1
|
De Matteis E, Ornello R, Sacco S. Menstrually associated migraine. HANDBOOK OF CLINICAL NEUROLOGY 2024; 199:331-351. [PMID: 38307655 DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-823357-3.00023-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2024]
Abstract
Menstrually related migraine is a disabling condition affecting 35% to 54% females with migraine during their fertile years. The International Headache Classification distinguishes menstrually related migraine from pure menstrual migraine based on the occurrence of the attacks even outside the perimenstrual periods. Hormonal fluctuations are the main driver for the disease in subjects with genetic susceptibility and alterations of brain structures and connectivity. Menstrually related attacks are often particularly severe and disabling requiring proper management. Acute treatment mainly consists of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), recommended in patients also suffering from dysmenorrhea, and triptans. Prevention is specifically indicated in women with high monthly headache frequency or burdensome attacks during perimenstrual periods. Trials proved the efficacy of short-term prevention with triptans and NSAIDs but did not evaluate possible long-term effectiveness and tolerability. Evidence of prevention using hormonal treatments is poor, but extended-cycle treatments might be suitable for women requiring hormonal replacement for concomitant conditions. Few data are available on treatments targeting CGRP, among whom gepants are the most promising because of their utility both in migraine acute and preventive treatment. A greater recognition of disease and a deep knowledge of patients' comorbidities are essential to its proper management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleonora De Matteis
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Raffaele Ornello
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Simona Sacco
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jiang Y, Huang ZL. Recent advances in targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide for the treatment of menstrual migraine: A narrative review. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101:e29361. [PMID: 35713436 PMCID: PMC9276107 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000029361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2021] [Accepted: 04/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Menstrual migraine (MM) has a longer duration and higher drug resistance than non-perimenstrual migraine. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and CGRP receptors are expressed in the peripheral and central nervous systems throughout the trigeminovascular system. The CGRP/CGRP receptor axis plays an important role in sensory physiology and pharmacology. CGRP receptor antagonists and anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have shown consistent efficacy and tolerability in the prevention of chronic or episodic migraine and are now approved for clinical use. However, few studies have reported the use of these drugs in MM, and no specific treatment for MM has been approved. This review aimed to shed light on the recent advances in targeting calcitonin gene-related peptides for the treatment of menstrual migraines in PubMed. In this review, we first discuss the axis of the CGRP/CGRP receptor. We then discuss the role of CGRP receptor antagonists and anti-CGRP mAbs in MM treatment. Finally, we discuss the role of the combination of anti-CGRP mAbs and CGRP receptor antagonists in migraine treatment and the drugs that inhibit CGRP release. Altogether, the anti-CGRP mAbs or CGRP receptor antagonists showed good efficacy and safety in the treatment of MM.
Collapse
|
3
|
Silvestro M, Orologio I, Bonavita S, Scotto di Clemente F, Fasano C, Tessitore A, Tedeschi G, Russo A. Effectiveness and Safety of CGRP-mAbs in Menstrual-Related Migraine: A Real-World Experience. Pain Ther 2021; 10:1203-1214. [PMID: 34106431 PMCID: PMC8586402 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-021-00273-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 05/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Migraine shows a significantly higher prevalence in women, especially during reproductive age when menstrual-related hormonal fluctuations represent the most common migraine trigger. Indeed, over 50% of patients report a higher occurrence of migraine attacks during the perimenstrual window. Menstrual migraine attacks are consistently referred to as more disabling, less responsive to symptomatic treatments, longer in duration, and more prone to relapse than non-menstrual migraine attacks. Evidence strongly suggests that estrogen fluctuations are involved in migraine attacks worsening during the