Supraspinal glycinergic neurotransmission in pain: A scoping review of current literature

The neurotransmitter glycine is an agonist at the strychnine-sensitive glycine receptors. In addition, it has recently been discovered to act at two new receptors, the excitatory glycine receptor and metabotropic glycine receptor. Glycine's neurotransmitter roles have been most extensively investigated in the spinal cord, where it is known to play essential roles in pain, itch, and motor function. In contrast, less is known about supraspinal glycinergic functions, and their contributions to pain circuits are largely unrecognized. As glycinergic neurons are absent from cortical regions, a clearer understanding of how supraspinal glycine modulates pain could reveal new pharmacological targets. This review aims to synthesize the published research on glycine's role in the adult brain, highlighting regions where glycine signaling may modulate pain responses. This was achieved through a scoping review methodology identifying several key regions of supraspinal pain circuitry where glycine signaling is involved. Therefore, this review unveils critical research gaps for supraspinal glycine's potential roles in pain and pain-associated responses, encouraging researchers to consider glycinergic neurotransmission more widely when investigating neural mechanisms of pain.

Model-based signal processing enables bidirectional inferring between local field potential and spikes evoked by noxious stimulation

BACKGROUND

Recording spontaneous and evoked activities by means of unitary extracellular recordings and local field potential (LFP) are key understanding the mechanisms of neural coding. The LFP is one of the most popular and easy methods to measure the activity of a population of neurons. LFP is also a composite signal known to be difficult to interpret and model. There is a growing need to highlight the relationship between spiking activity and LFP. Here, we hypothesized that LFP could be inferred from spikes under evoked noxious conditions.

METHOD

Recording was performed from the medullary dorsal horn (MDH) in deeply anesthetized rats. We detail a process to highlight the C-fiber (nociceptive) evoked activity, by removing the A-fiber evoked activity using a model-based approach. Then, we applied the convolution kernel theory and optimization algorithms to infer the C-fiber LFP from the single cell spikes. Finally, we used a probability density function and an optimization algorithm to infer the spikes distribution from the LFP.

RESULTS

We successfully extracted C-fiber LFP in all data recordings. We observed that C-fibers spikes preceded the C-fiber LFP and were rather correlated to the LFP derivative. Finally, we inferred LFP from spikes with excellent correlation coefficient (r = 0.9) and reverse generated the spikes distribution from LFP with good correlation coefficients (r = 0.7) on spikes number.

CONCLUSION

We introduced the kernel convolution theory to successfully infer the LFP from spikes, and we demonstrated that we could generate the spikes distribution from the LFP.

A potential role for two brainstem nuclei in craniovascular nociception and the triggering of migraine headache

AIM

To use an animal model of migraine to test whether migraine headache might arise from a brainstem-trigeminal nucleus pathway.

METHODS

We measured evoked and spontaneous activity of second-order trigeminovascular neurons in rats to test whether the activity of these neurons increased following the induction of cortical spreading depression or the imposition of light flash - two potential migraine triggers, or headache provokers. We then tested whether drugs that could activate, or inactivate, neurons of the nucleus raphe magnus or the periaqueductal gray matter, would affect any such increases selectively for the dura mater.

RESULTS

Injection of sodium glutamate (a neuronal excitant) into these two nuclei selectively inhibited the responses of trigeminovascular second-order neurons to dura mater, but not to facial skin, stimulation. Injection of lignocaine (a local anaesthetic) into these nuclei selectively potentiated the responses of these neurons to dura, but not to facial skin, stimulation. Furthermore, injections into either nucleus of glutamate inhibited the increase in the ongoing discharge rate of these neurons produced by cortical spreading depression and light flash.

CONCLUSIONS

These results provide indirect evidence that trigeminovascular nociception may be tightly controlled by these two nuclei, whereas cutaneous trigeminal sensation may be less so. These nuclei may be relays of one possible brainstem-trigeminal pathway that could mediate migraine headache. Modification of neuronal activity in these two nuclei produced by migraine (headache) triggers may lie behind the pain of a migraine attack, at least in some cases.

