1
|
Best RD, Ozmeral A, Grinberg AS, Smitherman TA, Seng EK. Pain acceptance as a change mechanism for mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for migraine. J Behav Med 2024; 47:471-482. [PMID: 38407727 DOI: 10.1007/s10865-024-00475-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/27/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
Migraine is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide. Third wave therapies, such as Mindfulness Based Cognitive Therapy for Migraine (MBCT-M), have proven efficacious in reducing headache-related disability. However, research is needed to better understand the change mechanisms involved in these third-wave therapies. Acceptance is a fundamental component of third wave therapies, and more research is warranted on the role of pain acceptance in MBCT-M. It is also valuable to understand the independent roles of the two components of pain acceptance-pain willingness (PW) and activity engagement (AE). The current study is a secondary analysis of a randomized control trial of MBCT-M. Sixty participants were included in the study (MBCT = 31; WL/TAU = 29). Baseline correlations between overall pain acceptance, PW, AE, and headache-related disability were run. Mixed models assessed change from baseline to one-month post-treatment and treatment-by-time interaction for overall pain acceptance, PW, and AE. Mixed models also assessed maintenance of changes at 6-month follow-up in the MBCT-M group. Longitudinal mediation models assessed whether change in pain acceptance, PW, and AE mediated the relationship between treatment and change in headache-related disability. Pain acceptance, PW, and AE were all negatively correlated with headache-related disability at baseline. Pain acceptance, PW, and AE all significantly increased over time in both the waitlist/ treatment-as-usual group (WL/TAU) and the MBCT-M group. Only AE increased more in the MBCT group than the WL/TAU group. Change in pain acceptance, PW, and AE all significantly mediated the relationship between MBCT and change in headache-related disability. The study supports the importance of pain acceptance, specifically the activity engagement component, in MBCT-M.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel D Best
- Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University, 1165 Morris Park Ave, The Bronx, New York, NY, 10461, USA.
| | - Ali Ozmeral
- Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University, 1165 Morris Park Ave, The Bronx, New York, NY, 10461, USA
| | - Amy S Grinberg
- Headache Centers of Excellence Research and Evaluation Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA
- Psychology Service, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA
| | - Todd A Smitherman
- Department of Psychology, University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS, USA
| | - Elizabeth K Seng
- Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University, 1165 Morris Park Ave, The Bronx, New York, NY, 10461, USA
- Saul R. Korey Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- Montefiore Headache Center, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Martin PR. Triggers of Primary Headaches: Issues and Pathways Forward. Headache 2020; 60:2495-2507. [PMID: 32648597 DOI: 10.1111/head.13901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Revised: 06/08/2020] [Accepted: 06/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The triggers of primary headaches have considerable significance for our understanding and management of headache and migraine. Triggers explain the variance in headaches - why they occur when they do. Trigger management is generally viewed as an important component of a comprehensive treatment approach for headaches. Historically, however, triggers have not had a prominent place in the headache literature. This situation began to change 20 to 30 years ago, and the pace of change has increased exponentially in recent times. Nevertheless, the field is beset with issues that have held it back from achieving more. This review will focus on elaborating those issues with the goal of suggesting ways forward. The first issue considered will be the definition of a trigger, and how specific triggers are labeled. Consideration will then be given to a classification system for triggers. The review will discuss next the evidence relating to whether self-reported triggers can, indeed, precipitate headaches, and how the capacity to elicit headaches may be acquired or extinguished. Attention will be given to the very important clinical issue of trigger management. Finally, the pathways forward will be proposed. Perhaps the most useful thing to accomplish at this point in time would be agreement on a definition of headache triggers, a list of triggers, and a classification system for triggers. This would greatly assist in comparing research on triggers from different research groups as well as eliminating some of the issues identified in this review. An authoritative body such as the American Headache Society or the International Headache Society, could establish a multidisciplinary committee that would complete these tasks. Consideration should also be given to incorporating triggers into the International Classification of Headache Disorders as an axis or via the use of codes, as this would raise the profile of triggers in assessment and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul R Martin
- Department of Psychiatry, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Department of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|