Investigation of the characteristics of headache due to unruptured intracranial vertebral artery dissection

Morphological characteristics associated with ruptured intracranial vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms

OBJECTIVE

Morphological risk factors for the rupture of intracranial vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms (IVADAs) have not been well characterized. In this study, we aim to identify morphological characteristics associated with IVADA rupture.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of 249 consecutive patients with single IVADAs (31 ruptured and 218 unruptured) admitted to Beijing Tiantan Hospital between January 2016 and December 2020. Various morphological parameters were measured using three-dimensional digital subtraction angiography images. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify morphological characteristics associated with IVADA rupture.

RESULTS

Univariate regression analysis revealed that the coexistence of significant proximal and distal stenosis and posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) involvement were associated with IVADA rupture, while the origin from the dominant vertebral artery was inversely associated with the rupture. Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that the coexistence of significant proximal and distal stenosis (OR 22.00, 95% CI 5.60 to 86.70, p<0.001) and PICA involvement (OR 4.55, 95% CI 1.36 to 15.20, p=0.014) were independently associated with IVADA rupture.

CONCLUSION

The coexistence of significant proximal and distal stenosis and PICA involvement were independently associated with IVADA rupture. These morphological characteristics may facilitate the assessment of rupture risk in patients with IVADAs.

Pain as an alarm signal in cervical carotid dissection: report of a case with catastrophic evolution

Background Cervical carotid dissection is a commonly reported arteriopathy and is associated with stroke in young, healthy patients. Case report The authors present a case of a woman with pain of recent onset secondary to a dissection of the cervical segment of the carotid artery on the same side and that evolved with stroke. Conclusion The diagnosis of arterial dissection is based on clinical suspicion and angiographic images of the encephalic vessels.

Persistent headache attributed to past cervicocephalic artery dissection: clinical characteristics and contributors to headache persistence

BACKGROUND

Persistent headache/facial/neck pain attributed to past cervicocephalic arterial dissection is under-documented in literature. Our main goal was to evaluate clinical characteristics and contributors to this persistence.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study which included patients with a radiologically confirmed cervicocephalic arterial dissection (2015-2020) in a Portuguese tertiary hospital. Headache persistence was identified through clinical records. A questionnaire aimed to characterize headache in three moments: previous, persistent, and headache at the time of the interview (on average 2.5 years post-event).

RESULTS

Ninety-two patients were identified; 24 (26.1%) had headache persistence ≥3 months, and 20 (22.2%) on average after 2.5 years post-event. There were no differences regarding demographics and vascular risk factors among patients with (n = 22) and without (n = 68) headache persistence. The first group had higher previous headache history (68.2% vs 4.4%, p < 0.001), delay in diagnosis (3.6 vs 1.9 days, p < 0.001), and headache/cervicalgia as the first symptom (81.8% vs 41.2%, p < 0.001). At the time of the interview, 20% still reported daily headache. A logistic regression model depicted headache history (OR = 59.8, p < 0.001), acute headache/cervicalgia (odds ratio, OR = 25.4, p = 0.005), posterior circulation dissection (OR = 7.6, p < 0.001), and less than 4 points by National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (OR = 5.0, p = 0.025) as contributors to headache persistence.

CONCLUSION

Headache persistence post-cervicocephalic arterial dissection is common, and frequently affects patients daily. As it potentially affects functional outcomes and quality of life, the contributors identified in this study may help clinicians manage patients after the acute event.

Headache characteristics to screen for cervicocerebral artery dissection in patients with acute onset unusual headache

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this preplanned primary analysis was to investigate the clinical manifestations of headache to screen for CAD patients with acute onset headache only.

BACKGROUND

Spontaneous cervicocerebral artery dissection (CAD) with acute onset headache is not rare in clinical practice; however, it is underdiagnosed. On the other hand, subsequent infarction or subarachnoid hemorrhage mainly occurs within 1 week of headache onset.

METHODS

Between April 2017 and January 2022, we conducted a single-center, cross-sectional retrospective study on 197 consecutive referred patients from neurosurgical outpatient clinics with acute onset unusual headache (stronger or longer headache than usual). All patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging to screen for secondary headache and were diagnosed based on the diagnostic protocol. We examined patient background data and the following headache characteristics: distribution, condition at the onset of headache, accompanying vomiting or nausea, worsening headache, and analgesic effects against headache. These factors were analyzed to identify independent diagnostic predictors of CAD. In this study, the rate of missing data was 41% for improvement of headache by analgesia and multiple imputation by chained equations was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 93 patients (46 men and 47 women; mean age: 48 years, range: 25-73 years) were diagnosed with CAD. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed CAD was associated with current smoking, systolic blood pressure >140 mmHg, unilateral headache, worsening headache, and no headache improvement by analgesia. Unilateral, worsening headache and no headache improvement by analgesia remained independent diagnostic predictors in multivariable logistic regression after multiple imputation. No headache improvement by analgesia had the highest sensitivity (86%), while worsening headache had the highest specificity (84%).