perimenstrual window through several mechanisms directly or indirectly involving the CGRP pathway. We aimed to evaluate whether mAbs blocking CGRP-ligand or receptor (CGRP-mAbs) could represent an effective and safe preventive treatment for menstrual migraine attacks in patients with menstrual-related migraine (MRM) with previous treatment failures. METHODS Forty patients with MRM with at least three previous treatment failures received monthly CGRP-mAbs. At the baseline and after six CGRP-mAbs administrations, patients underwent to extensive interviews to assess frequency, duration, intensity, and responsiveness to painkiller intake of migraine attacks occurring during the perimenstrual window. RESULTS After six administrations of CGRP-mAbs we observed a reduction of median menstrual migraine frequency (from 5 to 2 days per month), pain intensity (from 8/10 to 6/10), and attacks duration (from 24 to 8 h) (p < 0.001). Nevertheless, a significant increase in the percentage of responding to migraine painkillers was observed from 42.5% at baseline to 95% at T1 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS CGRP-mAbs could represent a safe and effective preventive therapeutic strategy able to reduce the disabling burden of menstrual migraine attack frequency, duration, intensity, and significantly improve the response to painkillers. These findings could be related to and further indirectly prove the greater influence of CGRP-mediated mechanisms in the pathophysiology of menstrual migraine attacks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcello Silvestro
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences (DAMS), Headache Center, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Piazza Miraglia 2, 80138, Naples, Italy
| | - Ilaria Orologio
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences (DAMS), Headache Center, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Piazza Miraglia 2, 80138, Naples, Italy
| | - Simona Bonavita
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences (DAMS), Headache Center, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Piazza Miraglia 2, 80138, Naples, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Scotto di Clemente
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences (DAMS), Headache Center, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Piazza Miraglia 2, 80138, Naples, Italy
| | - Carla Fasano
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences (DAMS), Headache Center, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Piazza Miraglia 2, 80138, Naples, Italy
| | - Alessandro Tessitore
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences (DAMS), Headache Center, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Piazza Miraglia 2, 80138, Naples, Italy
| | - Gioacchino Tedeschi
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences (DAMS), Headache Center, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Piazza Miraglia 2, 80138, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Russo
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences (DAMS), Headache Center, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Piazza Miraglia 2, 80138, Naples, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
van Casteren DS, Verhagen IE, van der Arend BWH, van Zwet EW, MaassenVanDenBrink A, Terwindt GM. Comparing Perimenstrual and Nonperimenstrual Migraine Attacks Using an e-Diary. Neurology 2021; 97:e1661-e1671. [PMID: 34493613 PMCID: PMC8605615 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000012723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2021] [Accepted: 08/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Endogenous and exogenous female sex hormones are considered important contributors to migraine pathophysiology. Previous studies have cautiously suggested that perimenstrual migraine attacks have a longer duration and are associated with higher disability compared to nonperimenstrual attacks, but they showed conflicting results on acute therapy efficacy, pain intensity, and associated symptoms. We compared perimenstrual and nonperimenstrual migraine attack characteristics and assessed premenstrual syndrome (PMS) in women with migraine. METHODS Women with migraine were invited to complete a headache e-diary. Characteristics of perimenstrual attacks and nonperimenstrual attacks were compared. The primary outcome was attack duration. Secondary outcomes were headache intensity, accompanying symptoms, acute medication intake, and pain coping. Mixed effects models were used to account for multiple attacks within patients. PMS was assessed in patients without hormonal contraceptives. Subgroup analyses were performed for women with menstrually related migraine (MRM) and nonmenstrually related migraine (non-MRM) and women with a natural menstrual cycle and women using hormonal contraceptives. RESULTS A representative group of 500 participants completed the e-diary for at least 1 month. Perimenstrual migraine attacks (n = 998) compared with nonperimenstrual attacks (n = 4097) were associated with longer duration (20.0 vs 16.1 hours, 95% confidence interval 0.2-0.4), higher recurrence risk (odds ratio [OR] 2.4 [2.0-2.9]), increased triptan intake (OR 1.2 [1.1-1.4]), higher headache intensity (OR 1.4 [1.2-1.7]), less pain coping (mean difference -0.2 [-0.3 to -0.1]), more pronounced photophobia (OR 1.3 [1.2-1.4]) and phonophobia (OR 1.2 [1.1-1.4]), and less aura (OR 0.8 [0.6-1.0]). In total, 396/500 women completed the diary for ≥3 consecutive menstrual cycles, of whom 56% (221/396) fulfilled MRM criteria. Differences in attack characteristics became more pronounced when focusing on women with MRM and women using hormonal contraceptives. Prevalence of PMS was not different for women with MRM compared to non-MRM (11% vs 15%). DISCUSSION The longer duration of perimenstrual migraine attacks in women (with MRM) is associated with higher recurrence risk and increased triptan use. This may increase the risk of medication overuse and emphasizes the need to develop female-specific prophylactic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daphne S van Casteren
- From the Departments of Neurology (D.S.C., I.E.V., B.W.H.A., G.M.T.) and Medical Statistics (E.W.Z.), Leiden University Medical Center; and Division of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology (D.S.C., I.E.V., B.W.H.A., A.M.V.D.B.), Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Iris E Verhagen
- From the Departments of Neurology (D.S.C., I.E.V., B.W.H.A., G.M.T.) and Medical Statistics (E.W.Z.), Leiden University Medical Center; and Division of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology (D.S.C., I.E.V., B.W.H.A., A.M.V.D.B.), Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Britt W H van der Arend
- From the Departments of Neurology (D.S.C., I.E.V., B.W.H.A., G.M.T.) and Medical Statistics (E.W.Z.), Leiden University Medical Center; and Division of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology (D.S.C., I.E.V., B.W.H.A., A.M.V.D.B.), Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Erik W van Zwet
- From the Departments of Neurology (D.S.C., I.E.V., B.W.H.A., G.M.T.) and Medical Statistics (E.W.Z.), Leiden University Medical Center; and Division of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology (D.S.C., I.E.V., B.W.H.A., A.M.V.D.B.), Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Antoinette MaassenVanDenBrink
- From the Departments of Neurology (D.S.C., I.E.V., B.W.H.A., G.M.T.) and Medical Statistics (E.W.Z.), Leiden University Medical Center; and Division of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology (D.S.C., I.E.V., B.W.H.A., A.M.V.D.B.), Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gisela M Terwindt
- From the Departments of Neurology (D.S.C., I.E.V., B.W.H.A., G.M.T.) and Medical Statistics (E.W.Z.), Leiden University Medical Center; and Division of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology (D.S.C., I.E.V., B.W.H.A., A.M.V.D.B.), Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hormonal influences in migraine - interactions of oestrogen, oxytocin and CGRP. Nat Rev Neurol 2021; 17:621-633. [PMID: 34545218 DOI: 10.1038/s41582-021-00544-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Migraine is ranked as the second highest cause of disability worldwide and the first among women aged 15-49 years. Overall, the incidence of migraine is threefold higher among women than men, though the frequency and severity of attacks varies during puberty, the menstrual cycle, pregnancy, the postpartum period and menopause. Reproductive hormones are clearly a key influence in the susceptibility of women to migraine. A fall in plasma oestrogen levels can trigger attacks of migraine without aura, whereas higher oestrogen levels seem to be protective. The basis of these effects is unknown. In this Review, we discuss what is known about sex hormones and their receptors in migraine-related areas in the CNS and the peripheral trigeminovascular pathway. We consider the actions of oestrogen via its multiple receptor subtypes and the involvement of oxytocin, which has been shown to prevent migraine attacks. We also discuss possible interactions of these hormones with the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) system in light of the success of anti-CGRP treatments. We propose a simple model to explain the hormone withdrawal trigger in menstrual migraine, which could provide a foundation for improved management and therapy for hormone-related migraine in women.
