Current Update on Categorization of Migraine Subtypes on the Basis of Genetic Variation: a Systematic Review

Migraine is a complex neurovascular disorder that is characterized by severe behavioral, sensory, visual, and/or auditory symptoms. It has been labeled as one of the ten most disabling medical illnesses in the world by the World Health Organization (Aagaard et al Sci Transl Med 6(237):237ra65, 2014). According to a recent report by the American Migraine Foundation (Shoulson et al Ann Neurol 25(3):252-9, 1989), around 148 million people in the world currently suffer from migraine. On the basis of presence of aura, migraine is classified into two major subtypes: migraine with aura (Aagaard et al Sci Transl Med 6(237):237ra65, 2014) and migraine without aura. (Aagaard K et al Sci Transl Med 6(237):237ra65, 2014) Many complex genetic mechanisms have been proposed in the pathophysiology of migraine but specific pathways associated with the different subtypes of migraine have not yet been explored. Various approaches including candidate gene association studies (CGAS) and genome-wide association studies (Fan et al Headache: J Head Face Pain 54(4):709-715, 2014). have identified the genetic markers associated with migraine and its subtypes. Several single nucleotide polymorphisms (Kaur et al Egyp J Neurol, Psychiatry Neurosurg 55(1):1-7, 2019) within genes involved in ion homeostasis, solute transport, synaptic transmission, cortical excitability, and vascular function have been associated with the disorder. Currently, the diagnosis of migraine is majorly behavioral with no focus on the genetic markers and thereby the therapeutic intervention specific to subtypes. Therefore, there is a need to explore genetic variants significantly associated with MA and MO as susceptibility markers in the diagnosis and targets for therapeutic interventions in the specific subtypes of migraine. Although the proper characterization of pathways based on different subtypes is yet to be studied, this review aims to make a first attempt to compile the information available on various genetic variants and the molecular mechanisms involved with the development of MA and MO. An attempt has also been made to suggest novel candidate genes based on their function to be explored by future research.

A cross-tissue transcriptome-wide association study reveals novel susceptibility genes for migraine

BACKGROUND

Migraine is a common neurological disorder with a strong genetic component. Despite the identification of over 100 loci associated with migraine susceptibility through genome-wide association studies (GWAS), the underlying causative genes and biological mechanisms remain predominantly elusive.

METHODS

The FinnGen R10 dataset, consisting of 333,711 subjects (20,908 cases and 312,803 controls), was utilized in conjunction with the Genotype-Tissue Expression Project (GTEx) v8 EQTls files to conduct cross-tissue transcriptome association studies (TWAS). Functional Summary-based Imputation (FUSION) was employed to validate these findings in single tissues. Additionally, candidate susceptibility genes were screened using Gene Analysis combined with Multi-marker Analysis of Genomic Annotation (MAGMA). Subsequent Mendelian randomization (MR) and colocalization analyses were conducted. Furthermore, GeneMANIA analysis was employed to enhance our understanding of the functional implications of these susceptibility genes.

RESULTS

We identified a total of 19 susceptibility genes associated with migraine in the cross-tissue TWAS analysis. Two novel susceptibility genes, REV1 and SREBF2, were validated through both single tissue TWAS and MAGMA analysis. Mendelian randomization and colocalization analyses further confirmed these findings. REV1 may reduce the migraine risk by regulating DNA damage repair, while SREBF2 may increase the risk of migraine by regulating cholesterol metabolism.

CONCLUSION

Our study identified two novel genes whose predicted expression was associated with the risk of migraine, providing new insights into the genetic framework of migraine.

The Dawn and Advancement of the Knowledge of the Genetics of Migraine

Background: Migraine is a prevalent episodic brain disorder known for recurrent attacks of unilateral headaches, accompanied by complaints of photophobia, phonophobia, nausea, and vomiting. Two main categories of migraine are migraine with aura (MA) and migraine without aura (MO). Main body: Early twin and population studies have shown a genetic basis for these disorders, and efforts have been invested since to discern the genes involved. Many techniques, including candidate-gene association studies, loci linkage studies, genome-wide association, and transcription studies, have been used for this goal. As a result, several genes were pinned with concurrent and conflicting data among studies. It is important to understand the evolution of techniques and their findings. Conclusions: This review provides a chronological understanding of the different techniques used from the dawn of migraine genetic investigations and the genes linked with the migraine subtypes.

Migraine and major depression: localizing shared genetic susceptibility in different cell types of the nervous systems

Background

There is a bidirectional relationship between migraine and major depression disorder (MDD). They likely share important risk genes associated with different cell types in the central nervous system (CNS) and peripheral nervous system (PNS). Profiling the expression of these genes in specific cell types is critical in understanding the pathophysiology of the relationship between migraine and MDD.

