg) and 4.6 for paracetamol (1000 mg), both compared with placebo. However, direct comparisons between paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have not been extensively reviewed. The aims of this review are (i) to compare the analgesic and adverse effects of paracetamol with those of other NSAIDs in postoperative pain, (ii) to compare the effects of combined paracetamol and NSAID with those of either drug alone, and (iii) to discuss whether the adverse effects of NSAIDs in short-term use are justified by their analgesic effects, compared with paracetamol.

METHODS

Medline (1966 to January 2001) and the Cochrane Library (January 2001) were used to perform a systematic, qualitative review of postoperative pain studies comparing paracetamol (minimum 1000 mg) with NSAID in a double-blind, randomized manner. A quantitative review was not performed as too many studies of high scientific standard (27 out of 41 valid studies, including all major surgery studies) would have been excluded.

RESULTS

NSAIDs were clearly more effective in dental surgery, whereas the efficacy of NSAIDs and paracetamol seemed without substantial differences in major and orthopaedic surgery, although firm conclusions could not be made because the number of studies was limited. The addition of an NSAID to paracetamol may confer additional analgesic efficacy compared with paracetamol alone, and the limited data available also suggest that paracetamol may enhance analgesia when added to an NSAID, compared with NSAIDs alone.

CONCLUSION

Paracetamol is a viable alternative to the NSAIDs, especially because of the low incidence of adverse effects, and should be the preferred choice in high-risk patients. It may be appropriate to combine paracetamol with NSAIDs, but future studies are required, especially after major surgery, with specific focus on a potential increase in side-effects from their combined use.

Ketorolac, diclofenac, and ketoprofen are equally safe for pain relief after major surgery

BACKGROUND

Ketorolac is approved for the relief of postoperative pain but concerns have been raised over a possible risk of serious adverse effects and death. Two regulatory reviews in Europe on the safety of ketorolac found the data were inconclusive and lacked comparison with other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The aim of this study was to compare the risk of serious adverse effects with ketorolac vs diclofenac or ketoprofen in adult patients after elective major surgery.

METHODS

This prospective, randomized multicentre trial evaluated the risks of death, increased surgical site bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, acute renal failure, and allergic reactions, with ketorolac vs diclofenac or ketoprofen administered according to their approved parenteral and oral dose and duration of treatment. Patients were followed for 30 days after surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 11,245 patients completed the trial at 49 European hospitals. Of these, 5634 patients received ketorolac and 5611 patients received one of the comparators. 155 patients (1.38%) had a serious adverse outcome, with 19 deaths (0. 17%), 117 patients with surgical site bleeding (1.04%), 12 patients with allergic reactions (0.12%), 10 patients with acute renal failure (0.09%), and four patients with gastrointestinal bleeding (0.04%). There were no differences between ketorolac and ketoprofen or diclofenac. Postoperative anticoagulants increased the risk of surgical site bleeding equally with ketorolac (odds ratio=2.65, 95% CI=1.51-4.67) and the comparators (odds ratio=3.58, 95% CI=1.93-6.70). Other risk factors for serious adverse outcomes were age, ASA score, and some types of surgery (plastic/ear, nose and throat, gynaecology, and urology).

CONCLUSION

We conclude that ketorolac is as safe as ketoprofen and diclofenac for the treatment of pain after major surgery.