Collapse
|
6
|
Ornello R, De Matteis E, Di Felice C, Caponnetto V, Pistoia F, Sacco S. Acute and Preventive Management of Migraine during Menstruation and Menopause. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10112263. [PMID: 34073696 PMCID: PMC8197159 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10112263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Revised: 05/15/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Migraine course is influenced by female reproductive milestones, including menstruation and perimenopause; menstrual migraine (MM) represents a distinct clinical entity. Increased susceptibility to migraine during menstruation and in perimenopause is probably due to fluctuations in estrogen levels. The present review provides suggestions for the treatment of MM and perimenopausal migraine. MM is characterized by long, severe, and poorly treatable headaches, for which the use of long-acting triptans and/or combined treatment with triptans and common analgesics is advisable. Short-term prophylaxis with triptans and/or estrogen treatment is another viable option in women with regular menstrual cycles or treated with combined hormonal contraceptives; conventional prevention may also be considered depending on the attack-related disability and the presence of attacks unrelated to menstruation. In women with perimenopausal migraine, hormonal treatments should aim at avoiding estrogen fluctuations. Future research on migraine treatments will benefit from the ascertainment of the interplay between female sex hormones and the mechanisms of migraine pathogenesis, including the calcitonin gene-related peptide pathway.
Collapse
|
7
|
Menstrual migraine: a distinct disorder needing greater recognition. Lancet Neurol 2021; 20:304-315. [DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(20)30482-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2019] [Revised: 11/22/2020] [Accepted: 12/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
8
|
Menstrual and perimenopausal migraine: A narrative review. Maturitas 2020; 142:24-30. [DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2020.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2020] [Revised: 07/01/2020] [Accepted: 07/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
9
|
Pavlovic JM, Paemeleire K, Göbel H, Bonner J, Rapoport A, Kagan R, Zhang F, Picard H, Mikol DD. Efficacy and safety of erenumab in women with a history of menstrual migraine. J Headache Pain 2020; 21:95. [PMID: 32746775 PMCID: PMC7398400 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-020-01167-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2020] [Accepted: 07/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We performed a post hoc, subgroup analysis of a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of erenumab for prevention of episodic migraine (STRIVE) to determine the efficacy and safety of erenumab in women with self-reported menstrual migraine. METHODS Patients received placebo, erenumab 70 mg, or erenumab 140 mg subcutaneously once monthly during the 6-month double-blind treatment phase of STRIVE. Women who reported history of menstrual migraine and who were ≤ 50 years old were included in the analysis. Endpoints were change from baseline in monthly migraine days (MMD) and monthly acute migraine-specific medication days (MSMD; among patients who took acute migraine-specific medications at baseline), proportion of patients achieving ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in MMD, and incidence of adverse events. RESULTS Among 814 women enrolled in STRIVE, 232 (28.5%) reported a history of menstrual migraine and were ≤ 50 years old. Of the 232 patients, 214 (92%) had a baseline MMD > 5, suggesting a high proportion of women with attacks outside of the 5-day perimenstrual window (2 days before and 3 days after the start of menstruation). Information on "migraine days" includes (and does not discriminate between) perimenstrual and intermenstrual migraine attacks. Between-group differences from placebo over months 4-6 for erenumab 70 mg and 140 mg were - 1.8 (P = 0.001) and - 2.1 (P < 0.001) days for MMD and - 1.6 (P = 0.002) and - 2.4 (P < 0.001) days for acute MSMD, respectively. The odds of having a ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in MMD over months 4-6 were 2.2 (P = 0.024) and 2.8 (P = 0.002) times greater for erenumab 70 mg and 140 mg, respectively, than for placebo. Erenumab had an overall safety profile comparable to placebo. CONCLUSION Data from this subgroup analysis of women with menstrual migraine are consistent with data from the overall STRIVE episodic migraine population, supporting the efficacy and safety of erenumab in women who experience menstrual migraine. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02456740. Registered 28 May 2015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jelena M Pavlovic
- Department of Neurology, Montefiore Headache Center, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Van Etten 3C9, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA. .,Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