Methods

Associated genes shared by migraine and MDD were identified by consolidating multiple curations of human disease-gene associations. Subsequently, the expression of overlapping genes was profiled and compared across the different cell types in CNS, PNS and neurovascular cells using eight single cell RNA sequencing datasets, including two human CNS datasets, two mouse CNS datasets, one human PNS dataset and three mouse PNS datasets.

Results

45 shared genes between migraine and MDD were identified. Consistently found in all eight datasets, dopaminergic and serotonergic neurotransmitters were broadly expressed in CNS and PNS cell types. Glutamatergic and endocannabinoid genes were specifically expressed in CNS neurons and astrocytes. Synthesis and/or Release and Binding of Neuropeptides were specifically expressed in PNS peptidergic nociceptor (PEP). Genes related to inflammatory factors and immune responses were specifically expressed in CNS microglia. Among which, IL1B and COMT were highly expressed in CNS microglia cells.

Conclusion

Single cell RNA sequencing of the CNS and PNS helps to identify the shared genes between migraine and MDD that are enriched in specific cell types. The findings provide new insight in understanding the underlying mechanism of action for the bidirectional co-morbidity between migraine and MDD.

Migraine genetics: Status and road forward

BACKGROUND

Migraine is considered a multifactorial genetic disorder. Different platforms and methods are used to unravel the genetic basis of migraine. Initially, linkage analysis in multigenerational families followed by Sanger sequencing of protein-coding parts (exons) of genes in the genomic region shared by affected family members identified high-effect risk DNA mutations for rare Mendelian forms of migraine, foremost hemiplegic migraine. More recently, genome-wide association studies testing millions of DNA variants in large groups of patients and controls have proven successful in identifying many dozens of low-effect risk DNA variants for the more common forms of migraine with the number of associated DNA variants increasing steadily with larger sample sizes. Currently, next-generation sequencing, utilising whole exome and whole genome sequence data, and other omics data are being used to facilitate their functional interpretation and the discovery of additional risk factors. Various methods and analysis tools, such as genetic correlation and causality analysis, are used to further characterise genetic risk factors.

FINDINGS

We describe recent findings in genome-wide association studies and next-generation sequencing analysis in migraine. We show that the combined results of the two most recent and most powerful migraine genome-wide association studies have identified a total of 178 LD-independent (r² < 0.1) genome-wide significant single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), of which 99 were unique to Hautakangas et al., 11 were unique to Choquet et al., and 68 were identified by both studies. When considering that Choquet et al. also identified three SNPs in a female-specific genome-wide association studies then these two recent studies identified 181 independent SNPs robustly associated with migraine. Cross-trait and causal analyses are beginning to identify and characterise specific biological factors that contribute to migraine risk and its comorbid conditions.

CONCLUSION

This review provides a timely update and overview of recent genetic findings in migraine.

Anatomy and Physiology of Headache

Headache disorders can produce recurrent, incapacitating pain. Migraine and cluster headache are notable for their ability to produce significant disability. The anatomy and physiology of headache disorders is fundamental to evolving treatment approaches and research priorities. Key concepts in headache mechanisms include activation and sensitization of trigeminovascular, brainstem, thalamic, and hypothalamic neurons; modulation of cortical brain regions; and activation of descending pain circuits. This review will examine the relevant anatomy of the trigeminal, brainstem, subcortical, and cortical brain regions and concepts related to the pathophysiology of migraine and cluster headache disorders.

Transcriptional Alterations of Mouse Trigeminal Ganglion Neurons Following Orofacial Inflammation Revealed by Single-Cell Analysis

Orofacial inflammation leads to transcriptional alterations in trigeminal ganglion (TG) neurons. However, diverse alterations and regulatory mechanisms following orofacial inflammatory pain in different types of TG neurons remain unclear. Here, orofacial inflammation was induced by injection of complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA) in mice. After 7 days, we performed single-cell RNA-sequencing on TG cells of mice from control and treatment groups. We identified primary sensory neurons, Schwann cells, satellite glial cells, oligodendrocyte-like cells, immune cells, fibroblasts, and endothelial cells in TG tissue. After principal component analysis and hierarchical clustering, we identified six TG neuronal subpopulations: peptidergic nociceptors (PEP1 and PEP2), non-peptidergic nociceptors (NP1 and NP2), C-fiber low-threshold mechanoreceptors (cLTMR) and myelinated neurons (Nefh-positive neurons, NF) based on annotated marker gene expression. We also performed differential gene expression analysis among TG neuronal subtypes, identifying several differential genes involved in the inflammatory response, neuronal excitability, neuroprotection, and metabolic processes. Notably, we identified several potential novel targets associated with pain modulation, including Arl6ip1, Gsk3b, Scn7a, and Zbtb20 in PEP1, Rgs7bp in PEP2, and Bhlha9 in cLTMR. The established protein–protein interaction network identified some hub genes, implying their critical involvement in regulating orofacial inflammatory pain. Our study revealed the heterogeneity of TG neurons and their diverse neuronal transcriptomic responses to orofacial inflammation, providing a basis for the development of therapeutic strategies for orofacial inflammatory pain.