CONCLUSIONS

CAD needs to be considered in patients with unilateral, worsening headache and no headache improvement by analgesia.

Acute hemicranial pain accompanied with a pearl and string type dissection of intracranial vertebral artery: Consideration for the time when to finish the medical observation

The International Classification of Headache Disorder (ICHD) clearly guides the suspicion of intracranial vertebral artery dissection (ICVAD) in headache patients, but guidelines on how observational or imaging studies should be performed to detect dangerous progression early are unclear. Fifty-six cases with pearl and string type intracranial vertebral artery dissection were divided into 3 groups: 39 in the headache group, 6 in the infarction group, and 11 in the hemorrhagic group. Clinical and angiographic data were analyzed and compared. Most headaches resolved within 2 weeks and did not exceed 8 weeks. Of the 33 patients (84.6%) who underwent continuous follow-up imaging, 18 (54.5%) returned to normal, but 3 (9%) had deteriorated. All the patients survived without subsequent bleeding or infarction. Image changes started before 3rd month and ended after 6 to 7 months. In acute ICVADs, image changes occur at the same time as the headache resolves and continue for several months after the headache has subsided. Since the dissection is likely to worsen even after the headache disappears, the image changes continue over several months, and prediction of rupture of unruptured ICVAD is unpredictable, it is desirable to conduct continuous imaging studies regularly after the initiation of dissection until stabilization is confirmed.

Identifying vascular pathologies or flow limitations: Important aspects in the clinical reasoning process

Cervical spine manipulation and mobilisation are frequently used in the management of neck pain and headache. Although very rare, serious adverse events (SAEs) following cervical spine manipulation and mobilisation have been described. Recently, a revised version of the International IFOMPT Cervical Framework was published, to provide guidance for the assessment of the cervical spine region for potential vascular pathologies of the neck in advance of planned Orthopaedic Manual Physical Therapy (OMPT) interventions. Clinicians should realise that following the Framework does not guarantee that vascular pathologies or flow limitations will be identified. To illustrate this, in this Professional Issue, we use a case description of a SAE that occurred in the Netherlands during a mobilisation technique used by a physiotherapist and discuss this case using the IFOMPT Cervical Framework and highlight some important aspects in the clinical reasoning process.

Headache in cervicocerebral artery dissection

Cervicocerebral artery dissection (CAD) is one of the more frequent causes of stroke in young adults with rates of up to 25%. Predisposing and risk factors for CAD are very different, and an etiological classification is based on the presence of a previous minor or major trauma, differentiating traumatic from spontaneous CAD. Headache represents one of the main initial symptoms for this pathological condition, probably due to the release of pro-inflammatory neurotransmitters from nerve terminals near the injured vessel. For its peculiar characteristics, the headache due to CAD has been defined with specific ICHD-3 criteria. In many cases, headache is associated with other signs related to the dissection or cerebral ischemia. In this systematic review of literature, headache was reported in more than 70% of cases with CAD with a prevalence in vertebrobasilar dissections. More than half of patients suffered a severe pain that was usually located in fronto-temporal and occipito-nuchal regions in the case of dissections in the anterior and posterior circulation, respectively. For the high stroke risk, CAD has to be promptly diagnosed with MRI or CTA and treated with anticoagulants or antithrombotics.

Facial Pain: A Comprehensive Review and Proposal for a Pragmatic Diagnostic Approach

BACKGROUND

Facial pain, alone or combined with other symptoms, is a frequent complaint. Moreover, it is a symptom situated at, more than any other pain condition, a crosspoint where several disciplines meet, for example, dentists; manual therapists; ophthalmologists; psychologists; and ear-nose-throat, pain, and internal medicine physicians besides neurologists and neurosurgeons. Recently, a new version of the most widely used classification system among neurologists for headache and facial pain, the International Classification of Headache Disorders, has been published.

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were to provide an overview of the most prevalent etiologies of facial pain and to provide a generic framework for the neurologist on how to manage patients presenting with facial pain.

METHODS

An overview of the different etiologies of facial pain is provided from the viewpoint of the respective clinical specialties that are confronted with facial pain. Key message: Caregivers should "think outside their own box" and refer to other disciplines when indicated. If not, a correct diagnosis can be delayed and unnecessary treatments might be given. The presented framework is aimed at excluding life- or organ-threatening diseases, providing several clinical clues and indications for technical investigations, and ultimately leading to the correct diagnosis and/or referral to other disciplines.