| | | | | | - Jo Bonner
- Mercy Clinic Neurology, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Alan Rapoport
- The David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Risa Kagan
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Sutter East Bay Medical Foundation, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Allais G, Chiarle G, Sinigaglia S, Benedetto C. Menstrual migraine: a review of current and developing pharmacotherapies for women. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2017; 19:123-136. [PMID: 29212383 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2017.1414182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Migraine is one of the most common neurological disorders in the general population. It affects 18% of women and 6% of men. In more than 50% of women migraineurs the occurrence of migraine attacks correlates strongly with the perimenstrual period. Menstrual migraine is highly debilitating, less responsive to therapy, and attacks are longer than those not correlated with menses. Menstrual migraine requires accurate evaluation and targeted therapy, that we aim to recommend in this review. AREAS COVERED This review of the literature provides an overview of currently available pharmacological therapies (especially with triptans, anti-inflammatory drugs, hormonal strategies) and drugs in development (in particular those acting on calcitonin gene-related peptide) for the treatment of acute migraine attacks and the prophylaxis of menstrual migraine. The studies reviewed here were retrieved from the Medline database as of June 2017. EXPERT OPINION The treatment of menstrual migraine is highly complex. Accurate evaluation of its characteristics is prerequisite to selecting appropriate therapy. An integrated approach involving neurologists and gynecologists is essential for patient management and for continuous updating on new therapies under development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Allais
- a Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics , University of Turin, Women's Headache Center , Turin , Italy
| | - Giulia Chiarle
- a Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics , University of Turin, Women's Headache Center , Turin , Italy
| | - Silvia Sinigaglia
- a Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics , University of Turin, Women's Headache Center , Turin , Italy
| | - Chiara Benedetto
- a Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics , University of Turin, Women's Headache Center , Turin , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Merki-Feld GS, Epple G, Caveng N, Imthurn B, Seifert B, Sandor P, Gantenbein AR. Temporal relations in hormone-withdrawal migraines and impact on prevention- a diary-based pilot study in combined hormonal contraceptive users. J Headache Pain 2017; 18:91. [PMID: 28842849 PMCID: PMC5572786 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-017-0801-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2017] [Accepted: 08/18/2017] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Menstrually related migraine (MRM) in the hormone-free interval (HFI) of combined hormonal contraceptives (CHC) are according to the ICHD definition also estrogen withdrawal migraines (EWH). MRMs are less responsive to acute medication. Therefore short-term prevention, initiated 1–2 days before onset of the anticipated bleeding and continued for 6 days, is recommended. Such a long prophylactic triptan use might increase the risk for medication overuse headache in women suffering in addition from non-menstrual migraines. In CHC users onset of hormone decline is predictable. It is however unknown, whether the EWHs are rather associated with onset of hormone withdrawal or onset of bleeding. Improved understanding of this relation might contribute to better define and shorten the time interval for prevention. Methods For this observational diary-based pilot study we collected data from daily conducted headache diaries of CHC users with MRM in at least two of three cycles, visiting our clinic from 2009 to 2015. We analyzed frequency of migraines for each hormone free day, onset of migraine, onset of bleeding and the relation of migraine to onset of bleeding in the 7-day period following estrogen withdrawal. We identified in addition the onset of migraine attacks lasting more than 1 day (episodes). Results Forty patient charts met the inclusion criteria, what allowed us to analyze 103 cycles. The mean number of migraine days in the HFI was 2.2 ± 1.6. Migraine started typically on days 1–5 and bleeding on days 3–5. In relation to first day of bleeding, migraines started on days −1 to 4. Almost half of the migraine attacks lasted longer than 24 h, despite the use of rescue medication. Conclusion MRM in CHC users starts on bleeding days −1 to 4, what differs from findings in the natural cycle. Referring to the HFI interval migraine started mostly on days 1–5. According to these data, it seems to be reasonable to initiate short-term prevention at the last day of pill use or the first day of the HFI and continue for 5 days.