Clinical Effectiveness of Peripheral Nerve Blocks for Diagnosis of Migraine Trigger Points

BACKGROUND

With a 13 percent global prevalence, migraine headaches are the most commonly diagnosed neurologic disorder, and are a top five cause of visits to the emergency room. Surgical techniques, such as decompression and/or ablation of neurovasculature, have shown to provide relief. Popular diagnostic modalities to identify trigger loci include handheld Doppler examinations and botulinum toxin injection. This article aims to establish the positive predictive value of peripheral nerve blocks for identifying therapeutic surgical targets for migraine headache surgery.

METHODS

Electronic medical records of 36 patients were analyzed retrospectively. Patients underwent peripheral nerve blocks using 1% lidocaine with epinephrine and subsequent surgery on identified migraine headache trigger sites. Patients were grouped into successful and unsuccessful blocks and further categorized into successful and unsuccessful surgery subgroups. Group analysis was performed using paired t tests, and positive-predictive value calculations were performed on subgroups.

RESULTS

The preoperative Migraine Headache Index of patients with positive blocks was 152.71, versus 34.26 postoperatively (p < 0.001). Each index component also decreased significantly: frequency (22.11 versus 15.06 migraine headaches per month; p < 0.001), intensity (7.43 versus 4.12; p < 0.001), and duration (0.93 versus 0.55 days; p < 0.001). The positive-predictive value of diagnostic peripheral nerve blocks in identifying a migraine headache trigger site responsive to surgical intervention was calculated to be 0.89 (95 percent CI, 1 to 0.74).

CONCLUSIONS

To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the positive-predictive value of peripheral nerve blocks as used in the diagnostic workup of patients with chronic migraine headaches. Peripheral nerve blocks serve as a reliable clinical tool in mapping migraine trigger sites for surgical intervention while offering more flexibility in their administration and recording as compared to established diagnostic methods. .

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic, IV.

A review of migraine genetics: gathering genomic and transcriptomic factors

Migraine is a common and complex neurologic disorder that affects approximately 15-18% of the general population. Although the cause of migraine is unknown, some genetic studies have focused on unravelling rare and common variants underlying the pathophysiological mechanisms of this disorder. This review covers the advances in the last decade on migraine genetics, throughout the history of genetic methodologies used, including recent application of next-generation sequencing techniques. A thorough review of the literature interweaves the genomic and transcriptomic factors that will allow a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying migraine pathophysiology, concluding with the clinical utility landscape of genetic information and future consideration to creating a new frontier toward advancing the field of personalized medicine.

Identifying New Antimigraine Targets: Lessons from Molecular Biology

Primary headaches are one of the most common conditions; migraine being most prevalent. Recent work on the pathophysiology of migraine suggests a mismatch in the communication or tuning of the trigeminovascular system, leading to sensitization and the release of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). In the current Opinion, we use the up-to-date molecular understanding of mechanisms behind migraine pain, to provide novel aspects on how to modify the system and for the development of future treatments; acute as well as prophylactic. We explore the distribution and the expression of neuropeptides themselves, as well as certain ion channels, and most importantly how they may act in concert as modulators of excitability of both the trigeminal C neurons and the Aδ neurons.

A Comprehensive Review on the Role of Genetic Factors in the Pathogenesis of Migraine

Migraine is a common neurovascular condition. This disorder has a complex genetic background. Several single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) or mutations within genes regulating glutamatergic neurotransmission, cortical excitability, ion channels, and solute carriers have been associated with polygenic and monogenic forms of migraine. SNPs within ACE, DBH, TRPM8, COMT, GABRQ, CALCA, TRPV1, and other genes have been reported to affect the risk of migraine or the associated clinical parameters. The distribution of some HLA alleles within the HLA-DRB1, HLA-DR2, HLA-B, and HLA-C regions have also been found to differ between migraineurs and healthy subjects. In addition, certain mitochondrial DNA changes and polymorphisms in this region have been shown to increase the risk of migraine. A few functional studies have investigated the molecular mechanisms contributing to these genetic factors in the development of migraine. Here we review studies evaluating the role of genetic polymorphisms and mRNA/miRNA dysregulation in migraine.