The Role of Acid-sensing Ion Channel 3 in the Modulation of Tooth Mechanical Hyperalgesia Induced by Orthodontic Tooth Movement

This study aimed to explore the role of acid-sensing ion channel 3 (ASIC3) in the modulation of tooth mechanical hyperalgesia induced by orthodontic tooth movement. In male Sprague-Dawley rats, closed coil springs were ligated between mandibular incisors and molars to mimic orthodontic tooth movement. Bite force was assessed to evaluate tooth mechanical hyperalgesia. The alveolar bone, trigeminal ganglia, and trigeminal nucleus caudalis underwent immunohistochemical staining and immunoblotting for ASIC3. The inferior alveolar nerves were transected to explore the interaction between the periodontal sensory endings and trigeminal ganglia. The role of ASIC3 in trigeminal ganglia was further explored with lentivirus-mediated ASIC3 ribonucleic acid interference. Results showed that ASIC3 was expressed in the periodontal Ruffini endings and expression of ASIC3 protein was elevated in periodontal tissues, trigeminal ganglia, and trigeminal nucleus caudalis, following orthodontic tooth movement. ASIC3 agonists and antagonists significantly aggravated and mitigated tooth mechanical hyperalgesia, respectively. ASIC3 expression decreased after inferior alveolar nerve transection in periodontal tissues. Both in vitro and vivo, the lentivirus vector carrying ASIC3 shRNA inhibited ASIC3 expression and relieved tooth mechanical hyperalgesia. To conclude, ASIC3 is important in the modulation of tooth mechanical hyperalgesia induced by orthodontic tooth movement. Further, the role of ASIC3 in the modulation of pain in periodontal tissues is regulated by trigeminal ganglia. An adjuvant analgesic therapy targeting ASIC3 could alleviate orthodontic movement-associated mechanical hyperalgesia in rats.

Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2017

This paper is the fortieth consecutive installment of the annual anthological review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system, summarizing articles published during 2017 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides and receptors as well as effects of opioid/opiate agonists and antagonists. The review is subdivided into the following specific topics: molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors (1), the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia in animals (2) and humans (3), opioid-sensitive and opioid-insensitive effects of nonopioid analgesics (4), opioid peptide and receptor involvement in tolerance and dependence (5), stress and social status (6), learning and memory (7), eating and drinking (8), drug abuse and alcohol (9), sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology (10), mental illness and mood (11), seizures and neurologic disorders (12), electrical-related activity and neurophysiology (13), general activity and locomotion (14), gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions (15), cardiovascular responses (16), respiration and thermoregulation (17), and immunological responses (18).

CGRP and the Trigeminal System in Migraine

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this narrative review is to provide an overview of migraine pathophysiology, with an emphasis on the role of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) within the context of the trigeminovascular system.

BACKGROUND

Migraine is a prevalent and disabling neurological disease that is characterized in part by intense, throbbing, and unilateral headaches. Despite recent advances in understanding its pathophysiology, migraine still represents an unmet medical need, as it is often underrecognized and undertreated. Although CGRP has been known to play a pivotal role in migraine for the last 2 decades, this has now received more interest spurred by the early clinical successes of drugs that block CGRP signaling in the trigeminovascular system.

DESIGN

This narrative review presents an update on the role of CGRP within the trigeminovascular system. PubMed searches were used to find recent (ie, 2016 to November 2018) published articles presenting new study results. Review articles are also included not as primary references but to bring these to the attention of the reader. Original research is referenced in describing the core of the narrative, and review articles are used to support ancillary points.

RESULTS

The trigeminal ganglion neurons provide the connection between the periphery, stemming from the interface between the primary afferent fibers of the trigeminal ganglion and the meningeal vasculature and the central terminals in the trigeminal nucleus caudalis. The neuropeptide CGRP is abundant in trigeminal ganglion neurons, and is released from the peripheral nerve and central nerve terminals as well as being secreted within the trigeminal ganglion. Release of CGRP from the peripheral terminals initiates a cascade of events that include increased synthesis of nitric oxide and sensitization of the trigeminal nerves. Secreted CGRP in the trigeminal ganglion interacts with adjacent neurons and satellite glial cells to perpetuate peripheral sensitization, and can drive central sensitization of the second-order neurons. A shift in central sensitization from activity-dependent to activity-independent central sensitization may indicate a mechanism driving the progression of episodic migraine to chronic migraine. The pathophysiology of cluster headache is much more obscure than that of migraine, but emerging evidence suggests that it may also involve hypersensitivity of the trigeminovascular system. Ongoing clinical studies with therapies targeted at CGRP will provide additional, valuable insights into the pathophysiology of this disorder.

CONCLUSIONS

CGRP plays an essential role in the pathophysiology of migraine. Treatments that interfere with the functioning of CGRP in the peripheral trigeminal system are effective against migraine. Blocking sensitization of the trigeminal nerve by attenuating CGRP activity in the periphery may be sufficient to block a migraine attack. Additionally, the potential exists that this therapeutic strategy may also alleviate cluster headache as well.