Collapse
|
12
|
Grazzi L, Egeo G, Calhoun AH, McClure CK, Liebler E, Barbanti P. Non-invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation (nVNS) as mini-prophylaxis for menstrual/menstrually related migraine: an open-label study. J Headache Pain 2016; 17:91. [PMID: 27699586 PMCID: PMC5047863 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-016-0684-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2016] [Accepted: 09/23/2016] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Menstrual migraine and menstrually related migraine attacks are typically longer, more disabling, and less responsive to medications than non-menstrual attacks. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation for the prophylactic treatment of menstrual migraine/menstrually related migraine. Methods Fifty-six enrolled subjects (menstrual migraine, 9 %; menstrually related migraine, 91 %), 33 (59 %) of whom were receiving other prophylactic therapies, entered a 12-week baseline period. Fifty-one subjects subsequently entered a 12-week treatment period to receive open-label prophylactic non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation adjunctively (31/51; 61 %) or as monotherapy (20/51; 39 %) on day −3 before estimated onset of menses through day +3 after the end of menses. Results The number of menstrual migraine/menstrually related migraine days per month was significantly reduced from baseline (mean ± standard error, 7.2 ± 0.7 days) to the end of treatment (mean ± standard error, 4.7 ± 0.5 days; P < 0.001) (primary end point). Of all subjects, 39 % (95 % confidence interval: 26 %, 54 %) (20/51) had a ≥ 50 % reduction (secondary end point). For the other secondary end points, clinically meaningful reductions in analgesic use (mean change ± standard error, −3.3 ± 0.6 times per month; P < 0.001), 6-item Headache Impact Test score (mean change ± standard error, −3.1 ± 0.7; P < 0.001), and Migraine Disability Assessment score (mean change ± standard error, −11.9 ± 3.4; P < 0.001) were observed, along with a modest reduction in pain intensity (mean change ± standard error, −0.5 ± 0.2; P = 0.002). There were no safety/tolerability concerns. Conclusions These findings suggest that non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation is an effective treatment that reduces the number of menstrual migraine/menstrually related migraine days and analgesic use without safety/tolerability concerns in subjects with menstrual migraine/menstrually related migraine. Randomised controlled studies are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Licia Grazzi
- Headache Center, Carlo Besta Neurological Institute and Foundation, Via Celoria 11, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Gabriella Egeo
- Headache and Pain Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, San Raffaele Pisana, Via della Pisana 235, 00163, Rome, Italy
| | - Anne H Calhoun
- Carolina Headache Institute, 6114 Fayetteville Rd., Suite 109, 27713, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Candace K McClure
- North American Science Associates Inc., 4050 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 450, 55422, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Eric Liebler
- electroCore, LLC, 150 Allen Road, Suite 201, 07920, Basking Ridge, NJ, USA
| | - Piero Barbanti
- Headache and Pain Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, San Raffaele Pisana, Via della Pisana 235, 00163, Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Xiao Y, Yuan L, Liu Y, Sun X, Cheng J, Wang T, Li F, Luo R, Zhao X. Traditional Chinese patent medicine for prophylactic treatment of migraine: a meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. Eur J Neurol 2014; 22:361-8. [PMID: 25346402 DOI: 10.1111/ene.12581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2014] [Accepted: 08/29/2014] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Y. Xiao
- Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine; Nanfang Hospital; Southern Medical University; Guangzhou China
- School of Traditional Chinese Medicine; Southern Medical University; Guangzhou China
| | - L. Yuan
- School of Traditional Chinese Medicine; Southern Medical University; Guangzhou China
| | - Y. Liu
- Department of Rheumatic Diseases; First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine; Guangzhou China
| | - X. Sun
- School of Traditional Chinese Medicine; Southern Medical University; Guangzhou China
| | - J. Cheng
- Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine; Nanfang Hospital; Southern Medical University; Guangzhou China
- School of Traditional Chinese Medicine; Southern Medical University; Guangzhou China
| | - T. Wang
- Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine; Nanfang Hospital; Southern Medical University; Guangzhou China
- School of Traditional Chinese Medicine; Southern Medical University; Guangzhou China
| | - F. Li
- Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine; Nanfang Hospital; Southern Medical University; Guangzhou China
- School of Traditional Chinese Medicine; Southern Medical University; Guangzhou China
| | - R. Luo
- Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine; Nanfang Hospital; Southern Medical University; Guangzhou China
- School of Traditional Chinese Medicine; Southern Medical University; Guangzhou China
| | - X. Zhao
- Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine; Nanfang Hospital; Southern Medical University; Guangzhou China
- School of Traditional Chinese Medicine; Southern Medical University; Guangzhou China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
|
15
|
Hu Y, Guan X, Fan L, Jin L. Triptans in prevention of menstrual migraine: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Headache Pain 2013; 14:7. [PMID: 23565873 PMCID: PMC3620011 DOI: 10.1186/1129-2377-14-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2012] [Accepted: 01/14/2013] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Randomized clinical trials (RCT) assessing the efficacy and tolerability of triptans compared with placebo as short-term prophylaxis of menstrual migraine (MM) were systematically reviewed in this study. Triptans, which interfere with the pathogenesis of migraine and are effective in relieving associated neurovegetative symptoms, have been extensively proposed for prevention of menstrual migraine attacks. We searched Cochrane CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE for randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials on triptans for MM until 1 Oct, 2012. A total of six RCTs were identified. Two authors independently assessed trial’s quality and extracted data. Numbers of participants free from MM per perimenstrual period (PMP), requiring rescue medication, suffering from headache-associated symptoms and experiencing adverse events in treatment and control groups were used to calculate relative risk (RR) and number needed to treat (NNT) with their corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). A total of 633 participants received frovatriptan 2.5 mg QD, 584 received frovatriptan 2.5 mg BID, 392 received naratriptan 1 mg BID, 70 received naratriptan 2.5 mg BID, 80 received zolmitriptan 2.5 mg BID, 83 received zolmitriptan 2.5 mg TID and 1104 received placebo. Overall, triptans is an effective, short-term, prophylactic treatment of choice for MM. Considering MM frequency, severity and adverse events, frovatriptan 2.5 mg BID and zolmitriptan 2.5 mg TID tend to be the preferred regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Hu
- Department of neurology, Shanghai Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Xin-Cun Road 389, Shanghai, 200065, China
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Seeburger JL, Cady RK, Winner P, MacGregor A, Valade D, Ge Y, Zhang Y, Hustad CM, Strickler N, Schaefer E, Connor KM, Ho TW. Rizatriptan for Treatment of Acute Migraine in Patients Taking Topiramate for Migraine Prophylaxis. Headache 2011; 52:57-67. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2011.02027.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
17
|
Ferrari A, Tiraferri I, Neri L, Sternieri E. Clinical pharmacology of topiramate in migraine prevention. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2011; 7:1169-81. [PMID: 21756204 DOI: 10.1517/17425255.2011.602067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Migraine is a widespread disorder. Migraine patients experience worse health-related quality of life than the general population. The availability of effective and tolerable treatments for this disorder is an important medical need. This narrative review focuses on the clinical pharmacology of topiramate, an antiepileptic drug that was approved for the prophylaxis of migraine where it should act as a neuromodulator. AREAS COVERED A PubMed database search (from 2000 to 24 January 2011) and a review of the human studies published on topiramate and migraine was conducted. EXPERT OPINION Topiramate is an important option for the prophylaxis of migraine and is of proven efficacy and tolerability. It has also been studied in chronic migraine with encouraging results, even in patients with medication overuse. However, in migraine prevention its efficacy is comparable to the other first-line drugs and there are no published trials with a superiority design which can establish topiramate's role in the available therapeutic armamentarium.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Ferrari
- University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Headache and Drug Abuse Inter-Dep. Research Centre, Division of Toxicology and Clinical Pharmacology, Modena, Italy.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
Menstrual migraine is a common neurological condition reported to affect up to 60% of women with migraine. Most women manage migraine adequately with symptomatic treatment alone. However, in women with menstrual migraine, menstrual attacks are recognised to be more severe, last longer, and are less responsive to treatment compared with attacks at other times of the menstrual cycle. In these situations, prophylactic treatment may be necessary. Short-term perimenstrual and continuous prophylactic treatments have shown efficacy in clinical trials but none are licensed for menstrual migraine. This article reviews the evidence for acute and prophylactic drugs in the management of this condition and considers future therapeutic options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E. Anne MacGregor
- The City of London Migraine Clinic, 22 Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6DX and Centre for Neuroscience and Trauma, Blizard Institute of Cell and Molecular Science, Queen Mary, University of London, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London
| |
Collapse
|